Free CAS-005 Exam Braindumps (page: 9)

Page 8 of 20

An organization wants to implement an access control system based on its data classification policy that includes the following data types:

-Confidential
-Restricted
-Internal
-Public Flag for Review

The access control system should support SSO federation to map users into groups. Each group should only access systems that process and store data at the classification assigned to the group. Which of the following should the organization implement to enforce its requirements with a minimal impact to systems and resources?

  1. A tagging strategy in which all resources are assigned a tag based on the data classification type, and a system that enforces attribute-based access control
  2. Role-based access control that maps data types to internal roles, which are defined in the human resources department's source of truth system
  3. Network microsegmentation based on data types, and a network access control system enforcing mandatory access control based on the user principal
  4. A rule-based access control strategy enforced by the SSO system with rules managed by the internal LDAP and applied on a per-system basis

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Tagging strategy: All resources (e.g., systems, files, databases) can be assigned tags based on their classification type (Confidential, Restricted, Internal, Public Flag for Review). This allows the access control system to easily associate resources with their respective data classifications without needing significant changes to the underlying systems.

Attribute-based access control (ABAC): ABAC allows access control decisions to be based on attributes (such as user group, resource tags, or data classification). By using ABAC, the system can enforce rules dynamically, allowing users in specific groups (mapped through SSO federation) to only access resources that match their assigned data classification.



A security analyst was monitoring the networks of a group of companies. The analyst identified several periods of concentrated, coordinated activity by unknown actors. The activity repeated at regular intervals and affected all the companies. Minor hardware outages that correlated with the same times as the discovered activity escalated in severity. Which of the following threat actors was most likely involved?

  1. An organized crime collective running a ransomware campaign
  2. A group of politically motivated hackers
  3. Disgruntled employees who were recently terminated
  4. An advanced persistent threat financed by a nation-state

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

The described activity - concentrated, coordinated attacks that happen at regular intervals and affect multiple companies - suggests the involvement of an advanced persistent threat (APT). APTs are often well-funded and organized, typically backed by nation-states. They focus on long-term, stealthy campaigns to achieve strategic goals, which might include espionage or disruption.

The fact that the attacks correlate with minor hardware outages and increasing severity indicates a well-planned and ongoing attack that escalates over time, a hallmark of nation-state-backed APTs. These attackers often have the resources, skill, and persistence to operate over extended periods without detection, making them a likely candidate for this type of activity.



The company's client service team is receiving a large number of inquiries from clients regarding a new vulnerability. Which of the following would provide the customer service team with a consistent message to deliver directly to clients?

  1. Communication plan
  2. Response playbook
  3. Disaster recovery procedure
  4. Automated runbook

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

A response playbook is a detailed document that outlines predefined steps, procedures, and templates for responding to specific incidents or situations. In this case, it would provide the customer service team with a consistent, clear, and accurate message to deliver to clients regarding the new vulnerability. The playbook would ensure that all team members are providing uniform responses to inquiries, reducing confusion and ensuring that the company's communication is coherent and accurate.



A company wants to use a process to embed a sign of ownership covertly inside a proprietary document without adding any identifying attributes. Which of the following would be best to use as part of the process to support copyright protections of the document?

  1. Steganography
  2. E-signature
  3. Watermarking
  4. Cryptography

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Steganography involves embedding information covertly within another file, such as a document, in a way that is not immediately apparent to the viewer. This can be used to embed a "sign of ownership" in a proprietary document without adding any visible or overt identifying attributes. It helps protect copyright by embedding hidden, identifying information that can later be used for verification or proof of ownership.






Post your Comments and Discuss CompTIA CAS-005 exam with other Community members:

CAS-005 Discussions & Posts