ASIS ASIS-PCI Exam Actual Questions
Professional Certified Investigator (ASIS-PCI) (Page 10 )

• Azure Resource Manager templates: Use ARM templates to define the VM infrastructure and baseline configuration as code. This ensures all Windows Server 2016 VMs are created with a uniform setup, minimizing manual configuration.

• PowerShell Desired State Configuration (DSC) extension for Windows: DSC enforces a defined state across all servers and can automatically remediate drift. This keeps the VMs in the desired configuration with minimal ongoing admin effort.

• Event | search "error"
• Event | where EventType == "error"
• search in (Event) "error"

• Why this is correct: In Azure Virtual Desktop, user access to a host pool is controlled through App Groups. The default app group for a host pool publishes the full desktop, so adding members to that app group grants them sign-in and access to the desktop (and any RemoteApps in that group). This is the standard way to give users access to AVD resources.

• Why the other options are not correct:

• Practical steps (high level):

• Elicited and documented customer requirements
• Converted them into clear, measurable specifications
• Validated the requirements with the customer
• Used them as the basis for design, quality checks, and acceptance

• A: Requirements should reflect the customer’s needs—not the supplier’s standards.
• B: Iteration review planning does not replace proper requirements collection.
• D: A retrospective occurs after work is completed and is mainly for process improvement, not initial requirements definition.

• Why: A multi-modal embedding model maps both text and images into a shared vector space, enabling cross-modal similarity and retrieval (e.g., find images matching a text query or text matching an image).

• What it does: Enables efficient similarity search using a vector database or nearest-neighbor indexing.

• Why the other options aren’t suitable:

• Quick implementation note: you’d typically pair the embeddings with a vector store (e.g., ANN index) and possibly fine-tune on domain data for better alignment across modalities.

• Answer: False. Agents and managers CAN create knowledge articles from Community questions.

• Why: In ServiceNow, a Community question can be converted into a Knowledge article using the Create Knowledge (or Convert to Knowledge) action. This allows what customers asked to become a reusable article for others.

• How it works (high level):

• Permissions: This ability depends on having the right roles/permissions (e.g., agents or knowledge managers). If you don’t see the option, check your role assignments or the knowledge-management configuration.

• Quick take: If a question in Community is valuable for others, a trained agent can turn it into a Knowledge article, making it available for self-service.

• 25 — Traditional SMTP server-to-server mail transfer; not normally used for secure client submission.
• 110 — POP3, used to retrieve email and typically unencrypted.
• 143 — IMAP, used to access email and typically unencrypted.

• The user needs the chosen occasion to remain available as they navigate through the current shopping experience. Session scope stores data for the duration of the user’s session.
• Request scope data is cleared with each HTTP request; Page scope only lasts for rendering a single page; Content slots are for page/content presentation, not user data.
• Since you don’t want to persist the selection in system/custom objects, session scope is the right level: it preserves state across pages during the same session but isn’t stored long-term.

• An IDS monitors network traffic for signs of attacks and raises alerts. It can be deployed out-of-band (via a SPAN/mirror port or a tap) so it analyzes traffic without being inline, meaning it doesn’t measurably affect latency.
• An IPS (intrusion prevention system) is inline and can block threats, but that processing can introduce some latency and potential throughput impact.
• A firewall also inspects traffic and can add latency, though usually modest with proper hardware, but its primary purpose isn’t continuous passive analysis.
• A load balancer distributes traffic and isn’t used for intrusion analysis.

• Increase/decrease the number of epochs: Changes how long training runs, but does not reuse a pre-trained model.
• Unsupervised learning: Trains from unlabeled data and does not specifically address adapting an existing model.

• Correct answer: S3 Versioning

• Why the other options aren’t suitable for this protection:

• Quick tip: For enhanced protection, enable Versioning (and consider related features like Object Lock for write-once scenarios in specific compliance cases).

Why B works

• AWS KMS keys are Regional resources. A normal customer managed key in Region A cannot be used directly in Region B.
• A customer managed multi-Region KMS key (MRK) has related key replicas in both Regions. The replicas share key material and key ID, although each has a Regional ARN.
• With client-side encryption, the application encrypts the data before storing it in S3. Cross-Region replication then copies already-encrypted objects, so S3 does not need to decrypt and re-encrypt them with a different Regional key.

