Amazon SCS-C02 Exam Prep
AWS Certified Security - Specialty (Replaced with SCS-C03) (Page 22 )

• wyjasnic istniejace pytania z tej strony,
• wskazac, dlaczego dana odpowiedz jest poprawna lub bledna (z uwzglednieniem celów egzaminu),
• omówic koncepcje zwiazane z Google Cloud AI.

• Honeypots: Decoy systems or services designed to attract attackers. Legitimate users should not access them, so activity on a honeypot is a strong indicator of unauthorized activity. Security teams can also observe attacker behavior.

• DNS sinkhole: Redirects requests for known malicious domains to a controlled internal server or blocks them. If an infected workstation attempts to contact command-and-control infrastructure, the sinkhole records the request and helps identify the compromised device.

• Tokenization: Protects sensitive data by replacing it with tokens.
• CI/CD: Automates software development and deployment.
• Threat modeling: Identifies potential risks before or during system design.
• Data obfuscation: Makes data harder to understand, but does not detect intruders.

• Context: You’ve enabled auditing in Dataverse and need to trim audit data to free storage. The question asks which deletion options you can use.

• What the options typically mean:

• About the provided answer (A, C, D): The list includes “by column,” which isn’t a typical or supported way to purge audit data. The more plausible trio is A (by record), B (date range), and C (by table older than date). If the exam expects A, C, D, that seems incorrect or mis-stated in the source.

• Practical takeaway: To reduce audit storage, use per-record deletions, per-table purge by date, and/or date-range deletions as supported by the environment’s audit management UI or admin docs.

• Leadership and stakeholder commitment
• Business capability and skills
• Organizational culture
• Availability of resources
• Ability to manage and sustain change
• Impact of the proposed transformation

• How ready the organization is
• Which areas require urgent attention
• How difficult each issue may be to resolve
• Risks that could affect implementation

• A: Places the assessment in Phase B and refers vaguely to creating views; this is not the prescribed technique.
• B: An Implementation Factor Assessment and Deduction Matrix is not the primary TOGAF technique described for business transformation readiness.
• D: A Business Scenario helps identify requirements and stakeholder concerns, but it is not the main technique for assessing organizational readiness.

• Server — provides services or resources
• Endpoint — a user device connected to the network
• Ethernet — a networking technology, not a filtering device
• Firewall — filters and controls traffic

• Correct answer: All four statements are true (A, B, C, and D). The given key (A,B) is likely incorrect.

• A) Customers can change the size of the Warehouse after creation — Yes. You can resize a virtual warehouse after it’s created using ALTER WAREHOUSE ... SET WAREHOUSE_SIZE.
• B) A Warehouse can be resized while running — Yes. Snowflake supports online resizing; you can change the size without stopping queries.
• C) A Warehouse can be configured to suspend after a period of inactivity — Yes. You can enable auto-suspend with a delay (AUTO_SUSPEND).
• D) A Warehouse can be configured to auto-resume when new queries are submitted — Yes. You can enable auto-resume (AUTO_RESUME) so a suspended warehouse automatically resumes on new queries.

• Example commands:

• Even if a warehouse is resizing or auto-suspending, queries will be queued and then executed once the warehouse has the appropriate capacity.

• In the source query: apply UPPER() or LOWER() to the column.
• In Power Query Editor: use Text.Upper or Text.Lower on the column, then load.

• This fixes the root cause when comparisons/joins depend on case.
• In DirectQuery, transformations are pushed to the source or query layer; ensure the transformation is supported by your data source/connector.
• After normalization, verify relationships and any downstream visuals that rely on that column.

• Why: Crisis management relies on established, repeatable procedures for responding to an incident (activation of the crisis team, escalation paths, communications, containment actions). This ensures a coordinated, timely, and auditable response.

• Why not the others:

• Answer: A. Use Amazon SageMaker Serverless Inference to deploy the model.

