Free CFA-Level-III Exam Braindumps (page: 13)

Page 13 of 91

John Green, CFA, is a sell-side technology analyst at Federal Securities, a large global investment banking and advisory firm. In many of his recent conversations with executives at the firms he researches, Green has heard disturbing news. Most of these firms are lowering sales estimates for the coming year. However, the stock prices have been stable despite management's widely disseminated sales warnings. Green is preparing his quarterly industry analysis and decides to seek further input. He calls Alan Volk, CFA, a close friend who runs the Initial Public Offering section of the investment banking department of Federal Securities.

Volk tells Green he has seen no slowing of demand for technology IPOs. "We've got three new issues due out next week, and two of them are well oversubscribed." Green knows that Volk's department handled over 200 IPOs last year, so he is confident that Volk's opinion is reliable. Green prepares his industry report, which is favorable. Among other conclusions, the report states that "the future is still bright, based on the fact that 67% of technology IPOs are oversubscribed." Privately, Green recommends to Federal portfolio managers that they begin selling all existing technology issues, which have "stagnated," and buy the IPOs in their place.

After carefully evaluating Federal's largest institutional client's portfolio, Green contacts the client and recommends selling all of his existing technology stocks and buying two of the upcoming IPOs, similar to the recommendation given to Federal's portfolio managers. Green's research has allowed him to conclude that only these two IPOs would be appropriate for this particular client's portfolio. Investing in these IPOs and selling the current technology holdings would, according to Green, "double the returns that your portfolio experienced last year."

Federal Securities has recently hired Dirks Bentley, a CFA candidate who has passed Level 2 and is currently preparing to take the Level 3 CFA® exam, to reorganize Federal's compliance department. Bentley tells Green that he may be subject to CFA Institute sanctions due to inappropriate contact between analysts and investment bankers within Federal Securities. Bentley has recommended that Green implement a firewall to rectify the situation and has outlined the key characteristics for such a system. Bentley's suggestions are as follows:
1. Any communication between the departments of Federal Securities must be channeled through the compliance department for review and eventual delivery. The firm must create and maintain watch, restricted, and rumor lists to be used in the review of employee trading.
2. All beneficial ownership, whether direct or indirect, of recommended securities must be disclosed in writing.
3. The firm must increase the level of review or restriction of proprietary trading activities during periods in which the firm has knowledge of information that is both material and nonpublic.
Bentley has identified two of Green's analysts, neither of whom have non-compete contracts, who are preparing to leave Federal Securities and go into competition. The first employee, James Ybarra, CFA, has agreed to take a position with one of Federal's direct competitors. Ybarra has contacted existing Federal clients using a client list he created with public records. None of the contacted clients have agreed to move their accounts as Ybarra has requested. The second employee, Martha Cliff, CFA, has registered the name Cliff Investment Consulting (CIC), which she plans to use for her independent consulting business. For the new business venture, Cliff has developed and professionally printed marketing literature that compares the new firm's services to that of Federal Securities and highlights the significant cost savings that will be realized by switching to CIC. After she leaves Federal, Cliff plans to target many of the same prospects that Federal Securities is targeting, using an address list she purchased from a third-party vendor. Bentley decides to call a meeting with Green to discuss his findings.

After discussing the departing analysts. Green asks Bentley how to best handle the disclosure of the following items: (1) although not currently a board member. Green has served in the past on the board of directors of a company he researches and expects that he will do so again in the near future; and (2) Green recently inherited put options on a company for which he has an outstanding buy recommendation. Bentley is contemplating his response to Green.
According to Standard 11(A) Material Nonpublic Information, when Green contacted Volk, he:

  1. violated CFA Institute Standards.
  2. violated of CFA Institute Standards unless the contact was disclosed to his clients.
  3. did not violate CFA Institute Standards since he was conducting a legitimate research activity.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

There is no evidence co suggest that the contact was inappropriate. Green is crying co gauge investor sentiment relative to technology stocks. While a fire wall within the firm would be advisable, since no company- specific information was exchanged, the contact was relatively harmless. Also, there is no violation of Standard 11(A) Material Nonpublic Information because there was no inside information discussed. (Study Session 1, LOS 2.a)



John Green, CFA, is a sell-side technology analyst at Federal Securities, a large global investment banking and advisory firm. In many of his recent conversations with executives at the firms he researches, Green has heard disturbing news. Most of these firms are lowering sales estimates for the coming year. However, the stock prices have been stable despite management's widely disseminated sales warnings. Green is preparing his quarterly industry analysis and decides to seek further input. He calls Alan Volk, CFA, a close friend who runs the Initial Public Offering section of the investment banking department of Federal Securities.

