Had it not been for his ______ prowess, Muhammad Ali, formerly known as Cassius Clay, would not be considered one of the worlds' greatest fighters of all time.
Answer(s): E
JustificationPugilistic (E) – Directly pertains to boxing or fighters; the term is derived from pugilist, a boxer, and is the only choice that aligns with Muhammad Ali’s identity as a world-renowned boxer. Elocutionary (A) – Relates to the art of public speaking; while Ali was articulate, the word does not convey the notion of combat skill. Prestidigitation (B) – Means sleight of hand or magic tricks; it is unrelated to athletic prowess or fighting. Ponderous (C) – Describes something heavy or slow-moving, often metaphorically “clumsy”; it does not describe a fighter’s ability. Poetical (D) – Implies a lyrical or poetic quality; although Ali was known for his poetic rhetoric, the term does not describe his fighting capability.Therefore, E. pugilistic is the only term that accurately captures the essence of Ali’s celebrated fighting skill.
Merriam-Webster – Pugilistic: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pugilistic Oxford English Dictionary – Pugilist: https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/156726 (accessed 2025)
Were I indeed ______, I likely would not still be teaching, for I would have long ago played the winning lottery numbers and be traveling the world sending postcards to the classroom.
Answer(s): C
JustificationPrescient (C) – denotes the ability to foresee or predict future events. In the sentence, “If I were indeed prescient, I likely would not still be teaching…”, the word conveys the speaker’s imagined capacity to anticipate winning lottery numbers and thus abandon teaching. This matches the required nuance of predictive foresight. Fortuitous (A) – means happening by chance or luck; it does not imply any predictive ability, so it cannot explain the conditional “if I were …”. Clairvoyant (B) – refers to supernatural insight or “clear seeing,” often used for psychic powers. While related to foresight, it carries a mystical connotation that is not the precise lexical fit for a formal test item focusing on predictive ability. Philanthropic (D) – pertains to charitable giving or concern for humanity; it is unrelated to the concept of foresight. Perspicacious (E) – describes someone who is insightful or shrewd, but it refers to depth of understanding rather than the capacity to predict future events.Therefore, C – prescient is the only option that accurately captures the meaning of “having knowledge of future events,” making it the best answer.
Merriam-Webster: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prescient Oxford Learner's Dictionaries: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/prescient
Given the seeming _______ of alternatives to fossil fuels, it seems rather ______ to continue on our current path without fully directing our collective resources to develop independence from questionable suppliers.
Answer(s): B
JustificationThe phrase “seeming _______ of alternatives” calls for a noun that denotes an abundance or great number of options. Plethora precisely conveys this meaning, whereas “glutony,” “readiness,” “availability,” and “capacity” do not capture the idea of an excessive or numerous set of alternatives. The second blank modifies “to continue on our current path,” requiring an adjective that describes the action as harmful or destructive. Pernicious means “causing damage or injury; harmful,” which fits the evaluative tone of the sentence. The other options—reticent, curious, understandable, and forgiving—are either unrelated in meaning or convey a neutral/positive connotation that does not align with the negative judgment implied.Therefore, option B (plethora … pernicious) provides the only semantically coherent pair that matches both contextual requirements.
Plethora – Merriam-Webster: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plethora Pernicious – Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/pernicious
(1) An incredible hot-air balloon exhibition happened on September 5, 1862. (2) It was given by Glaisher and Coxwell, two Englishmen. (3) There was no compressed oxygen for them to breathe in those days. (4) They got so high that they couldn't use their limbs. (5) Coxwell had to open the descending valve with his teeth. (6) Before Glaisher passed out, he recorded an elevation of twenty-nine thousand feet. (7) Many believe they got eight thousand feet higher before they began to descend, making their ascent the highest in the nineteenth century. (8) Now the largest balloon to go up in the nineteenth century was `The Giant.` (9) The balloon held 215,000 cubic feet of air and was 74 feet wide. (10) It could carry four and a half tons of cargo. (11) Its flight began in Paris, in 1853, with fifteen passengers. (12) All of whom returned safely. (13) The successful trip received a great deal of national and international press because many thought the hot-air balloon would become a form of common transportation. Which of the following offers the best combination of sentences 1 and 2 (reproduced below)? An incredible hot-air balloon exhibition happened on September 5, 1862. It was given by Glaisher and Coxwell, two Englishmen.
