Free CFA-Level-III Exam Braindumps (page: 17)

Page 17 of 91

Cindy Hatcher, CFA, has spent the last ten years as a portfolio manager with Bernhardt Capital. While working for Bernhardt, Hatcher was responsible for maintaining and improving the company's code of ethics and guidelines for ethical money management. As a result of Hatcher's efforts, Bernhardt saw a dramatic decline in the number of complaints received from their individual and institutional customers.
One of Bernhardt's direct competitors, Smith Investments, is keenly aware of Hatcher's reputation for ethical business practices and has offered her a job as their compliance officer. Hatcher has been apprised of several potential ethical problems at Smith that she will be directly responsible for fixing through implementation of policies and procedures that will prevent ethical dilemmas. The management at Smith is willing to grant Hatcher the authority to construct and implement policies to eliminate the ethical problems at the company.

Hatcher agrees to accept the position with Smith and resigns from employment with Bernhardt. As her first initiative with the company, Hatcher distributes to all employees at Smith a survey intended to acquaint her with the company's common business practices. Her goal is to identify those factors that are most likely to interfere with Smith's compliance with the CFA Institute's Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice. After collecting and analyzing the anonymous responses to the survey, Hatcher has identified the following four issues as the most frequently cited questionable business practices:
1. Many Smith employees have relatives who are clients of the firm. For relatives* accounts where the Smith employee does not have beneficial ownership, trades are generally executed in conjunction with trades for other discretionary accounts held at the firm. Only in accounts where the Smith employee has beneficial ownership are trades delayed until all discretionary account trading is completed.
2. Many of Smith's employees either personally own or maintain, through a family member, beneficial ownership of stocks that are also held in accounts for many of the firm's clients. While the company maintains a strict disclosure policy to the firm of such beneficial ownership and an "at will" disclosure policy to its clients, employees are not barred from trading these securities for their personal benefit even if their clients also own or have a direct or indirect financial interest in the same securities.
3. Account managers meet weekly to discuss the issues and concerns of the client portfolios managed at the firm. During the meetings it is not unusual for individual clients to be identified and discussed. Information regarding the client's holdings and investment strategy is discussed as well as persona! needs related to the client's portfolio. The meetings are held in order to provide guidance and continuing education to all of the firm's account managers.
4. At the suggestion of fixed-income analysts at the firm, most of the portfolio managers working for Smith have been adding B-rated corporate fixed-income securities to their portfolios. Analysts originally made (and continue to make) the suggestion due to the attractive yield potential offered by this class of investments. Smith's portfolio managers were thrilled with the idea since the returns on many of the portfolios' equity positions have been stifled by high profile accounting scandals.
Management at Smith Investments has been pleased with Hatcher's efforts so far but is concerned about the firm's ability to maintain compliance with the CFA Institute's Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®). The managing director of the firm, Erich Prince, has made the following comments to Hatcher:
"I am concerned that we will not be able to claim compliance with GIPS at the end of the year since our new information system has inhibited our ability to include terminated portfolios in the historical record up to the last full measurement period before they were terminated. Also, we are unable to regroup portfolios that utilize hedging into separate composites from those that do not utilize hedging. These portfolios are currently grouped according to traditional value and growth strategies based on the capitalization of portfolio holdings (i.e., large vs. small)."
Hatcher eases Prince's mind by telling him she will "ensure full compliance with GIPS by the end of the quarter."

Evaluate Martin Prince's comments about Smith's ability to maintain compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). Are Prince's statements regarding terminated portfolios and hedging strategies correct or incorrect?