Volk tells Green he has seen no slowing of demand for technology IPOs. "We've got three new issues due out next week, and two of them are well oversubscribed." Green knows that Volk's department handled over 200 IPOs last year, so he is confident that Volk's opinion is reliable. Green prepares his industry report, which is favorable. Among other conclusions, the report states that "the future is still bright, based on the fact that 67% of technology IPOs are oversubscribed." Privately, Green recommends to Federal portfolio managers that they begin selling all existing technology issues, which have "stagnated," and buy the IPOs in their place.

After carefully evaluating Federal's largest institutional client's portfolio, Green contacts the client and recommends selling all of his existing technology stocks and buying two of the upcoming IPOs, similar to the recommendation given to Federal's portfolio managers. Green's research has allowed him to conclude that only these two IPOs would be appropriate for this particular client's portfolio. Investing in these IPOs and selling the current technology holdings would, according to Green, "double the returns that your portfolio experienced last year."

Federal Securities has recently hired Dirks Bentley, a CFA candidate who has passed Level 2 and is currently preparing to take the Level 3 CFA® exam, to reorganize Federal's compliance department. Bentley tells Green that he may be subject to CFA Institute sanctions due to inappropriate contact between analysts and investment bankers within Federal Securities. Bentley has recommended that Green implement a firewall to rectify the situation and has outlined the key characteristics for such a system. Bentley's suggestions are as follows:
1. Any communication between the departments of Federal Securities must be channeled through the compliance department for review and eventual delivery. The firm must create and maintain watch, restricted, and rumor lists to be used in the review of employee trading.
2. All beneficial ownership, whether direct or indirect, of recommended securities must be disclosed in writing.
3. The firm must increase the level of review or restriction of proprietary trading activities during periods in which the firm has knowledge of information that is both material and nonpublic.
Bentley has identified two of Green's analysts, neither of whom have non-compete contracts, who are preparing to leave Federal Securities and go into competition. The first employee, James Ybarra, CFA, has agreed to take a position with one of Federal's direct competitors. Ybarra has contacted existing Federal clients using a client list he created with public records. None of the contacted clients have agreed to move their accounts as Ybarra has requested. The second employee, Martha Cliff, CFA, has registered the name Cliff Investment Consulting (CIC), which she plans to use for her independent consulting business. For the new business venture, Cliff has developed and professionally printed marketing literature that compares the new firm's services to that of Federal Securities and highlights the significant cost savings that will be realized by switching to CIC. After she leaves Federal, Cliff plans to target many of the same prospects that Federal Securities is targeting, using an address list she purchased from a third-party vendor. Bentley decides to call a meeting with Green to discuss his findings.

After discussing the departing analysts. Green asks Bentley how to best handle the disclosure of the following items: (1) although not currently a board member. Green has served in the past on the board of directors of a company he researches and expects that he will do so again in the near future; and (2) Green recently inherited put options on a company for which he has an outstanding buy recommendation. Bentley is contemplating his response to Green.

According to CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct, which of the following statements regarding Green's recommendation to Federal Securities' clients is TRUE?

