D-PSC-MN-01 Exam Discussions & Posts
AI Explanation - verified by juris.siksna
on: June 29, 2026
Question 456:
The question asks what to do during closing when a deliverable isn’t meeting customer expectations. The best move is to address the gap by renegotiating scope so that both parties are satisfied.
Answer: C
Why:
- Closing doesn’t mean ignoring issues. If a deliverable doesn’t meet expectations, you should work with the customer to agree on a revised scope that will satisfy both sides. This may involve a change in scope that is processed through the change control process, leading to new acceptance criteria and sign-off.
- This keeps the project aligned with customer needs while ensuring formal acceptance or a clearly defined path to resolution.
Why the other options are weaker:
- A suggests the customer must issue a change request, which isn’t typically how the PM handles defects or gaps; changes usually come from the project team or customer through formal change control.
- B is vague and doesn’t drive a path to resolution or re-define acceptance criteria.
- D inappropriately escalates to the sponsor before attempting direct negotiation for a revised scope.
Key takeaways:
- In closing, address unmet deliverables via a negotiated scope change that satisfies both parties and leads to formal acceptance.
Riga, Latvia
AI Explanation - verified by User8771
on: June 29, 2026
Question 13:
- Correct answer: C: Use the Audit log section in the organization's GitHub settings.
- Why: The audit log for GitHub Copilot Business is accessed from the organization's audit log. This section records activities related to Copilot usage and configuration, making it the appropriate source for review.
- Why the other options are less accurate:
- A: Security tab in the organization's settings is related to security settings but not specifically the Copilot audit log location.
- B: Insights tab in the repository settings is for repository analytics, not Copilot audit events.
- D: Code tab in the repository is unrelated to audit logs.
- Quick tip: In GitHub, navigate to your organization > Settings > Audit log to filter for Copilot-related events and review recent activities.
- Reference: GitHub Copilot Business documentation on audit logs.
Hyderabad, India
AI Explanation - verified by User8771
on: June 29, 2026
So copilot avoid the public code
- Short answer: Yes, Copilot is designed to avoid public code matches by applying the public code filter, which can block, alter, or deprioritize suggestions that resemble publicly available code.
- But it’s not a perfect guarantee: some suggestions may still resemble public code or slip through if the match isn’t exact.
- What to do:
- Review each suggestion for licensing and originality.
- If in doubt, steer prompts toward unique implementations and add your own context.
- Refer to the official docs on public code filtering and licensing for details.
Hyderabad, India
AI Explanation - verified by User1229
on: June 29, 2026
Question 20:
Heads up — the answer key on this page lists B, but the correct choice is D: Your custom endpoint is not acknowledging messages within the acknowledgement deadline.
Why D is correct:
- For push subscriptions, Pub/Sub expects your HTTPS endpoint to return a successful 200 response quickly to acknowledge each message.
- If the endpoint doesn’t acknowledge within the configured ack deadline (or fails with an error), Pub/Sub will redeliver the message. This can lead to duplicates.
- The other options are unlikely causes of duplicates:
- Message size being too large would typically cause a delivery error, not repeated duplicates.
- An out-of-date SSL certificate would cause TLS failures, not repeated successful deliveries.
- If the topic has too many messages, Pub/Sub would throttle or backlog, but not inherently create duplicates.
What to do:
- Ensure the endpoint responds quickly with 200 OK.
- Consider increasing the ack deadline if processing takes longer, or design the endpoint to be idempotent.
- Implement robust error handling and retries with backoff. Consider a dead-letter topic if delivery consistently fails.
Emsworth, United Kingdom
AI Explanation - verified by User7000
on: June 29, 2026
Question 41:
The correct answer is AWS CloudTrail (A).
Why:
- CloudTrail records AWS API calls made in your account, including who made the call, when it happened, where it came from, and the request parameters. This creates an auditable log of account activity for governance and compliance.
- The other options don’t focus on auditing API calls:
- AWS Trusted Advisor provides best-practice checks and optimization recommendations.
- Amazon Inspector is a security assessment service for EC2 workloads.
- AWS X-Ray traces requests through applications, not AWS account API activity.
Tip: For auditing, you typically enable a CloudTrail trail (potentially across regions) and store logs in S3, with optional CloudWatch Logs integration for alerts.
