AAPC CPC Exam Actual Questions
Certified Professional Coder (Page 2 )

• Goal: Guests should not use cameras, but company users can.
• Correct configuration: Guest access settings in the Org-wide settings.

• External access: Controls external-domain communication, not guest capabilities inside Teams.
• Teams settings in Org-wide settings: Too generic; doesn’t specifically target guest capabilities.
• Audio & Video in the default Meeting Policy: Would affect everyone assigned to that policy. To meet the requirement without impacting internal users, you’d need separate policies or guest-specific settings; the exam focuses on the guest-access policy.

• What wipe does: A factory reset that erases all data, apps, and settings and returns the device to the OOBE. It removes the device from management and resets identity.
• Why not for this scenario: The goal is to repurpose the same device to a new user with Autopilot. Autopilot Reset keeps the device’s Azure AD/Intune identity and re-provisions the device for the next user without a full wipe.
• What Autopilot Reset does: Removes user data and apps but preserves device identity and management connection, then reapplies the Autopilot provisioning for the next user.
• When you’d use wipe instead: If you’re selling or permanently discarding the device, or you truly want to scrub all traces and start fresh without re-enrolling.

• 25 — Traditional SMTP server-to-server mail transfer; not normally used for secure client submission.
• 110 — POP3, used to retrieve email and typically unencrypted.
• 143 — IMAP, used to access email and typically unencrypted.

• VPC: A logically isolated virtual network in a cloud environment; it describes networking, not shared application access.
• NFV: Replaces dedicated network appliances with virtualized network functions.
• SaaS: A cloud service model in which users consume an application without managing its infrastructure. It could describe how the application is delivered, but the question emphasizes serving multiple user groups, which points to multitenancy.

• A — conformant: Incorrect because one explicit requirement is violated.
• B — consistent: “Consistent” is not sufficient where the implementation contradicts a mandatory specification. The RPC mechanism is covered by the architecture, and the implementation differs from it.
• C — consistent: Incorrect reasoning: the RPC mechanism does have a defined architectural requirement, so conformance must be assessed.
• D — non-conformant: Correct because the implementation fails to follow the specified RPC/threading requirement.

Why

cmd 
PowerShell.exe -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\Scripts\ConfigureVM.ps1

Why the other options are less suitable

• GPO logon script: Runs only when a user logs on and may not run during initial VM provisioning.
• GPO startup script: Can work, but requires the VM to be joined to the domain and the policy to be applied. It is also normally evaluated at each startup.
• Place scripts in a VHD: Merely placing scripts on a disk does not cause them to execute.

• IPv6 address types you’ll typically see:

• Unique Local Addresses (ULAs)

• If an address begins with fdXX:… or fc00:…, place it under “Unique Local Address” (ULA).
• If it begins with 2000::/3, place it under “Global Unicast.”
• If it begins with fe80::, place it under “Link-local.”
• If it begins with ff00::, place it under “Multicast.”

• Use a field on Account to show the aggregated yearly shipments (a Roll-Up Summary).
• A Master-Detail relationship between Shipment and Account is required for Roll-Up Summary to work (and to ensure access is governed by the parent Account).
• OWD and the relationship type determine what users can see. If you want to restrict shipment-level access while still showing a summary on Account, Private OWD on Shipment plus Master-Detail helps, because access to shipments is controlled by the Account record.

• A (Public OWD on Shipment with Process Builder and a Lookup to Account): Not ideal. Public access would expose shipments broadly, and a lookup cannot support a built-in roll-up summary.
• B (Private OWD on Shipment, Roll-Up Summary, Master-Detail to Account): Best answer. Private shipments, but because of Master-Detail, access and the roll-up are tied to the Account. The Account can show the yearly total via a Roll-Up Summary field.
• C (Controlled by Parent on Shipment, Trigger, Master-Detail): Master-Detail is correct, but using a trigger is unnecessary for a straightforward roll-up; roll-ups are the standard, maintainable solution.
• D (Private OWD on Shipment, Trigger, Lookup to Account): More complex and not as efficient; no automatic roll-up, and lookup breaks the ease of summarizing by Account.

• Admin access to the deployment pipeline (B) – lets the developers use the pipeline and deploy content.
• Contributor access to the Development and Test workspaces (E) – required to deploy items into those workspaces.
• Viewer access to the Production workspace (D) – lets them view Production content without allowing deployment or modification.