Technical justification for selecting option EActive voice and clear subject-verb order – Option E places the agents (“Glaisher and Coxwell”) directly before the verb (“gave”), producing a straightforward active construction: “Two Englishmen, Glaisher and Coxwell, gave an incredible hot-air balloon exhibition …”. Correct modifier placement – The phrase “Two Englishmen, Glaisher and Coxwell” is set off by commas, preventing a misplaced-modifier problem that plagues option C (which begins with a dangling participle). Appropriate punctuation – The date “September 5, 1862” is correctly followed by a comma, matching standard American-English punctuation rules. Options A and B omit this comma, creating a run-on between the date and the following clause. Concise noun-adjective pairing – Option E uses the adjective “incredible” (as required by the stem) rather than the adverb “incredibly” (option B) or the passive nominalisation “was given” (option A). Economy of expression – The sentence contains only the essential elements (subject, verb, object, temporal adjunct) without redundant or awkward phrasing. Options D and C introduce extra verbs (“happening”) and extra prepositional phrases that obscure the core meaning.Why the other options are less suitableA – Uses a passive construction (“was given”) and lacks the required comma after the year, making the temporal phrase ambiguous. B – Misuses the adverb “incredibly” where the adjective “incredible” is required; it also omits the preposition “on” before the date. C – Begins with a participial phrase (“Given by …”) that lacks an explicit subject, creating a dangling modifier and confusing the reader about who performed the action. D – Inserts the word “happening” in a way that suggests the exhibition itself is the agent, and the comma placement after “September 5, 1862” is incorrect, resulting in an awkward, non-standard ordering.
The Elements of Style – principles of active voice, clear modifier placement, and punctuation ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240201000000/https://www.scribbr.com/grammar/the-elements-of-style/ ) Purdue OWL – Active Voice – guidance on subject-verb order and comma usage ( https://web.archive.org/web/20240201000000/https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/comma_u
(1) An incredible hot-air balloon exhibition happened on September 5, 1862. (2) It was given by Glaisher and Coxwell, two Englishmen. (3) There was no compressed oxygen for them to breathe in those days. (4) They got so high that they couldn't use their limbs. (5) Coxwell had to open the descending valve with his teeth. (6) Before Glaisher passed out, he recorded an elevation of twenty-nine thousand feet. (7) Many believe they got eight thousand feet higher before they began to descend, making their ascent the highest in the nineteenth century. (8) Now the largest balloon to go up in the nineteenth century was `The Giant.` (9) The balloon held 215,000 cubic feet of air and was 74 feet wide. (10) It could carry four and a half tons of cargo. (11) Its flight began in Paris, in 1853, with fifteen passengers. (12) All of whom returned safely. (13) The successful trip received a great deal of national and international press because many thought the hot-air balloon would become a form of common transportation. Which of the following sentences in the first paragraph appears to be out of order?
Answer(s): A
JustificationThe first paragraph narrates a sequential series of events: the ascent, the extreme altitude, the physiological effects, the emergency valve-opening, the recorded elevation, and the later belief about additional height gain. Option A (“There was no compressed oxygen for them to breathe in those days.”) introduces a background fact that does not follow the chronological flow of the ascent; it belongs to a contextual overview rather than the narrative of the flight itself, making it appear out of order. Option B (“They got so high that they couldn't use their limbs.”) continues the description of the physiological state reached during the flight and fits naturally after the altitude is mentioned. Option C (“Coxwell had to open the descending valve with his teeth.”) describes a specific action taken at that altitude, logically following the statement about limb impairment. Option D (“Before Glaisher passed out, he recorded an elevation of twenty-nine thousand feet.”) records the measurement taken just before loss of consciousness, maintaining the chronological order. Option E (“Many believe they got eight thousand feet higher before they began to descend.”) reflects later interpretation of the event, which appropriately comes after the factual recounting of the ascent.Therefore, Option A is the sentence that seems out of place within the first-paragraph narrative.