Dakar, Senegal
AI Explanation - verified by User5856
on: June 29, 2026
Question 41:
- The correct answer: Health policy
Explanation:
- In Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC), health data from managed devices is handled by the health monitoring system. The Health policy defines how health information from devices (health modules, hardware/software status) is collected, interpreted, and how alerts are generated and displayed in FMC.
- This is distinct from:
- system policy — global/system settings on devices
- correlation policy — rules for correlating and aggregating alerts
- access control policy — traffic allow/deny rules
- So, when asked which policy collects health module alerts from managed devices, you look to the Health policy.
Johannesburg, South Africa
Mildfed
on: June 29, 2026
Practice questions and answer explanation help me to understand quicker
Davao City, Philippines
AI Explanation - verified by User3757
on: June 28, 2026
Question 5:
Question 5 asks how Access Policies relate to Application Segments and Application Segment Groups.
- Correct answer: C — "When a condition is met, an Access Policy can either allow or block access to Application Segments and Application Segment Groups."
- Explanation: Access Policies apply the same allow-or-block decision to both individual Application Segments and to Application Segment Groups when their rule conditions are met. This means one policy can govern access for both objects, and the resulting action (allow or block) applies to whichever objects match the policy conditions.
San José, Costa Rica
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 355:
I can’t see the image in question 355, but here’s the idea and why A is the right choice.
- Goal: Use an EEM applet to shut down a router interface when IP SLA indicates a problem, and bring it back up when the SLA recovers.
- “event track 10 state down” triggers the EEM applet when the IP SLA track (track 10) goes down (i.e., SLA failure).
- In the applet you would issue a CLI to shut the target interface. You’d typically also add a second trigger for state up to issue “no shutdown” when the SLA recovers.
- Why the other options are less appropriate:
- “state unreachable” might be used for different tracking contexts; IP SLA failure is commonly represented as track going down, not “unreachable.”
- “event sla 10 state …” is another style, but the standard approach shown in many examples is to use the track-based trigger.
Example pattern you’d implement:
- event track 10 state down -> shutdown interface
- event track 10 state up -> no shutdown
In short: question 355 tests using an EEM applet triggered by a IP SLA track’s down state to shut an interface, with a complementary up state to restore it.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 350:
Question 350 explanation:
return (json.dumps({d['hostname']: d['serialNumber'] for d in json.loads(test_json)['response']}))
- Why: test_json is presumably a JSON string with a structure like {"response": [ {"hostname": "...", "serialNumber": "..."}, ... ]}. The expression:
- json.loads(test_json)['response'] yields a list of dicts.
- The dict comprehension builds a mapping: hostname -> serialNumber.
- json.dumps(...) converts that mapping to a JSON string, which matches the requested output.
- Why the others are not correct:
- B uses an invalid dict comprehension syntax.
- C incorrectly applies json.loads to a value produced by json.dumps, and mixes types; it also references json.dumps(test_json)['response'], which is not valid.
- D is invalid syntax for a dict comprehension and also misuses json.loads/json.dumps.
- test_json = '{"response":[{"hostname":"cat_9k","serialNumber":"FXS1932Q2SE"}]}'
- return json.dumps({d['hostname']: d['serialNumber'] for d in json.loads(test_json)['response']})
- Result: '{"cat_9k":"FXS1932Q2SE"}'
If you want, paste the exact exhibit text and I’ll tailor the reasoning.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 348:
Question 348 explanation:
- Correct answer: B — Create an XML filter as a string and pass it to the
get_config() method as an argument.
- Why: NETCONF responses are XML. To reduce data sent over the network, you filter at the request time by providing an XML filter (typically a subtree filter) to
get_config(). This tells the server to return only the interface’s configuration.
- Why the others are not correct:
- A: Using the Ixml library to parse after retrieval does not reduce the amount of data transferred; it only processes what you already got.
- C: A JSON filter is not applicable to NETCONF, which returns XML; filters must be XML.
- D: Using the JSON library to parse after retrieval also doesn’t reduce data transfer.
- Quick example (conceptual):
- filter_xml = '''<interfaces xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces"><interface><name>Gig0/1</name></interface></interfaces>'''
- m.get_config(source='running', filter=('subtree', filter_xml))
If you want, paste the exact exhibit text and I can map the reasoning more precisely.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 344:
Here’s how to understand Question 344.
- What the task asks: Create an Cisco IOS EEM applet that sends a syslog message when there’s a change caused by an OSPF problem.
- How EEM works (at a high level):
- You define an applet with a name using event manager applet <name>.
