Cisco
CompTIA
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
SAP
Google
NVIDIA
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
Splunk
ServiceNow
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. Dell
  5. D-SF-A-24

Dell D-SF-A-24 Exam
Dell Security Foundations Achievement (Page 2 )

Updated On: 1-Feb-2026
Page 2 of 5
PDF with 20 Questions
View Related Case Study

The A .R.T.I.E. has an evolving need, which was amplified during the incidents. Their complex and dispersed IT environments have thousands of users, applications, and resources to manage. Dell found that the existing Identity and Access Management was limited in its ability to apply expanding IAM protection to applications beyond the core financial and human resource management application. A .R.T.I.E. also did not have many options for protecting their access especially in the cloud. A .R.T.I.E. were also not comfortable exposing their applications for remote access. Dell recommended adopting robust IAM techniques like mapping out connections between privileged users and admin accounts, and the use multifactor authentication.



The Dell Services team suggest implementing a system that requires individuals to provide a PIN and biometric information to access their device.
Which type of multifactor authentication should be suggested?

  1. Something you have and something you are.
  2. Something you have and something you know.
  3. Something you know and something you are.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The recommended multifactor authentication (MFA) type for A .R.T.I.E., as suggested by Dell Services, is A. Something you have and something you are. This type of MFA requires two distinct forms of identification: one that the user possesses (something you have) and one that is inherent to the user (something you are).

Something you have could be a physical token, a security key, or a mobile device that generates time-based one-time passwords (TOTPs).
Something you are refers to biometric identifiers, such as fingerprints, facial recognition, or iris scans, which are unique to each individual.
By combining these two factors, the authentication process becomes significantly more secure than using any single factor alone. The physical token or device provides proof of possession, which is difficult for an attacker to replicate, especially without physical access. The biometric identifier ensures that even if the physical token is stolen, it cannot be used without the matching biometric input.


Reference:

The use of MFA is supported by security best practices and standards, including those outlined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Dell's own security framework likely aligns with these standards, advocating for robust authentication mechanisms to protect against unauthorized access, especially in cloud environments where the attack surface is broader.
In the context of A .R.T.I.E.'s case, where employees access sensitive applications and data remotely, implementing MFA with these two factors will help mitigate the risk of unauthorized access and potential data breaches. It is a proactive step towards enhancing the organization's security posture in line with Dell's strategic advice.



View Related Case Study

To minimize the cost and damage of ransomware attacks the cybersecurity team provided static analysis of files in an environment and compare a ransomware sample hash to known data.

Which detection mechanism is used to detect data theft techniques to access valuable information and hold ransom?

  1. Signature based
  2. Behavior based
  3. Deception based

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Signature-Based Detection: This method relies on known signatures or patterns of data that match known malware or ransomware samples.
Static Analysis: Involves analyzing files without executing them to compare their hashes against a database of known threats.
Ransomware Sample Hash: A unique identifier for a ransomware sample that can be matched against a database to identify known ransomware.
Dell Security Foundations Achievement: The Dell Security Foundations Achievement documents likely cover the importance of signature-based detection as part of a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy.
Effectiveness: While signature-based detection is effective against known threats, it may not detect new, unknown (zero-day) ransomware variants.
Signature-based detection is a fundamental component of many cybersecurity defenses, particularly for identifying and preventing known ransomware attacks.



View Related Case Study

Based on the information in the case study, which security team should be the most suitable to perform root cause analysis of the attack and present the proposal to solve the challenges faced by the A .R.T.I.E. organization?

  1. Identity and Assess Management
  2. Threat intelligence
  3. Ethical hackers
  4. Business advisory

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Role of Threat Intelligence: The threat intelligence team is specialized in investigating methodologies and technologies to detect, understand, and deflect advanced cybersecurity threats. Root Cause Analysis: They have the expertise to analyze security events, uncover advanced threats, and provide insights into the root causes of cyberattacks.

Solution Proposal: Based on their analysis, the threat intelligence team can propose solutions to tackle the identified vulnerabilities and enhance the security posture of A .R.T.I.E.1. Preventive Measures: Their knowledge of the latest developments in the security landscape allows them to recommend proactive measures to prevent future attacks. Dell Security Foundations Achievement: The Dell Security Foundations Achievement documents emphasize the importance of threat intelligence in understanding and responding to cybersecurity incidents.
The threat intelligence team's capabilities align with the requirements of A .R.T.I.E. to address their cybersecurity challenges effectively.



View Related Case Study

DRAG DROP (Drag and Drop is not supported)
The cybersecurity team created a detailed security incident management procedures training program to manage any probable incidents at A .R.T.I.E.

Arrange the steps in the proper sequence to best manage cybersecurity incidents.

  1. See Explanation section for answer.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:



To best manage cybersecurity incidents at A .R.T.I.E., the steps should be arranged in the following sequence:
Prepare to deal with incidents: Establish a robust incident response plan, including policies, procedures, and an incident response team.
Identify potential security incidents: Use monitoring tools and techniques to detect anomalies that may indicate security incidents.
Assess incidents and make decisions about how they are to be addressed: Evaluate the severity of the incident and decide on the appropriate response actions. Contain, investigate, and resolve the incidents: Take immediate action to contain the incident, investigate its cause, and resolve any issues to restore normal operations. Make changes to improve the process: After an incident, review the response process and make necessary changes to prevent future incidents and improve response strategies. This sequence aligns with the best practices for incident management, ensuring that A .R.T.I.E. is prepared for, can quickly respond to, and recover from cybersecurity incidents while continuously improving their security posture. The Dell Security Foundations Achievement documents would likely support this structured approach to managing cybersecurity incidents.



View Related Case Study

An A .R.T.I.E. employee received an email with an invoice that looks official for $200 for a one-year subscription. It clearly states: "Please do not reply to this email," but provides a Help and Contact button along with a phone number.

What is the type of risk if the employee clicks the Help and Contact button?

  1. People
  2. Technology
  3. Operational
  4. Strategic

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

People Risk Definition: People risk involves the potential for human error or intentional actions that can lead to security incidents.
Phishing and Social Engineering: The scenario described is typical of phishing, where attackers use seemingly official communications to trick individuals into revealing sensitive information or accessing malicious links.
Employee Actions: Clicking on the button could potentially lead to the employee inadvertently providing access to the company's systems or revealing personal or company information. Dell's Security Foundations Achievement: Dell's Security Foundations Achievement emphasizes the importance of recognizing and minimizing phishing exploits as part of managing people risk. Mitigation Measures: Training employees to recognize and respond appropriately to phishing attempts is a key strategy in mitigating people risk. In this context, the risk is categorized as `people' because it directly involves the potential actions of an individual employee that could compromise security.



Viewing page 2 of 5
Viewing questions 6 - 10 out of 20 questions



Post your Comments and Discuss Dell D-SF-A-24 exam prep with other Community members:

Join the D-SF-A-24 Discussion