• Why: SageMaker Serverless Inference hosts the model and serves real-time predictions without you provisioning or managing servers. It scales automatically and handles deployment details.

• Why the others aren’t suitable:

• Quick example flow: web app ? SageMaker Serverless Inference endpoint ? model ? response.

Why

cmd 
PowerShell.exe -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\Scripts\ConfigureVM.ps1

Why the other options are less suitable

• GPO logon script: Runs only when a user logs on and may not run during initial VM provisioning.
• GPO startup script: Can work, but requires the VM to be joined to the domain and the policy to be applied. It is also normally evaluated at each startup.
• Place scripts in a VHD: Merely placing scripts on a disk does not cause them to execute.

• Árvores de decisão: usam regras sequenciais, como “se característica X > valor, siga para este ramo”. São fáceis de visualizar e explicar. Atendem bem a problemas de classificação e regressão com alta interpretabilidade.

• Regressão linear: prevê um valor numérico contínuo, como preço, custo ou temperatura. Não é a escolha principal para classificar genes em categorias.

• Regressão logística: calcula a probabilidade de uma categoria. Pode atender à classificação, inclusive multiclasses, mas sua explicação costuma ser menos intuitiva que uma árvore para documentar decisões.

• Redes neurais: atendem a tarefas complexas, como imagens, texto e padrões não lineares. Porém, são menos interpretáveis, funcionando mais como uma “caixa-preta”.

• ProductSearchModel.getProductSearchHits() — option C
• ProductSearchHit.getRepresentedProducts() — option B

• ProductMgr.queryAllSiteProducts() (A) queries every product in the site, which is heavy and not scalable for large catalogs.
• Category.getProducts() (D) retrieves all products in a category; this can be slow for large categories.
• Using the search model and hits (B and C) leverages the search index, supports paging, and avoids scanning the entire catalog, making it more scalable.

• The Accrue liability on product receipt flag controls whether a liability is accrued and posted at the time of receiving the item.
• If this checkbox is unchecked, receipts won’t create postings to the Product receipt journal. Enabling it ensures the system posts inventory value and the vendor liability when the item is received.

• Go to the Item model group setup form.
• Enable (check) Accrue liability on product receipt.
• Save.

• The other option, Include physical value, affects how physical value is handled but is not the direct cause of postings to the product receipt journal. If issues persist after enabling accrual, you may need to verify related posting definitions or journal setup.

• Wiping securely overwrites the drive so the original data cannot reasonably be recovered. It is generally less expensive than physically destroying the device.
• Recycling could expose the data if the drive is not securely erased first.
• Shredding physically destroys the drive and is effective, but usually more costly and prevents reuse.
• Deletion only removes file references; it is not a secure sanitization method.

• The two correct options are:

• The two incorrect options:

• A (training data, hyperparameters, stakeholder feedback) focuses on training provenance; these details are important but are typically part of pre-deployment/training records, not the primary post-deployment documentation.
• B (encountered issues, monitoring process, risks) relates to governance and monitoring rather than the core documentation you’d publish about the deployed model itself.
• C (licensing information, the team, business goals) covers governance context but not the technical traceability and performance-based record needed for ongoing maintenance.

• Voice devices ? VLAN 10
• Data devices ? VLAN 20
• SVI for VLAN 10 ? 192.168.10.1
• SVI for VLAN 20 ? 192.168.20.1

• A: Describes a physical trunk interface, not an SVI.
• B: An SVI can provide management access, but that is not its primary definition here.
• D: SVI does not compensate for insufficient physical ports; it is a logical interface.

• Correct answer: A: The ITIL service value system (SVS).

• The SVS explains how all components (governance, the service value chain, practices, guiding principles, information and technology, partners and resources, and continual improvement) work together to enable value creation from demand to outcomes.