- You specify a trigger with an event line (e.g., a certain syslog pattern or routing event).
- You specify actions to take when the event fires. To generate a syslog message, you use a syslog action.
- The key point for this question: to actually send a syslog message, you use the action
- action 1 syslog msg "<your text>"
For example: action 1 syslog msg "OSPF ROUTING ERROR"
- Why the other choices are not correct:
- The option that starts with event manager applet LogMessage defines the applet name, not the particular syslog action. It’s part of the setup, not the action that sends the log.
- The other variants like syslog send, syslog pattern, or syslog write don’t match the proper EEM action syntax for sending a syslog message.
Bottom line: The correct action to generate the syslog message is the one that uses
action 1 syslog msg "OSPF ROUTING ERROR".
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 340:
Answer: C — intent-based APIs
- Cisco DNA Center uses intent-based APIs to express high-level business goals and enable the delivery of applications across the network, while also providing analytics to support innovation.
- Why not the others:
- A (process adapters) are for bridging specific processes, not for app delivery/analytics.
- B (Command Runner) runs CLI commands on devices, not for delivering applications or analytics.
- D (domain adapters) handle domain-specific integrations, but the primary mechanism described is the intent-based API layer.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 339:
Question 339 asks about why a device in Cisco DNA Center Plug and Play might be labeled as “unclaimed.”
- Answer: A — The device has not been assigned a workflow.
Why:
- In PnP, an Unclaimed device has been discovered but not yet assigned to a provisioning workflow (i.e., not yet claimed). It’s waiting to be placed into a workflow or site before provisioning begins.
- B is incorrect: “could not be added to the fabric” describes a provisioning/fabric-join failure, not an unclaimed state.
- C is incorrect: an error/provision failure would be a different status (e.g., failed).
- D is incorrect: the vendor does not determine the unclaimed status.
Once you claim the device (assign it to a workflow or site), its status moves beyond Unclaimed.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 338:
Question 338 asks about the Cisco DNA Center Intent API. The two correct characteristics are:
- northbound API
- business outcome oriented
Rationale:
- The Intent API is exposed to higher-level applications (northbound) to drive business outcomes, not device-level details.
- It is not device-oriented, not southbound, and it is intent-based (not procedural).
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 325:
Question 325: Which algorithms are used to secure REST API from brute attacks and minimize the impact?
Answer: D) PBKDF2, BCrypt, and SCrypt
Why:
- These are password hashing / key-derivation algorithms designed to be slow and salted, which dramatically lowers the success rate of brute-force and rainbow-table attacks.
- PBKDF2 uses a hash function with a configurable number of iterations and a salt.
- BCrypt uses Blowfish with a cost factor and built-in salt.
- SCrypt adds memory-hardness to resist GPU/ASIC cracking.
Why the others are less suitable:
- A (SHA-512 and SHA-384): fast hashes; no inherent salting or work factor, making brute-force easier.
- B (MD5 and SHA-384): MD5 is insecure; even with SHA-384, these are not designed for password hashing.
- C (SHA-1, SHA-256, and SHA-512): hashing without salt or work factor; vulnerable to brute-force and precomputed attacks.
Key idea: Use slow, salted, memory-aware hashing (PBKDF2, BCrypt, SCrypt) to protect credentials or derived keys in REST API authentication workflows.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 324:
Question 324: At which layer does Cisco DNA Center support REST controls?
Answer: B) northbound APIs
Why:
- RESTful access to DNA Center is provided through its northbound APIs. These are the external interfaces apps or controllers use to interact with DNA Center for automation, policy, and analytics.
- The session layer is an OSI concept about maintaining a communication session, not about REST controls.
- EEM applets or scripts are device-level automation on Cisco IOS, not how DNA Center exposes REST controls.
- YAML is just a data format for payloads; it’s not a distinct layer for REST controls.
Key idea: REST in DNA Center operates via its application-layer northbound APIs, which external systems call to manage and automate the network.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User7840
on: June 28, 2026
Question 148:
Question 148 asks which migration strategy is best to modernize and convert a monolithic application into microservices and move it to AWS.
- Correct answer: Refactor (D)
- Why: Refactoring involves re-architecting the application to decompose it into independent microservices. This aligns with the goal of moving from a monolith to microservices, enabling independent deployment, scaling, and maintenance.
