Free MCPA-LEVEL-1-MAINTENANCE Exam Braindumps
MuleSoft Certified Platform Architect - Level 1 MAINTENANCE Questions 65–69 (page: 8)

Updated On: 31-Jan-2026

Due to a limitation in the backend system, a system API can only handle up to 500 requests per second.
What is the best type of API policy to apply to the system API to avoid overloading the backend system?

  1. Rate limiting
  2. HTTP caching
  3. Rate limiting - SLA based
  4. Spike control

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Correct Answer: Spike control
*****************************************
>> First things first, HTTP Caching policy is for purposes different than avoiding the backend system from overloading. So this is OUT.
>> Rate Limiting and Throttling/ Spike Control policies are designed to limit API access, but have different intentions.
>> Rate limiting protects an API by applying a hard limit on its access. >> Throttling/ Spike Control shapes API access by smoothing spikes in traffic.
That is why, Spike Control is the right option.



A retail company with thousands of stores has an API to receive data about purchases and insert it into a single database. Each individual store sends a batch of purchase data to the API about every 30 minutes. The API implementation uses a database bulk insert command to submit all the purchase data to a database using a custom JDBC driver provided by a data analytics solution provider. The API implementation is deployed to a single CloudHub worker. The JDBC driver processes the data into a set of several temporary disk files on the CloudHub worker, and then the data is sent to an analytics engine using a proprietary protocol. This process usually takes less than a few minutes. Sometimes a request fails. In this case, the logs show a message from the JDBC driver indicating an out-of-file- space message. When the request is resubmitted, it is successful.

What is the best way to try to resolve this throughput issue?

  1. se a CloudHub autoscaling policy to add CloudHub workers
  2. Use a CloudHub autoscaling policy to increase the size of the CloudHub worker
  3. Increase the size of the CloudHub worker(s)
  4. Increase the number of CloudHub workers

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Correct Answer: Increase the size of the CloudHub worker(s)
*****************************************

The key details that we can take out from the given scenario are:
>> API implementation uses a database bulk insert command to submit all the purchase data to a database
>> JDBC driver processes the data into a set of several temporary disk files on the CloudHub worker >> Sometimes a request fails and the logs show a message indicating an out-of-file-space message Based on above details:
>> Both auto-scaling options does NOT help because we cannot set auto-scaling rules based on error messages. Auto-scaling rules are kicked-off based on CPU/Memory usages and not due to some given error or disk space issues.
>> Increasing the number of CloudHub workers also does NOT help here because the reason for the failure is not due to performance aspects w.r.t CPU or Memory. It is due to disk-space. >> Moreover, the API is doing bulk insert to submit the received batch data. Which means, all data is handled by ONE worker only at a time. So, the disk space issue should be tackled on "per worker" basis. Having multiple workers does not help as the batch may still fail on any worker when disk is out of space on that particular worker.
Therefore, the right way to deal this issue and resolve this is to increase the vCore size of the worker so that a new worker with more disk space will be provisioned.



An API implementation returns three X-RateLimit-* HTTP response headers to a requesting API client.
What type of information do these response headers indicate to the API client?

  1. The error codes that result from throttling
  2. A correlation ID that should be sent in the next request
  3. The HTTP response size
  4. The remaining capacity allowed by the API implementation

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Correct Answer: The remaining capacity allowed by the API implementation.



Reference:

https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/2.x/rate-limiting-and-throttling-sla-based- policies#response-headers



An API has been updated in Anypoint exchange by its API producer from version 3.1.1 to 3.2.0 following accepted semantic versioning practices and the changes have been communicated via the APIs public portal. The API endpoint does NOT change in the new version. How should the developer of an API client respond to this change?

  1. The API producer should be requested to run the old version in parallel with the new one
  2. The API producer should be contacted to understand the change to existing functionality
  3. The API client code only needs to be changed if it needs to take advantage of the new features
  4. The API clients need to update the code on their side and need to do full regression

Answer(s): C

Explanation:



A company requires Mule applications deployed to CloudHub to be isolated between non-production and production environments. This is so Mule applications deployed to non-production environments can only access backend systems running in their customer-hosted non-production environment, and so Mule applications deployed to production environments can only access backend systems running in their customer-hosted production environment. How does MuleSoft recommend modifying Mule applications, configuring environments, or changing infrastructure to support this type of per-environment isolation between Mule applications and backend systems?

  1. Modify properties of Mule applications deployed to the production Anypoint Platform environments to prevent access from non-production Mule applications
  2. Configure firewall rules in the infrastructure inside each customer-hosted environment so that only IP addresses from the corresponding Anypoint Platform environments are allowed to communicate with corresponding backend systems
  3. Create non-production and production environments in different Anypoint Platform business groups
  4. Create separate Anypoint VPCs for non-production and production environments, then configure connections to the backend systems in the corresponding customer-hosted environments

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Correct Answer: Create separate Anypoint VPCs for non-production and production environments, then configure connections to the backend systems in the corresponding customer-hosted environments.
*****************************************
>> Creating different Business Groups does NOT make any difference w.r.t accessing the non-prod and prod customer-hosted environments. Still they will be accessing from both Business Groups unless process network restrictions are put in place.
>> We need to modify or couple the Mule Application Implementations with the environment. In fact, we should never implements application coupled with environments by binding them in the properties. Only basic things like endpoint URL etc should be bundled in properties but not

environment level access restrictions.
>> IP addresses on CloudHub are dynamic until unless a special static addresses are assigned. So it is not possible to setup firewall rules in customer-hosted infrastrcture. More over, even if static IP addresses are assigned, there could be 100s of applications running on cloudhub and setting up rules for all of them would be a hectic task, non-maintainable and definitely got a good practice. >> The best practice recommended by Mulesoft (In fact any cloud provider), is to have your Anypoint VPCs seperated for Prod and Non-Prod and perform the VPC peering or VPN tunneling for these Anypoint VPCs to respective Prod and Non-Prod customer-hosted environment networks.


Reference:

https://docs.mulesoft.com/runtime-manager/virtual-private-cloud



Bottom of Form
Top of Form



Viewing page 8 of 17
Viewing questions 36 - 40 out of 80 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss MuleSoft MCPA-LEVEL-1-MAINTENANCE exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!