Free NSK300 Exam Braindumps (page: 6)

Page 5 of 16

You are the network architect for a company using Netskope Private Access. Multiple users are reporting that they are unable to access an application using Netskope Private Access that was working previously. You have verified that the Real-time Protection policy allows access to the application, private applications are steered for the users, and the application is reachable from internal machines. You must verify that the application is reachable through Netskope Publisher In this scenario, which two tools in the Netskope Ul would you use to accomplish this task? (Choose two.)

  1. Reachability Via Publisher in the App Definitions page
  2. Troubleshooter tool in the App Definitions page
  3. Applications in Skope IT
  4. Clear Private App Auth under Users in Skope IT

Answer(s): A,B

Explanation:

In the scenario where users are unable to access an application through Netskope Private Access, and after verifying that the Real-time Protection policy allows access, the application is steered for the users, and it is reachable from internal machines, the next step is to verify the application's reachability through the Netskope Publisher. The two tools in the Netskope UI that would be used to accomplish this task are:
A . Reachability Via Publisher in the App Definitions page - This tool allows you to check if the application is reachable through the configured Publishers. It is essential to ensure that the application's connectivity is intact and that there are no issues with the Publishers themselves. B . Troubleshooter tool in the App Definitions page - The Troubleshooter tool can help diagnose and resolve issues related to application reachability. It provides insights into potential problems and offers guidance on how to fix them.
These tools are designed to assist in troubleshooting and ensuring that applications are accessible through Netskope Private Access.


Reference:

The explanation is based on the standard procedures for managing private applications and troubleshooting within the Netskope Private Access environment as outlined in the Netskope Knowledge Portal



You want to integrate with a third-party DLP engine that requires ICAP. In this scenario, which Netskope platform component must be configured?

  1. On-Premises Log Parser (OPLP)
  2. Secure Forwarder
  3. Netskope Cloud Exchange
  4. Netskope Adapter

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

When integrating a third-party Data Loss Prevention (DLP) engine that requires ICAP, the Netskope platform component that must be configured is the Netskope Adapter. The Netskope Adapter is designed to facilitate the integration of Netskope with various third-party tools and services, including DLP engines that use ICAP for communication. By configuring the Netskope Adapter, you can ensure that the third-party DLP engine can communicate effectively with the Netskope platform to provide comprehensive data protection.


Reference:

This information is based on the integration capabilities of the Netskope platform, which includes the use of Netskope Adapters for third-party integrations as detailed in the Netskope

Knowledge Portal1 and the Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) documentation2



Your Netskope Client tunnel has connected to Netskope; however, the user is not receiving any steering or client configuration updates What would cause this issue?

  1. The client is unable to establish communication to add-on-[tenantl.goskope.com.
  2. The client is unable to establish communication to gateway-(tenant|.goskope.com.
  3. The Netskope Client service is not running.
  4. An invalid steering exception was created in the tenant

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

When the Netskope Client service is not running, it cannot execute the necessary processes to receive steering or client configuration updates. The service must be active to establish communication with the Netskope cloud and apply the configurations and policies defined by the administrator.


Reference:

This information aligns with the Netskope Cloud Security Architect learning objectives and documents, which emphasize the importance of running client services for proper communication and functionality



You built a number of DLP profiles for different sensitive data types. If a file contains any of this sensitive data, you want to take the most restrictive policy action but also create incident details for all matching profiles.
Which statement is correct in this scenario?

  1. Create a Real-time Protection policy for each DLP profile; each matched profile will generate a unique DLP incident.
  2. Create a Real-time Protection policy for each DLP profile; all matched profiles will show up in a single DLP incident
  3. Create a single Real-time Protection policy and include all of the DLP profiles; each matched profile will generate a unique DLP incident
  4. Create a single Real-time Protection policy and include all of the DLP profiles; all matched profiles will show up in a single DLP incident.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

When configuring a Real-time Protection policy with multiple DLP profiles, if the content matches multiple profiles, the policy performs the most restrictive action associated with the DLP profiles that match for that policy. The resulting incident lists all the profiles that matched along with their corresponding forensic information. This means that even though the most restrictive action is taken,

details for all matching profiles are created and included in a single DLP incident12.


Reference:

The explanation is based on the best practices and detailed descriptions provided in the Netskope Knowledge Portal and Community discussions, which outline the process of handling multiple DLP profile matches within a single Real-time Protection policy






Post your Comments and Discuss Netskope NSK300 exam with other Community members:

NSK300 Discussions & Posts