DRAG DROP (Drag and Drop is not supported)
Drag and drop the descriptions from the left onto the related OAuth-defined roles on the right.
Select and Place:

See Explanation section for answer.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 66

Refer to the exhibit. This cURL POST request creates an OAuth access token for authentication with FDM API requests.

What is the purpose of the file “@token_data” that cURL is handling?

This file is given as input to store the access token received from FDM.
This file is used to send authentication-related headers.
This file contains raw data that is needed for token authentication.
This file is a container to log possible error responses in the request.

Answer(s): C

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 67

What is the result of a successful OAuth2 authorization grant flow?

The third-party service is provided with a token that allows actions to be performed.
The user has the application rights that correspond to the user's role within the application's database.
The application is provided with a token that allows actions on services on the user's behalf.
The user has administrative rights to the application's backend services.

Answer(s): C

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 68

In the three-legged OAuth2 process, after the authorization server presents a form to the resource owner to grant access, what is the next step?

The resource owner authenticates and optionally authorizes with the authorization server.
The user who owns the resource initiates a request to the OAuth client.
If the resource owner allows access, the authorization server sends the OAuth client a redirection.
A form to allow or restrict access is submitted by the owner of the resource.

Answer(s): D

Show Answer Next Question

QUESTION: 69

Which OAuth mechanism enables clients to continue to have an active access token without further interaction from the user?

refresh grant
JWT
password grant
preshared key

Answer(s): A

Show Answer Next Question

Download PDF Next Page

Viewing page 30 of 78
Viewing questions 146 - 150 out of 507 questions

Post your Comments and Discuss Cisco 350-901 exam prep with other Community members:

Comments:

Name:

350-901 Exam Discussions & Posts
350-901 AI Verifications

Alex on: March 02, 2025
Great material
UNITED KINGDOM

Sean Yoon on: July 03, 2026
This is a new exam and I am happy to see the questions are available here. This is the best exam prep site with reliable content. Keep up the good owrk guys.
Singapore

TechNerd92 on: May 05, 2026
Spent weeks diving into braindumps and still found the exam very hard. Without real exam questions in the dumps I would still be at square one.
Thailand

it_dad_of_3 on: June 22, 2026
This challenging exam took more out of me than expected but the braindumps and the AI Assistant kept me on track. I wasn't confident I'd pass without them.
Brazil

l4b_rat on: May 21, 2026
The AI Assistant helped clarify some real exam questions but the dumps were what finally got me through this exam. After weeks of stress it's done.
Nigeria

k3rn3l_k on: June 16, 2026
The exam dumps were my last resort after weeks of frustrating study with very hard material. Real exam quetions matched the dumps pretty closely but it still was a challenging exam.
India

CyberArk_C on: May 30, 2026
Underestimated this exam and spent nights grinding throgh braindumps and exam dumps to pass. Very hard and challenging questions made me question my sanity.
Jordan

Shorya on: July 01, 2026
free study material
Mumbai, India

jakob_vmware on: March 30, 2026
Spent weeks grinding through brain dumps to scrape a pass on this exam. It was very hard and the stress was real but real exam questions helped a bit.
Israel

Mildfed on: June 29, 2026
Practice questions and answer explanation help me to understand quicker
Davao City, Philippines

AzureNinja on: May 15, 2026
Finally done with this exam after spending too much time. Braindumps adn the AI Assistant were the only ways I managed to get through such a challenging exam with real exam questions.
South Africa

SleepDeprivedPass on: April 12, 2026
The AI Assistant was helpful alongside the braindumps for this challenging exam. Just finished and wasn't sure I'd make it.
South Africa

CertOrBust_2025 on: May 17, 2026
Underestimated this exam and had to grind through countless braindumps to finally pass it on my second try. Real exam questions and teh AI Assistant were key but it was still a very hard challenge.
Lebanon

OnePunchCert on: April 05, 2026
The brain dumps were a huge help because this exam was very hard. The AI Assistant also made a difference in understanding the real exam questions.
India

PassedByLuck_K on: April 20, 2026
The exam was very hard and I couldn't have passed without relying heavily on dumps. Stressful but the real exam questions from the dumps made all the difference.
Australia

ExamSurvivor_T on: May 18, 2026
The exam was very hard and the dumps were my last resort after struggling to grasp everything. Real exam questions helped reduce the stress a bit.
Jordan

GCPengineer_T on: May 08, 2026
Spent weeks digging through brain dumps and finally squeaked by this exam but it was very hard and stressful.
France

PassOrFail_Lol on: June 12, 2026
Spent weeks on this exam adn the braindumps were my last resort. Real exam questions were tougher than expected but I managed to push through.
Argentina

StudiedForWeeks on: May 09, 2026
The AI Assistant and braindumps barely got me through this very hard exam. It was challenging but I made it.
Ireland

zeroDaysLeft on: May 22, 2026
Passed it using exam dumps because the exam was very hard and I was struggling.
United Kingdom

career_changer_c on: June 17, 2026
Took two attempts with the AI Assistant before passing this very hard exam and relied on braindumps as a backup plan.
Mexico

RedHat_Rick on: April 11, 2026
Spent weeks on this challenging exam and ended up relying on exam dumps to finally clear it. Real exam questions were very hard and the AI Assistant didn't make it much easier.
Kenya

gita_dataeng on: May 26, 2026
Finally done with this challenging exam and it was very hard to pass even using brain dumps. The real exam questions were tricky making the whole process quite stressful.
Ghana

flashcard_fanatic on: March 31, 2026
The exam dumps felt outdated and the real exam questions caught me off guard. Was tougher than I anticipated even with all the prep material.
Czech Republic

linuxlover99 on: May 19, 2026
Three weeks of brain dumps and the AI Assistant were just enough for this exam. It was very hard and I wasn't sure if I'd pass.
Malaysia

odin on: June 04, 2026
these questions are more scenario based rather than "what does this service do" which makes me think more of how do things fall into place to suite the question
Tel Aviv, Israel

Kapil on: June 06, 2026
Good to get idea of question asked
Udaipur, India

ReadTheRationale on: May 20, 2026
This exam was very hard but the exam dumps helped pinpoint many of the real exam questions. Without those dumps I doubt I'd have cleared it.
Colombia

upskill_or_bust on: June 06, 2026
Took two attempts to pass this challenging exam using brain dumps adn it was still very hard. The real exam questions were a nightmare even with all the prep.
Hungary

nerd_by_day on: May 23, 2026
Got through this exam by the skin of my teeth after two attempts using brain dumps like everyone else probably does becuase it's just that challenging. The AI Assistant materials were useful but those real exam questions were the real lifesaver.
United Kingdom

QuietQuitter_IT on: March 29, 2026
This exam was very hard and I definitely underestimated it so I had to spend hours with braindumps to finally pass.
Thailand

mark_passed_aws on: April 26, 2026
Took two attempts but managed to pass this exam with the help of new exam dumps and reviewing lots of real exam questions.
Indonesia

