Free CRCM Exam Braindumps (page: 164)

Page 164 of 344

First National Bank, a U.S. bank, is contacted by Manufacturing Company, InC. , a U.S. company, to finance its transaction with Country Z, a boycotting country. Payment will be made through a letter of credit in favor of Manufacturing Company at its U.S. address. First National Bank knows that the letter of credit will contain restrictive boycott conditions that would prevent the bank from implementing it. First National Bank suggests to Manufacturing Company, InC. , that it set up a shell corporation in Country Y, a nonboycotting country, and have the shell corporation be the beneficiary of the letter of credit. Does First National Bank have any problem with this transaction?

  1. No. The transaction is now not subject to Department of Commerce regulations because the beneficiary is not a U.S. company.
  2. Yes. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation and First National Bank is liable.
  3. No. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation, but First National Bank is not liable because Manufacturing Company, In , actually effected the transaction.
  4. No. First National should have Manufacturing Company, InC. , sign a statement accepting full responsibility for the establishment of the shell corporation.

Answer(s): B



First National Bank, a U.S. bank, is contacted by Manufacturing Company, InC. , a U.S. company, to finance its transaction with Country Z, a boycotting country. Payment will be made through a letter of credit in favor of Manufacturing Company at its U.S. address. First National Bank knows that the letter of credit will contain restrictive boycott conditions that would prevent the bank from implementing it. First National Bank suggests to Manufacturing Company, InC. , that it set up a shell corporation in Country Y, a nonboycotting country, and have the shell corporation be the beneficiary of the letter of credit. Does First National Bank have any problem with this transaction?

  1. No. The transaction is now not subject to Department of Commerce regulations because the beneficiary is not a U.S. company.
  2. Yes. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation and First National Bank is liable.
  3. No. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation, but First National Bank is not liable because Manufacturing Company, In , actually effected the transaction.
  4. No. First National should have Manufacturing Company, InC. , sign a statement accepting full responsibility for the establishment of the shell corporation.

Answer(s): B



First National Bank, a U.S. bank, is contacted by Manufacturing Company, InC. , a U.S. company, to finance its transaction with Country Z, a boycotting country. Payment will be made through a letter of credit in favor of Manufacturing Company at its U.S. address. First National Bank knows that the letter of credit will contain restrictive boycott conditions that would prevent the bank from implementing it. First National Bank suggests to Manufacturing Company, InC. , that it set up a shell corporation in Country Y, a nonboycotting country, and have the shell corporation be the beneficiary of the letter of credit. Does First National Bank have any problem with this transaction?

  1. No. The transaction is now not subject to Department of Commerce regulations because the beneficiary is not a U.S. company.
  2. Yes. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation and First National Bank is liable.
  3. No. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation, but First National Bank is not liable because Manufacturing Company, In , actually effected the transaction.
  4. No. First National should have Manufacturing Company, InC. , sign a statement accepting full responsibility for the establishment of the shell corporation.

Answer(s): B



First National Bank advises Country A, a boycotting country, on various U.S. investments. Country A instructs First National Bank not to recommend for investment any shares of certain blacklisted companies. First National Bank follows this instruction. Has First National Bank participated or cooperated in an international boycott under the IRS regulations by this action?

  1. Yes. The companies are the subject of a boycott.
  2. No. The bank may agree not to recommend certain companies.
  3. Yes, if the companies are part of a boycott.
  4. No, but the bank must report this action to the IRS.

Answer(s): B



Page 164 of 344



Post your Comments and Discuss Banking CRCM exam with other Community members:

LeAnne Hair commented on August 24, 2023
#229 in incorrect - all the customers require an annual review
UNITED STATES
upvote

LeAnne Hair commented on August 24, 2023
#229 in incorrect - all the customers require an annual review
UNITED STATES
upvote

LeAnne Hair commented on August 24, 2023
I think question 204 has an incorrect solution. It should be D-Regulation E
UNITED STATES
upvote

Igor commented on April 10, 2020
Guys, leave no stones unturned. Try to study every questions and anything other supplementary material you have. The exam is not easy. I just wrote mine and if it wss not for these questions I would have not have passed it.
BULGARIA
upvote

Lori commented on July 20, 2017
I had a good result. Worth the money.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Chipps commented on July 20, 2017
Studying from this dump helped me understand the concept and what comes in the exam. But I only get about 80 to 85% of the questions not 100% as it is claimed. Well... still good enough to pass.
UNITED STATES
upvote