• B: The ITIL guiding principles describe aspirational guidance for decision-making, not how all components/activities interact.
• C: The four dimensions of service management explain areas to consider (organizations/people, information/technology, partners/suppliers, value streams/processes) but don’t describe the integrated system itself.
• D: A service relationship defines the relationship between provider and consumer, not the overall system of components and activities creating value.

• R-squared (R²): mede quanto da variação dos valores reais é explicada pelo modelo. É mais usado em regressão, não em classificação.

• Accuracy (acurácia): mede a proporção de previsões corretas em relação ao total. É adequada para a classificação de imagens da questão.

• RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error): mede o tamanho médio dos erros entre valores previstos e reais, penalizando erros maiores. É usado principalmente em regressão.

• Learning rate (taxa de aprendizado): controla o tamanho dos ajustes feitos pelo modelo durante o treinamento. Não é uma métrica de avaliação; é um hiperparâmetro.

• Goal: serving a static website globally with minimal latency.
• Why C works: CloudFront is a Content Delivery Network (CDN) that caches content at many edge locations around the world. When users request the site, CloudFront serves cached copies from the nearest edge location, greatly reducing latency. It also reduces load on your EC2 origin by handling many requests at the edge.
• Why the other options aren’t as good:

• Create a record-triggered Flow on Opportunity.
• Run it when the record is created or updated.
• Add entry criteria such as Probability > 50%.
• Use Create Records to create the related Sales Demo Request, populating its Opportunity lookup.

• Apex Trigger: Possible, but unnecessary custom code for a straightforward automation requirement.
• Workflow Rule: Cannot create a related custom record.
• Process Builder: Could create a record, but Flow is Salesforce’s preferred and more capable declarative automation tool.

• Cutover: The old system is replaced immediately. It may be fast, but any failure can cause significant disruption.
• Phased: The system is introduced in stages, which reduces implementation risk but may prolong the transition.
• Pilot: The system is first deployed to a limited group or location. This is useful for testing but does not necessarily minimize downtime for the entire organization.

• The correct AAA mapping (per Cisco objectives) is:

• Why the given options aren’t fully correct:

• Quick takeaway: when you configure AAA, you should conceptually map them as:

• Example commands (to reinforce concepts):

• Self-signed certificate: Causes a certificate warning, not incorrect IP resolution.
• Nameserver record: A DNS record problem would typically affect multiple users, not just one.
• IP helper: Relays DHCP or other broadcast traffic between networks; it does not control website name resolution.

• A — SCIM synchronizes changes to user attributes from the identity provider to GitHub.
• B — SCIM deactivates GitHub accounts when users are removed or deactivated in the identity provider.
• D — SCIM automates user provisioning when new users are added to the identity provider.

• C: SCIM does not delete organization repositories.
• E: SCIM does not generate REST API authentication tokens.
• F: SCIM handles identity lifecycle management, not repository permission configuration based on roles.

1. Define Power Platform DLP policies
2. Add custom prompt modifications
3. Conduct adversarial testing

1. DLP policies first

1. Prompt modifications second

1. Adversarial testing last

• Progress iteratively with feedback focuses on making improvements in manageable steps and learning from feedback.
• Optimize and automate focuses on maximizing value from resources and automating suitable activities.
• Start where you are focuses on assessing the current situation and reusing what already exists.

• App Tag: a label that reflects the app’s enterprise readiness based on its Cloud Confidence Index (CCI) rating. It lets you quickly group apps (e.g., Poor, Average, Good) for policy decisions.
• App Score: a numeric value representing the CCI score. It provides a precise threshold you can use to enforce policies (e.g., block apps with Score below 50).

• You can create policies that block or restrict apps with a Poor App Tag or with an App Score under a chosen threshold.
• These two aspects let you filter cloud apps by CCI ratings during policy evaluation.

• CCL isn’t described as a real-time policy facet in this scenario.
• GDPR Readiness is a separate consideration and not the two CCI aspects used for real-time protection policy in this context.