3rdTimeCharm_IT on: April 26, 2026
Thought this exam would be a breeze but it was very hard and I ended up grinding through a pile of braindumps. Cleared it eventually but it was definitely a challenge.
Malaysia

hashbang_h on: May 13, 2026
This exam was harder than expected so I relied heavily on exam dumps to pass. Without the brain dumps I doubt I would have cleared it.
Philippines

n3tw0rk3r on: March 30, 2026
Passed it after a lot of stress with the help of exam dumps. This exam was very hard and the real exam questions were no joke.
Norway

WrongAnswerRight on: April 12, 2026
Two attempts were needed for this exam since it's very hard but the exam dumps finally helped me pass. The AI Assistant also provided some clarity on real exam questions I struggled to understand.
Saudi Arabia

bgp_believer on: June 24, 2026
The exam was very hard and the real exam questions caught me off guard despite using braindumps. The AI Assistant tried to help but I struggled through every minute of it.
Austria

t1_support_guy on: May 22, 2026
Spent weeks on the exam dumps but it was still a very hard exam. Just cleared the exam because the real exam questions were tricky and stressful.
Nigeria

FortinetFred on: April 13, 2026
This exam was very hard and I don't think I could have passed without the exam dumps. Real exam questions helped a lot but the AI Assistant's guidance was essential.
Mexico

wei_syseng on: May 11, 2026
Finally done with this challenging exam and barely passed after relying heavily on brain dumps. The AI Assistant helped a bit with the stress but the real exam questions were very hard.
Belgium

WrongAnswerRight on: May 01, 2026
Underestimated this exam and had to grind throgh a lot of braindumps to finally make it. Real exam questions were very hard and the AI Assistant helped me get through.
Netherlands

anya_cloudarch on: May 20, 2026
Finally done with this exam after weeks of using dumps and brain dumps which helped with some very hard questions. The combination of real exam questions and the AI Assistant made it just barely manageable.
Switzerland

CertHunter on: May 19, 2026
Three weeks of prep and I still wasn't sure I'd pass. The AI Assistant and braindumps were what got me through this exam.
Italy

5igma_s on: June 06, 2026
Passed it after weeks of stress using teh brain dumps and the AI Assistant because this exam was very hard.
Bangladesh

RedHat_Rick on: May 13, 2026
Spent weeks poring over brain dumps as this exam was very hard adn exhausting. Real exam questions were the only reason I managed to finally get through it.
Canada

mark_passed_aws on: May 16, 2026
Spent weeks on the exam dumps only to find the real exam questions were very hard and unexpected. The AI Assistant was helpful but this exam was still a serious challenge.
Turkey

RetakeKing2025 on: June 21, 2026
Took two attempts throgh this challenging exam and the AI Assistant provided real exam questions that counted when I needed them most. Had to rely on braindumps because the stress was unreal.
Spain

Yogesh on: June 17, 2026
UI is best and qestions and aswer are also super
Pune, India

ITpro_Sarah on: May 28, 2026
This exam was very hard and the brain dumps were my last resort. The AI Assistant didn't help much but at least I passed on the second try.
Bahrain

r00tkit_r on: June 18, 2026
Finally done with this exam but it was very hard and I needed the exam dumps to push through. The real exam questions were tough so I relied heavily on the AI Assistant.
South Africa

AI Explanation - verified by juris.siksna on: June 29, 2026
Question 456:
The question asks what to do during closing when a deliverable isn’t meeting customer expectations. The best move is to address the gap by renegotiating scope so that both parties are satisfied.
Answer: C
Why:

Closing doesn’t mean ignoring issues. If a deliverable doesn’t meet expectations, you should work with the customer to agree on a revised scope that will satisfy both sides. This may involve a change in scope that is processed through the change control process, leading to new acceptance criteria and sign-off.

This keeps the project aligned with customer needs while ensuring formal acceptance or a clearly defined path to resolution.

Why the other options are weaker:

A suggests the customer must issue a change request, which isn’t typically how the PM handles defects or gaps; changes usually come from the project team or customer through formal change control.

B is vague and doesn’t drive a path to resolution or re-define acceptance criteria.

D inappropriately escalates to the sponsor before attempting direct negotiation for a revised scope.

Key takeaways:

In closing, address unmet deliverables via a negotiated scope change that satisfies both parties and leads to formal acceptance.

Riga, Latvia

AI Explanation - verified by User2971 on: June 26, 2026
Question 86:
Question 86 asks how to assign the IP 192.168.1.1/24 to GigabitEthernet1. Here’s the idea:

A) Router(config-if)# ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

- This is the standard command to configure an IPv4 address on an interface. It sets the interface’s address and subnet mask.

B) Router(config-vrf)# address-family ipv4

- This enters the IPv4 address-family context for a VRF. It only applies if you’re using a VRF and need to configure IPv4 routing within that VRF (for example, enabling IPv4 unicast routes in the VRF).
Why these two might be chosen:

If the interface is part of a VRF, you typically configure the interface IP with the first command (A) and, in the VRF context, enable the IPv4 address family (B) so IPv4 routing works inside the VRF.

Note:

In a plain, non-VRF setup, you usually just need A (and possibly no shutdown if the interface is administratively down). The VRF-specific B command isn’t needed unless VRFs are being used.

If you want, I can walk through whether your network really uses a VRF and how that changes the steps.
Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by odili.tina on: June 27, 2026
Question 47:

Answer: The items you can endorse are Lakehouse1, Model1, and Report1 only (Dashboard1 cannot be endorsed).

Why: Endorsement is a Fabric and Power BI feature used to mark high-quality content. The rule is that any Fabric or Power BI item except Power BI dashboards can be promoted or certified. Since Dashboard1 is a Power BI dashboard, it isn’t eligible for endorsement, per the note and explanation.

Quick takeaway:

- Eligible: Lakehouse1, Model1, Report1 - Not eligible: Dashboard1
Lagos, Nigeria

AI Explanation - verified by User3934 on: June 08, 2026
Question 81:
Question 81 asks how to best gain insight into potential single-person dependencies (SOD issues).

The correct answer is C. Mapping IT processes to roles.

Why: It directly shows who is responsible for each step in critical processes, highlights overlap between duties, and reveals where one person could control multiple key steps. This is the most effective way to identify SOD gaps and design proper controls.

Why not the others:

- Reviewing vacation patterns: can show coverage gaps but not the actual duty assignments or overlaps. - Interviewing senior IT management: provides opinions, not concrete evidence of role assignments. - Reviewing user activity logs: shows what individuals did, but after the fact and may not reveal where duties are improperly combined.
Tip: Use process-to-role mapping to assess separation of duties, and pair with access reviews to strengthen control.
Siteki, Eswatini

AI Explanation - verified by raman.thulasi71 on: June 24, 2026
Question 204:
Answer: C. AWS Cost and Usage Report
Explanation:

The goal is to build QuickSight dashboards from billing data on a weekly cadence. The Cost and Usage Report (CUR) provides detailed, granular billing data that you can export to S3 and then feed into QuickSight (via Athena/Direct) for dashboards.

