Free SAT Exam Braindumps
Scholastic Aptitude Test Exam Questions 377–384 (page: 49)

Updated On: 31-Jul-2026

Far from the ______ crowds of the city, I find refuge at my ______ cabin on Big Lake.

  1. pervasive ... dominant
  2. aggressive ... listless
  3. petrified ... motivating
  4. overwhelming ... secluded
  5. extensive ... scanty

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Justification
Option D (“overwhelming … secluded”) correctly fills both blanks with adjectives that convey contrasting scales and settings: “far from the overwhelming crowds of the city” suggests an intense, pervasive presence of people, while “secluded cabin on Big Lake” describes a quiet, isolated place. The semantic relationship— large-scale urban activity versus a small, private retreat—is logically coherent and stylistically balanced.
Option A (“pervasive … dominant”) uses two synonyms that both describe intensity but lack the necessary contrast; “dominant” does not naturally modify “cabin,” making the second blank awkward.
Option B (“aggressive … listless”) juxtaposes an aggressive urban environment with a listless cabin, but “listless” connotes a lack of energy that does not fit a refuge setting and creates a semantic mismatch.
Option C (“petrified … motivating”) mixes an emotional state (“petrified”) with a positive adjective (“motivating”) that does not describe a cabin’s location, resulting in an ill-fitted pair.
Option E (“extensive … scanty”) pairs a large-scale descriptor with a small-scale one, but “scanty” is typically used for resources or quantities, not for describing a cabin’s isolation, leading to an unnatural phrasing.
Therefore, Option D provides the most precise and context-appropriate word choice, maintaining parallelism and clear contrast between the crowded city and the secluded cabin.


Reference:

Dictionary.com definition of “overwhelming” – https://www.dictionary.com/browse/overwhelming Merriam-Webster definition of “secluded” – https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/secluded



The professor's oldest colleague was selected to give the __________ at the funeral.

  1. eulogy
  2. elegy
  3. epigraph
  4. eponymy
  5. epitaph

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Correct choice: A. eulogy Reasoning: An eulogy is a formal speech or text praising a deceased person, typically delivered at a funeral service. The sentence describes a colleague being selected to give something at the funeral, which directly matches the function of an eulogy.
Why the other options are unsuitable:
B: elegy – a lyrical poem or mournful composition, usually not delivered as a spoken address at a funeral. C. epigraph – a brief quotation or saying placed at the beginning of a work; it is not an oral tribute. D. eponymy – the relationship between a name and the thing named after it; unrelated to funeral speeches. E. epitaph – an inscription on a gravestone; it is written, not spoken during a funeral ceremony.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster definition of eulogy: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eulogy Dictionary.com entry for eulogy: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/eulogy



The new team member's __________ was an encouragement to the rest of the team, who had become __________
by the string of defeats.

  1. enthusiasm ... elated
  2. vigor ... inundated
  3. ebullience ... dispirited
  4. dourness ... undone
  5. excessiveness ... downcast

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Justification
The first blank requires a noun that conveys a positive, uplifting attitude that can encourage others. Ebullience (high-spirited enthusiasm) precisely fits this role; it denotes an energetic, optimistic demeanor that naturally lifts teammates. The second blank must describe the team’s condition after a series of defeats. Dispirited means lacking confidence or enthusiasm, i.e., emotionally drained and demoralized, which aligns perfectly with being “discouraged by the string of defeats.” Option C therefore presents a logically coherent pair: ebullience → dispirited.
Why the other options are unsuitable

A: enthusiasm … elated – “Elated” describes an extreme high mood, not a state of discouragement; the pair lacks contrast. B. vigor … inundated – “Vigor” is positive, but “inundated” implies being overwhelmed, not specifically demoralized; the semantic link is weak. D. dourness … undone – “Dourness” is itself negative, so it could not serve as an encouragement; “undone” is vague and does not capture the emotional fatigue implied. E. excessiveness … downcast – “Excessiveness” is not a quality that would encourage others, and while “downcast” fits the discouraged mood, the first term fails to meet the requirement.
Hence, option C is the only choice that provides a semantically appropriate, contrasting pair that matches the sentence’s meaning.


Reference:

Ebullience – Merriam-Webster: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ebullience Dispirited – Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/dispirited



By the end of the campaign both candidates had resorted to __________ the other.

  1. commending
  2. denigrating
  3. mollifying
  4. conceding
  5. swindling

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Justification
The phrase “resorted to ___ the other” requires a verb that conveys a negative, hostile action toward the opponent. Denigrating means to disparage or speak ill of someone, which aligns with the context of both candidates sinking to a lower, antagonistic level. Commending (praising) would imply a positive action, contradicting the adversarial tone. Mollifying (soothing) and conceding (admitting) describe conciliatory or yielding behaviors, which are opposite to the described escalation. Swindling involves deceit for personal gain, a different semantic field and does not fit the grammatical construction “resorted to ___ the other.”
Therefore, B. denigrating is the only option that accurately captures the hostile, disparaging conduct implied by the sentence.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster definition of denigrate: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/denigrate Cambridge Dictionary entry for denigrate: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/denigrate



The cat __________ crept across the lawn, gracefully __________ the dog.