- Why others aren’t correct for this goal:
- Rehost (lift-and-shift): moves the app with minimal changes, preserving the monolithic architecture.
- Replatform: makes some cloud optimizations but still keeps a monolith.
- Repurchase: replaces the app with a different product (often SaaS), not microservices.
High-level AWS approach after refactoring (conceptual):
- Decompose into services with clear boundaries.
- Deploy per-service using containers or serverless (e.g.,
ECS/EKS/Fargate or Lambda).
- Use
API Gateway for service exposure and potentially a service mesh like App Mesh for communication.
- Implement per-service data stores and resilient communication, with CI/CD pipelines (
CodePipeline, CodeBuild).
If you want, I can walk through how to apply this with a sample monolith-to-microservices decomposition.
Dakar, Senegal
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 303:
Answer: A
Reasoning:
- To enforce a password expiry/age policy for local (local database) accounts on a Cisco gateway, you can attach the Common Criteria policy to the local user. The command would look like:
username admin privilege 15 password 0 Cisco13579! common-criteria-policy
- The
common-criteria-policy applies a baseline password policy that includes expiry (60 days in your scenario) and other criteria defined by the Common Criteria-compatible policy.
- The other options don’t configure local-password expiry:
- B (AAA server) handles authentication on the server side, not the local account expiry on the gateway itself.
- C, D don’t address the local-password expiry requirement.
So, enabling a Common Criteria policy on the local user is the correct way to ensure local passwords expire after 60 days. The referenced Cisco doc discusses the common-criteria-password policy for this purpose.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User7912
on: June 28, 2026
Question 58:
Question 58 is about Azure Policy scope and exclusions.
Key idea:
- Policy can be assigned at any of the fourScope levels: management groups, subscriptions, resource groups, or individual resources. You can also exclude a subscope from the assignment.
Based on the hotspot:
- Box 1 (where you can assign Policy1): Tenant Root Group, ManagementGroup1, Subscription1, RG1, and VM1.
- You can place a policy at the top of the hierarchy (root), a specific management group, a subscription, a resource group, or a single resource.
- Box 2 (what you can exclude from Policy1): ManagementGroup1, Subscription1, RG1, and VM1.
- You can exclude a subscope from the assignment, such as a particular management group, subscription, resource group, or even a specific resource.
Why this matters:
- Assigning at a higher scope applies the policy broadly; exclusions let you carve out exceptions without moving the policy.
- There are four levels of scope, and exclusions apply to subscopes within the chosen assignment.
Québec, Canada
AI Explanation - verified by User9954
on: June 28, 2026
Question 62:
The correct answer is D — RAID 6.
Reason: RAID 6 uses dual parity, so the array can tolerate up to two drives failing simultaneously without data loss. This provides higher fault tolerance than RAID 5, which can survive only a single drive failure. For comparison: RAID 0 has no redundancy, and RAID 1 tolerates one failed drive per mirrored pair, not multiple simultaneous failures across the array.
Paris, France
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 295:
Question 295 explanation:
- Correct answer: A) enable AAA override
- Why: When ISE assigns VLANs via RADIUS attributes, you need the WLC to accept and apply those attributes. Enabling
AAA Override (in the WLC, typically via the Advanced tab and the Allow AAA Override option) lets the RADIUS server’s attributes override the WLC’s local VLAN configuration. This is the standard fix to ensure clients get placed on the VLAN returned by the RADIUS server.
- Why the other options aren’t correct:
- set a NAC state: not the direct mechanism to apply RADIUS-provided VLANs.
- utilize RADIUS profiling: helpful for device/class identification but does not by itself override VLAN assignment.
- require a DHCP address assignment: unrelated to VLAN mapping based on authentication.
- Note on the exam key: The page shows answer C (utilize RADIUS profiling), but the correct Cisco practice is to enable
AAA Override to allow RADIUS-provided attributes to place the client on the proper VLAN.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 294:
Question 294: The scenario describes guest users on the same guest WLAN being able to reach each other. The fix is to prevent client-to-client traffic on that WLAN.
- Correct answer: A) implement P2P blocking
Why: P2P blocking (often called client isolation) stops peer-to-peer and direct client-to-client traffic at the WLAN level. This keeps each guest device from seeing or talking to other guest devices on the same SSID.
Why the other options aren’t suitable here:
- MFP client protection: protects against certain client threats, not client isolation.
- Wi-Fi Direct policy: related to devices connecting via Wi-Fi Direct, not typical guest WLAN isolation.