AWS Budgets tracks budgets and alerts; it isn’t a data source for BI dashboards.

AWS Cost Explorer offers insights through a UI, but isn’t designed as a direct data feed for automated BI dashboards.

AWS Cost Anomaly Detection focuses on identifying spend anomalies, not providing raw billing data for dashboards.

Chennai, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7588 on: June 10, 2026
Question 21:
Question 21 asks what you should change in the scanner to get the automated scans to work, given the header log.

What the log shows: requests with a common browser User-Agent (Mozilla/5.0) get 200 responses, while requests with UA like curl or python receive no response. This suggests the target is filtering or blocking non-browser clients.

Why the correct choice is D: Modify the scanner user agent. By making the scanner mimic a normal browser, you’re more likely to get consistent responses and avoid basic bot protections that block or ignore non-browser clients. This aligns with the observed pattern in the log (browser UA works; non-browser UA does not).

Why the other options are less appropriate here:

- Slow down the scan: may help with rate-limiting, but doesn’t solve UA-based blocking evident in the log. - Change the source IP with VPN: could help if there’s IP-based blocking, but the log indicates UA-based filtering rather than IP blocking. - Only using HTTP GET: would reduce coverage and not address the blocking issue seen with non-browser UAs.
In short, the server’s behavior points to user-agent-based blocking, so adjusting the scanner’s User-Agent to resemble a real browser is the proper fix.
Markkleeberg, Germany

AI Explanation - verified by User2971 on: June 27, 2026
Question 126:
Answer: D
Reasoning:

SW3 has all access ports in VLAN 50, so it has no ports in VLAN 60.

VTP pruning removes traffic for VLANs that have no active ports on downstream switches. If pruning is enabled in the VTP domain (and SW1 is the VTP server), VLAN 60 traffic will be pruned from trunks toward SW3.

Therefore, SW3 will only receive frames from VLAN 50.

Why the other options aren’t correct:

A: SW1(config)#vtp mode transparent — makes SW1 ignore VTP updates; pruning won’t function domain-wide.

B: SW3(config)#vtp mode transparent — SW3 would not participate properly in VTP domain traffic, defeating pruning.

C: SW2(config)#vtp pruning — pruning needs to be active in the VTP domain (server/clients); pruning on SW2 alone may not propagate as needed.

Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by raman.thulasi71 on: June 25, 2026
Question 252:
Correct answer: AWS Managed Services (AMS).
Explanation:

The question asks for a service/framework to provide operational support at scale, making workloads run more efficiently and securely.

AWS Managed Services (AMS) is a managed service that handles day-to-day operations, monitoring, incident response, provisioning, security/compliance, and ongoing optimization for AWS environments.

Other options:

- AWS Support provides help when issues arise but doesn’t manage operations at scale. - AWS Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF) guides organizational adoption and governance, not ongoing operations. - AWS Well-Architected Framework offers architectural best practices and reviews, not operational execution.
Key takeaway:

For ongoing, scale-focused operational support, choose AMS. For planning, governance, or architecture reviews, consider CAF or Well-Architected respectively.

Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by u2fuadk0x on: June 25, 2026
Question 96:
In question 96, the goal is zero-downtime updates for an Azure Container Apps microservice.
The correct approach is to: Enable multiple revision mode.
Why:

In multiple revision mode, you can run several revisions of the app at the same time.

Deploying a new revision doesn’t take down the old one; you can gradually (or instantly) route traffic to the new revision.

If issues arise, you can roll back by shifting traffic back to the previous revision, avoiding downtime.

Why the other options aren’t correct for zero downtime:

Single revision mode would swap the running revision during an update, risking downtime.

Using multiple environments for each container, or a private registry/single image, or a single environment, doesn’t address traffic management during upgrades.

So the key concept is: use multiple revision mode to enable safe, zero-downtime deployments with traffic routing between revisions.
Asnières-Sur-Seine, France

AI Explanation - verified by User8492 on: June 20, 2026
Question 56:

Answer: No (B)

Why the solution doesn’t meet the goal:

The problem is a long-running, HTTP-triggered function that times out after about four minutes. Merely enabling Always On on an App Service plan doesn’t remove this timeout or ensure blob processing completes.

Best practice is to decouple long-running work from the HTTP trigger. Instead, pass the HTTP trigger payload into a queue (Azure Service Bus or Storage Queue) and return an immediate success response to the caller. A separate function, triggered by the queue, processes the blob data asynchronously.

This approach avoids timeouts, improves reliability, and scales better. It also aligns with the guidance to break large functions into smaller, cooperating units and to use asynchronous patterns (e.g., queue-triggered processing or, optionally, Durable Functions for orchestrations).

Key concept:

Don’t perform lengthy processing inside an HTTP-triggered function. Use asynchronous processing via queues or durable workflows.

Pune, India

AI Explanation - verified by madhavi.chilla09 on: June 09, 2026
Question 64:
Question 64 tests how Row-Level Security (RLS) behaves when a user belongs to multiple roles.

Model: Tables Orders, Date, City with one-to-many relationships (Date ? Orders and City ? Orders).

Roles:

- Role1: City[State Province] = "Kentucky" - Role2: Date[Calendar Year] = 2020
Key concept: When a user is a member of more than one RLS role, the filters from those roles are applied together. In Power BI, RLS filters are effectively ANDed across roles for the same user, so the user must meet all role filters simultaneously.
Therefore, the user will see data where:

State Province is Kentucky AND

Calendar Year is 2020

Which corresponds to option D: “The user will only see data for which the State Province value is Kentucky and the Calendar Year is 2020.”
Note: The provided key showing A (Kentucky OR 2020) is incorrect for standard RLS behavior.
Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7840 on: June 28, 2026
Question 148:
Question 148 asks which migration strategy is best to modernize and convert a monolithic application into microservices and move it to AWS.

Correct answer: Refactor (D)

Why: Refactoring involves re-architecting the application to decompose it into independent microservices. This aligns with the goal of moving from a monolith to microservices, enabling independent deployment, scaling, and maintenance.

Why others aren’t correct for this goal:

- Rehost (lift-and-shift): moves the app with minimal changes, preserving the monolithic architecture. - Replatform: makes some cloud optimizations but still keeps a monolith. - Repurchase: replaces the app with a different product (often SaaS), not microservices.
High-level AWS approach after refactoring (conceptual):

Decompose into services with clear boundaries.

Deploy per-service using containers or serverless (e.g., ECS/EKS/Fargate or Lambda).

Use API Gateway for service exposure and potentially a service mesh like App Mesh for communication.