  1. felicitously ... enticing
  2. swiftly ... defeating
  3. acrobatically ... apprehending
  4. maladroitly ... undermining
  5. deftly ... eluding

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Justification
The first blank describes how the cat moves across the lawn. “Deftly” conveys skillful, graceful movement that matches the adverbial tone of the sentence. The second blank must be a verb that fits the idiom “gracefully _____ the dog.” “Eluding” means to evade or avoid capture, which logically follows a graceful motion and preserves the intended meaning that the cat is evading the dog.
Why option E is the only viable choice:
Deftly is an adverb that naturally modifies a verb of motion or action, fitting the first blank perfectly. Eluding is a present-participle verb that can follow “gracefully” to describe the cat’s ongoing avoidance of the dog, creating a coherent, idiomatic phrase: “gracefully eluding the dog.” Why the other options fail:

A: felicitously … enticing – “Felicitously” is an uncommon, awkward adverb; “enticing” suggests the cat is attracting the dog, which contradicts the notion of graceful evasion. B. swiftly … defeating – “Swiftly” is plausible for the first blank, but “defeating” implies the cat overpowers the dog, a meaning not supported by the context of graceful movement. C. acrobatically … apprehending – “Acrobatically” could describe movement, yet “apprehending” means capturing, which again conflicts with the intended evasion. D. maladroitly … undermining – “Maladroitly” conveys clumsiness, the opposite of “gracefully,” making the phrase internally inconsistent.
Thus, option E provides the only grammatically and semantically coherent pair.


Reference:

College Board – Official SAT Practice Test #5 (PDF) – https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/2016-08/SAT-Practice-Test-5.pdf Purdue OWL – Adverb Usage and Modifiers – https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/adverb_usage.html



The storyteller's __________ anecdotes earned her the __________ attention of the crowd.

  1. compelling ... rapt
  2. pointed ... spellbound
  3. moribund ... lucid
  4. poignant ... abrasive
  5. meandering ... distracted

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Justification
Option A – “compelling … rapt”
Compelling describes stories that attract and hold interest through strong emotional or intellectual appeal; it is the standard adjective used to modify “anecdotes” in this context. Rapt conveys a state of being completely absorbed or engrossed; it pairs naturally with “attention” to indicate the crowd’s undivided focus. The collocation “rapt attention” is idiomatic and fits the sentence structure perfectly.
Option B – “pointed … spellbound”
Pointed can mean “sharp” or “direct,” but it is not commonly used to characterize anecdotes in a way that would attract a crowd. Spellbound is a possible synonym for “rapt,” yet the mismatch between “pointed anecdotes” and the intended sense of engaging storytelling makes the pair unsuitable.
Option C – “moribund … lucid”
Moribund means “dying” or “in decline,” which directly contradicts the idea of anecdotes that earn admiration. Lucid describes clarity of expression, not the audience’s reaction; it does not convey the intensity of attention implied by the blank.
Option D – “poignant … abrasive”
Poignant fits emotionally resonant anecdotes, but abrasive describes a harsh or irritating manner, which would repel rather than attract a crowd’s attention. The two descriptors are contradictory.
Option E – “meandering … distracted”
Meandering suggests a wandering, unfocused narrative, which would likely diminish, not earn, attention. Distracted denotes a lack of focus, the opposite of the “attention” the sentence seeks to describe.
Conclusion: Only option A provides a semantically coherent and idiomatically appropriate pairing (“compelling anecdotes … rapt attention”), making it the correct choice.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster: compelling | rapt Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries: spellbound | poignant
These sources confirm the definitions and typical collocations used in the analysis.



The bill became bogged down in a(n) __________ of contentious issues in a Senate subcommittee.

  1. marsh
  2. sequence
  3. iota
  4. conundrum
  5. quagmire

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Justification
Quagmire (option E) denotes a complicated, entangling predicament—exactly the sense of a legislative proposal being stalled by numerous contentious issues. Marsh (A) refers to a wetland; it carries no connotation of difficulty or obstruction. Sequence (B) describes an ordered succession; it does not imply a problematic or tangled situation. Iota (C) means a very small amount; it cannot convey a large, pervasive set of issues. Conundrum (D) is a puzzling question or riddle, not a broader, sticky circumstance involving many disputes.
Therefore, “quagmire” is the only term that accurately captures the idea of the bill being trapped in a tangled mass of contentious matters.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster definition of quagmire: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quagmire Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries entry for quagmire: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/quagmire



The outcome of the race seemed __________ before the leader's misstep on the final leg gave her competitors a(n) __________ of winning the title.

  1. dubious ... prospect
  2. inevitable ... hope
  3. indubitable ... air
  4. assured ... expectation
  5. partial ... endeavor

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Justification
The phrase “the outcome … seemed __________” requires an adjective that conveys certainty or inevitability. “Inevitable” precisely expresses that the result appeared unavoidable prior to the leader’s error. The second blank calls for a noun that denotes a feeling or expectation held by the competitors after the misstep. “Hope” fits naturally as the thing they now possess—“a hope of winning the title.” Option B (“inevitable … hope”) therefore creates a coherent, grammatically correct sentence: “The outcome of the race seemed inevitable before the leader's misstep on the final leg gave her competitors a hope of winning the title.”
Why the other options are unsuitable

A: dubious … prospect – “Dubious” suggests doubt or suspicion, which contradicts the sense of certainty implied by “seemed.” “Prospect” can work, but the pair loses the intended nuance of inevitability. C. indubitable … air – “Indubitable” is a rare, overly formal synonym for certain, but “air” does not collocate with “a … of winning the title”; the phrase is ungrammatical. D. assured … expectation – “Assured” is an adjective that typically modifies a noun directly (e.g., “an assured victory”), not a verb phrase like “seemed assured.” “Expectation” is possible, yet the collocation feels forced compared to “hope.” E. partial … endeavor – “Partial” denotes incompleteness, which clashes with the context of a race outcome that was about to be decided. “Endeavor” does not fit the required noun slot (“a … of winning the title”).
Hence, option B best satisfies both semantic and syntactic requirements.


Reference:

Merriam-Webster definition of inevitable: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inevitable Cambridge Dictionary entry for hope (noun): https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/hope



Viewing page 49 of 117
Viewing questions 385 - 392 out of 924 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss College Board SAT exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!