Refer to the exhibit.

which shows the topology tot an Ethernet Ring Protection Switching (ERPS) solution.
Is this a valid design for the control and protected VLANs on the VSX fabric 1 switches?
Solution: Ring 1, instance 1:
control VLAN: 1000protected VLANs: 51-135 Ring l,Instance2:
control VLAN: 1001 protected VLANs: 136-220 Ring 2, Instance 1: control VLAN: 1000 protected VLANs: 181 -200 Ring 2, Instance 2: control VLAN: 1003 protected VLANs: 201 -220
Answer(s): B
Explanation:
Ring 1, instance 1: control VLAN: 1000protected VLANs: 51-135 Ring l,Instance2: control VLAN: 1001 protected VLANs: 136-220 Ring 2, Instance 1: control VLAN: 1000 protected VLANs: 181 -200 Ring 2, Instance 2: control VLAN: 1003 protected VLANs: 201 -220 is not a valid design for the control and protected VLANs on the VSX fabric 1 switches for an Ethernet Ring Protection Switching (ERPS) solution. The control VLANs must be unique for each ring instance and must not overlap with any protected VLANs. In this design, the control VLAN 1000 is used for both ring 1 instance 1 and ring 2 instance 1, which can cause conflicts and errors. Also, the protected VLANs 181-220 are used for both ring instances on ring 2, which can cause loops and traffic duplication2.
Reveal Solution Next Question