  1. Green violated the Standards by making a material misrepresentation in his report to Federal Securities' clients.
  2. Green violated the Standards by failing to preserve the confidentiality of Federal Securities' investment banking clients.
  3. Green did not violate the Standards since he made a suitable recommendation in the best interest of Federal Securities' clients.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Green has taken a small number of oversubscribed IPOs to represent the entire market for technology IPOs. This is clearly a misrepresentation of the true market situation. Thus, Green has violated Standard 1(C) Misrepresentations which prohibits such misstatements of fact. Also, IPOs may not be suitable for all accounts, but Green has recommended that all of Federal Securities' portfolio managers add the IPO shares to their portfolios. Green did not violate the confidentiality of the investment banking clients since he was unaware of, and did not disclose, any details of the upcoming IPOs, Also, Green was not in possession of any material nonpublic information. (Study Session I, LOS2.a)



John Green, CFA, is a sell-side technology analyst at Federal Securities, a large global investment banking and advisory firm. In many of his recent conversations with executives at the firms he researches, Green has heard disturbing news. Most of these firms are lowering sales estimates for the coming year. However, the stock prices have been stable despite management's widely disseminated sales warnings. Green is preparing his quarterly industry analysis and decides to seek further input. He calls Alan Volk, CFA, a close friend who runs the Initial Public Offering section of the investment banking department of Federal Securities.
Volk tells Green he has seen no slowing of demand for technology IPOs. "We've got three new issues due out next week, and two of them are well oversubscribed." Green knows that Volk's department handled over 200 IPOs last year, so he is confident that Volk's opinion is reliable. Green prepares his industry report, which is favorable. Among other conclusions, the report states that "the future is still bright, based on the fact that 67% of technology IPOs are oversubscribed." Privately, Green recommends to Federal portfolio managers that they begin selling all existing technology issues, which have "stagnated," and buy the IPOs in their place.

After carefully evaluating Federal's largest institutional client's portfolio, Green contacts the client and recommends selling all of his existing technology stocks and buying two of the upcoming IPOs, similar to the recommendation given to Federal's portfolio managers. Green's research has allowed him to conclude that only these two IPOs would be appropriate for this particular client's portfolio. Investing in these IPOs and selling the current technology holdings would, according to Green, "double the returns that your portfolio experienced last year."

Federal Securities has recently hired Dirks Bentley, a CFA candidate who has passed Level 2 and is currently preparing to take the Level 3 CFA® exam, to reorganize Federal's compliance department. Bentley tells Green that he may be subject to CFA Institute sanctions due to inappropriate contact between analysts and investment bankers within Federal Securities. Bentley has recommended that Green implement a firewall to rectify the situation and has outlined the key characteristics for such a system. Bentley's suggestions are as follows:
1. Any communication between the departments of Federal Securities must be channeled through the compliance department for review and eventual delivery. The firm must create and maintain watch, restricted, and rumor lists to be used in the review of employee trading.
2. All beneficial ownership, whether direct or indirect, of recommended securities must be disclosed in writing.
3. The firm must increase the level of review or restriction of proprietary trading activities during periods in which the firm has knowledge of information that is both material and nonpublic.
Bentley has identified two of Green's analysts, neither of whom have non-compete contracts, who are preparing to leave Federal Securities and go into competition. The first employee, James Ybarra, CFA, has agreed to take a position with one of Federal's direct competitors. Ybarra has contacted existing Federal clients using a client list he created with public records. None of the contacted clients have agreed to move their accounts as Ybarra has requested. The second employee, Martha Cliff, CFA, has registered the name Cliff Investment Consulting (CIC), which she plans to use for her independent consulting business. For the new business venture, Cliff has developed and professionally printed marketing literature that compares the new firm's services to that of Federal Securities and highlights the significant cost savings that will be realized by switching to CIC. After she leaves Federal, Cliff plans to target many of the same prospects that Federal Securities is targeting, using an address list she purchased from a third-party vendor. Bentley decides to call a meeting with Green to discuss his findings.

After discussing the departing analysts. Green asks Bentley how to best handle the disclosure of the following items: (1) although not currently a board member. Green has served in the past on the board of directors of a company he researches and expects that he will do so again in the near future; and (2) Green recently inherited put options on a company for which he has an outstanding buy recommendation. Bentley is contemplating his response to Green.

According to CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct, which of the following statements related to Green's investment recommendation to the large institutional client is TRUE?