• Users retain their existing usernames and passwords.
• Existing accounts can be used to access Azure-based resources.
• Administrators avoid manually recreating thousands of accounts.
• The transition is less disruptive before the on-premises data center is retired.

• VMs without NGT: Not clearly a migration blocker on its own; NGT (Nutanix Guest Tools) status isn’t the typical gating factor for live migration during maintenance.
• VMs marked as an Agent: Not a standard, widely-known migration blocker; agents aren’t the typical reason a VM can’t be migrated.
• Memory Overcommitted VMs: While memory pressure can affect placement, memory overcommitment isn’t a fundamental reason a VM would be labeled non-migratable during maintenance.
• VMs with attached Volume Groups: This is the strongest candidate. A Volume Group is a set of volumes bound to a VM; moving the VM would entail relocating and reattaching those volumes, which can complicate or block live migration during maintenance.

• Mesh: WAPs communicate wirelessly with one another, often to extend coverage without wired connections. It does not specifically describe centralized WLC management.
• Point-to-point: Connects two specific devices or locations.
• Ad hoc: Wireless devices communicate directly with one another without an access point.

• Multi-pass wipe: Overwrites the drive’s existing data multiple times, making recovery much more difficult while preserving the drive’s functionality.
• Single-pass wipe: May be sufficient in some modern sanitization standards, but is presented here as less secure than multiple overwrites.
• Degaussing: Uses a strong magnetic field to disrupt data. It can render the drive unusable or unreliable, reducing its resale value.
• Pinning: Is not an appropriate data-sanitization method.

• IaaS: You manage the virtual machine’s operating system, configuration, applications, and data. Azure manages the physical infrastructure and virtualization platform.
• PaaS: You deploy applications without managing the underlying operating system or servers.
• SaaS: You consume a complete application managed by the provider, such as Microsoft 365.

• The 99.99% availability SLA for VMs is achieved when you run VMs across two or more Availability Zones.
• Two VMs in a single Availability Zone do not meet the 99.99% target (their SLA is lower, e.g., around 99.95% or less depending on configuration).

• Deploy at least two VMs across two different Availability Zones (one VM in each zone, or both in two zones with a load balancer).
• This provides the required zone redundancy and the 99.99% SLA.

• A: Security groups do not control traffic to an S3 gateway endpoint in this way. Gateway endpoints are configured through route tables.
• B: An S3 bucket policy may be needed for authorization, but the error specifically indicates a connectivity or endpoint-routing problem.
• C: Glue connection settings do not require a fully qualified domain name to resolve this endpoint issue.

• Topic: Conditional Access (CA) policy and MFA for Azure management.
• Policy name: Policy1, created with the template “Require multifactor authentication for Azure management.”
• What the template does: It enforces MFA when signing in to manage Azure resources (Azure management) for the users included in the policy.
• Who is included: The question lists Admin1, Admin2, Admin3, and Admin4 as the admins in the tenant. The template’s default scope for this scenario is to apply to those admin accounts (i.e., all four admins unless you explicitly limit the scope).

• CA policy for “Azure management” targets admin sign-ins.
• If the policy includes Admin1–Admin4, all of them must use MFA on their next sign-in (choice D).

• administrators — Full access to switch configuration and REST API functions; excessive for this requirement.
• sysadmin — Intended for highly privileged system administration, not basic monitoring.
• helpdesk — More limited and focused on troubleshooting/support functions; it does not match the stated default role and level-1 requirement as directly.

• Elicited and documented customer requirements
• Converted them into clear, measurable specifications
• Validated the requirements with the customer
• Used them as the basis for design, quality checks, and acceptance

• A: Requirements should reflect the customer’s needs—not the supplier’s standards.
• B: Iteration review planning does not replace proper requirements collection.
• D: A retrospective occurs after work is completed and is mainly for process improvement, not initial requirements definition.