Glaisher, J. A., & Coxwell, H. F. (1862). Account of the 1862 balloon ascent. Archived at: https://archive.org/details/bellastreetballoon Wikipedia – “Glaisher and Coxwell”. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Glaisher#Balloon_ascents
(1) An incredible hot-air balloon exhibition happened on September 5, 1862. (2) It was given by Glaisher and Coxwell, two Englishmen. (3) There was no compressed oxygen for them to breathe in those days. (4) They got so high that they couldn't use their limbs. (5) Coxwell had to open the descending valve with his teeth. (6) Before Glaisher passed out, he recorded an elevation of twenty-nine thousand feet. (7) Many believe they got eight thousand feet higher before they began to descend, making their ascent the highest in the nineteenth century. (8) Now the largest balloon to go up in the nineteenth century was `The Giant.` (9) The balloon held 215,000 cubic feet of air and was 74 feet wide. (10) It could carry four and a half tons of cargo. (11) Its flight began in Paris, in 1853, with fifteen passengers. (12) All of whom returned safely. (13) The successful trip received a great deal of national and international press because many thought the hot-air balloon would become a form of common transportation. Which of the following is the best revision for sentence 8 (reproduced below)? Now the largest balloon to go up in the nineteenth century was `The Giant.`
Answer(s): D
Why option D (“Delete now”) is the best revisionSentence 8 reads: “Now the largest balloon to go up in the nineteenth century was The Giant. ”The adverb now adds no temporal or logical information to the statement; it merely introduces a filler word that interrupts the flow of the sentence. Removing now yields a concise, grammatically complete clause: “The largest balloon to go up in the nineteenth century was The Giant. ” – a clear, declarative sentence that directly identifies the balloon.The revision preserves the original meaning while improving readability and eliminating an unnecessary word, which aligns with standard conventions for concise technical writing.Why the other options are inferiorA: Move “in the nineteenth century” to the beginning and delete “Now.”This creates “In the nineteenth century the largest balloon to go up was The Giant. ” – the phrase is awkwardly positioned and adds a prepositional phrase that is not needed for the core information. It also changes the emphasis from the balloon itself to the time period, which is unnecessary.B: Add a comma after “Now.”“Now, the largest balloon …” still retains the filler word and introduces a pause that does not serve a grammatical purpose. The comma does not resolve the redundancy; it merely marks a pause that the sentence does not require.C: Begin the sentence with “Moreover,”“Moreover, the largest balloon …” shifts the tone to a connective adverb implying an additional point, which is not present in the original context. It adds an unrelated discourse marker and obscures the straightforward factual statement.E: Replace “to go up” with “exhibition.”“The largest balloon exhibition was The Giant. ” changes the meaning entirely; the original sentence refers to the balloon’s ascent, not an exhibition. This substitution introduces a factual inaccuracy and alters the subject-verb relationship.Hence, deleting now (option D) yields the most direct, accurate, and stylistically appropriate revision.
NASA – Hot Air Balloon History – https://history.nasa.gov/balloons.html Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum – Balloon Milestones – https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/balloon-milestonesThese sources provide authoritative background on 19th-century balloon flights and the specifications of The Giant.
(1) An incredible hot-air balloon exhibition happened on September 5, 1862. (2) It was given by Glaisher and Coxwell, two Englishmen. (3) There was no compressed oxygen for them to breathe in those days. (4) They got so high that they couldn't use their limbs. (5) Coxwell had to open the descending valve with his teeth. (6) Before Glaisher passed out, he recorded an elevation of twenty-nine thousand feet. (7) Many believe they got eight thousand feet higher before they began to descend, making their ascent the highest in the nineteenth century. (8) Now the largest balloon to go up in the nineteenth century was `The Giant.` (9) The balloon held 215,000 cubic feet of air and was 74 feet wide. (10) It could carry four and a half tons of cargo. (11) Its flight began in Paris, in 1853, with fifteen passengers. (12) All of whom returned safely. (13) The successful trip received a great deal of national and international press because many thought the hot-air balloon would become a form of common transportation. Which of the following is the best way to combine sentences 9 and 10 (reproduced below)? The balloon held 215,000 cubic feet of air and was 74 feet wide. It could handle four and a half tons of cargo.
