Free CFA-Level-II Exam Braindumps
CFA Level II Chartered Financial Analyst Questions 75–79 (page: 37)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

Amie Lear, CFA, is a quantitative analyst employed by a brokerage firm. She has been assigned by her supervisor to cover a number of different equity and debt investments. One of the investments is Taylor, Inc. (Taylor), a manufacturer of a wide range of children's toys. Based on her extensive analysis, she determines that her expected return on the stock, given Taylor's risks, is 10%. In applying the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), the result is a 12% rate of return.

For her analysis of the returns of Devon, Inc. (Devon), a manufacturer of high-end sports apparel, Lear intends to use the Fama-French model (FFM). Devon is a small-cap growth stock that has traded at a low market-to-book value in recent years. Lear's analysis has provided a wealth of quantitative information to consider. The return on a value-weighted market index minus the risk- free rate is 5.5%, the small-cap return premium is 3.1%, the value return premium is 2.2%, and the liquidity premium is 3.3%. The risk-free rate is 3.4%. The market, size, relative value, and liquidity betas for Devon are 0.7, -0.3, 1.4, and 1.2, respectively. In estimating the appropriate equity risk premium, Lear has chosen to use the Gordon growth model.

Lear's assistant, Doug Saunders, presents her with a report on macroeconomic multifactor models that includes the following two statements:
Statement 1: Business cycle risk represents the unexpected change in the difference between the return of risky corporate bonds and government bonds.

Statement 2: Confidence risk represents the unexpected change in the level of real business activity.

Lear is also attempting to determine the most appropriate method for determining the required return for Densmore, Inc. (Densmore), a closely held company that is considering a debt issue within the next year. The company has not previously issued debt securities to the public, relying instead on bank financing. She realizes that there are a number of models to consider, including the CAPM, multifactor models, and build-up models.

Lear's choice of the Gordon growth model is an example of which of the following types of estimates of the equity risk premium?

  1. Historical estimate.
  2. Forward-looking estimate.
  3. Macroeconomic model estimate.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

The Gordon growth model is a popular method to generate forward-looking estimates using current information and expectations concerning economic and financial variables.

A historical estimate of the equity risk premium consists of the difference between the historical mean return for a broad-based equity market index and a risk-free rate over a given time period.

A macroeconomic model estimate of the equity risk premium is based on the relationships between macroeconomic variables and financial variables.
(Study Session 10, LOS 35.b, c, d)



Amie Lear, CFA, is a quantitative analyst employed by a brokerage firm. She has been assigned by her supervisor to cover a number of different equity and debt investments. One of the investments is Taylor, Inc. (Taylor), a manufacturer of a wide range of children's toys. Based on her extensive analysis, she determines that her expected return on the stock, given Taylor's risks, is 10%. In applying the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), the result is a 12% rate of return.

For her analysis of the returns of Devon, Inc. (Devon), a manufacturer of high-end sports apparel, Lear intends to use the Fama-French model (FFM). Devon is a small-cap growth stock that has traded at a low market-to-book value in recent years. Lear's analysis has provided a wealth of quantitative information to consider. The return on a value-weighted market index minus the risk- free rate is 5.5%, the small-cap return premium is 3.1%, the value return premium is 2.2%, and the liquidity premium is 3.3%. The risk-free rate is 3.4%. The market, size, relative value, and liquidity betas for Devon are 0.7, -0.3, 1.4, and 1.2, respectively. In estimating the appropriate equity risk premium, Lear has chosen to use the Gordon growth model.

Lear's assistant, Doug Saunders, presents her with a report on macroeconomic multifactor models that includes the following two statements:
Statement 1: Business cycle risk represents the unexpected change in the difference between the return of risky corporate bonds and government bonds.
Statement 2: Confidence risk represents the unexpected change in the level of real business activity.

Lear is also attempting to determine the most appropriate method for determining the required return for Densmore, Inc. (Densmore), a closely held company that is considering a debt issue within the next year. The company has not previously issued debt securities to the public, relying instead on bank financing. She realizes that there are a number of models to consider, including the CAPM, multifactor models, and build-up models.