• Contributor access to Production (F), because that could allow changes or deployment there.
• Viewer access to Development/Test (C), because Viewer is insufficient for deployment.
• Build permission to Production semantic models (A), because building reports on a semantic model is not required merely to view Production items.

• Answer: A) Clear the Windows event logs

• Windows event logs (System, Security, Application) are key forensic artifacts. If an attacker clears these logs, there’s no built-in local record of actions taken, making it harder for investigators to trace what happened.

• Modify the system time: may misalign timestamps but does not erase past events and can be easily detected.
• Alter log permissions: could prevent new log entries, but it doesn’t remove existing ones and can raise alarms due to permission changes.
• Reduce log retention settings: affects only future logs; it doesn’t wipe already recorded activity.

• In real environments, defenders mitigate this risk with tamper-evident, centralized logging (remote SIEM, write-once storage, log integrity checks) to preserve evidence even if a host is compromised.

• L2TP uses UDP port 1701 for the L2TP control channel.
• The destination port is 1701; the source port is a dynamically chosen ephemeral port on the client (not 1701).
• Therefore the statement that both source and destination ports are 1710 is incorrect (and 1710 is not the standard L2TP port).

• The destination port should be 1701, not 1710.
• The source port should be an ephemeral port chosen by the client, not 1701.

• IPv6 address types:

• The block FF00::/12 is a subset of the multicast space, so it represents multicast addresses.
• Therefore, this block forwards packets to a multicast address (to multiple receivers) rather than to a single unicast address.
• The other prefixes are unicast and would deliver to a single interface.

• In Microsoft Entra (Azure AD), admin roles can be scoped to either the entire directory (tenant) or to an Administrative Unit (AU). To assign a role at an AU scope, the user must be a member of that AU.

• Roles in question: Security Administrator and User Administrator can be scoped either to the Directory or to a specific AU.

• User1 is a member of AU1. Therefore, User1 can be assigned either at the AU scope (AU1) or at the Directory scope (global).

• User2 is not a member of AU1. Therefore, User2 cannot be assigned at the AU scope; the valid scope for User2 is only the Directory scope.

• User1: can be assigned at AU1 and at Directory scopes.
• User2: can be assigned only at the Directory scope.

• Goal: Identify the host that originated the infection, then label each remaining host as infected or clean based on log evidence.

• Logs to review (across hosts and firewall):

• How to identify the origin:

• How to classify other hosts:

• Quick tip: use the Reset All option if you want to re-run the scenario and practice again.

• a) True — To add a field to the form layout, drag the field from the Fields tab to the desired destination on the form. This adds to the form view only, without changing the table definition.
• b) True — To create a new field on the form’s table, drag a data type from the Field Types tab to the form and configure it. This creates a new column on the table and adds the field to the form view.
• c) True — To remove a field from the form layout, hover to enable the action buttons and select Delete. This removes the field from the form view but does not remove it from the table definition.
• d) False — You cannot add a section by dragging from the Field Types tab. Sections are added via the Add Section option (toolbar or right-click menu), not from the Field Types tab.

• Side loading means installing software from sources outside official or trusted repositories.
• This process can bring in malicious payloads because the installed software hasn’t been vetted. A rootkit is a type of malware that hides its presence and maintains privileged access, making it a prime risk when using untrusted sources.
• Why not the other options:

• Only install apps from trusted sources; verify signatures.
• Use application whitelisting and security controls to block sideloading.
• Keep systems updated and use anti-malware tools capable of detecting rootkits.

• Short answer: The correct term is Anti-forensics (option D), not “Felony.”

• Why: The actions described—hiding files in slack space, changing file headers, placing suspicious files in executables, and altering metadata—are classic anti-forensics techniques. They’re used to hinder or obscure forensic analysis, not to label the act as a legal category.

• About the options:

• Note: The provided answer key lists B (Felony), which is misleading for this exam objective. The exam typically tests knowledge of forensics concepts, where anti-forensics is the correct category.

• A. Extranet
• B. VLAN
• C. Intranet
• D. VPN

• A — IDS attack signatures: An IDS generally detects suspicious network activity but does not necessarily scan uploaded PDF files or prevent them from being accepted.
• C — Load balancer: Distributes traffic among servers; it does not inspect files for malware.
• D — WAF command-injection blocking: A WAF can help block web attacks such as command injection, SQL injection, and cross-site scripting, but this option does not specifically address malicious PDF uploads.