• Create Power Query parameters for the Azure SQL server/database—or at least the database name.
• Use the parameter in the PBIX connection.
• Publish the same PBIX separately to the relevant development, test, and production workspaces.
• Set each dataset’s parameter value in the Power BI service so it points to the corresponding Azure SQL database.

• Development dataset ? DevelopmentDB
• Test dataset ? TestDB
• Production dataset ? ProductionDB

• The same PBIX is used for every lifecycle stage.
• Each stage consumes data from its matching database.
• Deployment pipelines are not required.
• Azure SQL is a cloud source, so gateway administration is generally avoided.
• Only the parameter value differs between published datasets, reducing maintenance.

• The mapping and resolution of endpoint identities (EIDs) to their location (RLOCs) in an SD-Access fabric is handled by the control plane using the LISP protocol.
• Why not the others:

• prompt: the input or instruction given to the model
• completion: the desired response

json 
{"prompt":"Summarize this customer complaint.","completion":"The customer reports a delayed shipment."}

• B: A .txt file containing CSV-style lines is not automatically a valid fine-tuning dataset. The required structure and format must match the selected Bedrock model.
• C: Provisioned Throughput provides dedicated inference capacity; it does not fine-tune a model.
• D: Journals and textbooks might support domain adaptation or pretraining, but they do not provide the prompt-to-answer examples typically required for supervised fine-tuning.

• Product Owner: May attend, but is not required unless also working as a Developer.
• Scrum Master: May attend to help facilitate or coach, but is not required.
• Developers: Must participate because the event is specifically for them.

powershell 
Get-AzureVM -ServiceName <service-name> -Name <vm-name> | 
  Set-AzureStaticVNetIP -IPAddress <private-ip> | 
  Update-AzureVM

• New-AzureRMVMConfig configures VM settings but does not itself assign the static IP.
• Set-AzureSubnet is not the appropriate cmdlet for assigning a VM’s private IP.
• The Azure portal option mentioned in the question was not the intended method for this older deployment model.
• Changing settings in Windows Network and Sharing Center is incorrect because Azure assigns the IP through the VM’s virtual network interface; manually configuring it inside the guest can cause conflicts.

• Used for communication on the local link or LAN segment
• Automatically generated on IPv6-enabled interfaces
• Not routed by routers to other networks
• Commonly used by devices to communicate with their local IPv6 router
• Begins with FE80 through FEBF

• FC00::/7 — unique local unicast
• FE80::/10 — link-local unicast
• FF00::/8 — multicast
• 2000::/3 — global unicast

• Multiple nodes: Data is replicated several times in the primary region.
• Separate geography: A copy is asynchronously replicated to a secondary Azure region.
• Readable secondary: RA-GRS provides read-only access to the secondary replica, even when the primary region is available.

• GRS: Replicates to another region but the secondary copy isn’t normally readable.
• ZRS: Replicates across availability zones in the same region, not a separate geographic region.
• LRS: Keeps replicas within a single datacenter or region and provides no geographic redundancy.

• The correct option is B: AWS Storage Gateway.

• Why: The scenario requires backing up on-prem data to AWS without changing existing backup workflows. AWS Storage Gateway provides a hybrid storage solution; specifically, the Tape Gateway emulates a physical tape library, allowing your existing backup software to write to virtual tapes that are stored in AWS (in S3 or S3 Glacier). This lets you back up 10 TB to the cloud while preserving current backup workflows and on-prem infrastructure.

• How it would work: Deploy a gateway appliance or VM on-site, connect your tape-based backup software to the virtual tape library, and start writing to virtual tapes. The data is then archived in AWS, freeing up local storage.

• Why the others aren’t suitable:

• Quick tip: If you weren’t using tape, File Gateway could be another option for file-based backups; Tape Gateway is the right pick for tape-based workflows.

• Correct answer: A) Hashing

• Why: Hashing produces a fixed-size digest of the software. If the final build is altered in any way, the hash will change, enabling you to detect tampering by comparing the stored digest with a freshly computed one.

• Why not the others: