Free CTAL-TAE Exam Braindumps
Certified Tester Advanced Level Test Automation Engineering Questions 21–25 (page: 6)

Updated On: 4-Sep-2026

Your organisation has successfully implemented a Test Automaton Solution (TAS) for a new project which has since been delivered into production via a number of sprints. A series of maintenance releases are now planned.
Some improvements were made to the Test Automation Architecture (TAA) as a result of feedback from the early sprints. The TAA improvements affected the TA, and the TAS was changed for the final sprint.
The new version of the TAS was generally well received but some performance and usability issues were encountered with the TAS which have yet to be addressed.
The test automation engineers supporting the maintenance releases must decide whether to use the enhanced TAS or the version that was used successfully for previous sprints.
What is the BEST action to take next?

  1. Perform an analysis of risks versus benefits for the enhanced TAS and then decide which version to use.
  2. Use the previous version because this was proven to work. It will be too risky to use the new version, with unresolved issues, for a live system.
  3. Use the new version because, despite some issues, it works, and the live system should not be tested using a different TAS.
  4. Use the new version of the TAS for the first maintenance release on a trial basis. If issues are encountered,
    -switch to the previous version for later releases until the issues are resolved.
    -

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The best action is to perform a risk-benefit analysis of the enhanced TAS before deciding which version to use. This ensures a balanced, informed decision that considers the unresolved issues, potential improvements, and the impact on the live system, rather than relying solely on assumptions or trial-based changes.



A major component of your organisation’s Test Automation Solutions (TAS) is a popular open-source third-party capture-replay tool for automated functional testing.
Which two of the following must the Test Automation Engineer (TO) ensure happens for this TAS?
a) The third party tool is placed under configuration management control. b) The annual support and maintenance costs are agreed with the tool’s vendor. c) It is important to obtain information about updates and new versions of the tool so that the third party tool is kept up to date. d) Ensure that the TAS test scripts are integrated into the tool’s framework. e) Ensure that no changes are made to the tool, because modifications are not allowed for third party products.

  1. a and b.
  2. c and d.
  3. a and c.
  4. d and e.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The Test Automation Engineer must ensure the third-party tool is under configuration management control (a) to manage versions and dependencies, and stay informed about updates and new versions (c) to maintain compatibility and benefit from improvements or security fixes. These are critical when relying on third-party open-source tools.



As the TAE, you are working with the organisation’s Test Manager to decide which external metrics and which internal metrics should be gathered for the new TAS.
Which of the following represents the BEST internal metric that would help measure the quality of the TAS and the number of problems associated with the TAS?

  1. The average maintenance cost to keep an automated test in sync with the SUT.
  2. The number of hours of manual test effort saved by implementing a TAS.
  3. A measure of defect density within the TAS automation code.
  4. A measure of how many automated tests pass and fail.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

A measure of defect density within the TAS automation code is the best internal metric for assessing the quality of the TAS and identifying problems within it. It directly reflects the reliability and robustness of the automation solution itself.



You have been asked to implement test automation for a project that is not meeting its deadlines. After further analysis you discover that the manual testers are not able to keep up with the new feature testing because the regression testing is taking 75% of their time. As a result, the new features are being released with many defects and customers are complaining about the quality.
Given this information, what metric SHOULD you be tracking to show the value of test automation for this project?

  1. Percentage of code covered by the test automation.
  2. Equivalent Manual Test Effort for the automated tests.
  3. Number of defects found by test automation.
  4. Percentage of builds accepted/rejected by the automated tests.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Equivalent Manual Test Effort for the automated tests quantifies how much manual effort is being saved through automation. In this scenario, where regression testing consumes 75% of manual testers' time, this metric directly demonstrates the value of automation in freeing up resources to focus on new feature testing, ultimately improving release quality.



The Test Automation Manager has asked you to provide a solution for collecting metrics from the TAS that measures code coverage every time the automated regression test pack is run. The metrics must be trend based to ensure that the scope of the regression test pack continues to reflect enhancements made to the SUT - coverage must not drop and should ideally increase. The solution must be as automated as possible to avoid unnecessary manual overheads and errors.
Which of the following approaches would BEST meet these requirements?

  1. Test automation cannot measure code coverage for the SUT, only the code for the automation tools and scripts. The automated test cases would need to be run manually with a code coverage and reporting tool running in the background.
  2. The automated testware would record overall code coverage for each run and add the figure to a new row in a pre-formatted Excel spreadsheet. You would then present the spreadsheet to stakeholders so they could look for changes in coverage.
  3. The automated testware would record overall code coverage for each run, export the data to a pre-
    formatted Excel spreadsheet that automatically updates a trend analysis bar chart for you to distribute to stakeholders.
    -D. The automated testware would record the pass/fail rate of each regression test case, export the data to a pre-formatted Excel spreadsheet that automatically updates a trend analysis success rate bar chart and emails it to stakeholders.
    -

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Automating the collection and reporting of code coverage metrics after each regression test run. It ensures that trend analysis is available with minimal manual effort, helping stakeholders monitor whether test coverage keeps up with system changes and enhancements.



Viewing page 6 of 25
Viewing questions 26 - 30 out of 120 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss ISTQB CTAL-TAE exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!