Free CRISC Exam Braindumps
Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control Questions 676–680 (page: 137)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

Which of the following is the GREATEST concern when an organization uses a managed security service provider as a firewall administrator?

  1. Exposure of log data
  2. Lack ofgovernance
  3. Increased number of firewall rules
  4. Lack of agreed-upon standards

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

A managed security service provider (MSSP) is a third-party entity that offers network security services to an organization, such as firewall operation, administration, monitoring, and maintenance1. A firewall is a device or software that controls the incoming and outgoing network traffic based on predefined rules2. A firewall administrator is a person or entity that manages and maintains the firewall configuration, rules, and policies3.
When an organizationuses an MSSP as a firewall administrator, the greatest concern is the exposure of log data, because log data contains sensitive and valuable information about the organization's network activity, such as source and destination IP addresses, ports, protocols, timestamps, and user identities4. If the log data is not protected properly by the MSSP, it could be accessed, modified, or stolen by unauthorized parties, such as hackers, competitors, or regulators, which could result in data breaches, compliance violations, reputational damage, or legal liabilities for the organization5. The other options are not as concerning as the exposure of log data, because they do not pose a direct and immediate threat to the organization's data security and privacy, but rather affect the quality and efficiency of the firewall management, as explained below:
B . Lack of governance is a concern when an organization uses an MSSP as a firewall administrator, because it could lead to misalignment or inconsistency between the organization's and the MSSP's objectives, policies, and standards for firewall management. However, this concern can be mitigated by establishing a clear and comprehensive service level agreement (SLA)with the MSSP,which defines the roles, responsibilities, expectations, and performance indicators for the firewall management service6.
C . Increased number of firewall rules is a concern when an organization uses an MSSP as a firewall administrator, because it could create complexity, confusion, or duplication in the firewall configuration, which could affect the firewall performance and security. However, this concern can be mitigated by conducting regular firewall audits and reviews with the MSSP, whichcan help to rationalize, optimize, and update the firewall rules, and to ensure that they are relevant, effective, and efficient for the organization's network environment. D . Lack of agreed-upon standards is a concern when an organization uses an MSSP asa firewall administrator, because it could result in gaps or weaknesses in the firewall design and implementation, which could compromise the firewall functionality and security.

However, this concern can be mitigated by adopting and following industry best practices, norms, and expectations for firewall management, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) guidelines, the Center for Internet Security (CIS) benchmarks, or the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) requirements . References = Risk and Information Systems Control Study Manual, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1, page 115.
What Is A Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP)? - Fortinet, What is a Firewall? - Definition from Techopedia, Firewall Administrator Job Description - Betterteam, What is a Firewall Log? - Definition from Techopedia, Firewall Log Management: Why It's Important and How to Do It Right, How to Write a Service Level Agreement (SLA) for an MSSP, [Firewall Auditing: BestPractices for Security and Compliance], [Guidelines on Firewalls and Firewall

Policy |CSRC], [CIS Firewall Benchmark - CIS], [PCI DSS and Firewalls - PCI Security Standards Council]



Which of the following BEST indicates the efficiency of a process for granting access privileges?

  1. Average time to grant access privileges
  2. Number of changes in access granted to users
  3. Average number of access privilege exceptions
  4. Number and type of locked obsolete accounts

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

According to the CRISC Review Manual, the average time to grant access privileges is the best indicator of the efficiency of a process for granting access privileges, because it measures how quickly and effectively the process can respond to the access requests and meet the business needs. The average time to grant access privileges can be calculated by dividing the total time spent on granting access privileges by the number of access requests processed. The other options are not the best indicators of the efficiency of the process, because they measure other aspects of the process, such as the quality, the security, or the maintenance. The number of changes in access granted to users measures the quality of the process, as it indicates how wellthe process can align the access rights with the user roles and functions. The average number of access privilege exceptions measures the security of the process, as it indicates how often theprocess deviates from the established policies and standards. The number and type of locked obsolete accounts measures the maintenance of the process, as it indicates how well the process can remove the unnecessary or outdated accounts. References = CRISC Review Manual, 7th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.1.2, page



The PRIMARY reason for prioritizing risk scenarios is to:

  1. provide an enterprise-wide view of risk
  2. support risk response tracking
  3. assign risk ownership
  4. facilitate risk response decisions.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

The primary reason for prioritizing risk scenarios is to facilitate risk response decisions. Risk scenarios are hypothetical situations that describe the possible causes, events, and consequences of a risk. Prioritizing risk scenarios is the process of ranking the risk scenarios according to their level of importance, urgency, or impact. Prioritizing risk scenarios helps to facilitate risk response decisions, which are the choices made to address the risks, such as avoiding, transferring, mitigating, or accepting the risks. Prioritizing risk scenarios helps to allocate the resources and efforts to the most significant or critical risk scenarios, and to select the most appropriate and effective risk responses. Prioritizing risk scenarios also helps to communicate and justify the risk response decisions to the stakeholders, and to monitor and report the risk status and performance. Providing an enterprise-wide view of risk, supporting risk response tracking, and assigning risk ownership are not the primary reasons for prioritizing risk scenarios, as they are either theinputs or the outputs of the risk prioritization process, and they do not address the primary need of responding to the risks. References = CRISC Review Manual, 6th Edition, ISACA, 2015, page 50.



A risk practitioner has reviewed new international regulations and realizes the new regulations will affect the organization.
Which of the following should be the risk practitioner's NEXT course of action?

  1. Conduct a peer response assessment.
  2. Update risk scenarios in the risk register.
  3. Reevaluate the risk management program.
  4. Ensure applications are compliant.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

The risk practitioner should update the risk scenarios in the risk register to reflect the new international regulations and their potential impact on the organization. The risk register is a tool that records and tracks the identified risks, their likelihood, impact, mitigation strategies, and status. Updating the risk register will help the risk practitioner to prioritize and manage the risks effectively, and communicate them to the relevant stakeholders.

References
·ISACA CRISC Review Manual, 7th Edition, Domain 1: IT Risk Identification, Section 1.2.2: Risk Register
·Risk Register - ISACA
·How to Create a Risk Register: A Step-by-Step Guide | The Blueprint



Which of the following is the BEST way to mitigate the risk associated with fraudulent use of an enterprise's brand on Internet sites?

  1. Utilizing data loss prevention (DLP) technology
  2. Monitoring the enterprise's use of the Internet
  3. Scanning the Internet to search for unauthorized usage
  4. Developing training and awarenesscampaigns

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Scanning the Internet for unauthorized usage of the enterprise's brand proactively identifies fraudulent activities and enables timely response. This aligns withBrand Protection and Risk Mitigationstrategies.



Viewing page 137 of 380
Viewing questions 681 - 685 out of 1895 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss ISACA CRISC exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!