  1. Only Prince's statement on terminated portfolios is correct.
  2. Only Prince's statement regarding hedging strategies is correct.
  3. Both of Prince's statements are correct and in full compliance with GIPS.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

GIPS Standard 3.A.4 requires terminated portfolios to be included in the appropriate composite up until the last full measurement period before the portfolio was terminated. The fact that Smith's new information system will inhibit the ability to account for terminated portfolios means they will be unable to fully comply with GIPS. Remember, there is no partial compliance. A firm either does or does not comply with GIPS. Separating portfolios into composites that utilize and do not utilize hedging is a recommendation of GIPS and not a requirement. Therefore a firm can fail to separate portfolios on the basis of hedging strategies and still maintain compliance with GIPS. GIPS requires separating portfolios into composites based on investment strategy, which Smith has done (i.e., value vs. growth and large cap vs. small cap). (Study Session 1, LOS2.a)



Harold Chang, CFA, has been the lead portfolio manager for the Woodlock Management Group (WMG) for the last five years. WMG runs several equity and fixed income portfolios, all of which are authorized to use derivatives as long as such positions are consistent with the portfolio's strategy. The WMG Equity Opportunities Fund takes advantage of long and short profit opportunities in equity securities. The fund's positions are often a relatively large percentage of the issuer's outstanding shares and fund trades frequently move securities prices. Chang runs the Equity Opportunities Fund and is concerned that his performance for the last three quarters has put his position as lead manager in jeopardy. Over the last three quarters, Chang has been underperforming his benchmark by an increasing margin and is determined to reduce the degree of underperformance before the end of the next quarter. Accordingly, Chang makes the following transactions for the fund:
Transaction 1: Chang discovers that the implied volatility of call options on GreenCo is too high. As a result, Chang shorts a large position in the stock options while simultaneously taking a long position in GreenCo stock, using the funds from the short position to partially pay for the long stock. The GreenCo purchase caused the share price to move up slightly. After several months, the GreenCo stock position has accumulated a large unrealized gain. Chang sells a portion of the GreenCo position to rebalance the portfolio.
Richard Stirr, CFA, who is also a portfolio manager for WMG, runs the firm's Fixed Income Fund. Stirr is known for his ability to generate excess returns above his benchmark, even in declining markets. Stirr is convinced that even though he has only been with WMG for two and a half years, he will be named lead portfolio manager if he can keep his performance figures strong through the next quarter. To achieve this positive performance, Stirr enters into the following transactions for the fund:
Transaction 2: Stirr decides to take a short forward position on the senior bonds of ONB Corporation, which Stirr currently owns in his Fixed Income Fund. Stirr made his decision after overhearing two of his firm's investment bankers discussing an unannounced bond offering for ONB that will subordinate all of its outstanding debt. As expected, the price of the ONB bonds falls when the upcoming offering is announced. Stirr delivers the bonds to settle the forward contract, preventing large losses for his investors.
Transaction 3: Sitrr has noticed that in a foreign bond market, participants are slow to react to new information relevant to the value of their country's sovereign debt securities. Stirr, along with other investors, knows that an announcement from his firm regarding the sovereign bonds will be made the following day. Stirr doesn't know for sure, but expects the news to be positive, and prepares to enter a purchase order. When the positive news is released, Stirr is the first to act, making a large purchase before other investors and selling the position after other market participants react and move the sovereign bond price higher.
Because of their experience with derivatives instruments, Chang and Stirr are asked to provide investment advice for Cherry Creek, LLC, a commodities trading advisor. Cherry Creek uses managed futures strategies that incorporate long and short positions in commodity futures to generate returns uncorrelated with securities markets. The firm has asked Chang and Stirr to help extend their reach to include equity and fixed income derivatives strategies. Chang has been investing with Cherry Creek since its inception and has accepted increased shares in his Cherry Creek account as compensation for his advice. Chang has not disclosed his arrangement with Cherry Creek since he meets with the firm only during his personal time. Stirr declines any formal compensation but instead requests that Cherry Creek refer their clients requesting traditional investment services to WMG. Cherry Creek agrees to the arrangement.
Three months have passed since the transactions made by Chang and Stirr occurred. Both managers met their performance goals and are preparing to present their results to clients via an electronic newsletter published every quarter. The managers want to ensure their newsletters are in compliance with CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct. Chang states, "in order to comply with the Standards, we are required to disclose the process used to analyze and select portfolio holdings, the method used to construct our portfolios, and any changes that have been made to the overall investment process. In addition, we must include in the newsletter all factors used to make each portfolio decision over the last quarter and an assessment of the portfolio's risks." Stirr responds by claiming, "we must also clearly indicate that projections included in our report are not factual evidence but rather conjecture based on our own statistical analysis. However, I believe we can reduce the amount of information included in the report from what you have suggested and instead issue more of a summary report as long as we maintain a full report in our internal records."

