Free NCP-US-6.5 Exam Braindumps (page: 2)

Page 2 of 19

A CIO has been reviewing the corporate BCDR plan. In this review, the CIO has noticed that they are replicating their Files deployments using the built in Files DR capabilities that are configured out of the box.

Upon further investigation, the CIO has identified that there are no granular share replications between their Files deployments and has requested the administrator to take an initiative and implement a granular Files Share recovery model.

Which Files capability should the administrator configure in order to be able to failover only certain shares?

  1. Data Lens
  2. Smart DR
  3. Smart Tiering
  4. NC2 on AWS

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Smart DR enables granular recovery of individual file shares in Nutanix Files by replicating data at the share level. This allows for more fine-grained control over the failover process and ensures that only critical data is recovered in the event of a disaster or outage.

Files Smart DR is a feature that allows you to replicate between Files instances, either on-premises or running on Nutanix Cloud Clusters on AWS1. With Files Smart DR, you can configure granular share replication, which means you can select which shares to replicate and which ones to exclude1. Therefore, the correct answer to your question is B. Smart DR.

Files Smart DR also supports replicating snapshots between the source share and its target, which can help with data recovery and compliance2. Additionally, Files Smart DR is the mechanism by which Files will support disaster recovery in the Nutanix Xi cloud.



A RHEL administrator has requested a new NFS v4 export share to be deployed.

The task has been completed with the following settings:

· Authentication - System

· Default Access - Read-Write

Which mount--t nfs -o sec option should the RHEL administrator issue in order to properly mount the new share?

  1. Krb5p
  2. None
  3. Sys
  4. Krb5i

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Nutanix Files supports NFSv4, which includes advanced features such as strongly mandated security1. NFSv4 supports different security flavors such as sys, krb5, krb5i, and krb5p1. The sys flavor uses UNIX-style authentication based on UID/GID mapping1. The other flavors use Kerberos authentication with different levels of protection.

Since the NFS v4 export share was configured with System authentication, which is equivalent to sys flavor1, the RHEL administrator should issue the mount command with the option -o sec=sys21.



While preparing for migrating data from a legacy storage environment to a new Files scale-out file server, the administrator make the following notes:

Requirements:

Number of home directories: 4000

Number of Departmental shares: 1

Everyone is permitted to accessing it

All users use the same Departmental share

The administrator deploys Files using the following configuration:

Number of FSVMs: 3

VCPU & RAM/FSVM: 4VCPU,12GB

One Distributed share with SSR & ABE enabled for the Home Directories

One Standard share for the Departmental share

Does this configuration satisfy the project's requirements?

  1. No, the project needs two distributed Share 4 FSVMs. 6 vCPU & 326B RAM
  2. Yes, the listed configuration elements satisfy the requirements.
  3. No, the project needs two distributed 4 FSVMs, 24 vcpu & 128GB RAM
  4. No, the project needs 4 FSVMs 4 vCPU & 12GB RAM.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

According to the scenario, the administrator is preparing to migrate data from a legacy storage environment to a new Files scale-out file server in a way that meets the following requirements:

Number of home directories: 4000

Number of Departmental shares: 1

Everyone is permitted to access it

All users use the same Departmental share

The administrator deploys Files using the following configuration:

Number of FSVMs: 3

VCPU & RAM/FSVM: 4VCPU, 12GB

One Distributed share with SSR & ABE enabled for the Home Directories

One Standard share for the Departmental share

Based on this configuration, it appears that the project's requirements are satisfied. The configuration provides a Distributed share for the home directories, which is recommended when there is a large number of files or directories, and this will distribute the load across multiple FSVMs.
Note that everyone is permitted to access it.

In addition, the configuration provides a Standard share for the Departmental share, and since all users use the same Departmental share, this will not create any performance issues. Therefore, the correct answer is B, 'Yes, the listed configuration elements satisfy the requirements'.



What is the reason for the alert: File Server In Heterogeneous State?

  1. The FSVMs are distributed properly on the hosts in the cluster.
  2. Performance of the File Server is optimal, and the alert can be ignored.
  3. The FSVMs do not match in their CPU or memory
  4. The hosts where the FSVMs run do not match in their CPU or memory configuration

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

According to the Nutanix Files Solution Guide1, all the FSVMs have the same basic configuration: four vCPU and 12 GB of RAM1. However, you can add more vCPU, RAM, and FSVMs to the cluster.

Based on this information, the alert: File Server In Heterogeneous State indicates that the FSVMs do not match in their CPU or memory configuration1. This could affect the performance and availability of the file server.



Page 2 of 19



Post your Comments and Discuss Nutanix NCP-US-6.5 exam with other Community members:

sANJAY commented on December 08, 2024
hARD QUESTIOS
Anonymous
upvote