CIPS L4M6 Exam Actual Questions
Supplier Relationships (Page 2 )

1. Ingestion Lambda receives requests from API Gateway and places messages in an SQS queue.
2. Processing Lambda is triggered by the queue and loads records into Aurora PostgreSQL.

• Decoupling: API request handling is separated from database loading.
• Buffering: SQS absorbs bursts when incoming traffic exceeds the database’s processing capacity.
• Controlled concurrency: Configure the SQS-triggered Lambda’s concurrency and batch size to avoid overwhelming Aurora or exhausting database connections.
• Automatic retries: Messages that fail processing can return to the queue and be retried. A dead-letter queue can capture persistent failures.
• Lower operational effort: The solution remains serverless and avoids managing EC2 servers or Kubernetes clusters.

• A: EC2 and Tomcat add server-management overhead.
• B: DynamoDB/DAX would require changing the database model and does not solve the Aurora ingestion design.
• C: SNS is useful for notifications and fanout, but SQS is better for durable buffering and backpressure in this producer-consumer workflow.

• The correct answer: C. Tokenization

• Why:

• Why the others are weaker:

• wyjasnic istniejace pytania z tej strony,
• wskazac, dlaczego dana odpowiedz jest poprawna lub bledna (z uwzglednieniem celów egzaminu),
• omówic koncepcje zwiazane z Google Cloud AI.

kusto 
Event | where EventType == "error"

• == is the KQL equality operator.
• -eq is a PowerShell operator, not KQL.
• is is not the correct equality operator in this context.

text 
Event | where EventType –eq "error"

• Event | search "error" — valid, broad search.
• search in (Event) "error" — valid, broad search.
• Event | where EventType == "error" — valid, targeted filter.

• In Azure, the typical cost approach for pay-as-you-go VMs is an Operational Expenditure (OPEX) model. You’re billed for actual usage each month.
• The term “elastic expenditure model” isn’t a standard Azure cost category. Elasticity describes scaling capacity, not the billing category itself.
• So recommending the elastic expenditure model is not correct for this goal.

• The solution does not meet the goal. Answer: No (B).

• Pay-as-you-go aligns with OPEX because costs vary with usage.
• Elasticity is about scaling resources, which affects performance and capacity, not the fundamental cost model.

• Answer: D

• The strongest security comes from enforcing access at the storage layer. An IAM policy scoped to the Cognito identity prefix restricts each user to their own S3 prefix (folder), so users can only access their own files regardless of client or server code.
• This per-user isolation reduces risk of cross-user data access and is more robust than UI validation or Lambda/API validation alone.
• Implementation note: attach a policy to the Cognito identity role that allows actions on arn:aws:s3:::your-bucket/${cognito-identity.amazonaws.com:sub}/* (per-user prefix). Ensure TLS in transit and enable at-rest encryption (SSE-S3 or SSE-KMS). Use multipart upload for large files up to 300 MB.

• The Accrue liability on product receipt flag controls whether a liability is accrued and posted at the time of receiving the item.
• If this checkbox is unchecked, receipts won’t create postings to the Product receipt journal. Enabling it ensures the system posts inventory value and the vendor liability when the item is received.

• Go to the Item model group setup form.
• Enable (check) Accrue liability on product receipt.
• Save.

• The other option, Include physical value, affects how physical value is handled but is not the direct cause of postings to the product receipt journal. If issues persist after enabling accrual, you may need to verify related posting definitions or journal setup.

1. Define Power Platform DLP policies
2. Add custom prompt modifications
3. Conduct adversarial testing

1. DLP policies first

1. Prompt modifications second

1. Adversarial testing last

• Storage accounts: storage1, storage2, and storage3
• Log Analytics workspace: Analytics3

• Azure Backup reports can send the AzureBackupReports diagnostic log to eligible storage accounts. The storage account’s subscription and region do not have to match the Recovery Services vault, so all three listed storage accounts are valid.
• The Log Analytics workspace must be in the same region as the Recovery Services vault for this configuration. Vault1 and Analytics3 are both in West Europe, making Analytics3 the valid workspace.