Determine whether Chang has violated any CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct with respect to Transaction 1.

  1. This is a violation of CFA Institute Standards due to use of the funds from the short position being used to partially pay for the long position.
  2. This is a violation of CFA Institute Standards since the immediate upward movement in GreenCo stock price was a result of the transaction artificially manipulating the market.
  3. No violation of CFA Institute Standards has occurred.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Standard II(B) Market Manipulation. Transaction 1 is simply an attempt to exploit a market mispricing through a legitimate arbitrage strategy. Transaction 1 does not violate Standard II(B). (Study Session 1, LOS 2.a)



Harold Chang, CFA, has been the lead portfolio manager for the Woodlock Management Group (WMG) for the last five years. WMG runs several equity and fixed income portfolios, all of which are authorized to use derivatives as long as such positions are consistent with the portfolio's strategy. The WMG Equity Opportunities Fund takes advantage of long and short profit opportunities in equity securities. The fund's positions are often a relatively large percentage of the issuer's outstanding shares and fund trades frequently move securities prices. Chang runs the Equity Opportunities Fund and is concerned that his performance for the last three quarters has put his position as lead manager in jeopardy. Over the last three quarters, Chang has been underperforming his benchmark by an increasing margin and is determined to reduce the degree of underperformance before the end of the next quarter. Accordingly, Chang makes the following transactions for the fund:
Transaction 1: Chang discovers that the implied volatility of call options on GreenCo is too high. As a result, Chang shorts a large position in the stock options while simultaneously taking a long position in GreenCo stock, using the funds from the short position to partially pay for the long stock. The GreenCo purchase caused the share price to move up slightly. After several months, the GreenCo stock position has accumulated a large unrealized gain. Chang sells a portion of the GreenCo position to rebalance the portfolio.
Richard Stirr, CFA, who is also a portfolio manager for WMG, runs the firm's Fixed Income Fund. Stirr is known for his ability to generate excess returns above his benchmark, even in declining markets. Stirr is convinced that even though he has only been with WMG for two and a half years, he will be named lead portfolio manager if he can keep his performance figures strong through the next quarter. To achieve this positive performance, Stirr enters into the following transactions for the fund:
Transaction 2: Stirr decides to take a short forward position on the senior bonds of ONB Corporation, which Stirr currently owns in his Fixed Income Fund. Stirr made his decision after overhearing two of his firm's investment bankers discussing an unannounced bond offering for ONB that will subordinate all of its outstanding debt. As expected, the price of the ONB bonds falls when the upcoming offering is announced. Stirr delivers the bonds to settle the forward contract, preventing large losses for his investors.