Why the other choices are weaker

• A and C: SSE-S3 uses Amazon-managed S3 keys, not the required customer managed KMS key.
• D: SSE-KMS can work only if the solution creates and configures the appropriate KMS key or multi-Region key replica in each Region. As written, it says to create a customer managed KMS key in each Region, which implies separate keys—not the same KMS key. Replication also requires additional KMS permissions and destination encryption configuration.

• Assign a Teams license to a user — Licenses are assigned through the Microsoft 365 admin center, Microsoft Entra ID, or PowerShell.
• Deploy the Teams client — The Teams admin center manages Teams policies and apps, but it is not the primary tool for deploying the desktop client.
• Prevent users from creating teams — Team creation depends on controlling the creation of Microsoft 365 groups, generally configured through Microsoft Entra ID and PowerShell rather than directly in the Teams admin center.

• Correct answer: B (No, it does not).

• A purchase agreement in Dynamics 365 SCM is a vendor-side price arrangement. It sets prices/discounts for what your company buys from suppliers, not for what you sell to customers.
• The objective in Question 2 is to give clients a quantity-based discount on items they purchase from you. To accomplish this, you should configure a sales price / trade agreement (on the customer/sales side), not a purchase agreement.
• In a sales price trade agreement, you can define quantity breaks such as:

• Create a Sales price trade agreement for the item and relevant customer (or customer group).
• Add quantity breaks: 51–100 with 10% discount, 101+ with 15% discount.
• Ensure the agreement is active for the desired date range.

1. Define Power Platform DLP policies
2. Add custom prompt modifications
3. Conduct adversarial testing

1. DLP policies first

1. Prompt modifications second

1. Adversarial testing last

• IPv6 address types you’ll typically see:

• Unique Local Addresses (ULAs)

• If an address begins with fdXX:… or fc00:…, place it under “Unique Local Address” (ULA).
• If it begins with 2000::/3, place it under “Global Unicast.”
• If it begins with fe80::, place it under “Link-local.”
• If it begins with ff00::, place it under “Multicast.”

• What each role allows at the storage account scope:

• Why someone might say it’s not correct in this question:

• Practical takeaway:

• The problem: Guest users can’t create posts in the Monthly Reports channel.
• The recommended fix (answer B): Modify the Guest access settings in the Teams admin center.

• Guest access settings control what guests are allowed to do across Teams (for example, posting, chat, and channel participation). If guests are restricted from posting, enabling the appropriate guest permissions will let them post in channels like Monthly Reports.
• The other options don’t directly change guest permissions in the way that affects posting:

• ?????? CPU
• ?????????????????
• ??????????????????????????
• ???????????? throughput
• ??????????????????????????????

• A ??????? system software ????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????
• B ?????????????????????????? ????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????
• D ????????????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????

• A limited lifetime
• Permissions defined by an IAM role or policy
• The ability to access AWS APIs without using long-term IAM user credentials

• Amazon API Gateway — Builds and manages APIs; it does not generally issue AWS credentials for applications.
• IAM users — Usually use long-term credentials, which are less suitable for applications.
• IAM instance profiles — Provide temporary role credentials to applications running on EC2 instances, but are specifically tied to EC2. The broader requirement described is best met by AWS STS.

• Requirements map to this: send to syslog server at 10.10.10.1, use a reliable protocol (TCP), and avoid well-known ports (0–1023). Port 1024 is the first non–well-known port, so it satisfies the non–well-known requirement.
• Why the others are wrong:

• TCP provides reliability for syslog delivery, unlike UDP.
• Port numbers in the 0–1023 range are well-known ports; using 1024+ avoids the well-known range.

• runParallel is defined as async, so it returns a Promise.
• To use the result, you attach a then handler (or use await inside another async function).

• A: “Async runParallel() .then(data);” is invalid. “async” is a keyword for function declarations, not something you put in front of a call, and you’d need a function as the then-argument.
• B: “runParallel().done(function(data){return data;});” .done is not standard in native Promises (it exists in some libraries). Without a compatible library, this won’t work.
• C: “runParallel().then(data);” is invalid because then expects a function as its argument; data is not a function.
• D: “runParallel().then(function(data){ return data; });” is valid (or equivalently, runParallel().then(data => data);).