• A. Implement retries with exponential backoff

• C. Reduce the frequency and/or size of requests

• B. Use PutRecord instead of PutRecords — PutRecord sends one record per call and does not remove the underlying throughput limitation. It may increase request overhead.
• D. Use Amazon SNS instead — SNS is not a direct fix for Kinesis shard throttling and changes the required streaming architecture.
• E. Reduce KCL consumers — KCL consumers read from Kinesis; they do not solve producer-side PutRecords throttling.

• Elicited and documented customer requirements
• Converted them into clear, measurable specifications
• Validated the requirements with the customer
• Used them as the basis for design, quality checks, and acceptance

• A: Requirements should reflect the customer’s needs—not the supplier’s standards.
• B: Iteration review planning does not replace proper requirements collection.
• D: A retrospective occurs after work is completed and is mainly for process improvement, not initial requirements definition.

• Multi-pass wipe: Overwrites the drive’s existing data multiple times, making recovery much more difficult while preserving the drive’s functionality.
• Single-pass wipe: May be sufficient in some modern sanitization standards, but is presented here as less secure than multiple overwrites.
• Degaussing: Uses a strong magnetic field to disrupt data. It can render the drive unusable or unreliable, reducing its resale value.
• Pinning: Is not an appropriate data-sanitization method.

• Answer: A

• Reason: The Standard web tier is the lowest tier that provides dedicated compute, built-in load balancing across instances, and sufficient storage to host multiple apps with custom domains. Basic may lack the required scalability/storage, while Free/Shared do not offer dedicated compute or proper load balancing.

• Improve QA testing efficiency: A prototype may help discover defects early, but that is not its greatest benefit.
• Decrease time allocated for user testing and review: Prototyping usually requires additional user involvement and review, not less.
• Minimize scope changes: Prototypes can actually reveal new requirements or cause scope changes. However, discovering those changes early is beneficial.

• Answer: No

• Why: Using several Azure AD directories (tenants) would create separate identity stores for each division, which significantly increases administrative overhead. You’d need cross-tenant access management, separate governance, and duplicated admin efforts, which goes against the goal of minimizing administrative work.

• How to meet the goal instead:

• Strongest encryption algorithms: Choose the strongest available encryption and integrity options, typically AES with the largest key size and a secure integrity algorithm.
• Encrypt all traffic: Select tunnel mode rather than transport mode. Tunnel mode encrypts the entire original IP packet, which is appropriate for a site-to-site VPN between branch networks.
• Secret-password authentication: Configure a pre-shared key (PSK) on both VPN concentrators. The key must match at both ends.

• State is stored remotely in Terraform Cloud/Enterprise, not as a local file.
• Terraform runs (plan/apply) can be executed on remote infrastructure, with results visible in the remote workspace UI.
• Supports workspace-based organization, state locking, and concurrency control.
• Useful for team collaboration, centralized governance, and auditable logs.

• In your configuration, you use a backend block like backend "remote" { ... }.
• You still run terraform init to configure/migrate to the remote backend.
• After setup, terraform plan/terraform apply may be executed remotely, and the outputs/logs appear in the Terraform Cloud/Enterprise UI rather than (only) in your local terminal.

• Other backends store state remotely but typically do not provide remote execution; with the remote backend you get remote runs and a collaborative UI, not just remote state storage.

• Answer: C – netstat -an

• netstat -an lists all active connections and listening ports with numeric addresses, without resolving names. This lets you spot DoS patterns such as a flood of connections to a specific port or many connections from a single or few IPs.
• The other options don’t help as directly:

• Windows: netstat -an and look for numerous ESTABLISHED connections to a service or many SYNs to a port.
• Filter by port, e.g., netstat -an | findstr :80, or on Linux: ss -tunap | grep ':80'.

• Netstat provides a snapshot. DoS detection often benefits from continuous monitoring, flow data, and IDS/IPS logs.

• On-prem you generalize and capture the VM as a VHD.
• Upload the VHD to Azure with Add-AzVhd.
• Register the VHD as an image in Azure with Add-AzImage (or New-AzImage) so it appears as a selectable image.
• Create new VMs from that image (e.g., with New-AzVM -Image ...).