Which of the following approaches/methods is most appropriate for Lear to consider in determining the required return for Densmore?

  1. Build-up method.
  2. Risk premium approach.
  3. Bond-yield plus risk premium method.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The build-up method is usually applied to closely held companies (such as Densmore) where betas are not readily obtainable.

The risk premium approach requires betas for its calculations; betas are generally not readily available for closely held companies.

The bond-yield plus risk premium method is appropriate only if the company has publicly traded debt. The method simply adds a risk premium to the yield to maturity of the company's long-term debt. (Study Session 10, LOS 35-d)



Amie Lear, CFA, is a quantitative analyst employed by a brokerage firm. She has been assigned by her supervisor to cover a number of different equity and debt investments. One of the investments is Taylor, Inc. (Taylor), a manufacturer of a wide range of children's toys. Based on her extensive analysis, she determines that her expected return on the stock, given Taylor's risks, is 10%. In applying the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), the result is a 12% rate of return.

For her analysis of the returns of Devon, Inc. (Devon), a manufacturer of high-end sports apparel, Lear intends to use the Fama-French model (FFM). Devon is a small-cap growth stock that has traded at a low market-to-book value in recent years. Lear's analysis has provided a wealth of quantitative information to consider. The return on a value-weighted market index minus the risk- free rate is 5.5%, the small-cap return premium is 3.1%, the value return premium is 2.2%, and the liquidity premium is 3.3%. The risk-free rate is 3.4%. The market, size, relative value, and liquidity betas for Devon are 0.7, -0.3, 1.4, and 1.2, respectively. In estimating the appropriate equity risk premium, Lear has chosen to use the Gordon growth model.

Lear's assistant, Doug Saunders, presents her with a report on macroeconomic multifactor models that includes the following two statements:

Statement 1: Business cycle risk represents the unexpected change in the difference between the return of risky corporate bonds and government bonds.
Statement 2: Confidence risk represents the unexpected change in the level of real business activity.

Lear is also attempting to determine the most appropriate method for determining the required return for Densmore, Inc. (Densmore), a closely held company that is considering a debt issue within the next year. The company has not previously issued debt securities to the public, relying instead on bank financing. She realizes that there are a number of models to consider, including the CAPM, multifactor models, and build-up models.

Are Saunders' statements regarding the macroeconomic multifactor models correct?

  1. Both statements are incorrect.
  2. Only Statement I is correct.
  3. Only Statement 2 is correct.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Neither of Saunder's statements is correct. Confidence risk represents the unexpected change in the difference between the return of risky corporate bonds and corporate bonds. Business cycle risk represents the unexpected change in the level of real business activity. (Study Session 10, LOS 35.d)



Amie Lear, CFA, is a quantitative analyst employed by a brokerage firm. She has been assigned by her supervisor to cover a number of different equity and debt investments. One of the investments is Taylor, Inc. (Taylor), a manufacturer of a wide range of children's toys. Based on her extensive analysis, she determines that her expected return on the stock, given Taylor's risks, is 10%. In applying the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), the result is a 12% rate of return.

For her analysis of the returns of Devon, Inc. (Devon), a manufacturer of high-end sports apparel, Lear intends to use the Fama-French model (FFM). Devon is a small-cap growth stock that has traded at a low market-to-book value in recent years. Lear's analysis has provided a wealth of quantitative information to consider. The return on a value-weighted market index minus the risk- free rate is 5.5%, the small-cap return premium is 3.1%, the value return premium is 2.2%, and the liquidity premium is 3.3%. The risk-free rate is 3.4%. The market, size, relative value, and liquidity betas for Devon are 0.7, -0.3, 1.4, and 1.2, respectively. In estimating the appropriate equity risk premium, Lear has chosen to use the Gordon growth model.

Lear's assistant, Doug Saunders, presents her with a report on macroeconomic multifactor models that includes the following two statements:
Statement 1: Business cycle risk represents the unexpected change in the difference between the return of risky corporate bonds and government bonds.