• The robust, standard option is D.
• B could work only with a library that provides .done; otherwise it’s not reliable.

• Startup scripts run at computer startup, before any user logs on, making them ideal for machine-wide configuration on each new VM.
• They execute under the Local System account, which is appropriate for initial setup tasks.
• Linking a GPO to the OU ensures every new VM in that domain automatically receives the configuration—great for scalability.

• A) SetupComplete.cmd runs only once, right after Windows Setup, not on every boot, so it isn’t ideal for provisioning multiple VMs consistently.
• B) Logon scripts run per user, not per machine, so they aren’t reliable for initial VM configuration before a user signs in.
• D) Placing scripts in a VHD doesn’t automatically execute them.

• A assigned without var becomes a global variable (in non-strict mode). So after myFunction(), a = 5 is accessible.
• b is declared with var inside the function, so it’s local to that function (function-scoped). It’s not defined in the outer (global) scope.

• console.log(a) prints 5.
• console.log(b) throws a ReferenceError: b is not defined.

• Statement 1: Admin1 must approve requests for the Agent ID Developer role — No

• Statement 2: Admin2 can approve requests for the AI Administrator role — No

• Statement 3: Admin3 can assign User1 a two-day active assignment for the Agent ID Developer role — Yes

• The diagnostic output shows that the protocol is TCP (proto=6) and the session state is 2.
• In FortiGate’s session output, state=2 maps to SYN_SENT. This means the TCP SYN has been sent but the handshake hasn’t completed yet.
• Therefore, the session is not ESTABLISHED, FIN/ACK-related states, or other states; it’s in SYN_SENT.

• The question asks which Azure support plans allow you to open new support requests.

• Key concept:

• Therefore, the correct choice is the plan(s) other than Basic (i.e., Developer, Standard, Professional Direct, Premier). If the provided key lists only one option as correct (A), it may be incomplete or misleading—the official plans page shows that Basic does not meet the requirement, while the paid plans do. See: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/support/plans/

• What the HOTSPOT is testing

• The actual action you need on HyperV1

• Typical commands you’d use (depending on OS version)

• Why this matters for Q6

• Quick validation steps

• Answer: No.

• Why it doesn’t meet the goal:

• How to implement correctly (brief guidance):

• The correct permission is Manage Sandboxes (the official Salesforce name; the option in the list is written as “Manage Sandbox,” which is effectively the same idea but the canonical name uses the plural).
• Why: Sandboxes are a lifecycle feature. Only users with the explicit Manage Sandboxes permission can perform create, delete, refresh, or activate actions.
• Why the other options aren’t correct:

• Pay-as-you-go in Azure is an operating expense (OPEX) model, not an “elastic” expenditure model.
• Elastic or scalable terms describe capacity planning, not the cost category. The cost should be treated as OPEX since you pay for usage each month.
• The parallel question (Question 12) shows the correct approach is using an operational expenditure model.

1. Create a new AMI or copy the existing AMI while specifying EBS encryption and an appropriate AWS KMS key.
2. This creates an encrypted AMI backed by encrypted EBS snapshots.
3. Copy the encrypted AMI to the destination Region, using a KMS key available there.
4. Launch the application stack from the encrypted AMI.

• B: AWS KMS does not encrypt an existing unencrypted AMI in place. You must create an encrypted copy.
• C: AWS Certificate Manager manages TLS certificates, not EBS or AMI encryption.
• D: Enabling encryption by default affects newly created EBS volumes and snapshots; it does not encrypt an existing unencrypted AMI during copying.

• Transact-SQL (T-SQL) is used to query relational data in Azure SQL Database, not telemetry data from monitoring services.
• To analyze monitoring data from Azure SQL Database Intelligent Insights and Azure Application Insights, you should use the Kusto Query Language (KQL) in Azure Monitor Logs/Log Analytics (and in Application Insights Analytics).
• Using KQL lets you query telemetry tables such as requests, dependencies, pageViews, and customEvents (from App Insights) and any integrated monitoring data you’ve ingested into Log Analytics.