Transaction 3: Sitrr has noticed that in a foreign bond market, participants are slow to react to new information relevant to the value of their country's sovereign debt securities. Stirr, along with other investors, knows that an announcement from his firm regarding the sovereign bonds will be made the following day. Stirr doesn't know for sure, but expects the news to be positive, and prepares to enter a purchase order. When the positive news is released, Stirr is the first to act, making a large purchase before other investors and selling the position after other market participants react and move the sovereign bond price higher.
Because of their experience with derivatives instruments, Chang and Stirr are asked to provide investment advice for Cherry Creek, LLC, a commodities trading advisor. Cherry Creek uses managed futures strategies that incorporate long and short positions in commodity futures to generate returns uncorrelated with securities markets. The firm has asked Chang and Stirr to help extend their reach to include equity and fixed income derivatives strategies. Chang has been investing with Cherry Creek since its inception and has accepted increased shares in his Cherry Creek account as compensation for his advice. Chang has not disclosed his arrangement with Cherry Creek since he meets with the firm only during his personal time. Stirr declines any formal compensation but instead requests that Cherry Creek refer their clients requesting traditional investment services to WMG. Cherry Creek agrees to the arrangement.
Three months have passed since the transactions made by Chang and Stirr occurred. Both managers met their performance goals and are preparing to present their results to clients via an electronic newsletter published every quarter. The managers want to ensure their newsletters are in compliance with CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct. Chang states, "in order to comply with the Standards, we are required to disclose the process used to analyze and select portfolio holdings, the method used to construct our portfolios, and any changes that have been made to the overall investment process. In addition, we must include in the newsletter all factors used to make each portfolio decision over the last quarter and an assessment of the portfolio's risks." Stirr responds by claiming, "we must also clearly indicate that projections included in our report are not factual evidence but rather conjecture based on our own statistical analysis. However, I believe we can reduce the amount of information included in the report from what you have suggested and instead issue more of a summary report as long as we maintain a full report in our internal records."

Determine whether Stirr has violated any CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct with respect to Transaction 2 and Transaction 3.

  1. Both Transactions 2 and 3 violate CFA Institute Standards.
  2. Neither transaction is a violation of CFA Institute Standards.
  3. Transaction 2 is a violation of CFA Institute, while Transaction 3 is not.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Standard 11(A) Material Nonpublic Information. Stirr violated Standard 11(A) by using material nonpublic information in his decision to take a short forward position on the ONB Corporation bonds (Transaction 2). Stirr would have known about any publicly announced plans by ONB to offer more debt since the company's bonds were already a holding in the Fixed Income Fund at the time of the forward transaction. Stirr obviously knew that the unannounced bond offering by ONB would affect the price of the firm's existing bonds since he acted on the information shortly after overhearing the conversation between the investment bankers. Standard 11(A) prohibits such trades. It does not matter that the trade utilized a derivative security rather than the actual underlying security or that the trade prevented losses for his investors. Stirr should have waited for the information to become public before making any trades on ONB securities. Transaction 3 is not in violation of the Standards. Transaction 3 reflects a trading advantage that Stirr has discovered. He is not using material nonpublic information to complete the trade. Rather, he is simply processing news and information faster than other market participants to make profitable trades. Transaction 3 also is not intended to manipulate marker prices or information and is Therefore a legitimate trade. (Study Session 1, LOS 2.a)



