Free PCDRA Exam Braindumps
Palo Alto Networks Certified Detection and Remediation Analyst Questions 31–35 (page: 8)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

What is by far the most common tactic used by ransomware to shut down a victim's operation?

  1. preventing the victim from being able to access APIs to cripple infrastructure
  2. denying traffic out of the victims network until payment is received
  3. restricting access to administrative accounts to the victim
  4. encrypting certain files to prevent access by the victim

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Ransomware is a type of malicious software, or malware, that encrypts certain files or data on the victim's system or network and prevents them from accessing their data until they pay a ransom. This is by far the most common tactic used by ransomware to shut down a victim's operation, as it can cause costly disruptions, data loss, and reputational damage. Ransomware can affect individual users, businesses, and organizations of all kinds. Ransomware can spread through various methods,

such as phishing emails, malicious attachments, compromised websites, or network vulnerabilities. Some ransomware variants can also self-propagate and infect other devices or networks. Ransomware authors typically demand payment in cryptocurrency or other untraceable methods, and may threaten to delete or expose the encrypted data if the ransom is not paid within a certain time frame. However, paying the ransom does not guarantee that the files will be decrypted or that the attackers will not target the victim again. Therefore, the best way to protect against ransomware is to prevent infection in the first place, and to have a backup of the data in case of an attack1234


Reference:

What is Ransomware? | How to Protect Against Ransomware in 2023 Ransomware - Wikipedia
What is ransomware? | Ransomware meaning | Cloudflare
[What Is Ransomware? | Ransomware.org]

[Ransomware -- FBI]



Cortex XDR Analytics can alert when detecting activity matching the following MITRE ATT&CKTM techniques.

  1. Exfiltration, Command and Control, Collection
  2. Exfiltration, Command and Control, Privilege Escalation
  3. Exfiltration, Command and Control, Impact
  4. Exfiltration, Command and Control, Lateral Movement

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

Cortex XDR Analytics is a feature of Cortex XDR that leverages machine learning and behavioral analytics to detect and alert on malicious activity across the network and endpoint layers. Cortex XDR Analytics can alert when detecting activity matching the following MITRE ATT&CKTM techniques:
Exfiltration, Command and Control, Lateral Movement, Execution, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, Defense Evasion, Credential Access, Discovery, and Collection. However, among the options given in the question, the correct answer is D, Exfiltration, Command and Control, Lateral Movement. These are three of the most critical techniques that indicate an advanced and persistent threat (APT) in the environment. Exfiltration refers to the technique of transferring data or information from the compromised system or network to an external location controlled by the adversary. Command and Control refers to the technique of communicating with the compromised system or network to provide instructions, receive data, or update malware. Lateral Movement refers to the technique of moving from one system or network to another within the same environment, usually to gain access to more resources or data. Cortex XDR Analytics can alert on these techniques by analyzing various data sources, such as network traffic, firewall logs, endpoint events, and threat intelligence, and applying behavioral models, anomaly detection, and correlation rules. Cortex XDR Analytics can also map the alerts to the corresponding MITRE ATT&CKTM techniques and provide additional context and visibility into the attack chain1234


Reference:

Cortex XDR Analytics
MITRE ATT&CKTM
Cortex XDR Analytics MITRE ATT&CKTM Techniques

Cortex XDR Analytics Alert Categories



When selecting multiple Incidents at a time, what options are available from the menu when a user right-clicks the incidents? (Choose two.)

  1. Assign incidents to an analyst in bulk.
  2. Change the status of multiple incidents.
  3. Investigate several Incidents at once.
  4. Delete the selected Incidents.

Answer(s): A,B

Explanation:

When selecting multiple incidents at a time, the options that are available from the menu when a user right-clicks the incidents are: Assign incidents to an analyst in bulk and Change the status of multiple incidents. These options allow the user to perform bulk actions on the selected incidents, such as assigning them to a specific analyst or changing their status to open, in progress, resolved, or closed. These options can help the user to manage and prioritize the incidents more efficiently and effectively. To use these options, the user needs to select the incidents from the incident table, right- click on them, and choose the desired option from the menu. The user can also use keyboard shortcuts to perform these actions, such as Ctrl+A to select all incidents, Ctrl+Shift+A to assign incidents to an analyst, and Ctrl+Shift+S to change the status of incidents12


Reference:

Assign Incidents to an Analyst in Bulk
Change the Status of Multiple Incidents



A file is identified as malware by the Local Analysis module whereas WildFire verdict is Benign, Assuming WildFire is accurate.
Which statement is correct for the incident?

  1. It is true positive.
  2. It is false positive.
  3. It is a false negative.
  4. It is true negative.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

A false positive is a situation where a file or activity is incorrectly identified as malicious by a security tool, when in fact it is benign or harmless. A false positive can cause unnecessary alerts, disruptions, or remediation actions, and reduce the confidence and efficiency of the security system. In this question, a file is identified as malware by the Local Analysis module, whereas WildFire verdict is Benign, assuming WildFire is accurate. This means that the Local Analysis module has made a mistake and flagged a legitimate file as malicious, while WildFire has correctly determined that the file is safe. Therefore, this is an example of a false positive. The Local Analysis module is a feature of the Cortex XDR agent that uses a static set of pattern-matching rules and a statistical model to determine if an unknown file is likely to be malware. The Local Analysis module can provide a fast and offline verdict for files that are not yet analyzed by WildFire, but it is not as accurate or comprehensive as WildFire, which uses dynamic analysis and machine learning to examine the behavior and characteristics of files in a sandbox environment. WildFire verdicts are considered more reliable and authoritative than Local Analysis verdicts, and can override them in case of a discrepancy. Therefore, if a file is identified as malware by the Local Analysis module, but as Benign by WildFire, the WildFire verdict should be trusted and the Local Analysis verdict should be disregarded123


Reference:

False positive (security) - Wikipedia
Local Analysis
WildFire Overview



What is the outcome of creating and implementing an alert exclusion?

  1. The Cortex XDR agent will allow the process that was blocked to run on the endpoint.
  2. The Cortex XDR console will hide those alerts.
  3. The Cortex XDR agent will not create an alert for this event in the future.
  4. The Cortex XDR console will delete those alerts and block ingestion of them in the future.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

The outcome of creating and implementing an alert exclusion is that the Cortex XDR console will hide those alerts that match the exclusion criteria. An alert exclusion is a policy that allows you to filter out alerts that are not relevant, false positives, or low priority, and focus on the alerts that require your attention.
When you create an alert exclusion, you can specify the criteria that define which alerts you want to exclude, such as alert name, severity, source, or endpoint. After you create an alert exclusion, Cortex XDR will hide any future alerts that match the criteria, and exclude them from incidents and search query results. However, the alert exclusion does not affect the behavior of the Cortex XDR agent or the security policy on the endpoint. The Cortex XDR agent will still create an alert for the event and apply the appropriate action, such as blocking or quarantining, according to the security policy. The alert exclusion only affects the visibility of the alert on the Cortex XDR console, not the actual protection of the endpoint. Therefore, the correct answer is B, the Cortex XDR console will hide those alerts12


Reference:

Alert Exclusions
Create an Alert Exclusion Policy



Viewing page 8 of 20
Viewing questions 36 - 40 out of 96 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Palo Alto Networks PCDRA exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!