Implement per-service data stores and resilient communication, with CI/CD pipelines (CodePipeline, CodeBuild).

If you want, I can walk through how to apply this with a sample monolith-to-microservices decomposition.
Dakar, Senegal

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 294:
Question 294: The scenario describes guest users on the same guest WLAN being able to reach each other. The fix is to prevent client-to-client traffic on that WLAN.

Correct answer: A) implement P2P blocking

Why: P2P blocking (often called client isolation) stops peer-to-peer and direct client-to-client traffic at the WLAN level. This keeps each guest device from seeing or talking to other guest devices on the same SSID.
Why the other options aren’t suitable here:

MFP client protection: protects against certain client threats, not client isolation.

Wi-Fi Direct policy: related to devices connecting via Wi-Fi Direct, not typical guest WLAN isolation.

Split tunneling: used with VPNs to choose which traffic goes through the VPN, not for isolating devices on a WLAN.

If you want, I can walk through how to enable P2P blocking on a specific Cisco wireless controller version.
Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User9215 on: June 20, 2026
Question 2:
Question 2 asks which connector to use to build a Power BI report from a Power Apps project management app hosted in Teams.

Correct answer: Dataverse

Why: Power Apps in Teams typically stores its data in Dataverse (Dataverse for Teams). The Dataverse connector in Power BI lets you connect directly to that data source to pull in the app data for reporting, with options for live or scheduled refresh.

Quick contrast with other options:

- Microsoft Teams Personal Analytics: analyzes your own Teams usage, not the app’s data. - SQL Server database: only applicable if the app data lives in SQL Server. - Dataflows: used for ETL within Power BI; not the direct connector to the app’s data source.

How to use (brief): In Power BI Desktop, choose Get Data > Dataverse, select the environment and tables used by the app, then load and model for your report.

Lagos, Nigeria

AI Explanation - verified by User4385 on: June 23, 2026
Question 16:
Question 16: An e-learning platform needs to run an application for 2 months each year with no downtime. Which EC2 option is MOST cost-effective?
Answer: On-Demand Instances (D)
Why the other options aren’t as good here:

Reserved Instances: require a 1-year or 3-year commitment. For only 2 months of use, you’d pay for unused time and still not meet the uptime requirement cost-effectively.

Dedicated Hosts: mainly for license/enforcement needs and to meet compliance; they’re typically more expensive and unnecessary for just ensuring uptime.

Spot Instances: can be terminated with little or no notice, so they can’t guarantee no downtime.

On-Demand gives you no long-term commitment and you pay by the hour for the 2-month window. To truly avoid downtime, pair On-Demand with a fault-tolerant design (e.g., multi-AZ deployment and load balancing) so services stay online even if one AZ has issues. If there were a Scheduled Reserved Instances option, that could be even cheaper for a repeating 2-month window, but it isn’t listed among the choices.
Tower Hamlets, United Kingdom

AI Explanation - verified by User8756 on: June 16, 2026
Question 32:
No. The solution does not meet the goal.
Why:

A local network gateway represents an on-premises VPN device for site-to-site or VNet-to-VNet connections. It’s used to connect Azure to external networks, not to control traffic inside Azure between resources.

To control connection types between web servers and database servers in Azure, you should use Network Security Groups (NSGs). Apply NSGs to the appropriate scope (subnets or NICs) and configure inbound/outbound rules to permit only the required traffic (e.g., allow SQL port from web subnet to the DB subnet, and deny everything else).

Helpful alternative concepts:

Use NSGs to implement port/protocol restrictions between the web and database tiers.

For more advanced filtering, consider Azure Firewall or private endpoints/service endpoints to further restrict access to databases.

Singapore, Singapore

AI Explanation - verified by madhavi.chilla09 on: June 09, 2026
Question 62:
Short answer: D — Split the visuals onto multiple pages.
Why this is the best choice:

A single page with 25 visuals (15 AppSource + 10 default) can overload a report, causing slower load/interact times as each visual runs its queries. Splitting visuals across pages reduces concurrent queries and rendering work, improving perceived performance in a shared capacity.

Why the other options aren’t better:

Change DAX measures to iterator functions: Iterator functions (e.g., SUMX) often cost more CPU per row and can slow performance rather than speed it up.

Enable visual interactions: Enabling interactions can increase cross-filtering and the number of queries, potentially slowing things down; not a performance win.

Replace default visuals with AppSource visuals: AppSource visuals aren’t inherently faster; some may be heavier or less optimized. This isn’t a guaranteed performance gain.

Additional note:

In a 12M-row fact table on shared capacity, page-level optimization (fewer visuals per page) is a common, effective tactic. If needed, you can also consider aggregations or other model optimizations, but among the given options, paging the visuals is the recommended approach.

Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User6685 on: June 28, 2026
Question 26:
No. The proposed solution does not meet the goal.

APIM can secure back-end calls using client certificates. Using Basic gateway credentials is not appropriate for a back-end hosted as an Azure resource like an Azure App Service.

For an App Service back-end, configure backend authentication with a client certificate in API Management (upload the certificate to APIM and have the API Management service present it to the backend).

The explanation in the question notes that the back end is an Azure resource and should use certificate-based authentication rather than basic authentication.

Jaitpur, India

AI Explanation - verified by User4625 on: June 22, 2026
Question 1:
For Question 1, the provided answer is A: Use of the Snowball Edge appliance for a 10-day period.
Why A is correct (explanation):

In the Snowball/Edge pricing model, the device rental duration (the period you have the appliance) is covered as part of the service during the initial loan; the 10-day window is the period you can use the device without additional device-use charges.

After that window, there are ongoing charges for daily device usage.

Why the other options are not free:

B: The transfer of data out of S3 to the Snowball Edge incurs data-transfer costs; it’s not considered a free activity.

C: The transfer of data from the Snowball Edge into S3 involves data transfer/storage costs.

D: Daily use of the Snowball Edge after 10 days would incur ongoing device usage charges.

Key concept:

Snowball Edge pricing typically includes the device rental period as part of the initial service, but data transfer and continued usage after the rental window are charged separately.

Dakar, Senegal

AI Explanation - verified by User9278 on: June 09, 2026
Shared responsibility is a key principle of Microsoft
Yes. Shared responsibility is a key principle in Microsoft’s cloud security model. Microsoft documents the Shared Responsibility Model, where Microsoft is responsible for security “of” the cloud (infrastructure, platform, physical security) and customers are responsible for security “in” the cloud (data protection, identity and access management, configurations, and applicable compliance). This clarifies which controls Microsoft provides and which the customer must implement.
São Paulo, Brazil

AI Explanation - verified by User3649 on: June 09, 2026
Question 17:
Question 17 asks which tool best supports version control for the documentation of requirements.

Multiauthoring software: Designed for collaboration with version control, track changes, and manage input from multiple authors. This fits the scenario of diligently maintaining requirement docs.

