support@Free-Braindumps.com
Register Login
Cisco
CompTIA
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
SAP
Google
NVIDIA
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
Splunk
ServiceNow
All Vendors
  1. Home
  2. Exams
  3. CFA
  4. ESG-Investing

CFA ESG-Investing Exam Actual Questions
Certificate in ESG Investing (Page 3 )

Updated On: 5-Jul-2026
Page 3 of 95
PDF with 618 Questions

Human rights violations are most likely to affect workers employed

  1. by first-tier suppliers to publicly traded companies
  2. by second-tier suppliers to publicly traded companies.
  3. deep within the supply chain of publicly traded companies.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Human rights violations are most likely to occur deep within the supply chain of publicly traded companies. Here's why:

First-tier Suppliers:

First-tier suppliers are those that directly supply products or services to a company. These suppliers are often under greater scrutiny from the company and external stakeholders, including auditors and regulatory bodies. Publicly traded companies typically enforce stricter compliance and monitoring mechanisms at this level.

Second-tier Suppliers:

Second-tier suppliers supply products or services to the first-tier suppliers.
While there is still some level of oversight, the scrutiny diminishes as the layers in the supply chain increase. Human rights violations can occur here, but they are less frequent compared to deeper levels in the supply chain.

Deep within the Supply Chain:

Suppliers deeper within the supply chain, such as third-tier and beyond, are the least visible and have the least amount of oversight. These suppliers often operate in regions with weaker regulatory frameworks and less stringent enforcement of labor laws. Consequently, they are more prone to human rights violations, including poor working conditions, forced labor, and child labor.

Companies may not have direct business relationships with these deeper-tier suppliers, making it challenging to enforce ethical practices and human rights standards.

CFA ESG Investing


Reference:

The CFA Institute's ESG curriculum highlights the importance of supply chain transparency and the risks associated with human rights violations at different levels of the supply chain. The curriculum emphasizes that deeper tiers within the supply chain are often where the most significant human rights risks are found, and it encourages investors to assess and address these risks in their ESG evaluations.



What is the underlying principle of the corporate governance code in most markets?

  1. If not, why not
  2. Apply or explain
  3. Comply or explain

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The underlying principle of the corporate governance code in most markets is "comply or explain." This principle mandates that companies either comply with the established governance guidelines or explain why they have not done so. This approach allows for flexibility while encouraging transparency and accountability in corporate governance.

Flexibility and Adaptability: The "comply or explain" approach provides companies with the flexibility to adapt the guidelines to their specific circumstances. If a company believes that a certain recommendation is not suitable for its situation, it can choose not to comply, provided it explains the reasons for this decision.

Transparency: By requiring companies to explain their non-compliance, this approach promotes transparency. Stakeholders, including investors, can assess the company's governance practices and make informed decisions based on the explanations provided.

Encouragement of Best Practices: This principle encourages companies to strive towards best practices in governance, while allowing for deviations when justified. It balances the need for high standards with the recognition that one size does not fit all.


Reference:

MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Discusses the principles of corporate governance codes and highlights the "comply or explain" approach as a common standard in various markets.

ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Provides insights into how corporate governance codes are designed to promote transparency and accountability through the "comply or explain" principle.



Which of the following is an example of a bottom-up ESG engagement approach? An asset manager:

  1. joining the PRI Collaboration Platform
  2. sending out a letter to the CFOs of all investee companies
  3. initiating dialogue with an investee company's investor relations team

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

A bottom-up ESG engagement approach involves direct interaction with specific investee companies to address ESG issues. Initiating dialogue with an investee company's investor relations team is an example of this approach.

Direct Communication: Engaging directly with the investor relations team allows asset managers to discuss specific ESG issues relevant to the company. This direct line of communication can lead to more detailed and company-specific insights.

Targeted Engagement: This method focuses on individual companies, enabling asset managers to address specific concerns and influence company practices more effectively. It allows for a deeper understanding of how ESG issues are managed at the company level.

Active Ownership: By engaging with companies, asset managers exercise active ownership, encouraging companies to adopt better ESG practices. This can lead to improved ESG performance and, ultimately, better long-term investment returns.


Reference:

MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Highlights the importance of direct engagement with companies as part of an effective ESG strategy.

ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Discusses various engagement approaches and emphasizes the value of direct dialogue with investee companies in improving ESG practices.



The concept of double-agency in society refers to the conflict of interest between

  1. corporate CEOs and shareholders
  2. money managers and asset owners.
  3. corporate CEOs and money managers

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

The concept of double-agency in society refers to the conflict of interest between money managers and asset owners. This concept arises when there are two levels of agency relationships, each with potential conflicts of interest.

Principal-Agent Relationship: In the first level, asset owners (principals) delegate the management of their assets to money managers (agents). The money managers are expected to act in the best interests of the asset owners, but their own interests might not always align with those of the asset owners.

Secondary Agency: The second level involves the relationship between the corporate CEOs (agents) and the company's shareholders (principals). Here, the CEOs are supposed to act in the best interests of the shareholders, but again, there might be conflicts of interest.

Double-Agency Conflict: The double-agency conflict occurs because the money managers, who are agents of the asset owners, also act as principals when dealing with corporate CEOs. This dual role can lead to conflicts where the money managers' decisions may benefit themselves or the CEOs rather than the asset owners.


Reference:

MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Explains the principal-agent relationships and how conflicts of interest can arise at multiple levels, leading to the double-agency problem.

ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Discusses the importance of aligning interests between asset owners, money managers, and corporate executives to mitigate the double-agency issue.



In France, shareholders eligible for being awarded double voting rights are

  1. founding shareholders during an IPO
  2. long-standing shareholders of at least two years.
  3. minority shareholders that are employee representatives

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

In France, shareholders eligible for being awarded double voting rights are long-standing shareholders of at least two years. This policy aims to encourage long-term investment and shareholder loyalty.

Loyalty Incentive: The double voting rights are granted to shareholders who have held their shares for at least two years. This incentivizes long-term holding and aligns shareholders' interests with the company's long-term success.

Strengthening Governance: By rewarding long-term shareholders with additional voting power, companies can strengthen their governance structures. Long-term shareholders are more likely to be interested in sustainable growth and responsible governance.

Legal Framework: This practice is embedded in the French legal framework under the Florange Act, which automatically grants double voting rights to shares held for at least two years unless the company's articles of association specify otherwise.


Reference:

MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Highlights the mechanisms in place in different jurisdictions to promote long-term investment through measures such as double voting rights.

ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Discusses the importance of shareholder engagement and long-term investment incentives in corporate governance.



  PDF
Viewing page 3 of 95
Viewing questions 11 - 15 out of 618 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss CFA ESG-Investing exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!