QUESTION: 17

Which statement about Workfront Fusion templates is accurate?

Fusion templates are publicly shared scenarios that support the quick development of automations for Workfront enterprise-level customers
Fusion templates are only created and shared by Workfront to help customers with common workflow automations
Fusion templates allow a user to swap connections in commonly used scenarios to support multiple team automations
Fusion templates help customers build Workfront automations for Workfront using simple walk- through guides

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Understanding the Role of Fusion Templates:
Fusion templates are prebuilt scenario structures designed to help users set up automations efficiently by reusing common workflows.
They are flexible and can be customized based on the organization's requirements.
Why Option C is Correct:
Swap Connections:

Fusion templates allow users to replace connections (e.g., API connections, authentication tokens) to adapt the scenario for different teams, departments, or environments. This makes templates versatile for reuse in scenarios where the logic remains the same, but the data sources or destinations differ.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Fusion templates are publicly shared scenarios for enterprise-level customers"):
Fusion templates are not public. They are created by users or Workfront admins for internal use within organizations.
Option B ("Fusion templates are only created and shared by Workfront"):
While Workfront provides some default templates, users can also create custom templates tailored to their needs.
Option D ("Fusion templates help customers build Workfront automations using simple walk-through guides"):
Fusion templates do not include walkthrough guides. They are structural frameworks for scenarios that users can modify or replicate.
How Fusion Templates Help:
Simplify repetitive workflows: Users don't need to recreate scenarios from scratch. Enable scalability: Templates can be shared across teams for consistent processes. Save time: By swapping connections, the same scenario logic can be used for different use cases.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Templates Documentation
Workfront Community: Best Practices for Fusion Templates
Fusion templates enable efficient automation setup by supporting reusable workflows with adaptable connections, making them a powerful tool for scaling team-level automation.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 18

A customer wants all their Salesforce Opportunities to sync with their connected projects in Workfront -approximately 20,000+ projects.
After the admin sets a Workfront Fusion scenario to run each night and perform this action, the scenario is run once to test. After 40 minutes, it unexpectedly stops running.
Why did this occur?

Workfront has a limit to the number of API calls it can receive and stopped the scenario from running
Workfront Fusion occasionally times out if trying to process over 2000 records within a 40-minute period
Workfront Fusion has an execution timeout and likely stopped the scenario from running
The Workfront API stops integration webhooks if they are hit more than 2000 times in a 10 minute period

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Understanding the Issue:

The customer is syncing 20,000+ Salesforce Opportunities with Workfront projects using a scheduled Fusion scenario.
After running for 40 minutes, the scenario unexpectedly stops.
Why Option C is Correct:
Workfront Fusion Execution Timeout:
Fusion scenarios have a default execution timeout of 40 minutes per run. If the scenario exceeds this time limit, Fusion automatically stops the execution to avoid resource overuse.
Handling Large Data Sets:
Scenarios involving large datasets (like syncing 20,000+ records) may require optimizations, such as breaking the data into smaller chunks using paginated requests or iterators. In this case, the scenario stopped because the execution timeout was reached, not due to API limits or webhook restrictions.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Workfront API call limit"):
While Workfront does have API rate limits, they are generally generous and not the reason for the scenario stopping. Fusion scenarios are designed to manage API calls efficiently. Option B ("Fusion times out if processing over 2000 records in 40 minutes"):
This is incorrect because Fusion does not have a hard limit on the number of records processed in 40 minutes. The timeout is time-based, not record-based.
Option D ("Workfront API stops webhooks after 2000 hits in 10 minutes"):
This does not apply to Fusion scenarios. Webhooks are separate from the API calls initiated by Fusion.
How to Resolve the Issue:
Split the Data: Use pagination or batch processing to divide the 20,000+ records into smaller chunks (e.g., 1,000 or 2,000 records per run).
Adjust Scheduling: Schedule the scenario to run more frequently with smaller batches, ensuring all records are synced over multiple runs.
Use Iterators: Add an Iterator module to loop through smaller subsets of data, preventing the scenario from exceeding the execution timeout.
Steps to Optimize the Scenario:
Add a Search Module to retrieve opportunities in smaller batches (e.g., using limits or pagination parameters).
Use a Repeater Module to process each batch iteratively.
Save the scenario and schedule it to run nightly or more frequently, depending on the sync requirements.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion: Execution Timeout Limits
Workfront Community: Managing Large Data Sets in Fusion Scenarios By optimizing the scenario to handle smaller batches of data, the admin can avoid the execution timeout issue and ensure successful syncing of Salesforce Opportunities with Workfront projects.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 19

A web service provides the following array named "Colors":

Which expression returns the first ID in the array?