Word processor: Useful for creating docs, but not inherently strong on multi-author version control unless tied to a cloud service.

Real-time polling: Used for quick input collection, not for document version control.

Conferencing platforms: For meetings, not for documenting or version-controlling requirements.

Therefore, the correct answer is A: Multiauthoring software, because it enables collaborative editing with version history and change tracking for requirement documentation. If you’d like, I can walk through how this concept maps to your exam objectives.
Albuquerque, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User3477 on: June 22, 2026
Question 26:
Question 26 asks how to let Compute Engine instances write data to a Cloud Storage bucket using Google-recommended practices.

Correct answer: C

Why:

Use a dedicated service account for the VM and grant it the bucket-level IAM role storage.objectCreator. This provides the minimum privilege needed to create objects in the bucket (write data) without giving broader access.

Relying on IAM roles at the bucket level follows the principle of least privilege and aligns with current best practices.

Why the other options are less recommended:

A and B rely on OAuth access scopes (devstorage.write_only or cloud-platform). Scopes are legacy and less granular; they’re being phased out in favor of IAM roles on service accounts.

- cloud-platform is overly broad (all APIs). - devstorage.write_only is still a scope-based approach, not the preferred per-resource permission model.

D (storage.objectAdmin) is more permissive than needed and can allow deleting objects; use objectCreator for write-only needs unless you explicitly require delete rights.

Key concept: attach a dedicated service account to the VM and grant the narrow, bucket-level role storage.objectCreator to follow least-privilege practices. Reference: cloud.google.com/compute/docs/access/iam.
Kingston, United States

AI Explanation - verified by raman.thulasi71 on: June 25, 2026
Question 292:
Question 292 asks which capabilities are in the Platform Perspective of the AWS CAF. The two correct options are B) Data engineering and C) Continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD).

B) Data engineering: The Platform Perspective focuses on building and enabling shared services and capabilities that platform teams provide to developers. Data engineering fits here as it covers data pipelines, storage, and data services that support workloads across teams.

C) CI/CD: Platform-level automation for software delivery, including CI/CD pipelines and related tooling, is a core platform capability to enable repeatable, rapid deployment.

Why the others aren’t correct:

A) Performance and capacity management is usually associated with operations or platform operations rather than the core Platform Perspective.

D) Infrastructure protection aligns with the Security Perspective.

E) Change and release management aligns with Governance/organizational processes, not primarily the Platform Perspective.

Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User5972 on: June 09, 2026
Question 1:
Question 1 asks: Which methodology does ITDR use?

Correct answer: A — Behavior analysis

Why: ITDR relies on behavior analytics (often aligned with UEBA concepts) to identify suspicious or anomalous identity-related activity. It builds a baseline of normal user behavior (login times/locations, access patterns, privilege escalations) and flags deviations, enabling real-time alerts and automated responses to credential abuse or lateral movement.

Why not the others:

- B (Comparison of alerts to signatures): signature-based detection relies on known patterns and can miss novel identity threats. - C (Manual inspection of user activities): not scalable or timely for real-time threat detection. - D (Rule-based activity prioritization): static rules miss evolving or atypical behavior.
In short, ITDR’s strength is detecting anomalies in identity-related behavior rather than relying on signatures or manual/rule-based checks.
Floreffe, Belgium

AI Explanation - verified by User3580 on: June 04, 2026
ich versteh nicht, wofür der ganze kram ist?
Kurz gesagt: Der ganze Kram dient dazu, sensible Daten zu schützen, Risiken zu minimieren und Compliance sicherzustellen, ohne dass Systeme unbrauchbar werden.

Masking: Daten in Logs/UIs sichtbar machen, aber unlesbar (z. B. 4111-**-**-1111). Zweck: Diagnose erlaubt, sensible Daten bleiben geschützt.

Verschlüsselung: Daten im Speicher oder beim Transfer schützen. Wiederherstellung nur mit dem richtigen Schlüssel. Einsatz: Datenbanken, Backups, TLS-Verbindung.

Tokenisierung: Echte Daten bleiben in einem sicheren Vault; im System wird nur ein Token verwendet. Falls Daten gestohlen werden, sind sie nutzlos.

Hashing: Einweg-Transformation, z. B. Passwörter; abgleich über Hash, aber Originaldaten nicht abrufbar.

Obfuskation: Daten oder Code absichtlich schwer verständlich machen; kein starker Sicherheitsmechanismus, eher Verwirrung oder Schutz vor casual Inspection.

Warum mehrere Techniken? Weil Daten in unterschiedlichen Phasen geschützt werden müssen (vor Ort, unterwegs, in Nutzung) und verschiedene Anforderungen (Audit, Support, Privacy) bestehen. Layered defense ( defense in depth ) erhöht den Schutz.
Wenn du willst, fasse ich das auf eine konkrete Anwendungs-Szene zusammen.
Bedburg, Germany

AI Explanation - verified by User1113 on: June 05, 2026
Question 1:

Answer: B (False)

Explanation: The terraform.tfstate file is a snapshot Terraform uses to map your configuration to real resources. It does not always stay perfectly in sync with the live infrastructure. Drift can occur if resources are changed outside Terraform or manipulated directly. You can reconcile this with commands like terraform plan (to see what would change) and terraform refresh (to update the state). The state stored in a backend reflects the last known state, not a guaranteed real-time reflection of reality. See Terraform state documentation for details.

Gurugram, India

AI Explanation - verified by User2971 on: June 27, 2026
Question 160:
Question 160 asks how SSO works with HSRP to minimize disruption.

Correct concept: The answer should be C — "It enables data forwarding along known routes following a switchover, while the routing protocol reconverges."

Why:

SSO (Stateful Switchover) preserves forwarding state on redundant supervisors. When the active HSRP router fails or a switchover occurs, the standby can resume forwarding using the already learned state (MACs, FIB entries, ARP, etc.) without waiting for full routing convergence.

HSRP provides the active/standby pair for first-hop redundancy. SSO ensures the data plane continues to forward packets during the switchover, while the control plane (routing protocols) reconverges in the background.

This minimizes disruption because traffic continues along known paths even as the routing topology updates.

Why the other options are less correct:

A: HSRP election behavior isn’t the primary role of SSO.

B: Fast link-failure failover is about link health, not the switchover of supervisors.

D: “Failover to the standby RP on the same device” isn’t an accurate description of SSO’s effect.

Note: The provided key marks D, but the Cisco behavior described by SSO with HSRP is best described by option C.
Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User9647 on: July 01, 2026
Question 120:
Question 120 describes a company that wants a centralized storage system for configuration data and passwords for critical business applications, and asks which AWS service would meet this MOST cost-effectively.

Correct answer: A: AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store

Why: Parameter Store is designed to store configuration data and secrets (using SecureString), is integrated with IAM for access control, and is generally more cost-effective than dedicated secrets managers for large numbers of parameters.