• Answer: D) Out-of-band management

• Why this is correct:

• Why the other options aren’t suitable here:

• The correct permission is Manage Sandboxes (the official Salesforce name; the option in the list is written as “Manage Sandbox,” which is effectively the same idea but the canonical name uses the plural).
• Why: Sandboxes are a lifecycle feature. Only users with the explicit Manage Sandboxes permission can perform create, delete, refresh, or activate actions.
• Why the other options aren’t correct:

• A. Number ? Decimal — Correct. Salesforce Number fields are represented in Apex as Decimal.
• D. Date/Time ? Datetime — This is correct conceptually, but “Dateline” is not an Apex type. If the option literally says “Dateline,” it is incorrect.
• E. Checkbox ? Boolean — Correct. A checkbox contains true or false.

• Number ? Integer — A Number field maps to Decimal, even when its scale is zero.
• Text Area ? List<String> — A text area maps to a single String, not a list.

• Global Unicast: These are the IPv6 addresses that are globally routable on the Internet. They’re allocated by Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) and can be reached from anywhere with proper routing (similar to IPv4 public addresses). Example ranges include 2000::/3.

• Link-local: fe80::/10. Used only on the local link; not routable beyond the directly connected network.

• Unique Local Addresses (ULA): fc00::/7. Private addresses for internal use within an organization; not publicly routable on the Internet (like IPv4 private addresses).

• Multicast: ff00::/8. One-to-many addresses used for group communication, not unicast routing.

• Ethical red-teaming is adversarial testing aimed at uncovering weaknesses and potential exploits in an AI system before deployment.
• A (improving accuracy) is not the primary?? of red-teaming.
• B (simulate model risk scenarios) is related but narrower; red-teaming centers on finding vulnerabilities and risk exposure, not just simulating risks.
• D (ensure compliance) is not the main goal of red-teaming.

• Answer: A

• Reason: The Standard web tier is the lowest tier that provides dedicated compute, built-in load balancing across instances, and sufficient storage to host multiple apps with custom domains. Basic may lack the required scalability/storage, while Free/Shared do not offer dedicated compute or proper load balancing.

• Answer: D

• The strongest security comes from enforcing access at the storage layer. An IAM policy scoped to the Cognito identity prefix restricts each user to their own S3 prefix (folder), so users can only access their own files regardless of client or server code.
• This per-user isolation reduces risk of cross-user data access and is more robust than UI validation or Lambda/API validation alone.
• Implementation note: attach a policy to the Cognito identity role that allows actions on arn:aws:s3:::your-bucket/${cognito-identity.amazonaws.com:sub}/* (per-user prefix). Ensure TLS in transit and enable at-rest encryption (SSE-S3 or SSE-KMS). Use multipart upload for large files up to 300 MB.

• Why: The data is unlabeled, so you can’t train a model with known input-output pairs. Unsupervised learning discovers structure in the data by grouping similar customers into clusters or tiers without labels.
• What it does: Clustering and segmentation (e.g., k-means, hierarchical clustering, DBSCAN, Gaussian mixtures) to form meaningful groups.
• Why the other options aren’t as suitable:

• Ensure that only users who manage the production environment sign in to the Azure portal from a hybrid Entra-joined device and authenticate with MFA.

• Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection (Identity Protection) to enforce MFA enrollment:

• Update the existing Capolicy1 (a Conditional Access policy):

• Identity Protection MFA registration policy ensures users are enrolled in MFA (Box 1 choice).
• CA policy Capolicy1 with aGrant control of “Require MFA” enforces MFA during sign-in (Box 2 choice).
• Both work together with the hybrid-joined device requirement to satisfy the authentication/authorization rules.

• Apply the MFA registration policy to the production-management users.
• Apply the MFA grant to Capolicy1 for those same users/groups.

• Answer: D: Making business cases for improvement action

• Continual Improvement focuses on identifying and planning improvements and ensuring they’re funded and prioritized. Creating a business case for an improvement action is part of justifying and obtaining support/resources to implement improvements.
• A (Identifying the cause of incidents) aligns with Problem Management.
• B (Authorizing changes) aligns with Change Enablement.
• C (Logging/managing incidents that result in improvement opportunities) aligns with Incident Management, not Continual Improvement.