• Port 515: LPD/LPR line-printer service
• Port 631: IPP — Internet Printing Protocol
• Port 9100: JetDirect/RAW printing, commonly used by network printers

• Linux machine: Linux could run these services, but the three printer-specific ports strongly indicate a printer.
• Router: Routers may use Telnet and HTTP, but normally would not expose ports 515, 631, and 9100 together.
• Windows machine: Windows can share printers, but this particular service combination is more characteristic of a network printer’s embedded operating system.

• Answer:

• Why:

• Why the other centers aren’t the right fit here:

• Key concept: ALE = SLE × ARO

• SLE = $15,000
• Occurrences: 2 in 3 years ? ARO = 2/3 per year ˜ 0.6667

• ALE = $15,000 × 0.6667 ˜ $10,000 per year

• ALE is the expected annual loss, so it averages the losses over each year.
• This helps prioritize risk treatments by comparing ALE to the cost of controls.

• Why this is correct: In Azure Virtual Desktop, user access to a host pool is controlled through App Groups. The default app group for a host pool publishes the full desktop, so adding members to that app group grants them sign-in and access to the desktop (and any RemoteApps in that group). This is the standard way to give users access to AVD resources.

• Why the other options are not correct:

• Practical steps (high level):

• Geo-redundant storage (GRS) replicates data to a secondary Azure region, but the secondary copy is normally unavailable for read access.
• RA-GRS provides geo-replication and read-only access to the secondary region, satisfying all requirements.
• Zone-redundant storage (ZRS) replicates data across availability zones within the same Azure region, not separate geographic regions.
• Locally redundant storage (LRS) keeps copies within a single datacenter or region and does not provide geographic resiliency.

• runParallel is defined as async, so it returns a Promise.
• To use the result, you attach a then handler (or use await inside another async function).

• A: “Async runParallel() .then(data);” is invalid. “async” is a keyword for function declarations, not something you put in front of a call, and you’d need a function as the then-argument.
• B: “runParallel().done(function(data){return data;});” .done is not standard in native Promises (it exists in some libraries). Without a compatible library, this won’t work.
• C: “runParallel().then(data);” is invalid because then expects a function as its argument; data is not a function.
• D: “runParallel().then(function(data){ return data; });” is valid (or equivalently, runParallel().then(data => data);).

• The robust, standard option is D.
• B could work only with a library that provides .done; otherwise it’s not reliable.

• Business
• People
• Governance
• Platform
• Security
• Operations

• Program and project management
• Risk management
• Cloud financial management
• Data governance
• Portfolio management

• Sustainability
• Performance efficiency
• Reliability

• L2TP uses UDP port 1701 for the L2TP control channel.
• The destination port is 1701; the source port is a dynamically chosen ephemeral port on the client (not 1701).
• Therefore the statement that both source and destination ports are 1710 is incorrect (and 1710 is not the standard L2TP port).

• The destination port should be 1701, not 1710.
• The source port should be an ephemeral port chosen by the client, not 1701.

• Answer: D) Out-of-band management

• Why this is correct:

• Why the other options aren’t suitable here:

• Help the team identify the causes of delays.
• Encourage continuous improvement through retrospectives.
• Support the team in changing its process, tools, or collaboration methods.
• Help remove impediments that the team cannot resolve independently.

• A: An impediment log may help, but simply maintaining it does not ensure the impediments are resolved.
• B: Directing the team to solutions conflicts with agile self-management.
• C: Adding impediments to the product backlog could delay their resolution and treats them like product features.

• Developed and maintained independently
• Deployed without changing the entire application
• Scaled separately based on demand
• More resilient when another service has problems

• A: Functional testing is useful, but it is not the main practice described.
• B: Automation helps deployment, but the scenario focuses on architectural decomposition.
• C: Multiple locations improve availability, not application modularity.

• What the goal is: You want to add guest (external) users to your Azure AD tenant contoso.com, one entry per external user in a CSV.

• The proposed solution uses New-AzureADUser for each external user. Why this isn’t correct: New-AzureADUser creates a regular (internal) user in your directory. It does not create a guest/B2B user invite. So you’d end up with 500 ordinary accounts, not guest accounts with external access.