• Ensure Intelligent Insights and Application Insights data is available in a Log Analytics workspace or accessible via Application Insights Analytics.
• Go to Azure Monitor > Logs (or Application Insights > Analytics) and write KQL queries, e.g.:

• A — IDS attack signatures: An IDS generally detects suspicious network activity but does not necessarily scan uploaded PDF files or prevent them from being accepted.
• C — Load balancer: Distributes traffic among servers; it does not inspect files for malware.
• D — WAF command-injection blocking: A WAF can help block web attacks such as command injection, SQL injection, and cross-site scripting, but this option does not specifically address malicious PDF uploads.

• It is a sequence of distinct phases that flow one after another (requirements ? design ? implementation ? verification ? maintenance).
• Requirements are defined up front and changes are costly; the project often requires formal sign-off before moving to the next phase.
• It emphasizes heavy documentation and minimal iteration after a phase is completed.

• Post-Incident Review (A) is the after-action step used to capture lessons learned, identify process gaps, and drive improvements across the incident response lifecycle. This directly supports process maturity and a stronger security posture.
• Incident Analysis (D) focuses on investigating root causes during/after an incident, which is important but more of a diagnostic activity than a standalone baseline improvement to maturity.
• Fast Eradication (B) and Incident Containment (C) are tactical actions aimed at stopping the incident, not on maturing the process.

• The correct answer: B) Synthetic identity theft.

• Synthetic identity theft involves creating a new, forged identity by combining information from multiple real people (e.g., names, dates of birth, SSNs) to commit fraud.
• In the scenario, Adam “created a new identity by obtaining information from different victims,” which matches the idea of synthesizing data to form a fake person.

• Medical identity theft: using someone’s medical information to obtain care or services.
• Tax identity theft: using someone’s personal info to file fraudulent tax returns.
• Social identity theft: impersonating someone to deceive others socially or publicly.

• Look for phrases like “create a new identity” or “combine information from multiple people” to identify synthetic identity theft.

• Correct options: C and D.

• The AWS Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF) security perspective focuses on capabilities to protect information and manage security risk.
• Observability (A) is primarily an operations/monitoring capability, not a core security capability under CAF.
• Incident and problem management (B) is IT service management/operations, not specifically a CAF security capability.
• Incident response (C) is a security-focused capability: detecting, containing, and recovering from security incidents.
• Infrastructure protection (D) involves applying security controls to protect the underlying infrastructure, which fits the security perspective.

• Amazon GuardDuty: Detects suspicious activity and threats using security-related data sources; it is not primarily a software vulnerability scanner.
• Amazon Detective: Helps investigate and analyze the root cause of security findings after an event.
• Amazon Cognito: Provides user authentication and authorization for applications.

• A Storage Gateway File Gateway provides an on-premises NFS/SMB file share that's backed by objects in S3. This is exactly what you need to migrate an NFS workload: applications continue using NFS, while the actual data moves to and is stored in S3.
• It can cache frequently accessed data locally for performance, while uploads go to an S3 bucket.
• Why the other options aren’t suitable:

• To get min/max per column, you need column profiling. That’s provided by enabling the column profile.
• To actually see those min/max values, you should show the column profile in the details pane, and you also need the details pane itself enabled so you can view it.

• Enable column profile (B)
• Show column profile in details pane (C)
• Enable details pane (E)

• Show column value distribution (D) shows distribution shape but isn’t required to get min/max.
• Show column quality details (D) deals with data quality metrics, not min/max.

• Version control provides a single source of truth for metadata changes and tracks every modification.
• It supports branching and merging, so each feature can be developed in isolation and later merged without overwriting others.
• It allows diffs and conflict resolution, making it easier to manage dependencies across features and ensure a stable release.

• Setup Audit Trail: only logs who/change when something happened; it doesn’t prevent overwriting or manage cross-feature dependencies.
• Change Sets: used to deploy changes between orgs, not to coordinate parallel development or prevent conflicts across ongoing sprints.

• Incidents & alerts — see how the phishing activity was detected, correlated, and investigated.
• Threat Explorer — search for the malicious messages, recipients, URLs, attachments, and campaign activity.
• Email and collaboration reports — assess how many users or messages were affected.
• Remediation details — verify whether messages were quarantined, removed, or otherwise contained.

• Microsoft 365 admin center — general tenant administration.
• Microsoft Entra admin center — identity and access management.
• Exchange admin center — mail-flow and Exchange configuration, rather than full phishing-incident investigation.

1. Ingestion Lambda receives requests from API Gateway and places messages in an SQS queue.
2. Processing Lambda is triggered by the queue and loads records into Aurora PostgreSQL.

