Cisco
CompTIA
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
SAP
Google
NVIDIA
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
Splunk
ServiceNow
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. ATLASSIAN
  5. ACP-610

ATLASSIAN ACP-610 Exam
Managing Jira Projects for Data Center and Server Certification (Page 3 )

Updated On: 1-Feb-2026
Page 3 of 16
PDF with 75 Questions

Which statement is definitely true about sub-tasks being used on a Scrurn board?

  1. Sub-task estimations are rolled up and displayed as the Original Estimate on the parent card.
  2. Sub-tasks can only be created by board administrators
  3. Sub-tasks can be displayed as cards in the Active sprints view.
  4. Sub-tasks can be displayed as cards in the Backlog view.
  5. Sub-tasks will automatically get resolved when the parent is moved to the Done column.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Sub-tasks are a type of issue that can be used to break down a parent issue into smaller and more manageable pieces. Sub-tasks can be displayed as cards in the Active sprints view of a Scrum board, which allows you to track their progress and status. However, sub-task estimations are not rolled up and displayed on the parent card, as they use a different field than the parent issue. Sub-tasks can be created by anyone who has the Create Issue permission in the project, not only by board administrators. Sub-tasks cannot be displayed as cards in the Backlog view, as they are only visible under their parent issues. Sub-tasks will not automatically get resolved when the parent is moved to the Done column, as they have their own workflow transitions and conditions. Therefore, the correct answer is C.


Reference:

[Working with sub-tasks], [Configuring columns]



A project uses several issue Types that have different workflows. Sam can only see some of the issues on the project's Kanban board but sees all of them in the issue search.
Identify a possible reason.

  1. board permissions
  2. column mapping
  3. issue-level security
  4. workflow conditions

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

A possible reason why Sam can only see some of the issues on the project's Kanban board but sees all of them in the issue search is that the column mapping of the board does not include all the statuses of the different workflows used by the issue types. Column mapping determines which statuses are mapped to which columns on a board, and only issues with mapped statuses are displayed on the board. If an issue type has a workflow with a status that is not mapped to any column, then it will not appear on the board. Board permissions, issue-level security, and workflow conditions do not affect the visibility of issues on a board, as they apply to both the board and the issue search. Therefore, the correct answer is B.


Reference:

[Configuring columns], [Configuring workflows]



Your team uses a custom field of type Labels to track keywords associated with incoming requests. Issues can have multiple keywords, and new keywords can be added at any time. They want to see keywords displayed prominently when viewing all cards on a board.
Which configuration meets this need?

  1. card layout
  2. swimlanes
  3. card colours
  4. issue detail view

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The best configuration to meet the team's need of displaying keywords prominently when viewing all cards on a board is card layout. Card layout allows you to customize what fields are shown on each card on a board, and you can choose to show any custom field of type Labels on the cards. Swimlanes are used to group issues into horizontal lanes based on certain criteria, such as assignee, priority, or query, but they do not show labels on each card. Card colours are used to highlight issues based on certain attributes, such as issue type, priority, or query, but they do not show labels on each card either. Issue detail view is used to show more information about an issue when you select it on a board, but it does not affect how cards are displayed on the board. Therefore, the correct answer is A.


Reference:

[Configuring card layout], [Configuring swimlanes], [Configuring card colours], [Using boards]



Sam and Jo are product managers responsible for two separate products. Each product has its own Jira project and a corresponding Scrum board.
Management requests an integration between the products. Sam and Jo decide to create all the integration-related issues in Sams project and label them integration". Jo updated his Scrum board's saved filter to include the relevant integration issues from Sam's project.
Which statement is definitely true?

  1. All integration issues always appear on top of Jo's backlog.
  2. Changes to the rank of integration issues on Jo's board are reflected on Sam's board.
  3. Jo is unable to rank integration issues created by Sam.
  4. Sam is unable to transition integration issues that were ranked by Jo.
  5. Integration issues can only be ranked on Sam's board.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

The statement that is definitely true is that changes to the rank of integration issues on Jo's board are reflected on Sam's board. This is because ranking is a global attribute that affects how issues are ordered across projects and boards based on their relative priority.
When Jo updates his Scrum board's saved filter to include integration issues from Sam's project, he can rank them along with his own issues on his board. These changes will also affect how these issues are ranked on Sam's board, as they share the same rank field value. The other statements are not necessarily true or false, as they depend on other factors such as permissions, workflow configurations, or board settings. Therefore, the correct answer is B.


Reference:

[Ranking an issue], [Configuring filters]



A team currently uses a single project to track both features and tasks. They will be adopting aqile practices, as follows:
· Features will be developed during three week iterations. · Tasks will be handled based on priority and rank and released incrementally as needed. they want to use agile boards with minimal disruption to their current configuration.
Which solution will meet their requirements?

  1. a Kanban board in the current project with separate swimlanes per issue type
  2. two Scrum boards for the current project, one for each issue type
  3. a Scrum board in the current project with two quick fillers to show each issue type separately
  4. a second project for tasks with a shared configuration and separate boards per project
  5. a Kanban board for tasks and a Scrum board for features in the current project

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

The solution that will meet the team's requirements of using agile boards with minimal disruption to their current configuration is to use a Kanban board for tasks and a Scrum board for features in the current project. This way, they can use different agile methodologies for different issue types without creating a new project or changing their existing configuration. They can use a Kanban board for tasks to handle them based on priority and rank and release them incrementally as needed. They can use a Scrum board for features to develop them during three week iterations with sprints and backlogs.

The other solutions are either not feasible or not optimal for their needs. Therefore, the correct answer is E.


Reference:

[Creating a board], [Using a Scrum board], [Using a Kanban board]



Viewing page 3 of 16
Viewing questions 11 - 15 out of 75 questions



Post your Comments and Discuss ATLASSIAN ACP-610 exam prep with other Community members:

Join the ACP-610 Discussion