• The correct approach: Use New-AzureADMSInvitation for each external user. This invites the external user to your directory and creates a guest user (a B2B collaboration user) in your tenant. The invited user then accepts the invitation and gains access as a guest.

• Azure AD vs directory/tenant: Azure AD is the cloud identity service. A directory (also called a tenant) is your specific instance of that service (contoso.com in your scenario). The terms are often used interchangeably in exams.
• Guest user vs internal user: A guest user is external to your organization; an internal user is created directly in your directory as a normal employee/user account.
• B2B invitation: The process of inviting external users so they can collaborate in your resources; New-AzureADMSInvitation is designed for this.

• Authenticating websites with TLS/HTTPS
• Enabling certificate-based VPN authentication
• Signing or encrypting email
• Supporting device or user authentication

• VLAN tagging: Uses network-frame tags, such as 802.1Q; it does not rely on X.509 certificates.
• LDAP: May integrate with PKI in some environments, but X.509 certificates are not most commonly associated with LDAP itself.
• MFA: Certificates can be one authentication factor, but X.509 is fundamentally a PKI technology.

• Multi-factor authentication
• A secure password change for users whose credentials may be compromised

• Correct answer: D — AWS Migration Hub

• AWS Migration Hub provides a single location to track the progress of application migrations. It offers a centralized dashboard to view migration status across multiple tools and projects.

• AWS Application Discovery Service helps inventory and map on-prem applications and their dependencies, not a single progress tracker.
• AWS Application Migration Service (formerly SMS) performs the actual lift-and-shift migrations, but isn’t the centralized tracker itself.
• AWS Service Catalog manages catalogs of IT services for self-service deployment, not migration progress.

• Answer: False. Agents and managers CAN create knowledge articles from Community questions.

• Why: In ServiceNow, a Community question can be converted into a Knowledge article using the Create Knowledge (or Convert to Knowledge) action. This allows what customers asked to become a reusable article for others.

• How it works (high level):

• Permissions: This ability depends on having the right roles/permissions (e.g., agents or knowledge managers). If you don’t see the option, check your role assignments or the knowledge-management configuration.

• Quick take: If a question in Community is valuable for others, a trained agent can turn it into a Knowledge article, making it available for self-service.

• Honeypots: Decoy systems or services designed to attract attackers. Legitimate users should not access them, so activity on a honeypot is a strong indicator of unauthorized activity. Security teams can also observe attacker behavior.

• DNS sinkhole: Redirects requests for known malicious domains to a controlled internal server or blocks them. If an infected workstation attempts to contact command-and-control infrastructure, the sinkhole records the request and helps identify the compromised device.

• Tokenization: Protects sensitive data by replacing it with tokens.
• CI/CD: Automates software development and deployment.
• Threat modeling: Identifies potential risks before or during system design.
• Data obfuscation: Makes data harder to understand, but does not detect intruders.

Why B works

• AWS KMS keys are Regional resources. A normal customer managed key in Region A cannot be used directly in Region B.
• A customer managed multi-Region KMS key (MRK) has related key replicas in both Regions. The replicas share key material and key ID, although each has a Regional ARN.
• With client-side encryption, the application encrypts the data before storing it in S3. Cross-Region replication then copies already-encrypted objects, so S3 does not need to decrypt and re-encrypt them with a different Regional key.

Why the other choices are weaker

• A and C: SSE-S3 uses Amazon-managed S3 keys, not the required customer managed KMS key.
• D: SSE-KMS can work only if the solution creates and configures the appropriate KMS key or multi-Region key replica in each Region. As written, it says to create a customer managed KMS key in each Region, which implies separate keys—not the same KMS key. Replication also requires additional KMS permissions and destination encryption configuration.

• ?????? CPU
• ?????????????????
• ??????????????????????????
• ???????????? throughput
• ??????????????????????????????

• A ??????? system software ????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????
• B ?????????????????????????? ????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????
• D ????????????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????

• Ethical red-teaming is adversarial testing aimed at uncovering weaknesses and potential exploits in an AI system before deployment.
• A (improving accuracy) is not the primary?? of red-teaming.
• B (simulate model risk scenarios) is related but narrower; red-teaming centers on finding vulnerabilities and risk exposure, not just simulating risks.
• D (ensure compliance) is not the main goal of red-teaming.