Why not the others:

- AWS Secrets Manager is specialized for secrets but is more expensive, and rotation features may be unnecessary for every parameter. - AWS Config tracks resource configurations and compliance, not centralized storage of config data or passwords. - Amazon S3 is generic object storage and lacks built-in secrets management and versioned parameter capabilities.
So, Parameter Store provides centralized, cost-effective storage for both configuration data and secrets.
Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User5184 on: June 08, 2026
Question 33:

Answer: No (B)

Why: The goal is to reduce the impact on users after migrating resources to Azure and decommissioning the on-prem data center. Requiring Azure MFA adds an extra authentication step for users, which increases login friction and can slow them down. That does not reduce user disruption; it can actually worsen it.

How to approach properly instead:

- Use Azure AD Connect with Password Hash Synchronization and enable Azure AD Seamless SSO to provide a smooth sign-on experience. - Apply Conditional Access to require MFA only under certain conditions (e.g., from untrusted networks or high-risk sign-ins), reducing unnecessary friction. - Plan phased migration and user communication so changes are predictable, with training and support.

In short: MFA is important for security, but alone it doesn’t meet the goal of reducing user impact during/after migration. A combination of SSO and selective MFA (via Conditional Access) achieves lower friction while maintaining security. If you want, I can walk through how to configure these concepts.

Pune, India

AI Explanation - verified by prasoonmudgal96 on: June 16, 2026
Question 4:
Question 4 asks: An administrator creating an exclusion is limited to applying a rule to how many groups of hosts?

What the options imply:

- A: File exclusions are not aligned to groups or hosts — likely false; exclusions are typically scoped to groups. - B: There is a limit of three groups — the page’s answer key says this, but I’m not certain it’s universally true. - C: There is no limit and exclusions can be applied to any or all groups — plausible, allows broad coverage. - D: Each exclusion can be aligned to only one group of hosts — seems unlikely, as admins often need multi-group scope.

My take: The most sensible behavior for flexibility is that exclusions can be applied to multiple groups (i.e., option C). The idea of a hard limit (three groups) or a single-group cap would be more restrictive and less practical in larger environments.

Caveat: The provided answer key on this page lists B, but I can’t confirm that limit is guaranteed across versions. If you need a definitive answer, I’d recommend checking the latest CrowdStrike admin/docs for the exact scoping rules in your environment. Want me to walk through how to verify this in the UI or compare with other questions?

Gurugram, India

AI Explanation - verified by User8249 on: June 14, 2026
Question 2:

Correct answer: D — The ability to support batch and streaming workloads

Why: Delta Lake is the storage layer that adds ACID transactions and a unified metadata model to data stored in the lake. This enables reliable, end-to-end processing for both batch and streaming workloads on the same data, which is a core benefit of the Databricks Lakehouse Platform.

Why other options aren’t Delta Lake benefits:

- A: Multi-language data manipulation is more about notebook/runtime capabilities, not Delta Lake. - B: Real-time notebook collaboration is a workspace feature, not Delta Lake. - C: Alerts for query failures are monitoring/ops features, not Delta Lake. - E: Distributing complex data operations is more about compute engines than Delta Lake storage semantics.

Quick takeaway: Delta Lake enables unified, reliable batch and streaming processing on the lakehouse.

Pune, India

AI Explanation - verified by User6170 on: June 15, 2026
Question 16:
A opção correta é C: "Proteger as liberdades civis e aumentar a conscientização do consumidor."
Por quê:

EFF e EPIC são organizações não governamentais criadas para defender liberdades civis na esfera digital e ampliar a consciência sobre privacidade e direitos dos consumidores.

Não foram criadas para estabelecer padrões de transações online (isso costuma envolver órgãos regulatórios ou padrões técnicos).

Embora apoiem criptografia, o objetivo principal delas não é promover a segurança via criptografia como único caminho.

Não se concentram apenas em aumentar a confiança do consumidor na indústria nem em “promover segurança na Internet através de criptografia forte” como missão central.

Resumo: defender liberdades civis digitais e educar/alertar o público sobre privacidade são seus compromissos centrais.
Curitiba, Brazil

AI Explanation - verified by User9855 on: June 23, 2026
Question 23:
Question 23 asks: Which of the following is NOT a method used by Identity Awareness for acquiring identity?

Remote Access

Active Directory Query

Cloud IdP (Identity Provider)

RADIUS

Answer: C: Cloud IdP (Identity Provider)
Why:

Identity Awareness typically acquires identity from on-prem or VPN-related sources such as:

- Active Directory Query (LDAP/AD) to map IPs to users. - Remote Access sessions, where user identity is captured when VPN clients connect. - RADIUS events, which provide user identity information from RADIUS-authenticated devices.

A Cloud IdP is generally not a standard direct identity source for Identity Awareness to map network identities to users. It’s more about cloud SSO/authentication, not feeding Identity Awareness with the mapping data IA uses.

So, Cloud IdP is NOT a method Identity Awareness uses to acquire identity.
Budapest, Hungary

AI Explanation - verified by canttouchthisemail2042 on: June 16, 2026
Question 104:
Answer: D
In ITIL 4, an incident is an unplanned interruption to a service or a reduction in the quality of a service. Option D mentions a service interruption, which captures the core idea of an incident. The phrase “resolved by the use of self-help tools” describes one possible resolution path (e.g., a user workaround), but the definition itself does not require self-help tools. The other options describe changes, risks, or outcomes that don’t define an incident.
Fayetteville, United States

AI Explanation - verified by raushankumar6343 on: June 27, 2026
Question 25:
The correct choice is A: From the Azure portal, configure parallel indexing.
Why:

Parallel indexing allows the indexer to process multiple documents concurrently, which directly reduces the time required to build the index when you have a sizable data set (10 GB of scanned documents/images in this case).

The other options don’t impact indexing speed:

- Scheduled indexing just controls when indexing runs, not how fast it builds the index. - Configuring field mappings via REST API affects data mapping, not speed. - Creating a text-based indexer via REST API doesn’t inherently speed up ingestion compared with parallel processing.
Notes:

Enabling parallel indexing increases throughput but may consume more resources; ensure the data source supports parallel ingestion and monitor performance quotas.

Kolkata, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7034 on: July 01, 2026
Question 2:

Correct answer: C. The flow is a before save flow.

Explanation:

- When a flow is configured as a record-triggered flow with the run type set to “Before Save,” Salesforce restricts the Flow Builder toolbox to a limited set of elements (e.g., Assignment, Decision, Get Records, Loop) because the flow runs before the record is saved and there’s no UI or post-save actions involved. - If it were a Screen Flow, you would see a Screen element in the toolbox. The status (inactive/active) doesn’t change the toolbox; it affects deployment/editability, not the available elements in a before-save flow. - So the limited toolbox indicates you’re editing a Before Save flow, not a screen flow or a different activation state.
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7686 on: June 17, 2026
Question 30:
Answer: A
Why:

The issue involves a P2S connection from Computer1 to access AppSvr2 in another VNet. Re-downloading and reinstalling the VPN client ensures the latest VPN profile/routes are applied for cross-VNet access.