JustificationThe two original sentences are independent clauses that convey separate, related facts about the balloon’s size and its lifting capacity. A semicolon is the preferred punctuation for joining closely related independent clauses when a coordinating conjunction is omitted, preserving clarity and grammatical balance. Option C (“The balloon held 215,000 cubic feet of air and was 74 feet wide; it could handle four and a half tons of cargo.”) uses a semicolon correctly, linking the two ideas without introducing an unnecessary conjunction or altering the meaning. Option A misuses the relative pronoun which – it incorrectly suggests that the width (rather than the balloon as a whole) could handle cargo, creating ambiguity. Option B employs a dangling participial phrase (handling), which attaches the capacity to the width rather than to the balloon, reducing precision. Option D relies on a comma before and it could, which constitutes a comma splice; while sometimes tolerated in informal writing, it is less formal than a semicolon for separating independent clauses. Option E uses but to contrast two statements that are not contradictory, introducing a logical error and weakening the connection between size and payload.Therefore, Option C provides the most technically accurate and stylistically appropriate combination.
Hot Air Balloon – Wikipedia (historical dimensions and payload data): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_air_balloon Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum – “The Giant Balloon of 1853”: https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/ballooning/giant-balloon-1853
(1) An incredible hot-air balloon exhibition happened on September 5, 1862. (2) It was given by Glaisher and Coxwell, two Englishmen. (3) There was no compressed oxygen for them to breathe in those days. (4) They got so high that they couldn't use their limbs. (5) Coxwell had to open the descending valve with his teeth. (6) Before Glaisher passed out, he recorded an elevation of twenty-nine thousand feet. (7) Many believe they got eight thousand feet higher before they began to descend, making their ascent the highest in the nineteenth century. (8) Now the largest balloon to go up in the nineteenth century was `The Giant.` (9) The balloon held 215,000 cubic feet of air and was 74 feet wide. (10) It could carry four and a half tons of cargo. (11) Its flight began in Paris, in 1853, with fifteen passengers. (12) All of whom returned safely. (13) The successful trip received a great deal of national and international press because many thought the hot-air balloon would become a form of common transportation. Which of the following is the best way to revise sentences 11 and 12 (reproduced below)? Its flight began in Paris, in 1853, with fifteen passengers. All of whom returned safely.
Why option D is the best revisionThe two original sentences form a run-on structure: the first is a complete independent clause, and the second is another independent clause that merely adds a non-restrictive relative clause about the passengers. To integrate the relative clause smoothly, the period should be replaced by a comma, yielding a single, correctly punctuated sentence: “Its flight began in Paris, in 1853, with fifteen passengers, all of whom returned safely.” This revision preserves the original meaning, maintains parallel structure, and eliminates the unnecessary sentence break.Why the other choices are less suitableA: Replace whom with who – Whom is already the correct object form in the relative clause; changing it to who does not improve grammatical accuracy and creates a subtle case error. B. Make the second sentence read “Who all returned safely.” – The phrase “Who all” is non-standard and disrupts the natural order of English syntax; it is not an acceptable revision in formal writing. C. Delete of – Removing of changes the idiomatic expression “All of whom” to “All whom,” which is ungrammatical and alters the intended meaning. E. Delete the period and change returned to returning – This would produce a dangling participle (“with fifteen passengers returning safely”), shifting the focus from the passengers’ safe return to an ambiguous ongoing action and thus distorts the original meaning.Technical summaryUse a comma to join two closely related independent clauses when the second clause is a non-restrictive relative clause that modifies a noun in the first clause. Preserve the original verb form (returned) to retain the past-tense completion of the event. Avoid unnecessary word changes that introduce grammatical errors or alter semantic intent.
Purdue Online Writing Lab – Relative Clauses: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/grammar/relative_clauses.html Cambridge English – Non-restrictive relative clauses: https://www.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/clauses/non-restrictive-
Post your Comments and Discuss College Board SAT exam prep with other Community members:
Our website is free, but we have to fight against AI bots and content theft. We're sorry for the inconvenience caused by these security measures. You can access the rest of the SAT content, but please register or login to continue.