All of the following are penalties and enforcements outlined in the EU Al Act EXCEPT?
Answer(s): C
The EU AI Act outlines specific penalties and enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with its regulations. Among these, fines for violations of banned AI applications can be as high as 35 million or 7% of the global annual turnover of the offending organization, whichever is higher. Proportional caps on fines are applied to SMEs and startups to ensure fairness. General Purpose AI rules are to apply after a 6-month period as a specific provision to ensure that stakeholders have adequate time to comply. However, there is no provision for an "AI Pact" acting as a transitional bridge until the regulations are fully enacted, making option C the correct answer.
Which of the following is an example of a high-risk application under the EU Al Act?
The EU AI Act categorizes certain applications of AI as high-risk due to their potential impact on fundamental rights and safety. High-risk applications include those used in critical areas such as employment, education, and essential public services. A government-run social scoring tool, which assesses individuals based on their social behavior or perceived trustworthiness, falls under this category because of its profound implications for privacy, fairness, and individual rights. This contrasts with other AI applications like resume scanning tools or customer service chatbots, which are generally not classified as high-risk under the EU AI Act.
Which of the following disclosures is NOT required for an EU organization that developed and deployed a high-risk Al system?
Under the EU AI Act, organizations that develop and deploy high-risk AI systems are required to provide several key disclosures to ensure transparency and accountability. These include the human oversight measures employed, how individuals can contest decisions made by the AI system, and informing individuals that an AI system is being used. However, there is no specific requirement to disclose the exact locations where data is stored. The focus of the Act is on the transparency of the AI system's operation and its impact on individuals, rather than on the technical details of data storage locations.
All of the following may be permissible uses of an Al system under the EU Al Act EXCEPT?
The EU AI Act explicitly prohibits the use of AI systems for social scoring by public authorities, as it can lead to discrimination and unfair treatment of individuals based on their social behavior or perceived trustworthiness. While AI can be used to promote equitable distribution of welfare benefits, manage border control, and even detect an individual's intent for law enforcement purposes (within strict regulatory and ethical boundaries), implementing social scoring systems is not permissible under the Act due to the significant risks to fundamental rights and freedoms.
Post your Comments and Discuss IAPP AIGP exam with other Community members:
g commented on July 12, 2024 good questions so far Anonymous upvote
g commented on July 12, 2024 good useful questions Anonymous upvote
Shifa S commented on July 04, 2024 Good set of questions INDIA upvote
Our website is free, but we have to fight against bots and content theft. We're sorry for the inconvenience caused by these security measures. You can access the rest of the AIGP content, but please register or login to continue.