CompTIA
Checkpoint
ISC
HP
Dell
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL®
Juniper
PMI
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
Google
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
Certiport
ISC2
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. ISTQB®
  5. ATTA

Free ATTA Exam Braindumps (page: 8)

Page 7 of 17
PDF with 65 Questions

The Bonus Program is perceived by management to be critical. Defects in the program would almost immediately lead to financial loss. In the past an improvement program has been run to implement review based on IEEE 1028. Knowledge and skills on both formal and informal reviews are available. There is also an existing pool of review leaders. Which of the following review types would you choose to review the program?

  1. Informal review
  2. Inspection
  3. Walkthrough
  4. Management review

Answer(s): B



You have tested the program and have found that with “bonus” a boundary value has not been implemented according to design. You have written an incident report. Which of the following is the incident report of the highest quality?

  1. Description: Boundary value not correctly implemented
    Priority: High
    Repeatability: Yes
    Tester: WVU
    Test case: 35 (test specification “bonus program”), V1.2
  2. Description: Boundary value not correctly implemented for bonus
    Priority: Medium
    Tester: WVU
    Test case: 35 (test specification “bonus program”)
  3. Description: Boundary value not correctly implemented for bonus (line 26: 10 according to design, now 5 implemented)
    Priority: High
    Repeatability: Yes
    Tester: WVU
    Test case: 35 (test specification “bonus program”), V1.2
  4. Description: Boundary value not correctly implemented for bonus
    Priority: High
    Repeatability: Yes
    Tester: WVU
    Test case: 35 (test specification “bonus program”), V1.2

Answer(s): C



When performing code reviews, which of the following defect types will be most difficult to find?

  1. Dead code
  2. Variable used that is not defined
  3. Memory issues
  4. Conformance to design

Answer(s): C



During code reviews, it is the author’s responsibility…

  1. to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
  2. to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
  3. to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log
  4. to correct source documents that have major defects

Answer(s): A






Post your Comments and Discuss ISTQB® ATTA exam with other Community members:

ATTA Exam Discussions & Posts