Harold Chang, CFA, has been the lead portfolio manager for the Woodlock Management Group (WMG) for the last five years. WMG runs several equity and fixed income portfolios, all of which are authorized to use derivatives as long as such positions are consistent with the portfolio's strategy. The WMG Equity Opportunities Fund takes advantage of long and short profit opportunities in equity securities. The fund's positions are often a relatively large percentage of the issuer's outstanding shares and fund trades frequently move securities prices. Chang runs the Equity Opportunities Fund and is concerned that his performance for the last three quarters has put his position as lead manager in jeopardy. Over the last three quarters, Chang has been underperforming his benchmark by an increasing margin and is determined to reduce the degree of underperformance before the end of the next quarter. Accordingly, Chang makes the following transactions for the fund:
Transaction 1: Chang discovers that the implied volatility of call options on GreenCo is too high. As a result, Chang shorts a large position in the stock options while simultaneously taking a long position in GreenCo stock, using the funds from the short position to partially pay for the long stock. The GreenCo purchase caused the share price to move up slightly. After several months, the GreenCo stock position has accumulated a large unrealized gain. Chang sells a portion of the GreenCo position to rebalance the portfolio.
Richard Stirr, CFA, who is also a portfolio manager for WMG, runs the firm's Fixed Income Fund. Stirr is known for his ability to generate excess returns above his benchmark, even in declining markets. Stirr is convinced that even though he has only been with WMG for two and a half years, he will be named lead portfolio manager if he can keep his performance figures strong through the next quarter. To achieve this positive performance, Stirr enters into the following transactions for the fund:
Transaction 2: Stirr decides to take a short forward position on the senior bonds of ONB Corporation, which Stirr currently owns in his Fixed Income Fund. Stirr made his decision after overhearing two of his firm's investment bankers discussing an unannounced bond offering for ONB that will subordinate all of its outstanding debt. As expected, the price of the ONB bonds falls when the upcoming offering is announced. Stirr delivers the bonds to settle the forward contract, preventing large losses for his investors.
Transaction 3: Sitrr has noticed that in a foreign bond market, participants are slow to react to new information relevant to the value of their country's sovereign debt securities. Stirr, along with other investors, knows that an announcement from his firm regarding the sovereign bonds will be made the following day. Stirr doesn't know for sure, but expects the news to be positive, and prepares to enter a purchase order. When the positive news is released, Stirr is the first to act, making a large purchase before other investors and selling the position after other market participants react and move the sovereign bond price higher.
Because of their experience with derivatives instruments, Chang and Stirr are asked to provide investment advice for Cherry Creek, LLC, a commodities trading advisor. Cherry Creek uses managed futures strategies that incorporate long and short positions in commodity futures to generate returns uncorrelated with securities markets. The firm has asked Chang and Stirr to help extend their reach to include equity and fixed income derivatives strategies. Chang has been investing with Cherry Creek since its inception and has accepted increased shares in his Cherry Creek account as compensation for his advice. Chang has not disclosed his arrangement with Cherry Creek since he meets with the firm only during his personal time. Stirr declines any formal compensation but instead requests that Cherry Creek refer their clients requesting traditional investment services to WMG. Cherry Creek agrees to the arrangement.
Three months have passed since the transactions made by Chang and Stirr occurred. Both managers met their performance goals and are preparing to present their results to clients via an electronic newsletter published every quarter. The managers want to ensure their newsletters are in compliance with CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct. Chang states, "in order to comply with the Standards, we are required to disclose the process used to analyze and select portfolio holdings, the method used to construct our portfolios, and any changes that have been made to the overall investment process. In addition, we must include in the newsletter all factors used to make each portfolio decision over the last quarter and an assessment of the portfolio's risks." Stirr responds by claiming, "we must also clearly indicate that projections included in our report are not factual evidence but rather conjecture based on our own statistical analysis. However, I believe we can reduce the amount of information included in the report from what you have suggested and instead issue more of a summary report as long as we maintain a full report in our internal records."
According to CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct, which of the following statements regarding Chang's arrangement with Cherry Creek, LLC is most accurate*! Chang's arrangement:

  1. does not violate any Standards.
  2. violates the Standards because he has not obtained written consent from WMG to enter into the agreement.
  3. violates the Standards because he has misrepresented his ability to provide professional advice to Cherry Creek.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Standard IV(B) Additional Compensation Arrangements. According to the Standard, Chang must obtain written consent from all parties involved before agreeing to accept additional compensation that could be reasonably expected to create a conflict of interest with his employer. Chang's arrangement with Cherry Creek involves providing investment advice in exchange for additional shares to be added to his account with Cherry Creek.
Such compensation could affect Chang’s loyalty to WMG or affect his independence and objectivity. Therefore, Chang must obtain written consent from WMG before accepting the arrangement with Cherry Creek. (Study Session 1, LOS 2.a)



Page 17 of 91



Post your Comments and Discuss CFA® CFA-Level-III exam with other Community members:

Vic commented on December 08, 2024
Interesting answers
CANADA
upvote

Cristina commented on December 08, 2024
good questions
ROMANIA
upvote

kanhaiya kumar commented on December 08, 2024
awsome stuff
Anonymous
upvote

WILLIAM RIBEIRO RODRIGUES commented on December 08, 2024
Amazing place to learning and share knowleg.
BRAZIL
upvote