  1. Green has misrepresented the expected performance of the IPOs, but has dealt fairly with clients.
  2. Green has misrepresented the expected performance of the IPOs and has not dealt fairly with clients.
  3. Green has not misrepresented the expected performance of the IPOs, but he has not dealt fairly with clients.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

By telling the institutional client that the IPO shares will double the performance that he experienced last year, Green has essentially guaranteed the performance of the IPO shares in violation of Standard 1(C) Misrepresentation. Green has also given the client a recommendation in advance of all other institutional and, presumably, many individual clients. This is a violation of Standard 111(B) Fair Dealing. (Study Session 1, LOS 2.a)



John Green, CFA, is a sell-side technology analyst at Federal Securities, a large global investment banking and advisory firm. In many of his recent conversations with executives at the firms he researches, Green has heard disturbing news. Most of these firms are lowering sales estimates for the coming year. However, the stock prices have been stable despite management's widely disseminated sales warnings. Green is preparing his quarterly industry analysis and decides to seek further input. He calls Alan Volk, CFA, a close friend who runs the Initial Public Offering section of the investment banking department of Federal Securities.

Volk tells Green he has seen no slowing of demand for technology IPOs. "We've got three new issues due out next week, and two of them are well oversubscribed." Green knows that Volk's department handled over 200 IPOs last year, so he is confident that Volk's opinion is reliable. Green prepares his industry report, which is favorable. Among other conclusions, the report states that "the future is still bright, based on the fact that 67% of technology IPOs are oversubscribed." Privately, Green recommends to Federal portfolio managers that they begin selling all existing technology issues, which have "stagnated," and buy the IPOs in their place.

After carefully evaluating Federal's largest institutional client's portfolio, Green contacts the client and recommends selling all of his existing technology stocks and buying two of the upcoming IPOs, similar to the recommendation given to Federal's portfolio managers. Green's research has allowed him to conclude that only these two IPOs would be appropriate for this particular client's portfolio. Investing in these IPOs and selling the current technology holdings would, according to Green, "double the returns that your portfolio experienced last year."
Federal Securities has recently hired Dirks Bentley, a CFA candidate who has passed Level 2 and is currently preparing to take the Level 3 CFA® exam, to reorganize Federal's compliance department. Bentley tells Green that he may be subject to CFA Institute sanctions due to inappropriate contact between analysts and investment bankers within Federal Securities. Bentley has recommended that Green implement a firewall to rectify the situation and has outlined the key characteristics for such a system. Bentley's suggestions are as follows:

1. Any communication between the departments of Federal Securities must be channeled through the compliance department for review and eventual delivery. The firm must create and maintain watch, restricted, and rumor lists to be used in the review of employee trading.
2. All beneficial ownership, whether direct or indirect, of recommended securities must be disclosed in writing.
3. The firm must increase the level of review or restriction of proprietary trading activities during periods in which the firm has knowledge of information that is both material and nonpublic.
Bentley has identified two of Green's analysts, neither of whom have non-compete contracts, who are preparing to leave Federal Securities and go into competition. The first employee, James Ybarra, CFA, has agreed to take a position with one of Federal's direct competitors. Ybarra has contacted existing Federal clients using a client list he created with public records. None of the contacted clients have agreed to move their accounts as Ybarra has requested. The second employee, Martha Cliff, CFA, has registered the name Cliff Investment Consulting (CIC), which she plans to use for her independent consulting business. For the new business venture, Cliff has developed and professionally printed marketing literature that compares the new firm's services to that of Federal Securities and highlights the significant cost savings that will be realized by switching to CIC. After she leaves Federal, Cliff plans to target many of the same prospects that Federal Securities is targeting, using an address list she purchased from a third-party vendor. Bentley decides to call a meeting with Green to discuss his findings.
After discussing the departing analysts. Green asks Bentley how to best handle the disclosure of the following items: (1) although not currently a board member. Green has served in the past on the board of directors of a company he researches and expects that he will do so again in the near future; and (2) Green recently inherited put options on a company for which he has an outstanding buy recommendation. Bentley is contemplating his response to Green.

Which of BentJey's recommendations regarding the key characteristics of a firewall are inconsistent with those recommended by CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?