The other options are not correct fixes for P2S cross-VNet reachability: routing via GatewaySubnet isn’t how P2S routes are configured, and service endpoints don’t establish inter-VNet VPN connectivity.

Melbourne, Australia

AI Explanation - verified by madhavi.chilla09 on: June 09, 2026
Question 68:
Question 68 is about reshaping data in Power Query Editor so you can show all measures over time and compute YoY for them.
Goal: Convert a wide table (one column per measure) into a long/tall table with columns like Date, Measure, Value.
Four actions in sequence:

1) In Power Query Editor, select the time/date column(s) you want to keep, then choose Unpivot Other Columns. This turns the measure columns into two: Attribute and Value.

2) Rename the Attribute column to Measure.

3) Change the data type of the Value column to a numeric type (e.g., Decimal Number).

4) Rename the Value column to a more descriptive name (e.g., MeasureValue or Amount).

Result: a dataset with Date, Measure, and MeasureValue fields, enabling visuals to include all measures over time and enabling YoY calculations in DAX.
Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User1143 on: June 20, 2026
Question 3:
The expected output is 4.
Reasoning:

Start: x = [0, 1, 2]

x.insert(0, 1) inserts 1 at index 0 ? x becomes [1, 0, 1, 2]

del x[1] removes the element at index 1 (which is 0) ? x becomes [1, 1, 2]

print(sum(x)) computes 1 + 1 + 2 = 4 and prints 4 (with a newline).

Harlow, United Kingdom

AI Explanation - verified by User3296 on: June 21, 2026
Question 42:
Here’s a focused explanation of Question 42.
What the question asks

You plan to deploy an Azure NAT gateway (Gateway1) to Vnet1.

VM1 and VM2 will access the internet via their own public IPs.

You want to minimize administrative effort.

You’re asked: what is the minimum number of subnets that Vnet1 must have to support this deployment?

Key Azure NAT Gateway requirements

The NAT gateway itself must be deployed in a dedicated subnet named GatewaySubnet. This is mandatory.

If you have an Azure Firewall in the same VNet, it must reside in its own subnet named AzureFirewallSubnet. This is also mandatory.

The NAT gateway is used to provide outbound internet access for subnets that you attach to it. If VM1 and VM2 live in one subnet, you only need that one subnet to be NAT-enabled; if they reside in multiple subnets, you’d attach NAT to each of those subnets.

Minimum-subnet reasoning

At minimum you need:

- GatewaySubnet (for Gateway1) - AzureFirewallSubnet (for FW1) - The VM subnet(s) that will use NAT (one subnet suffices if VM1 and VM2 share a subnet)
So, the typical minimum is 3 subnets (GatewaySubnet, AzureFirewallSubnet, and at least one VM subnet). If VM1 and VM2 sit in two separate subnets that both require NAT, you’d have 4 subnets.
Note on the answer key

The provided answer in the material shows 4 (option C). That would be correct if there are two separate VM subnets needing NAT. If VM1 and VM2 share a single subnet, 3 subnets is the minimum. If you want, I can help map the exact subnet layout you have and confirm which minimum applies.

Buffalo, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User1464 on: June 28, 2026
Question 13:
Here’s a focused explanation of Question 13.

What the question asks

- You need to deploy an AI solution in Azure and be able to build, test, and deploy predictive analytics. - The proposed solution is to use Azure Cosmos DB.

What the given answer implies

- Answer: No. Cosmos DB alone does not provide end-to-end AI tooling.

Why Cosmos DB is not sufficient

- Azure Cosmos DB is a globally distributed database service. It stores and serves data, but it does not offer the native tooling to build, train, test, validate, and deploy predictive models. - Building and deploying predictive analytics is typically done with an AI/ML platform such as Azure Machine Learning Studio (or the Azure ML service), which manages experiments, training, pipelines, and deployment.

How to approach correctly

- Use Azure Machine Learning Studio or the Azure ML service to handle the ML lifecycle. - You can use Cosmos DB as a data source or sink (e.g., feed training data from Cosmos DB into ML, or store model outputs back into Cosmos DB), but it’s not the end-to-end solution by itself.

Takeaway

- The correct choice is No, Cosmos DB does not meet the goal of building/testing/deploying predictive analytics. Use an AI/ML service (Azure Machine Learning) for the end-to-end process, possibly using Cosmos DB as a data source.
Calamba, Philippines

AI Explanation - verified by User5323 on: June 18, 2026
Question 41:
Question 41 answer: C (basic discovery)
Why:

The goal is to prevent the onboarded Defender for Endpoint device from polling the network for device discovery, but still allow it to discover devices it directly communicates with.

In Defender for Endpoint, discovery modes include Standard discovery and Basic discovery. Standard discovery performs broader network polling to enumerate devices, which contradicts the requirement.

Basic discovery limits discovery to locally observed devices or those the endpoint directly interacts with, matching the need to avoid broad network polling while still discovering directly connected devices.

How to configure:

In the Defender portal, go to Settings > Endpoints > Device discovery (or equivalent discovery settings).

Set the discovery mode to Basic discovery.

Note: Standard discovery would enable broader network polling (not desired), while device discovery exclusions targets specific devices, and a network assessment job is unrelated here.

Gurugram, India

AI Explanation - verified by User7356 on: July 04, 2026
Question 20:
Question 20 asks about the Server certificate SNI check when the SNI hostname doesn’t match the certificate’s CN or SAN.

Answer: C. FortiGate will close the connection if the SNI does not match the CN or SAN fields.

Why:

SNI (Server Name Indication) tells the server which hostname the client wants. The server certificate should cover that hostname, either in the CN or in the SAN (Subject Alternative Name) field.

If the SNI does not appear in either CN or SAN, the certificate identity check fails. In strict/SNI-check mode, FortiGate will terminate the TLS handshake to prevent a potential man-in-the-middle.

Why not D: matching both CN and SAN is not usually required; if the SNI matches either CN or SAN, the check passes. “Does not match CN and SAN” would be overly strict.

Why not A or B: A suggests using CN for URL filtering when SNI doesn’t match, which isn’t standard behavior. B suggests a warning while accepting the connection, which is not the default strict behavior in this context.

Note: I can’t see the exhibit image, but the general rule is: if SNI isn’t found in CN or SAN, FortiGate blocks the connection (C). If you want, I can walk through the concept of SNI checks or compare how different SSL inspection profiles affect this behavior.
Parabiago, Italy

AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68 on: June 28, 2026
Question 295:
Question 295 explanation:

Correct answer: A) enable AAA override

Why: When ISE assigns VLANs via RADIUS attributes, you need the WLC to accept and apply those attributes. Enabling AAA Override (in the WLC, typically via the Advanced tab and the Allow AAA Override option) lets the RADIUS server’s attributes override the WLC’s local VLAN configuration. This is the standard fix to ensure clients get placed on the VLAN returned by the RADIUS server.