- Split tunneling: used with VPNs to choose which traffic goes through the VPN, not for isolating devices on a WLAN.
If you want, I can walk through how to enable P2P blocking on a specific Cisco wireless controller version.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by User9455
on: June 28, 2026
Question 3:
Correct answer: B and C
Explanation:
- The Snowflake CLI supports two templating methods for passing variables into SQL scripts:
- LEGACY: legacy-style placeholders (e.g., ${VAR}) are substituted with values you provide.
- JINJA: Jinja templating (e.g., {{ VAR }}) allows more flexible, programmatic parameterization.
- The other options are not templating syntaxes used by the CLI in this context:
- STANDARD, NONE, ALL are not recognized templating syntaxes for this purpose.
Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 290:
- Correct answer: C — target 192.168.100.82 in the URI.
- Why: The show-control-connections output indicates the client (Postman) is not correctly reaching the vManage, i.e., the REST API calls are going to the wrong device. If Postman is pointing to a non-vManage IP, authentication will fail even if credentials are correct. By updating the URI to use the vManage IP (192.168.100.82), the request reaches the correct controller and authentication can proceed.
- Why the other options are less suitable:
- Use basic authentication: This doesn’t fix the endpoint mismatch; authentication method isn’t the root cause here.
- Change the port to 12446: There’s no evidence the port is the issue; the endpoint is the problem.
- Restart the vSmart host: The issue shown points to vManage reachability, not vSmart; rebooting won’t fix the endpoint being contacted.
- Concept note: In Cisco SD-WAN, REST API authentication must target the correct vManage controller. If you’re seeing a control connection issue, verify the API base URL/host first before changing auth methods or ports. If you want, I can walk through how to verify the target in Postman.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 287:
Question 287 explanation:
- Key concept: A standard ACL filters by source IP only and uses a wildcard mask to define the allowed set. You can’t express “odd-numbered hosts” in a single standard ACL entry for 10.0.0.0/24.
- What each option actually does:
- A: permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.1 matches 10.0.0.0 and 10.0.0.1 (two addresses), not all odd ones.
- B: permit 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.254 effectively matches a small pair of addresses near 10.0.0.1 (not all odd addresses across the /24).
- C: permit 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 matches only 10.0.0.1 (a single odd address).
- D: permit 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.254 is equivalent in effect to 0.0.0.1 (matches 10.0.0.0 and 10.0.0.1); not all odd addresses.
- Bottom line: None of the given single-entry options cleanly permits traffic from all odd-numbered hosts in 10.0.0.0/24. To achieve that, you’d need multiple ACL entries (one per odd address or a more complex filtering scheme), which isn’t represented by a single standard ACL line.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 286:
Question 286 recap:
- Client: 209.165.201.25
- Server: 209.165.200.225
- Service: TCP port 80
- ACL direction: inbound on the interface toward the web server (i.e., traffic entering the server)
Correct reasoning:
- For inbound traffic toward the server, the ACL must permit traffic with the client as the source and the server as the destination, using TCP and destination port 80.
- The proper entry is:
permit tcp host 209.165.201.25 host 209.165.200.225 eq 80
Why the other options are incorrect:
- B is the correct choice (source 209.165.201.25, destination 209.165.200.225, dest port 80).
- D would specify the reverse direction (server to client) or misapply the port, which is not what we want for inbound traffic to the server.
- A uses lt 80 (destination port < 80) which is not appropriate for HTTP.
- C also uses the reverse source/destination and would not allow client-to-server traffic.
Key takeaway: inbound ACL on the server-facing interface should permit tcp host 209.165.201.25 host 209.165.200.225 eq 80.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 285:
Question 285 asks how to write an ACL that permits packets with an ACK in the TCP header.
- Correct entry: access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 21 established
- Why: The Cisco ACL keyword
established matches TCP segments that belong to an already established connection, i.e., segments that have the ACK bit set. This is exactly the behavior you want for TCP ACK packets (after the initial SYN/handshake). The destination port 21 is shown, but the key factor is the established keyword.
- Why other options are not right:
- A uses tcp-ack, which is not a standard, portable match in IOS ACLs and may be device-specific.
- B/C differ only by ACL numbering; the essential concept is using established to match ACK-containing segments.
- D uses ip and would not specifically target TCP ACKs.
Tip: If you want to permit all ACK-containing TCP segments regardless of port, you could use something like permit tcp any any established.
