APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Exam Questions
Better Business Cases Practitioner (Page 11 )

Updated On: 28-Feb-2026
View Related Case Study

Using the Scenario, answer the following questions about scoping the proposal and preparing the Strategic Outline Case for the Pittville project.

Decide whether the approach is appropriate for stage 1, and select the response that supports your decision.

When preparing the Strategic Outline Case, the need to address the number of education courses available to 16-18-year-olds was considered to be sufficiently large and stand alone to form a project.

Was this an appropriate application of the Five Case Model for this project?

  1. No, because the Pittville project is part of a larger programme of change.
  2. No, because whether the change is sufficiently large to warrant a project should have been determined before this stage.
  3. Yes, because this stage should confirm the strategic context of the proposal.
  4. Yes, because this stage should provide stakeholders with an early indication of the preferred option.

Answer(s): A



View Related Case Study

The Consortium has stated that within the next three years, it expects to see at least a 15% increase in the attainment of qualifications. However, it has not proposed ways in which the success rates for qualifications can be increased.

Is this approach appropriate for defining the spending objectives in the Strategic Outline Case?

  1. No, because without a solution to the problem, there is no way of calculating what the potential improvements might be.
  2. No, because the Consortium should NOT be specifying the targeted outcomes.
  3. Yes, because the Consortium has been formed to plan the transformation of education and learning.
  4. Yes, because the Strategic Case should focus on what needs to be achieved in terms of the targeted outcomes and outputs rather than input in relation to the potential solution.

Answer(s): D



View Related Case Study

Using the Scenario, answer the following questions about scoping the proposal and preparing the Strategic Outline Case for the Pittville project.

Decide whether the approach is appropriate for stage 1, and select the response that supports your decision.

There is a risk that the local planning authority may reject proposals for development of the Old Fire Station Headquarters site. This will cause delays to the project.

Should this risk be recorded as an external non-systemic risk within the Strategic Outline Case?

  1. No, because risks should be identified in the Outline Business Case.
  2. No, because this is a service risk associated with the design and build phases of the project.
  3. Yes, because the local planning authority is an external organization.
  4. Yes, because changes to the Old Fire Station Headquarters site will affect the environment.

Answer(s): C



View Related Case Study

There is a need to meet regulations that address the needs of those with Learning Difficulties and Disabilities

Should this item be recorded as a dependency within the Strategic Outline Case?

  1. No, because the regulations are an externally imposed parameter or constraint.
  2. No, because dependencies should NOT be recorded within the Strategic Outline Case.
  3. Yes, because any actions or developments required by others should be considered if the success of the project is dependent upon them.
  4. Yes, because success of the project is dependent upon compliance with these regulations.

Answer(s): D



View Related Case Study

HOTSPOT
Answer the following question about the costs identified when preparing the Economic Appraisal for the short list options for the Pittville project.

Column 1 contains a list of the costs identified. For each cost in Column 1, decide if the cost should be included in the Economic

Appraisal and select from Column 2 the type of cost it represents. Each selection from Column 2 can be used once, more than once or not at all.

Column 1

1) The additional on-going cost of electricity for the Pittville

University development.

2) The money spent to date on the Old Fire Station

Headquarters site feasibility study and legal advice.

3) The cost of a stand-alone technology cabin with a separate contract for specialist call-out support, paid on an as-needed basis.

4) The Highways Department will have to upgrade the access road to the Old Fire Station Headquarters site.

However, this cost will NOT count against the Pittville project budget.

The Old Fire Station Headquarters site was to be sold but will now be used for the new campus. It is owned by the Council so there is no cost.

6) The car park at Pittville University will need to be expanded if over 1,500 students attend the university.

Column 2

A) NOT included in the Economic Appraisal

B) Fixed cost

C) Variable cost

D) Semi-variable cost

E) Step cost

  1. See Explanation for the Answer.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The additional on-going cost of electricity for the Pittville University development should be included in the Economic Appraisal as it represents a C. Variable cost. This is because the cost of electricity will vary depending on the level of usage, which is likely to fluctuate with the operational activities of the university development.

The money spent to date on the Old Fire Station Headquarters site feasibility study and legal advice should be included in the Economic Appraisal as a B. Fixed cost. These are costs that have already been incurred and will not change regardless of the scale of the project moving forward.

The cost of a stand-alone technology cabin with a separate contract for specialist call-out support, paid on an as-needed basis, should be included as a D. Semi-variable cost. The base cost of the cabin is fixed, but the call-out support costs will vary depending on the frequency of the need for specialist support.

The Highways Department's upgrade of the access road to the Old Fire Station Headquarters site, even though it will not count against the Pittville project budget, should still be considered in the Economic Appraisal to understand the full economic impact of the project. However, since it does not impact the project budget directly, it could be argued that it is

A. NOT included in the Economic Appraisal from the project's budget perspective but might be acknowledged in a broader economic impact analysis.

The use of the Old Fire Station Headquarters site, which is owned by the Council and was to be sold but will now be used for the new campus, represents an opportunity cost but not a direct financial cost to the project. Therefore, it might be A. NOT included in the Economic Appraisal as a direct cost but could be considered in terms of forgone revenue or alternative use value in a broader economic analysis.

The need to expand the car park at Pittville University if over 1,500 students attend represents a E. Step cost. This cost will not occur until a certain threshold (in this case, student numbers) is reached, at which point it will increase in a step-like manner.






Post your Comments and Discuss APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner exam dumps with other Community members:

Join the Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Discussion