Cisco
CompTIA
ISC
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
SAP
Google
NVIDIA
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
ISC2
Splunk
ServiceNow
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. Financial
  5. CMA

Financial CMA Exam Questions
Certified Management Accountant (Page 27 )

Updated On: 10-Mar-2026
Page 27 of 270
PDF with 1336 Questions
View Related Case Study

N-Air Corporation uses a joint process to produce three products: A, B, and C, all derived from one input. The company can sell these . products at the point of split-off (end of the joint process) or process them further. The joint production costs during October were $10,000. N-Air allocates joint costs to the products in proportion to the relative physical volume of output. Additional information is presented in the opposite column.


Assuming sufficient demand exists, N-Air could sell all the products at the prices previously mentioned at either the split-off point or after further processing. To maximize its profits, N-Air Corporation should

  1. Sell product A at split-oft and perform additional processing on products B and C.
  2. Sell product B at split-oft and perform additional processing on products C and A.
  3. Sell product C at split-off and perform additional processing on products A and B.
  4. Sell products A, B, and C at split-off.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

To maximize profits, it must be determined whether each product's incremental revenues will exceed its incremental costs. Joint costs are irrelevant because they are sunk costs.


It is most profitable for N-Air to process products A and B further and to sell product C at the split-off point.



View Related Case Study

Whitehall Corporation produces chemicals used in the cleaning industry. During the previous month, Whitehall incurred $300,000 of joint costs in producing 60,000 units of AM-12 and 40,000 units of BM-36. Whitehall uses the units-of-production method to allocate joint costs. Currently, AM-12 is sold at split-off for $3.50 per unit. Flank Corporation has approached Whitehall to purchase all of the production of AM-12 after further processing. The further processing will cost Whitehall $90,000. Concerning AM- 12, which one of the following alternatives is most advantageous?

  1. Whitehall should process further and sell to Flank if the total selling price per unit after further processing is greater than $3.00, which covers the joint costs.
  2. Whitehall should continue to sell at split-off unless Flank offers at least $4.50 per unit after further processing, which covers Whitehall's total costs.
  3. Whitehall should process further and sell to Flank if the total selling price per unit after further processing is greater than $5.00.
  4. Whitehall should process further and sell to Flank if the total selling price per unit after further processing is greater than $5.25, which maintains the same gross profit percentage.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The unit price of the product at the split-off point is known to be $3.50, so the joint costs are irrelevant. The additional unit cost of further processing is $1.50 ($90,000 ÷ 60,000 units). Consequently, the unit price must be at least $5.00 ($3.50 opportunity cost + $1 .50)



View Related Case Study

Whitehall Corporation produces chemicals used in the cleaning industry During the previous month, Whitehall incurred $300,000 of joint costs in producing 60,000 units of AM-12 and 40000 units of BM-36. Whitehall uses the units-of-production method to allocate joint costs. Currently, AM-i 2 is sold at split-off for $3.50 per unit. Flank Corporation has approached Whitehall to purchase all of the production of AM-12 after further processing. The further processing will cost Whitehall $90000.Assume that Whitehall Corporation agreed to sell AM-12 to Flank Corporation for $5.50 per unit after further processing. During the first month of production, Whitehall sold 50,000 units with 10,000 units remaining in inventory at the end of the month. With respect to AM-12, which one of the following statements is true?

  1. The operating profit last month was $50,000, and the inventory value is $15,000.
  2. The operating profit last month was $50,000, and the inventory value is $45,000.
  3. The operating profit last month was $125,000, and the inventory value is $30,000.
  4. The operating profit last month was $200,000, and the inventory value is $30,000.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Joint costs are allocated based on units of production. Accordingly, the unit joint cost allocated to AM-12 is $3.00 [$300,000 + (60,000 units of AM-12 + 40,000 units of BM-
36)]. The unit cost of AM-12 is therefore $4.50 [$3.00 joint cost + ($90,000 additional cost + 60,000 units)]. Total inventory value is $45,000 (10,000 units x $4.50), and total operating profit is $50,000 [50,000 units sold x ($5.50 unit price -- $4.50 unit cost)]



View Related Case Study

When a multiproduct plant operates at full capacity, quite often decisions must be made as to which products to emphasize. These decisions are frequently made with a short-run focus. In making such decisions, managers should select products with the highest

  1. Sales price per unit.
  2. Individual unit contribution margin.
  3. Sales volume potential.
  4. Contribution margin per unit of the constraining resource.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

In the short run, many costs are fixed. Hence, contribution margin (revenues -- all variable costs) becomes the best measure of profitability. Moreover, certain resources are also fixed. Accordingly, when deciding which products to produce at full capacity, the criterion should be the contribution margin per unit of the most constrained resource.
This approach maximizes total contribution margin.



View Related Case Study

Condensed monthly operating income data for Korbin, Inc. for May follows


Additional information regarding Korbin's operations follows:
· One-fourth of each store's direct fixed costs would continue if either store is closed. · Korbin allocates common fixed costs to each store on the basis of sales dollars. · Management estimates that closing the Suburban Store would result in a 10% decrease in the Urban Store's sales, while closing the Urban Store would not affect the Suburban Store's sales.
· The operating results for May are representative of all months. A decision by Korbin to close the Suburban Store would result in a monthly increase (decrease) in Korbin's operating income of

  1. $(10,800)
  2. $(6,000)
  3. $(1,200)
  4. $4,000

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

If the Suburban Store is closed, one-forth of its direct fixed costs will continue. Thus, the segment margin that should be used to calculate the effect of its closing on Korbin's operating income is $6,000 {$36,000 contribution margin- [$40,000 direct fixed costs x(1.0-.25)]}. In addition, the sales ( and contribution margin) of the Urban Store will decline by 10% if the Suburban store closes. A 10% reduction in Urban's $48,000 contribution margin will reduce income by $4,800. Accordingly, the effect of closing the Suburban Store is to decrease operating income by $10,800 ($6,000 + $4,800).



Viewing page 27 of 270
Viewing questions 131 - 135 out of 1336 questions



Post your Comments and Discuss Financial CMA exam dumps with other Community members:

CMA Exam Discussions & Posts

AI Tutor