CompTIA
Checkpoint
ISC
HP
Dell
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL®
Juniper
PMI
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
Google
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
Certiport
ISC2
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. IIA
  5. IIA-IAP

Free IIA-IAP Exam Braindumps (page: 12)

Page 11 of 26
PDF with 100 Questions

An internal auditor is conducting a human resources audit engagement.
Which of the following observations would increase the probability of fraud?

  1. Vague job descriptions.
  2. Lack of background checks.
  3. Poor interview skills.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step
Fraud Risk Factors:

Lack of proper vetting processes, such as background checks, significantly increases the likelihood of hiring individuals who may pose a fraud risk.

Reasoning:

Option B is correct because failing to conduct background checks creates opportunities for hiring individuals with a history of unethical behavior, increasing fraud risk.

Option A (vague job descriptions) may lead to inefficiencies or unclear expectations but does not directly relate to fraud risk.

Option C (poor interview skills) might affect hiring quality but does not increase fraud probability.

Best Practice:

Conducting thorough background checks is a critical control to reduce fraud risk in human resources processes.



Which sampling technique uses a nonrandom selection process that is expected to be representative of the population as a whole?

  1. Judgmental sampling.
  2. Haphazard sampling.
  3. Attribute sampling.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step
Definition of Sampling Techniques:

Judgmental Sampling: A nonrandom method where the auditor uses their professional judgment to select items expected to be representative of the population.

Haphazard Sampling: A nonrandom approach without systematic methodology, relying on arbitrary selection.

Attribute Sampling: A statistical sampling method used to test for specific attributes or characteristics in a population.

Reasoning:

Option A is correct because judgmental sampling intentionally selects items based on the auditor's knowledge and expectations, aiming for representation.

Option B (haphazard sampling) lacks intentionality and may not reliably represent the population.

Option C (attribute sampling) involves random, statistical selection rather than a nonrandom process.

When to Use Judgmental Sampling:

It is appropriate when the auditor has sufficient expertise to select representative items and when statistical sampling is not feasible.



Which of the following best describes the knowledge, skills, and abilities that internal auditors should possess with regard to fraud?

  1. Expertise in detecting and investigating fraud.
  2. Sufficient knowledge to evaluate the risk of fraud.
  3. Specialized skills for developing and implementing controls to prevent fraud.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Reference to IIA Standards:

Standard 1210.A2: Internal auditors must have sufficient knowledge to evaluate the risk of fraud and the manner in which it is managed by the organization.

They are not expected to have the expertise of a fraud examiner or forensic investigator.

Reasoning:

Option B is correct because internal auditors need enough knowledge to assess fraud risks and provide assurance over controls designed to mitigate those risks.

Option A overstates the requirement, as fraud detection and investigation require specialized expertise typically outside the scope of general internal auditing.

Option C refers to control development, which is a management responsibility, not an internal audit role.

Role of Internal Audit in Fraud:

Auditors evaluate fraud risks and provide recommendations to improve controls, ensuring alignment with organizational risk management strategies.



An internal auditor discovers a number of control concerns while reviewing the organization's online payment system and decides to interview key employees involved in the system's design and maintenance.
Which of the following best describes the results of those interviews?

  1. Testimonial evidence.
  2. Documentary evidence.
  3. Analytical evidence.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step
Types of Audit Evidence:

Testimonial Evidence: Information obtained through interviews, discussions, or statements from individuals.

Documentary Evidence: Written or recorded materials, such as policies, procedures, or reports.

Analytical Evidence: Evidence derived from analysis or comparisons of data.

Reasoning:

Option A is correct because interviews with employees provide testimonial evidence based on their knowledge, perspectives, or observations.

Option B refers to tangible documents or records, which are not the direct result of interviews.

Option C refers to data analysis, which is not applicable in this scenario.

Role of Testimonial Evidence:

Testimonial evidence is often used to corroborate documentary evidence or provide insights into processes and controls.






Post your Comments and Discuss IIA IIA-IAP exam with other Community members:

IIA-IAP Exam Discussions & Posts