Plano, United States
AI Explanation - verified by sshuang68
on: June 28, 2026
Question 269:
- The correct component is the Cisco Stealthwatch system.
Why:
- Stealthwatch provides network visibility and security analytics by collecting and analyzing flow data (NetFlow/IPFIX) across the network.
- It can map flows to user identities and devices (user and flow context), enabling context-aware threat detection and behavior analytics.
- Other CTD components serve different roles: Firepower for firewall/threat prevention, AMP for endpoint protection, and WSA for web security; none of these are primarily focused on user/flow context analysis like Stealthwatch.
Plano, United States
always_learning_a
on: June 11, 2026
Very hard exam that caught me off guard so I had to rely heavily on exam dumps to get through. teh AI Assistant helped with the real exam questions but it was still a grind.
Pakistan
graveyard_geek
on: June 08, 2026
The challenging exam felt impossible until I used braindumps and the AI Assistant. Passed it but not without stress and doubt.
Lebanon
CertifiedFinally
on: June 06, 2026
The exam seemed easy at first but turned out to be very hard. I had to rely heavily on brain dumps to get throgh it.
United States
TabsNotSpaces_T
on: May 30, 2026
Took two attempts before passing since this exam was very hard without exam dumps. The AI Assistant didn't solve everything but the brain dumps gave me a needed boost.
Finland
hashbang_h
on: May 30, 2026
Passed it on the second attempt after a very hard month of study but resorted to dumps in the end. The real exam quetions are tough even after using the brain dumps.
Malaysia
LastMinuteLearner
on: May 28, 2026
The brain dumps were a huge help because this exam was very hard. Barely passed adn the AI Assistant was confusing at times but I'm finally done.
Switzerland
night_study_guy
on: May 26, 2026
Passed it but the braindumps didn't fully prep me since the real exm questions were unexpectedly tricky.
Kenya
uptime_unc
on: May 19, 2026
Spent weeks underestimating this exam adn had to rely heavily on exam dumps to get through it. The challenging exam made me grind harder than expected but the brain dumps really helped in the end.
Switzerland
ines_cloudsec
on: May 18, 2026
Took two attempts with brain dumps adn the AI Assistant yet this exam's real questions caught me off guard. Harder than expected and very stressful but finally done.
Sri Lanka
pkttracer_m
on: May 14, 2026
Finally done with this exam after turning to exam dumps because the real exam questions were very hard. Spent too many sleepless nights with the AI Assistant just getting through it.
Portugal
hashbang_h
on: May 08, 2026
Underestimated this exm initially and had to grind through numerous braindumps to finally pass. The AI Assistant was critical for tackling those very hard questions.
Argentina
linuxlover99
on: May 08, 2026
Failed two times and teh exam dumps finally made the difference. The AI Assistant was only helpful for very hard parts of this exam.
Egypt
PassedByLuck_K
on: May 05, 2026
Spent weeks with brain dumps trying to prepare for this exam because the real exam questions were very hard. Barely passed and the stress was intense.
United States
zt_zealot
on: May 05, 2026
Thought this exam was very hard but the AI Assistant and braindumps made it manageable. Still exhausted from it all.
Switzerland
CoffeeAndCerts
on: May 04, 2026
Spent weeks grinding through materials but this exam was very hard. The exam dumps were a last resort and helped a lot in finally passing.
Oman
homelab_hero
on: April 30, 2026
Spent weeks using braindumps and the AI Assistant but this exam was very hard and I'm still amazed I passed.
Bahrain
mateus_aws_br
on: April 21, 2026
Underestimated how challenging this exam would be and spent days grinding through braindumps to pass. The exam dumps were more helpful than expected but the struggle was real.
India
osi_obsessed
on: April 03, 2026
Just cleared this exam and it was very hard. Used exam dumps and real exam questions to finally make it through.
Kuwait
flashcard_fanatic
on: March 31, 2026
The exam dumps felt outdated and the real exam questions caught me off guard. Was tougher than I anticipated even with all the prep material.
Czech Republic
gita_dataeng
on: March 31, 2026
This exam felt very hard but the exam dumps really helped me understand what to expect. Couldn't have cleared it without using those real exam questions.
Germany
jakob_vmware
on: March 30, 2026
Spent weeks grinding through brain dumps to scrape a pass on this exam. It was very hard and the stress was real but real exam questions helped a bit.
Israel