Free IT-Risk-Fundamentals Exam Braindumps (page: 9)

Page 8 of 20

The use of risk scenarios to guide senior management through a rapidly changing market environment is considered a key risk management

  1. benefit.
  2. incentive.
  3. capability.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The use of risk scenarios to guide senior management through a rapidly changing market environment is considered a key risk management benefit. Here's why:
Benefit: Using risk scenarios provides a strategic advantage by helping senior management understand potential future events and their impacts. It enables better decision-making and preparedness in navigating uncertainties.
Incentive: While risk scenarios may provide motivation to improve risk management practices, the primary aspect is the benefit they offer in strategic planning and risk mitigation. Capability: This refers to the ability of the organization to manage risks. Using risk scenarios enhances the risk management capability but is primarily beneficial in understanding and preparing for risks.
Therefore, using risk scenarios is a key benefit as it enhances the ability of senior management to navigate a changing environment.



Which of the following is an example of a tangible and assessable representation of risk?

  1. Enterprise risk policy
  2. Risk treatment plan
  3. Risk scenario

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

A risk scenario is an example of a tangible and assessable representation of risk. Here's the breakdown:
Enterprise Risk Policy: This is a document that outlines the organization's approach to risk management.
While important, it is not a specific, tangible representation of risk. Risk Treatment Plan: This outlines the actions to mitigate identified risks. It is a strategy rather than a representation of specific risks.
Risk Scenario: This provides a detailed and concrete representation of potential risk events, their causes, and impacts. It allows for assessment and preparation, making it a tangible and assessable representation of risk.
Therefore, a risk scenario is the best example of a tangible and assessable representation of risk.


Reference:

ISA 315 Anlage 5 and 6: Understanding risks, scenarios, and their impacts on IT systems and business objectives.
ISO-27001 and GoBD guidelines on risk management and identification. These references provide a comprehensive understanding of the concepts and principles involved in IT risk and audit processes.



An l&T-related risk assessment enables individuals responsible for risk governance to:

  1. define remediation plans for identified risk factors.
  2. assign proper risk ownership.
  3. identify potential high-risk areas.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

An IT-related risk assessment enables individuals responsible for risk governance to identify potential high-risk areas. Here's a detailed explanation:
Define Remediation Plans for Identified Risk Factors: While risk assessments may lead to the development of remediation plans, the primary objective is not to define these plans but to identify where the risks lie.

Assign Proper Risk Ownership: Assigning risk ownership is an important part of risk management, but it follows the identification of risks. The assessment itself is primarily focused on identifying risks rather than assigning ownership.
Identify Potential High-Risk Areas: The core purpose of a risk assessment is to identify and evaluate areas where the organization is exposed to significant risks. This identification process is crucial for prioritizing risk management efforts and ensuring that resources are allocated to address the most critical risks first.
Therefore, the primary purpose of an IT-related risk assessment is to identify potential high-risk areas.



A business impact analysis (BIA) generates the MOST benefit when:

  1. keeping impact criteria and cost data as generic as possible.
  2. measuring existing impact criteria exclusively in financial terms.
  3. using standardized frequency and impact metrics.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

A business impact analysis (BIA) generates the most benefit when using standardized frequency and impact metrics. Here's why:
Keeping Impact Criteria and Cost Data as Generic as Possible: This approach would not provide the necessary specificity and accuracy needed to understand the unique impacts on the organization. Generic data lacks the precision required for effective decision-making. Measuring Existing Impact Criteria Exclusively in Financial Terms: While financial metrics are important, limiting the analysis to financial terms alone ignores other critical factors such as reputational impact, operational disruption, and compliance issues. A comprehensive BIA should include a variety of impact criteria.
Using Standardized Frequency and Impact Metrics: Standardization ensures consistency, comparability, and reliability of the data collected. It allows for a systematic evaluation of risks and impacts across different scenarios, facilitating better decision-making and prioritization. Therefore, using standardized frequency and impact metrics is essential for generating the most benefit from a BIA.






Post your Comments and Discuss ISACA IT-Risk-Fundamentals exam with other Community members:

IT-Risk-Fundamentals Exam Discussions & Posts