Free CT-PT Exam Braindumps
ISTQB Certified Tester - Performance Testing Questions 6–10 (page: 3)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

What is typically the result of oversaturation of system resources during performance testing?

  1. Response time will gradually improve over a period of time.
  2. Response time will be slow under significant load levels.
  3. Error logging will decrease.
  4. The size of the database will gradually decrease.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

When system resources are oversaturated (e.g., CPU, RAM, or network bandwidth), response times will degrade because the system struggles to process requests efficiently. This is a key performance bottleneck indicator.

Option A is incorrect because response times do not improve under heavy load; they typically worsen.

Option C is incorrect because error logging may actually increase rather than decrease under stress.

Option D is incorrect because database size is independent of system saturation unless records are actively purged.


Reference:

ISTQB CT-PT Syllabus, Section 2.5: Identifying Bottlenecks.



What should be captured for batch processing performance metrics?

  1. Throughput and wait times
  2. Number of records deleted
  3. Average percentage of network latency
  4. Number of concurrent virtual users

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

For batch processing performance metrics, the two most important factors are:

Throughput ­ Measures the number of transactions processed over time.

Wait times ­ Evaluates delays in processing batches.

Option B (Number of records deleted) is irrelevant unless batch processing specifically involves deletions.

Option C (Network latency percentage) applies to real-time transaction processing, not batch jobs.

Option D (Concurrent virtual users) applies more to load testing rather than batch performance.


Reference:

ISTQB CT-PT Syllabus, Section 2.2.4: Batch Processing Performance Testing.



What is an advantage of aggregating the results of performance testing?

  1. Aggregated results provide more detail and allow for a more complete analysis of the test.
  2. Testing is expedited when the results are aggregated.
  3. It is easier for stakeholders to draw a correct conclusion from aggregated results.
  4. Aggregated results show when testing has been completed.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Aggregating test results helps stakeholders understand performance trends by combining data points from multiple test runs. This makes it easier to draw conclusions about system behavior.

Option A is incorrect because aggregation may reduce detailed visibility, not increase it.

Option B is incorrect because aggregation does not expedite testing itself.

Option D is incorrect because aggregated results do not indicate test completion.


Reference:

ISTQB CT-PT Syllabus, Section 2.6: Performance Test Result Analysis.



Which of the following is an advantage of using performance monitoring tools?

  1. They can prevent malicious behavior.
  2. They proactively compile metrics from server logs.
  3. They more easily identify and report multi-threading problems.
  4. They can proactively detect denial-of-service (DoS) attacks.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Performance monitoring tools collect real-time and historical performance data, particularly from server logs, application metrics, and infrastructure monitoring. This allows testers to analyze performance trends efficiently.

Option A is incorrect because monitoring tools do not prevent malicious behavior but may detect it.

Option C is incorrect since identifying multi-threading issues is typically done through profiling tools rather than performance monitors.

Option D is incorrect as DoS attack detection falls under security testing.


Reference:

ISTQB CT-PT Syllabus, Section 3.2: Performance Monitoring Tools.



Which of the following is usually identified by a performance test?

  1. Resource bottlenecks
  2. Suitability issues
  3. Learnability concerns
  4. Failure to meet accessibility requirements

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Performance tests primarily identify resource bottlenecks such as CPU saturation, memory leaks, network congestion, and database slowdowns.

Option B (Suitability issues) is a functional requirement concern, not a performance issue.

Option C (Learnability concerns) relates to usability testing, not performance.

Option D (Accessibility requirements) falls under compliance and usability testing, not performance testing.


Reference:

ISTQB CT-PT Syllabus, Section 2.5: Identifying Bottlenecks and Performance Issues.



Viewing page 3 of 9
Viewing questions 11 - 15 out of 120 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss ISTQB CT-PT exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!