  1. Characteristic 1.
  2. Characteristic 2.
  3. Characteristic 3.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

While disclosures such as the one detailed in Characteristic 2 are required by CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct, this disclosure has nothing to do with restricting information How between different departments and is not one of the minimum requirements of a firewall as laid out by Standard 11(A) Material Nonpublic Information. The minimum elements include control of interdepartmental communication through a clearance area such as the compliance or legal department; use of restricted, watch, and rumor lists to review employee trades; documentation of procedures that restrict information sharing between departments and of enforcement of such procedures; and heightened review of proprietary trading during periods in which the firm has knowledge of material nonpublic information. (Study Session 1, LOS 2.a)



Page 13 of 91



Post your Comments and Discuss CFA® CFA-Level-III exam with other Community members:

Jonhsh commented on November 07, 2024
It's ok to do this quizz
Anonymous
upvote

Joan commented on November 07, 2024
Keep Trying
Anonymous
upvote

ProDumpper commented on November 07, 2024
The questions looks promising and well formatted. But has anyone passed this exam recently? I have heard the exam is very very hard.
Anonymous
upvote

Vin commented on November 07, 2024
Good content
Anonymous
upvote

Mii commented on November 07, 2024
great resource, for the exams Ireland
Anonymous
upvote

Jay Gomes commented on November 07, 2024
Very nice and very good questions
Anonymous
upvote

Jay Gomes commented on November 07, 2024
Nice v nice questions
Anonymous
upvote

Aswin commented on November 07, 2024
Good practice test
INDIA
upvote

Elias commented on November 07, 2024
Really this material supports alot
Anonymous
upvote

DN commented on November 06, 2024
Very helpful
UNITED STATES
upvote

Christine commented on November 06, 2024
Good for practice
Anonymous
upvote

Mike commented on November 06, 2024
Very good website
Anonymous
upvote

Elias commented on November 06, 2024
The revision materials are 100% helpfull.
Anonymous
upvote

Lula commented on November 06, 2024
One of the top exam dumps sites I have ever used. Very clean and decent pricing for the full version.
Singapore
upvote

Paula commented on November 06, 2024
Useful question dumps. I will leave it to that.
Anonymous
upvote

Prabhat Kumar commented on November 06, 2024
Google Google Associate Cloud Engineer
EUROPEAN UNION
upvote

Connor commented on November 06, 2024
This is wild. I did not know these study guides were available online.
UNITED KINGDOM
upvote

Mike commented on November 05, 2024
can anyone explain to me for question 77?
MALAYSIA
upvote

Non-sus user commented on November 05, 2024
good luck y'all
MALAYSIA
upvote

Jondré commented on November 05, 2024
I am writing soon hope this will help me pass first time.
Anonymous
upvote

Farid commented on November 05, 2024
This exam is hard but not as bad as others have stated here. With these question you can pass on first try.
Canada
upvote

Mohammed commented on November 05, 2024
I got a 87.4% in my exam with these questions. Just keep in mind that the full version they sell in PDF format has way way more questions that covers most of the topics in this exam.
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
upvote

Giordano commented on November 05, 2024
Sono uguali all'esame?
Anonymous
upvote

Luntz commented on November 05, 2024
If you want to just prepare for your exam and then clear it then this is a good source. But not for deep learning.
GERMANY
upvote

Gutsy commented on November 05, 2024
Pretty clear and close to content of real exam.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Nansi commented on November 05, 2024
hope for the best
Anonymous
upvote

Amelio commented on November 04, 2024
Big win for me this week. I passed my exam and now getting ready for my second exam.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Jeeva commented on November 04, 2024
Still preparing to attend
Anonymous
upvote

Nikki Cruz commented on November 04, 2024
This was a life saver for me. I knew the material but these questions really helped me . Passed on my first attempt !
Anonymous
upvote

Emmanuel commented on November 04, 2024
Can a person pass AZ900 just by using this site only ?
SOUTH AFRICA
upvote

Tech Savvy commented on November 04, 2024
Great work team!, would be good if you list 10 questions at each page,
Anonymous
upvote

Jay commented on November 04, 2024
I tried to clear this exam for 3 times but failed. So I finally resorted to using these exam dumps which I really did not want to. But I was left with no choice.
New Zealand
upvote

Fernando commented on November 04, 2024
Very cool and very helpful. Bought 2 exams with 50% discount.
Brazil
upvote

Jai commented on November 03, 2024
I liked the questions
Anonymous
upvote