• Decoupling: API request handling is separated from database loading.
• Buffering: SQS absorbs bursts when incoming traffic exceeds the database’s processing capacity.
• Controlled concurrency: Configure the SQS-triggered Lambda’s concurrency and batch size to avoid overwhelming Aurora or exhausting database connections.
• Automatic retries: Messages that fail processing can return to the queue and be retried. A dead-letter queue can capture persistent failures.
• Lower operational effort: The solution remains serverless and avoids managing EC2 servers or Kubernetes clusters.

• A: EC2 and Tomcat add server-management overhead.
• B: DynamoDB/DAX would require changing the database model and does not solve the Aurora ingestion design.
• C: SNS is useful for notifications and fanout, but SQS is better for durable buffering and backpressure in this producer-consumer workflow.

• S3 Versioning stores all versions of an object. If an object is overwritten or deleted, you can recover the previous version using its version ID.
• This protects against accidental deletion or overwriting because the original data remains accessible as an older version.
• How to enable:

• Practical notes:

• S3 Lifecycle rules: automate moving/expiring data, not specifically protection against deletion.
• S3 bucket policies: control access but don’t inherently preserve previous data.
• S3 server-side encryption: protects data at rest, not against deletion/overwrite.

• L2TP uses UDP port 1701 for the L2TP control channel.
• The destination port is 1701; the source port is a dynamically chosen ephemeral port on the client (not 1701).
• Therefore the statement that both source and destination ports are 1710 is incorrect (and 1710 is not the standard L2TP port).

• The destination port should be 1701, not 1710.
• The source port should be an ephemeral port chosen by the client, not 1701.

• Create Power Query parameters for the Azure SQL server/database—or at least the database name.
• Use the parameter in the PBIX connection.
• Publish the same PBIX separately to the relevant development, test, and production workspaces.
• Set each dataset’s parameter value in the Power BI service so it points to the corresponding Azure SQL database.

• Development dataset ? DevelopmentDB
• Test dataset ? TestDB
• Production dataset ? ProductionDB

• The same PBIX is used for every lifecycle stage.
• Each stage consumes data from its matching database.
• Deployment pipelines are not required.
• Azure SQL is a cloud source, so gateway administration is generally avoided.
• Only the parameter value differs between published datasets, reducing maintenance.

• According to the provided answer key, the four options are: Upload File, User Criteria, HR Profiles, HR Criteria (options B, D, F, G).

• Upload File: Filter by a file you upload (e.g., CSV) that provides data for bulk case creation.
• User Criteria: Filter by criteria related to users (e.g., role, department) to select target users.
• HR Profiles: Filter by HR profile data associated with users.
• HR Criteria: Filter by HR-related criteria or attributes.

• Alice is co-resident on the same physical host and exploits shared hardware (the processor cache) to infer secrets. This is the classic definition of a side-channel attack—information leakage through implementation details (like timing or cache behavior) rather than by breaking a protocol or injecting code.

• Observing cache timing or access patterns to deduce cryptographic keys or plaintext data from the victim VM.

• Man-in-the-cloud attack: targets cloud trust/auth, not local hardware sharing.
• SQL injection: exploits input to run SQL commands, not a VM/caching vector.
• Service hijacking: takes control of a service, not about covert data leakage via shared hardware.

• Notice phrases like “shared hardware resources,” “co-resident,” or “cache”—these indicate a side-channel vector.

• Correct choice: Box 1 = Yes, Box 2 = Yes, Box 3 = No (Answer: A)

• Box 1: Yes – Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager provides a risk-based compliance score that helps you understand your overall compliance posture. The score reflects how well you’re meeting regulatory requirements and internal policies.
• Box 2: Yes – It also offers step-by-step remediation guidance through actionable “improvement actions.” These guide you to implement fixes and align controls, often with links to the relevant consoles.
• Box 3: No – Compliance Manager is not part of Microsoft Defender. It is part of Microsoft Purview. Defender is a separate security product family, while Compliance Manager is in Purview for compliance risk and remediation.

• Use Purview Compliance Manager to view your compliance score and follow improvement actions.
• Improvement actions provide actionable steps and guidance for remediation.
• Defender and Purview are distinct services; do not confuse their scopes.