Free AD0-E137 Exam Braindumps
Adobe Experience Manager Sites Developer Expert Questions 6–10 (page: 3)

Updated On: 12-Mar-2026

A developer is tasked with designing a solution to accommodate multiple client projects within a single Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) instance, each requiring its own set of unique resources, code, and content.

Given the need for true multi-tenancy, where each tenant operates independently with zero knowledge of other tenants and no shared code, content, or common authors, which approach should the developer recommend?

  1. Implement separate author and publish instances for each tenant, ensuring complete isolation of resources, code, and content, thereby achieving true multi-tenancy.
  2. Encourage the use of component groups and allowedPaths properties to logically separate tenant- specific components and templates within the same AEM instance.
  3. Utilize AEM's out-of-the-box multi-tenancy capabilities to segregate tenants within the same author and publish instances, relying on access control lists (ACLs) and content path organization to ensure separation.

Answer(s): A



While configuring SSO with SAML 2.0 compatible IDP on AEM, a developer notices an infinite loop between the IDP and AEM when trying to log in to AEM using SSO.

Which dispatcher-specific configuration is required to prevent this scenario?

  1. Config File: filters.any
    Config: /0100 {/type "allow" /method "POST" /url "*/saml_login"}
  2. Config File: allowed_clients.any
    Config: /0100 {/type "allow" /method "PUT" /url "*/samllogin"}
  3. Config File: vhosts.any
    Config: /0100 {/type "allow" /method "POST" /url "*/samllogin"}

Answer(s): A



A customer has the requirement to use SAML authentication on AEM using their SAML 2.0 compatible IDP.

Example:

AEM: www.wknd.com/content/siteB/index.html

IDP: https://www.idpB.com

How should an AEM Developer configure their SAML Authentication Handler?

  1. com.adobe.granite.auth.saml.SamlAuthenticationHandler.userIntermediatePath : /content/siteB com.adobe.granite.auth.saml.SamlAuthenticationHandler.assertionConsumerServiceURL :
    https://www.idpB.com
  2. com.adobe.granite.auth.saml.SamlAuthenticationHandler.path : /content/siteB com.adobe.granite.auth.saml.SamlAuthenticationHandler.idpUrl : https://www.idpcom
  3. com.adobe.granite.auth.saml.SamlAuthenticationHandler.userIntermediatePath : /content/siteB com.adobe.granite.auth.saml.SamlAuthenticationHandler.serviceProviderEntityId :

    https://www.idpB.com

Answer(s): B



A client wants to ensure that only specific components are available to content authors when using an editable template in AEM. Additionally, they require that certain fields within a content fragment model adhere to strict validation rules for data integrity.

Which two steps would the developer take to meet both requirements? (Choose two.)

  1. Use editable templates to directly configure field validation rules.
  2. Configure field validation within the content fragment model.
  3. Create and assign a new workflow to enforce component usage.
  4. Enable dynamic templates for flexible content creation.
  5. Define policies in the editable template to control allowed components.

Answer(s): B,E



A developer wants to deliver personalized content on a webpage.

Which rule should be applied in the dispatcher configuration to ensure cache efficiency?

  1. Cache .html files but configure dispatcher to invalidate the cache when URL parameters (query strings) are present.
  2. Enable caching for all POST requests to improve performance on forms and other dynamic interactions that modify content.
  3. Block caching for all .html pages to ensure that every page load is served directly from the AEM publish instance.

Answer(s): A



Viewing page 3 of 11
Viewing questions 11 - 15 out of 75 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Adobe AD0-E137 exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!