Statement 2: Confidence risk represents the unexpected change in the level of real business activity.

Lear is also attempting to determine the most appropriate method for determining the required return for Densmore, Inc. (Densmore), a closely held company that is considering a debt issue within the next year. The company has not previously issued debt securities to the public, relying instead on bank financing. She realizes that there are a number of models to consider, including the CAPM, multifactor models, and build-up models.

Which of the following statements regarding the models used to estimate the required return is most accurate?

  1. A strength of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is that it usually has high explanatory power.
  2. A strength of multifactor models is their relative simplicity and ease of calculation.
  3. A weakness of build-up models is that they typically use historical values as estimates that may not be relevant to current market conditions.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

A weakness (not strength) of the CAPM is its low explanatory power in some cases. Multifactor models usually have higher explanatory power than the CAPM since they use more than one factor, whereas CAPM uses only one factor.
A weakness (not strength) of multifactor models is that they are typically more complex to use. (Study Session 10, LOS 35.f)



Sampson Aerospace is a publicly-traded U.S. manufacturer. Sampson supplies communication and navigation control systems to manufacturers of airplanes for commercial and government use. The company operates two divisions: Commercial Operations and Government Operations. Revenues from the Government Operations division comprise 80% of Sampson's total company revenues.

Revenues for other companies in the industry are also driven primarily by sales to the U.S. government.

Sampson has gained a reputation for offering unique products and services. Sampson's market share has been increasing, and its net profit margin is among the highest in its industry.

As part of its business strategy, Sampson seeks out opportunities to enhance internal growth by acquiring smaller companies that possess new technologies that would allow Sampson to offer unique products and services. To this end, Sampson CEO, Drew Smith, recently asked his acquisitions team to consider the purchase of a controlling interest in either NavTech or Aerospace Communications, both software applications firms. Smith provides his acquisitions team with an aerospace analyst's industry report that addresses many key issues within the industry. Selected passages from the report are reproduced below:
Sales in the aerospace electronics industry depend primarily on government military spending, which, in turn, depends on defense budgets. Sales depend on commercial travel to a much lesser extent. The government defense spending budget outlook is fairly bleak as the current administration is looking for ways to reduce the budget deficit. We feel the commercial airline segment has more upside than downside, especially as the global economy improves, so we might see a gradual shift in industry focus toward the commercial airline sector. Companies that already have a foothold in the commercial sector are well-positioned to grow during the global recovery. Even so, companies in this industry will remain highly sensitive to government spending for their revenues. Research and development costs are high and the industry is highly capital intense. While there are only a few companies in this industry, good opportunities exist, especially for companies that have developed sustainable profits through wise acquisitions, cost containment, and the ability to secure long-term government contracts.

Sampson Aerospace recently announced that it is reducing its investment return assumption on its pension assets from 6% to 5%, and that it has entered negotiations to possibly acquire controlling equity interests in communications software firms, NavTech and Aerospace Communications.

NavTech recently has decided to capitalize a significant portion of its research and development expense, and Aerospace Communications has restructured and reclassified many of its leases from operating to financial leases. Sampson CEO Drew Smith recently announced that Sampson had dropped out of negotiations with Knowledge Technologies, claiming it was likely not a sustainable business model.

Consensus forecasts for NavTech and Aerospace Communications are presented in Exhibit 1.



Which of the following is most likely a negative factor in assessing the profitability of Sampson over the medium to long term?

  1. Bargaining power of suppliers.
  2. Bargaining power of customers.
  3. New entrants to the industry.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Since 80% of Sampsons business is with one customer (the U.S. government), we can expect a great deal of bargaining power from that customer. The government will likely use competitive bidding to encourage strong price competition. There is no indication that suppliers have great bargaining power. The threat of new entrants is likely low because of barriers to entry, including high capital expenditures required to enter the industry and perhaps proprietary knowledge about production and company-owned patents. (Study Session 11, LOS 37.b)



Viewing page 37 of 145
Viewing questions 181 - 185 out of 715 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss CFA CFA-Level-II exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!