Why the other options aren’t correct:

- set a NAC state: not the direct mechanism to apply RADIUS-provided VLANs. - utilize RADIUS profiling: helpful for device/class identification but does not by itself override VLAN assignment. - require a DHCP address assignment: unrelated to VLAN mapping based on authentication.

Note on the exam key: The page shows answer C (utilize RADIUS profiling), but the correct Cisco practice is to enable AAA Override to allow RADIUS-provided attributes to place the client on the proper VLAN.

Plano, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User5443 on: June 04, 2026
Question 7:
Question 7 asks you to map tools to the requirements: improve the experience of logging/responding to support requests and gain visibility into support technicians’ weekly activity.
Key idea: use the three core Power Platform components to cover both the front-end experience and the data/automation needs.

Power Apps: Build a custom ticketing UI so customers and technicians can log and respond to requests more efficiently.

Power Automate: Automate routine tasks like ticket routing, status updates, and notifications, reducing manual work.

Power BI: Create dashboards and reports to provide weekly visibility into technician activity and key metrics (e.g., tickets opened/closed, response times).

If the drag-and-drop options include these three tools (Power Apps, Power Automate, Power BI), that combination aligns with the described requirements. If you’d like, share the exact option list, and I’ll walk through which item matches each requirement.
Rayalacheruvu, India

AI Explanation - verified by User9195 on: June 14, 2026
Question 34:
Question 34 asks how to keep the first stage of a multi-step process from contributing to forecast.

Correct answers: B and D

Why:

B: Configure the first stage with the Forecast Category set to Omitted. Stages with Omitted are not included in forecast rollups.

D: Assign a probability of 0% to the first stage. If a stage has 0% probability, it won’t count toward forecast regardless of other fields.

Why not A or C:

A (enter $0 amount) doesn’t guarantee exclusion from forecast—forecast uses category and probability, not the amount.

C (override the forecast to $0) is manual and error-prone; automation via category or probability is preferable.

quick steps to implement:

Go to Setup ? Forecasts ? Settings (or Opportunity Stages for your sales process).

For the first stage, set Forecast Category to Omitted (and/or set Probability to 0%).

Save.

If you want, I can walk you through the exact navigation for your org (Lightning vs Classic).
Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User3091 on: July 02, 2026
Question 33:
Question 33 asks which two actions should be performed with Case escalation rules. The two correct actions are:

Send email notifications

Re-assign the Case

Why:

Escalation rules are designed to alert the right people and move cases to the next owner when SLAs are at risk. Email notifications ensure someone is aware of the escalation, and re-assigning the case hands it to the appropriate agent or queue who can handle the issue.

Why the other options aren’t correct:

Re-open the Case: Escalation rules don’t typically re-open a closed case. Escalation focuses on notifying and routing, not changing a case’s closed/open status.

Change the Case Priority: While you can adjust priority in some workflows, the canonical escalation actions are about reassigning and notifying. The question asks for two actions, and the strongest pair is email notifications plus re-assignment.

Bengaluru, India

AI Explanation - verified by User3058 on: June 08, 2026
Question 41:

Correct answer: D. Transform the column to contain only the year.

Reasoning:

The goal is to derive just the year from a Date column with minimal effort. Splitting by delimiters or a fixed number of characters is a text-manipulation approach and brittle for dates; it’s not the right tool for date semantics.

The proper approach is to extract the year from the date using a date function or a built-in date transformation.

How to implement in Power Query Editor:

Open Power Query Editor.

Select the Date column.

Use: Transform > Date > Year (or Add Column > Date > Year) to produce a year value.

If you need only the year column, delete the original Date column after you’ve created the year column, leaving just the year values.

Concept: Use Date.Year([Date]) (via the UI as Year) to convert a date to its year component, which is the most robust and least labor-intensive method.
Hyderabad, India

AI Explanation - verified by User9392 on: July 05, 2026
Question 23:
Question 23 explanation

Correct answer: A

Why this works:

- To see revenue by marketing campaign, use a standard Campaign report type that includes related Opportunities (Campaigns with Opportunities). This lets you pull Opportunity fields like Amount and filter to won opportunities. - By filtering for Won Opportunities, you attribute only actual revenue to each campaign, and you can sum the Opportunity Amounts grouped by Campaign.

Why the other options aren’t suitable:

- B: Periodic data jobs aren’t needed when you can report on live data from the Campaigns with Opportunities report type. - C: Roll-up summary fields require a Master-Detail relationship. Opportunities relate to Campaigns via a lookup, so you can’t create a roll-up from Opportunity to Campaign out-of-the-box. - D: A custom Total Value field with a workflow would require cross-object summing and isn’t feasible with standard automation on a lookup relationship without additional tools.

Quick steps to implement:

- Use the report type: "Campaigns with Opportunities." - Add columns: Campaign Name, Opportunity Amount. - Add a filter: Opportunity Stage = Closed Won. - Group by Campaign and summarize Amount to see revenue per campaign.
Edison, United States

AI Explanation - verified by User7197 on: June 20, 2026
Question 37:
Answer: A
Explanation:

Why A is correct: Publishing the on-prem web apps via Microsoft Entra Application Proxy applies a Zero Trust approach to remote access. It lets users reach the apps without exposing the internal network or requiring a VPN, and leverages Entra ID for SSO and conditional access, MFA, and centralized identity control. This minimizes the attack surface while meeting Zero Trust principles and aligns with the MCRA guidance for securing on-prem resources.

Why not B: Using VPN with Entra authentication still relies on a network gateway (VPN) and increases attack surface. It doesn’t inherently provide the same cloud-style access controls, SSO, or MFA-based policy enforcement for web apps as App Proxy.

Why not C: Configuring connectors/rules in Defender for Cloud Apps (Cloud App Security) focuses on SaaS and cloud app discovery/monitoring, not directly on securely publishing and access-controlling on-prem web apps.

Why not D: Defender for Endpoint web protection addresses endpoints, not access control for on-prem web applications.

Key alignment: App Proxy enables secure, identity-driven access, removes the need for inbound VPN, supports SSO/MFA, and centralizes access management—core tenets of Zero Trust in the scenario.

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!

Cisco 350-901 Exam Actual Questions Developing Applications using Cisco Core Platforms and APIs (DEVCOR) (Page 30 )

QUESTION: 65

Explanation:

QUESTION: 66

QUESTION: 67

QUESTION: 68

QUESTION: 69

Cisco 350-901 Exam Actual Questions
Developing Applications using Cisco Core Platforms and APIs (DEVCOR) (Page 30 )