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Understanding the Array and the Task:
Input Array (Colors):

[
{ "ID": "22342", "name": "Red" },
{ "ID": "33495", "name": "Blue" }
]
Goal: Extract the first ID from the array, which is "22342".
Why Option B is Correct:
The expression get(map(2.Colors; ID); 1):

map(2.Colors; ID): Iterates over the array 2.Colors and extracts the ID field from each object. This creates a new array containing just the IDs:
["22342", "33495"].
get(...; 1): Retrieves the first element of the newly created array, which is "22342".
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A (map(2.Colors; ID; ID; 1)):
This syntax is invalid because the additional ID and 1 parameters are misplaced. The map function requires only two arguments: the array and the field to map.
Option C (map(get(2.Colors; ID); 1)):
This incorrectly attempts to use get inside map. The get function does not return a field for mapping, so the syntax is invalid.
How the Expression Works:
Step 1: map(2.Colors; ID)
Extracts the ID field from each object in the Colors array.
Output: ["22342", "33495"].
Step 2: get(...; 1)
Retrieves the first element of the mapped array.
Output: "22342".
Use Case in Workfront Fusion:
This approach is commonly used when processing arrays in Fusion scenarios, ensuring specific elements are accessed without additional looping or complex logic.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation
Workfront Community: Using Map and Get Functions
By combining map and get, this expression efficiently extracts the first ID from the array, ensuring correct and reliable results.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 20

Refer to the exhibit.
In this image,

all items are displayed in a position that does not hide their execution sequence. In what order do the modules execute?

Google Drive > Email > Workfront > Data Store > Salesforce
Email > Workfronl > Data Store > Salesforce > Google Drive
Email > Data Store > Workfront > Salesforce >
Google Drive Google Drive > Email > Data Store > Workfront > Salesforce

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Understanding the Diagram:
The image depicts a Workfront Fusion scenario using Routers to split and manage multiple execution paths.
Fusion executes modules in a left-to-right and top-to-bottom sequence along each path. Routers direct the flow to downstream modules.
Determining the Execution Sequence:
Path 1:
The first path begins with Google Drive. The Router branches out, directing execution sequentially to other modules.
Path 2:
The second path starts with Email and continues downwards through the remaining modules.
Order Within Branches:
After passing through a Router, each branch completes its sequence of modules before moving to the next Router.

Why Option D is Correct:
Execution begins from the leftmost module (Google Drive) and flows rightward. The sequence is as follows:
Google Drive
Email
Data Store
Workfront
Salesforce
This matches the visual layout and Fusion's execution rules for scenarios with Routers.
Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
Option A ("Google Drive > Email > Workfront > Data Store > Salesforce"):
Incorrect because Workfront does not precede Data Store in the execution order. Option B ("Email > Workfront > Data Store > Salesforce > Google Drive"):
Incorrect because execution begins with Google Drive, not Email. Option C ("Email > Data Store > Workfront > Salesforce"):
Incorrect because it excludes Google Drive as the starting point and places modules out of sequence.
Execution Rules in Workfront Fusion:
Fusion executes modules in the order they appear visually, starting from left to right and top to bottom within each branch.
Routers split the execution into separate branches, which are completed sequentially.
Reference and Supporting Documentation:
Adobe Workfront Fusion: Execution Flow Rules
Workfront Community: Understanding Router and Module Execution The correct execution sequence is Google Drive > Email > Data Store > Workfront > Salesforce, ensuring all paths are processed as per the scenario's layout.

Reveal Solution Next Question

Free AD0-E902 Exam Braindumps (page: 6)

QUESTION: 17

Explanation:

QUESTION: 18

Explanation:

QUESTION: 19

Explanation:

QUESTION: 20

Explanation: