Cisco®
CompTIA
Checkpoint
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL®
Juniper
PMI
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
Google
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
Splunk®
Scrum
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. CIPS
  5. L4M6

Free L4M6 Exam Braindumps (page: 7)

Page 6 of 46
PDF with 226 Questions

A local government procurement team is undertaking a full review of their current internal working processes. The team of buyers currently have a partnership-style relationship with their routine suppliers. Is this the best relationship style to use?

  1. No, as there are many suppliers available
  2. No, as these are critical items to the buying organization
  3. Yes, as they present a great deal of risk to the organization
  4. Yes, as these are low-value items

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Routine suppliers typically supply low-value, low-risk items. Maintaining partnerships in such cases is inefficient since alternative suppliers are readily available. Adopting a transactional or adversarial relationship would be more appropriate.



A software developer is seeking to develop a new fitness trends app. They are looking to create a contract with a fitness expert to give advice on the type of changing fitness trends.
What agreement should the app developer aim to achieve?

  1. Quality-based relationship
  2. Traditional contracting relationship
  3. Partnering relationship
  4. Cost-based relationship

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

A partnering relationship fosters collaboration and ensures the fitness expert is actively involved in developing insights, which is crucial for innovation and mutual success in a knowledge-sharing environment.



When overcoming stakeholder resistance in a procurement-led project, which of the following groups would have the highest level of influence on other stakeholders?

  1. 2 and 3 only
  2. 1 and 4 only
  3. 1 and 2 only
  4. 3 and 4 only

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Negative leaders and promoters hold the most influence. Negative leaders can sway opposition, while promoters can actively advocate for project success. Managing these stakeholders effectively is crucial in procurement projects.



A company is relocating its manufacturing base to a low-cost country and is considering a partnership with a local supplier for its key components rather than a tender process. Although there are some concerns regarding confidentiality and component competitiveness, the procurement director is recommending a partnership strategy to the board of directors. The recommendation is based on a range of advantages including, but not limited to, gaining local market knowledge. Is this a valid recommendation?

  1. No, because confidentiality risk will be higher in a partnership
  2. Yes, as intellectual property costs will be lower in a partnership
  3. No, local market knowledge is guaranteed in a tender process
  4. Yes, as investment costs can be shared in a partnership

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Partnerships provide access to local market knowledge, enable shared investments, and mitigate risks associated with relocation. These advantages outweigh concerns that can be managed through strong contracts and confidentiality agreements.






Post your Comments and Discuss CIPS L4M6 exam with other Community members:

Exam Discussions & Posts