Free CRCM Exam Braindumps (page: 165)

Page 164 of 344

First National Bank, a U.S. bank, is contacted by Manufacturing Company, InC. , a U.S. company, to finance its transaction with Country Z, a boycotting country. Payment will be made through a letter of credit in favor of Manufacturing Company at its U.S. address. First National Bank knows that the letter of credit will contain restrictive boycott conditions that would prevent the bank from implementing it. First National Bank suggests to Manufacturing Company, InC. , that it set up a shell corporation in Country Y, a nonboycotting country, and have the shell corporation be the beneficiary of the letter of credit. Does First National Bank have any problem with this transaction?

  1. No. The transaction is now not subject to Department of Commerce regulations because the beneficiary is not a U.S. company.
  2. Yes. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation and First National Bank is liable.
  3. No. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation, but First National Bank is not liable because Manufacturing Company, In , actually effected the transaction.
  4. No. First National should have Manufacturing Company, InC. , sign a statement accepting full responsibility for the establishment of the shell corporation.

Answer(s): B



First National Bank, a U.S. bank, is contacted by Manufacturing Company, InC. , a U.S. company, to finance its transaction with Country Z, a boycotting country. Payment will be made through a letter of credit in favor of Manufacturing Company at its U.S. address. First National Bank knows that the letter of credit will contain restrictive boycott conditions that would prevent the bank from implementing it. First National Bank suggests to Manufacturing Company, InC. , that it set up a shell corporation in Country Y, a nonboycotting country, and have the shell corporation be the beneficiary of the letter of credit. Does First National Bank have any problem with this transaction?

  1. No. The transaction is now not subject to Department of Commerce regulations because the beneficiary is not a U.S. company.
  2. Yes. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation and First National Bank is liable.
  3. No. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation, but First National Bank is not liable because Manufacturing Company, In , actually effected the transaction.
  4. No. First National should have Manufacturing Company, InC. , sign a statement accepting full responsibility for the establishment of the shell corporation.

Answer(s): B



First National Bank, a U.S. bank, is contacted by Manufacturing Company, InC. , a U.S. company, to finance its transaction with Country Z, a boycotting country. Payment will be made through a letter of credit in favor of Manufacturing Company at its U.S. address. First National Bank knows that the letter of credit will contain restrictive boycott conditions that would prevent the bank from implementing it. First National Bank suggests to Manufacturing Company, InC. , that it set up a shell corporation in Country Y, a nonboycotting country, and have the shell corporation be the beneficiary of the letter of credit. Does First National Bank have any problem with this transaction?

  1. No. The transaction is now not subject to Department of Commerce regulations because the beneficiary is not a U.S. company.
  2. Yes. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation and First National Bank is liable.
  3. No. The transaction is set up to evade the regulation, but First National Bank is not liable because Manufacturing Company, In , actually effected the transaction.
  4. No. First National should have Manufacturing Company, InC. , sign a statement accepting full responsibility for the establishment of the shell corporation.

Answer(s): B



First National Bank advises Country A, a boycotting country, on various U.S. investments. Country A instructs First National Bank not to recommend for investment any shares of certain blacklisted companies. First National Bank follows this instruction. Has First National Bank participated or cooperated in an international boycott under the IRS regulations by this action?

  1. Yes. The companies are the subject of a boycott.
  2. No. The bank may agree not to recommend certain companies.
  3. Yes, if the companies are part of a boycott.
  4. No, but the bank must report this action to the IRS.

Answer(s): B






Post your Comments and Discuss Banking CRCM exam with other Community members:

CRCM Discussions & Posts