CompTIA
Checkpoint
ISC
HP
Dell
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL®
Juniper
PMI
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
Google
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
Certiport
ISC2
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. Riverbed
  5. 830-01

Free 830-01 Exam Braindumps (page: 45)

Page 44 of 101
PDF with 402 Questions

Refer to the exhibit.


A customer has a server-side out-of-path deployment, and reports that connections from some of their remote branch offices are not being optimized. What is the most likely problem?

  1. A missing fixed-target rule on the server-side Steelhead appliance
  2. A missing fixed-target rule on the client-side Steelhead appliance
  3. The WAN interface is connected to the server-side Steelhead appliance
  4. The LAN interface is connected to the server-side Steelhead appliance
  5. Using port 7810 in the fixed-target rule instead of 7800

Answer(s): B



After a new physical in-path installation, all applications appear to be slower. Adding a pass-through rule does not seem to fix the problem. Which of the following is the most likely cause of the problem?

  1. Duplex mismatch
  2. Firewall blocking auto-discovery probes
  3. No fixed-target rules installed
  4. A and C
  5. A, B, and C

Answer(s): A



In a recent in-path deployment, users are complaining that some of their CIFS drive-mapping connections do not appear to be optimized. Upon further analysis, you discover the file shares reside on a domain controller. The Steelhead appliances are deployed in a default configuration. Which of the following is the most likely cause of the problem?

  1. The Steelhead appliance lost an Opportunistic Lock on the file
  2. SMB Signing is set to required
  3. No fixed-target rules installed
  4. Misconfigured Steelhead appliance
  5. Packet ricochet

Answer(s): B



Refer to the exhibit.


A customer is reporting higher than normal CPU utilization on certain routers in their network. Looking at their Steelhead appliance logs, they see “intercept/localkernel/icore.c:1463] nat_check: SYN packet for already NAT'd connection 100.100.100.33:1611 -> 100.200.200.32:80 ==> 100.201.201.25:7801”. All connections are showing up optimized but the logs persist. Given the exhibit, what is the likely problem?

  1. Lost Opportunistic Lock
  2. SMB Signing
  3. Fixed-target rule is needed
  4. Asymmetric Route
  5. Packet Ricochet

Answer(s): E






Post your Comments and Discuss Riverbed 830-01 exam with other Community members:

830-01 Discussions & Posts