• Goal: serving a static website globally with minimal latency.
• Why C works: CloudFront is a Content Delivery Network (CDN) that caches content at many edge locations around the world. When users request the site, CloudFront serves cached copies from the nearest edge location, greatly reducing latency. It also reduces load on your EC2 origin by handling many requests at the edge.
• Why the other options aren’t as good:

• Why: A multi-modal embedding model maps both text and images into a shared vector space, enabling cross-modal similarity and retrieval (e.g., find images matching a text query or text matching an image).

• What it does: Enables efficient similarity search using a vector database or nearest-neighbor indexing.

• Why the other options aren’t suitable:

• Quick implementation note: you’d typically pair the embeddings with a vector store (e.g., ANN index) and possibly fine-tune on domain data for better alignment across modalities.

• AWS IoT Greengrass supports local ML inference using models trained in Amazon SageMaker.
• The model and inference code run on the factory’s local server, so processing continues even when internet connectivity is unavailable.
• A Greengrass component can:

• This provides low latency and avoids sending images to AWS for every inference.

• A: Uses AWS-hosted services and therefore depends on internet connectivity. It would fail during an outage.
• C: Snowball Edge is unnecessary for this use case and adds deployment complexity. A local Greengrass server is the intended edge-inference solution.
• D: Amazon Monitron is designed for monitoring industrial equipment health, not analyzing camera images with a custom SageMaker model.

• Correct choices: A and D.

• Why not B, C, or E?

• The correct option is B: AWS Storage Gateway.

• Why: The scenario requires backing up on-prem data to AWS without changing existing backup workflows. AWS Storage Gateway provides a hybrid storage solution; specifically, the Tape Gateway emulates a physical tape library, allowing your existing backup software to write to virtual tapes that are stored in AWS (in S3 or S3 Glacier). This lets you back up 10 TB to the cloud while preserving current backup workflows and on-prem infrastructure.

• How it would work: Deploy a gateway appliance or VM on-site, connect your tape-based backup software to the virtual tape library, and start writing to virtual tapes. The data is then archived in AWS, freeing up local storage.

• Why the others aren’t suitable:

• Quick tip: If you weren’t using tape, File Gateway could be another option for file-based backups; Tape Gateway is the right pick for tape-based workflows.

• Correct answer: A — a clear business case has been established.

• The audit focus for IT procurement is ensuring there is a solid economic justification for the investment. A clear business case documents the expected benefits, costs, risks, and alignment with strategic objectives, which governs whether the investment is worth pursuing.
• The other options are important controls or project aspects, but they are secondary to ensuring the investment is justified financially and strategically:

• Enable the owner dimension

• Assign a standard costing inventory model

• Batch dimension tracks batches or lots, such as expiration or production batches. It does not identify inventory ownership.
• Moving average is a costing method, but it is not the required choice for this consignment configuration.

• Multi-pass wipe: Overwrites the drive’s existing data multiple times, making recovery much more difficult while preserving the drive’s functionality.
• Single-pass wipe: May be sufficient in some modern sanitization standards, but is presented here as less secure than multiple overwrites.
• Degaussing: Uses a strong magnetic field to disrupt data. It can render the drive unusable or unreliable, reducing its resale value.
• Pinning: Is not an appropriate data-sanitization method.

1. Define Power Platform DLP policies
2. Add custom prompt modifications
3. Conduct adversarial testing

1. DLP policies first

1. Prompt modifications second

1. Adversarial testing last

• Alice is co-resident on the same physical host and exploits shared hardware (the processor cache) to infer secrets. This is the classic definition of a side-channel attack—information leakage through implementation details (like timing or cache behavior) rather than by breaking a protocol or injecting code.

• Observing cache timing or access patterns to deduce cryptographic keys or plaintext data from the victim VM.

• Man-in-the-cloud attack: targets cloud trust/auth, not local hardware sharing.
• SQL injection: exploits input to run SQL commands, not a VM/caching vector.
• Service hijacking: takes control of a service, not about covert data leakage via shared hardware.

• Notice phrases like “shared hardware resources,” “co-resident,” or “cache”—these indicate a side-channel vector.

• Answer: No

• Why: Using several Azure AD directories (tenants) would create separate identity stores for each division, which significantly increases administrative overhead. You’d need cross-tenant access management, separate governance, and duplicated admin efforts, which goes against the goal of minimizing administrative work.