• Correct answer: A — The degradation of a service.

• Why: A service request is a formal request from a user for something that is pre-approved and routine (e.g., provisioning a laptop, replacing a toner cartridge). Those are typical service request actions. The degradation of a service, however, is an incident: it describes a problem affecting service quality or availability and is handled by Incident Management (and possibly Problem Management), not as a standard service request.

• Quick note on the other options:

• Global Unicast: These are the IPv6 addresses that are globally routable on the Internet. They’re allocated by Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) and can be reached from anywhere with proper routing (similar to IPv4 public addresses). Example ranges include 2000::/3.

• Link-local: fe80::/10. Used only on the local link; not routable beyond the directly connected network.

• Unique Local Addresses (ULA): fc00::/7. Private addresses for internal use within an organization; not publicly routable on the Internet (like IPv4 private addresses).

• Multicast: ff00::/8. One-to-many addresses used for group communication, not unicast routing.

• A limited lifetime
• Permissions defined by an IAM role or policy
• The ability to access AWS APIs without using long-term IAM user credentials

• Amazon API Gateway — Builds and manages APIs; it does not generally issue AWS credentials for applications.
• IAM users — Usually use long-term credentials, which are less suitable for applications.
• IAM instance profiles — Provide temporary role credentials to applications running on EC2 instances, but are specifically tied to EC2. The broader requirement described is best met by AWS STS.

• D. Provide public endpoints to store and retrieve data

• E. Manage the infrastructure layer and the operating system

• Classifying data
• Configuring access permissions, such as IAM policies
• Selecting or configuring available encryption options, depending on the requirement

• Answer: A. Use Amazon SageMaker Serverless Inference to deploy the model.

• Why: SageMaker Serverless Inference hosts the model and serves real-time predictions without you provisioning or managing servers. It scales automatically and handles deployment details.

• Why the others aren’t suitable:

• Quick example flow: web app ? SageMaker Serverless Inference endpoint ? model ? response.

• The correct AAA mapping (per Cisco objectives) is:

• Why the given options aren’t fully correct:

• Quick takeaway: when you configure AAA, you should conceptually map them as:

• Example commands (to reinforce concepts):

• Import mode loads the data into the Power BI model. Visuals query the in-memory model, which generally provides faster calculation and rendering than DirectQuery.
• Import mode also minimizes online processing because report interactions do not send queries back to the dataflow or SQL Server.
• A daily refresh can load data through the previous day, satisfying the freshness requirement without unnecessary hourly processing.

• DirectQuery keeps querying the data source or dataflow during report use, increasing online processing and potentially slowing visuals.
• Adding a gateway enables connectivity for on-premises sources, but it does not remove the performance disadvantages of DirectQuery.
• An hourly Power Automate refresh is unnecessary when the requirement is only data through the previous day and creates additional processing overhead.

• Answer: Data enhancement.

• Why: Augmenting gold-layer tables with an additional dataset is enriching or enhancing the existing data to support the ad-hoc analysis. The other options don’t capture the idea of adding external data to improve the dataset (ad-hoc improvements = tweaks, last-mile dashboarding = building dashboards, last-mile ETL = ETL steps at the end of the pipeline). In practice, this is often also called data enrichment.

• The app on EC2 connects to Aurora using DB credentials stored on the instance. Secrets Manager centralizes these credentials and can rotate them automatically, eliminating manual updates on each EC2 host.
• Automatic rotation reduces operational overhead and enhances security because credentials are rotated on a schedule without code changes.
• The app can retrieve the current secret at runtime (e.g., via the AWS SDK) and use it to authenticate to Aurora, avoiding reliance on locally stored files.

• B (Parameter Store) can store secrets but lacks seamless built-in rotation for database credentials like Secrets Manager; rotation often requires more custom work.
• C (S3) would require complex tooling to rotate and securely fetch credentials and still risks exposure if access policies aren’t perfect.
• D (Encrypted EBS volumes) would store credentials locally on each instance and does not automate rotation or centralized management.

• B — Increase provisioned concurrency for Lambda

• D — Refactor the Lambda functions

• E — Use Amazon RDS Proxy