WILLIAM RIBEIRO RODRIGUES commented on December 08, 2024
Nice place to practice and learning.
BRAZIL
upvote

frans Bauwer commented on December 08, 2024
so far so good
BELGIUM
upvote

Karthick commented on December 08, 2024
@The Magic Beans Please update us after your exam.
SINGAPORE
upvote

HardHead commented on December 08, 2024
I searched for latest free braindumps in Google and I was brought to this site. I eventually bought the full version as the free version is not complete. It was too much money for me but with 50% sale I got 2 exams. Going to write my first exam this coming Monday. I am going to share my result once I write my exam. Stay Tuned!
INDIA
upvote

goku d soojaa commented on December 08, 2024
very important
INDIA
upvote

Johan commented on December 08, 2024
Would also appreciated comments, but this is already a big help
UNITED STATES
upvote

sANJAY commented on December 08, 2024
hARD QUESTIOS
Anonymous
upvote

Uday commented on December 08, 2024
Want to appear for snowpro core
Anonymous
upvote

M commented on December 07, 2024
96 : Answer is D
Anonymous
upvote

marco commented on December 07, 2024
i cant imagine
Anonymous
upvote

Felicia Simley commented on December 07, 2024
i cant download the premium version.. what to do please?
Anonymous
upvote

Felicia Simley commented on December 07, 2024
great questions on this one
Anonymous
upvote

The Magic Beans commented on December 07, 2024
Passed the exam - these questions are similar to the ones in the exam (some of these questions are very similar to the ones in the exam but there were questions in the exam way complicated than this). One of the labs (question 77) in these questions came up in my exam. The questions in the exam are tricky make sure you understand each concept in the exam objectives.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Asma commented on December 07, 2024
It would be better to have an explanation while revealing the solution
Anonymous
upvote

sly commented on December 07, 2024
@ The Magic Beans what was your exam outcome>
Anonymous
upvote

Zjanri commented on December 07, 2024
This is a good training platform.
Anonymous
upvote

Felicia Simley commented on December 07, 2024
great questions
Anonymous
upvote

Rohan commented on December 07, 2024
Really appreciate thanks, I cleared my exam today
Anonymous
upvote

Manraj commented on December 07, 2024
helpful and similar to exam
Anonymous
upvote

The Magic Beans commented on December 06, 2024
Taking my exam tomorrow Dec 7 / 2024 I will let you know if this questions are similar
UNITED STATES
upvote

Runner009 commented on December 06, 2024
The best money I have ever spent! It literally has all the real exam questions.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Dahamram commented on December 06, 2024
This new version of the exam is pretty tricky. You can tell by going over these questions. I really had no chance of passing if I had not used this exam dump. Questions are pretty valid as of this week.
Anonymous
upvote

Ravendra commented on December 06, 2024
Purchased the full version of this exam dump in PDF with the 50% sale on Black Friday. Got 2 exam for the price of one. Today I sat for this exam and as soon as I saw the first questions I was about to jump out of my seat. The questions are word by word the same. Got 98% in my result. Very happy.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Anand commented on December 06, 2024
Nice questions
UNITED STATES
upvote

Ajit Kumar Vishwakarma commented on December 06, 2024
I want to attend PSE certification; please guide me
Anonymous
upvote

Sangeeta commented on December 06, 2024
Want to attempt pd1 exam
UNITED STATES
upvote

yemane commented on December 06, 2024
Good for exam preparation
Anonymous
upvote

Ramya commented on December 05, 2024
Preparing for snowflake certificate
Anonymous
upvote

Casandra commented on December 05, 2024
Do not book your exam if you don't know the topics and the questions. The test is super duper hard and almost impossible to pass without knowing the questions.
EUROPEAN UNION
upvote

Andi commented on December 05, 2024
Superb no queson
POLAND
upvote