• How to meet the goal instead:

• Answer: C – netstat -an

• netstat -an lists all active connections and listening ports with numeric addresses, without resolving names. This lets you spot DoS patterns such as a flood of connections to a specific port or many connections from a single or few IPs.
• The other options don’t help as directly:

• Windows: netstat -an and look for numerous ESTABLISHED connections to a service or many SYNs to a port.
• Filter by port, e.g., netstat -an | findstr :80, or on Linux: ss -tunap | grep ':80'.

• Netstat provides a snapshot. DoS detection often benefits from continuous monitoring, flow data, and IDS/IPS logs.

• Basic: Self-help only; no technical support or design assessment.
• Standard: Technical support, but not the full proactive architectural guidance required here.
• Professional Direct: Provides proactive guidance and architecture-related assistance.
• Premier: Also supports this, but is a more expensive, enterprise-level option.

• TCP is connection-oriented. It establishes a connection before data transfer using a three-way handshake (SYN, SYN-ACK, ACK), enabling reliable delivery, ordering, and flow control.

• UDP is connectionless. It sends datagrams without a prior connection and provides no guarantee of delivery, order, or protection against duplicates; any reliability is up to the application.

• B incorrectly states UDP uses acknowledgment packets; UDP has no built-in ACKs.
• C wrongly claims UDP provides reliable transfer and that TCP is connectionless.
• D misstates framing bits; neither protocol uses the listed TCP/UDP handshake bits in frames.

• Correct answer: B — From the code repository, modify Startup.cs (in ASP.NET Core you configure the Application Insights SDK in code, not with ApplicationInsights.config).

• Why the other options aren’t correct:

• How to implement fixed-rate sampling (ASP.NET Core):

var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args); 


    builder.Services.Configure<TelemetryConfiguration>(telemetryConfiguration => 
    { 
        var builder = telemetryConfiguration.DefaultTelemetrySink.TelemetryProcessorChainBuilder; 
        double fixedSamplingPercentage = 10; // 10% sampling 
        builder.UseSampling(fixedSamplingPercentage); 
    }); 


    builder.Services.AddApplicationInsightsTelemetry(new ApplicationInsightsServiceOptions 
    { 
        EnableAdaptiveSampling = false 
    }); 


    var app = builder.Build();

• A — SCIM synchronizes changes to user attributes from the identity provider to GitHub.
• B — SCIM deactivates GitHub accounts when users are removed or deactivated in the identity provider.
• D — SCIM automates user provisioning when new users are added to the identity provider.

• C: SCIM does not delete organization repositories.
• E: SCIM does not generate REST API authentication tokens.
• F: SCIM handles identity lifecycle management, not repository permission configuration based on roles.

• DNS????????????????

• ???????????

• ????????????????

• Equipment and hardware
• Facilities
• Inventory
• Backup media
• Supplies stored at an alternate or remote location

• Personal belongings of staff: Usually not organizational assets.
• DR line-item revenues: Revenue is a financial impact, not a physical asset.
• Cloud-based applications: These are primarily logical or information-processing assets, even though they depend on physical infrastructure.

• Premium file shares: contoso104 only
• Blob access tiers: contoso101, contoso102, and contoso103

• Premium Azure Files shares require a storage account with the FileStorage account kind. This is a specialized account type and is not used for blob storage.
• Blob access tiers such as Hot, Cool, and—where supported—Archive apply to blob-capable accounts, such as General-purpose v2 or BlobStorage accounts shown in the exhibit.
• contoso104 is therefore excluded from the blob-tier selection because it is the premium Files account.

• According to the provided answer key, the four options are: Upload File, User Criteria, HR Profiles, HR Criteria (options B, D, F, G).

• Upload File: Filter by a file you upload (e.g., CSV) that provides data for bulk case creation.
• User Criteria: Filter by criteria related to users (e.g., role, department) to select target users.
• HR Profiles: Filter by HR profile data associated with users.
• HR Criteria: Filter by HR-related criteria or attributes.

• Pull: Downloads changes from the central repository and updates the local repository.
• Push: Sends local commits to the central repository.
• Commit: Records local changes in the repository’s history.
• Merge: Combines changes from different branches.
• Clone: Creates a new local copy of a repository.