Free ACMP_6.4 Exam Braindumps
Aruba Certified Mobility Professional 6.4 Questions 31–35 (page: 8)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

The Aruba Policy Enforcement Firewall (PEF) module supports source network address translation

(src-nat).
Which is a use of this statement in an Aruba configuration?

  1. provide a single source IP address for users in a role
  2. redirect Captive Portal HTTP sessions
  3. redirect Access Points to another Aruba controller
  4. provide IP addresses to clients
  5. redirects clients to Aruba Firewall

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

2-5 - Policy Interpretation



Review the following truncated output from an Aruba controller for this item.
(example) #show rights logon access-list List
----------------
Position Name Location
-------- ---- --------
1 logon-control
2 captiveportal logon-control
-------------
Priority Source Destination Service Action
-------- ------ ----------- ------- ------
1 user any udp 68 deny
2 any any svc-icmp permit
3 any any svc-dns permit
4 any any svc-dhcp permit
5 any any svc-natt permit captiveportal
-------------
Priority Source Destination Service Action
-------- ------ ----------- ------- ------
1 user controller svc-https dst-nat 8081
2 user any svc-http dst-nat 8080
3 user any svc-https dst-nat 8081
4 user any svc-http-proxy1 dst-nat 8088
5 user any svc-http-proxy2 dst-nat 8088
6 user any svc-http-proxy3 dst-nat 8088
Based on the above output from an Aruba controller, an unauthenticated user assigned to the logon role attempts to start an http session to IP address 172.16.43.170.
What will happen?

  1. the user's traffic will be passed to the IP address because of the policy statement:user any svc-http dst-nat 8080
  2. the user's traffic will be passed to the IP address because of the policy statement:user any svc- https dst-nat 8081
  3. the user's traffic will be passed to the IP address because of the policy statement:user any svc- http-proxy1 dst-nat 8088
  4. the user will not reach the IP address because of the policy statement:user any svc-http dst-nat
  5. the user will not reach the IP address because of the implicit deny any any at the end of the policy.

Answer(s): D



Refer to the following configuration segment for this item.
ip access-list session anewone user network 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 any permit user host 172.16.1.1 any deny user any any permit
An administrator wants users to have access to all destinations except 172.16.1.1. Based on the above Aruba Mobility Controller configuration segment, which statements best describe this policy? (Choose two)

  1. The rule user host 172.16.1.1 any deny is redundant because of the implicit deny all at the end.
  2. The rule user network 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 any permit is redundant.
  3. The two rules user network 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 any permit and user host 172.16.1.1 any deny need to be re-sequenced.
  4. The last statement user any any permit is not required
  5. The last statement should be any any any deny

Answer(s): B,C



Refer to the following configuration segment for this item.
netdestination "internal"
no invert network 172.16.43.0 255.255.255.0 position 1
range 172.16.11.0 172.16.11.16 position 2
!
ip access-list session "My-Policy"
alias "user" alias "internal" service_any permit queue low !
A user frame is evaluated against this firewall policy with the following attributes:
Source IP: 172.17.49.3 Destination IP: 10.100.86.37 Destination Port: 80 Referring to the above file segment, how will the frame be handled by this firewall policy?

  1. The frame will be dropped because of the implicit deny all at the end of the netdestination definition.
  2. The frame will be dropped because of the implicit deny all at the end of the firewall policy.
  3. The frame will be forwarded because of the implicit permit all at the end of the firewall policy.
  4. The frame will be passed because there is no service specified in the firewall policy.
  5. The frame will be dropped because there is no service specified in the firewall policy.

Answer(s): B



ip access-list session anewone user network 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 any permit user any any permit host 10.1.1.1 host 10.2.2.2 any deny
A user sends a frame with the following attributes:
Source IP: 10.1.1.1 Destination IP: 10.2.2.2 Destination Port: 25 Based on the above Mobility Controller configuration file segment, what will this policy do with the user frame?

  1. The frame is discarded because of the implicit deny all at the end of the policy.
  2. The frame is discarded because of the statement:user host 10.1.1.1 host 10.2.2.2 deny.
  3. The frame is accepted because of the statement:user any any permit.
  4. The frame is accepted because of the statement:user network 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 any permit.
  5. This is not a valid policy.

Answer(s): C



Viewing page 8 of 36
Viewing questions 36 - 40 out of 173 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Aruba ACMP_6.4 exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!