X Ltd has entered into a number of contracts with Y Ltd. In which of the following situations could the directors be held personally liable for the debts contracted with Y Ltd?(i) X Ltd has continued to trade at a time when insolvency appeared inevitable(ii) X Ltd has become insolvent and is unable to pay its debts to Y Ltd(iii) X Ltd has contracted for a purpose not specified in its articles of association
Answer(s): A
Which of the following is incorrect in relation to the criminal law?
Answer(s): D
Which of the following is correct?
In 2011 Exe Bank plc granted a loan of £200,000 to Wye Ltd secured by a fixed charge over the company's land and a floating charge over all the company's other assets. Wye Ltd remains solvent but has now failed to meet its monthly repayments for three months.Which of the following options are available to Exe Bank plc?(i) Sue Wye Ltd for breach of contract.(ii) Appoint an administrator(iii) Petition for the compulsory winding up of Wye Ltd.
Exe Ltd was under contract to deliver goods by road to London for Wye Ltd for £2,000. After part of the journey was completed the lorry broke down and Wye Ltd was forced to arrange for Zed Ltd to complete the delivery. Subject to the contract not providing for this situation, which of the following is correct?
Answer(s): B
Post your Comments and Discuss CIMA BA4 exam prep with other Community members:
Our website is free, but we have to fight against AI bots and content theft. We're sorry for the inconvenience caused by these security measures. You can access the rest of the BA4 content, but please register or login to continue.