Salesforce ARC-801 Exam Actual Questions
Design and Implement B2B Multi-Cloud Solutions (Page 8 )

• Azure Files is an example of infrastructure as a service (IaaS). No. Azure Files is a managed storage service, typically considered PaaS (Storage as a Service), not IaaS.
• A DNS server that runs on an Azure virtual machine is an example of platform as a service (PaaS). No. Running a DNS server on a VM is IaaS because you manage the OS and DNS software.
• Microsoft Intune is an example of software as a service (SaaS). Yes. Intune is a cloud-based, fully managed service you use over the Internet.

• The Scrum Guide specifies four required events: Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, and Sprint Retrospective. These events enable transparency, inspection, and adaptation.
• The other items listed are not mandatory under Scrum:

• The Well-Architected Framework has five pillars: Operational Excellence, Security, Reliability, Performance Efficiency, and Cost Optimization.
• Operational Excellence: how you run and improve your systems—monitoring, incident response, and evolving processes.
• Reliability: the ability of a workload to recover from failures, maintain uptime, and scale as demand changes.

• Availability (A) is not a pillar name; it’s an outcome that relates to Reliability.
• Scalability (C) isn’t a pillar name; scalability touches on Performance Efficiency.
• Responsive design (D) is not a pillar in the Well-Architected Framework.

• Correct answer: C — The model is deployed at UK border checkpoints.

• The EU AI Act applies to AI systems used within the EU or by entities established in the EU. So:

• The requirement: the support plan must allow opening new support requests (technical support incidents).
• Azure’s Basic plan does not include technical support incidents—only billing/subscription support and access to community support.
• Therefore, you must choose a paid plan to open new technical support requests: Developer, Standard, Professional Direct, or Premier.

• Correct answer: B

• To have a Lambda function reach an RDS instance inside a VPC, the function must run inside the VPC and have permission to manage ENIs. That requires the IAM policy AWSLambdaVPCAccessExecutionRole on the Lambda execution role.
• The RDS security group must allow inbound connections from the Lambda function’s security group (SG). This enables the DB port (e.g., 3306) to be accessible from the Lambda.

• A: Uses only AWSLambdaBasicExecutionRole (logs to CloudWatch). No VPCAccess permissions, so the Lambda cannot attach ENIs to the VPC or access resources in private subnets.
• C: Combines BasicExecutionRole with an interface VPC endpoint. An interface endpoint for Lambda is unnecessary for DB access and does not provide the needed ENI/VPC connectivity to RDS.
• D: Uses VPCAccessRole but still relies on an interface VPC endpoint with a permission model for lambda:InvokeFunction. This endpoint doesn’t enable connectivity to RDS; it’s about invoking Lambda itself via PrivateLink, not about network access to the DB.

• Azure Resource Manager templates: Use ARM templates to define the VM infrastructure and baseline configuration as code. This ensures all Windows Server 2016 VMs are created with a uniform setup, minimizing manual configuration.

• PowerShell Desired State Configuration (DSC) extension for Windows: DSC enforces a defined state across all servers and can automatically remediate drift. This keeps the VMs in the desired configuration with minimal ongoing admin effort.

• A — SCIM synchronizes changes to user attributes from the identity provider to GitHub.
• B — SCIM deactivates GitHub accounts when users are removed or deactivated in the identity provider.
• D — SCIM automates user provisioning when new users are added to the identity provider.

• C: SCIM does not delete organization repositories.
• E: SCIM does not generate REST API authentication tokens.
• F: SCIM handles identity lifecycle management, not repository permission configuration based on roles.

• Context: You’re configuring a Windows Autopilot deployment profile (Profile1) for Windows 11 devices. The hotspot asks you to pick the correct behavior for two statements based on the profile’s settings.

• Box 1: “can modify the desktop settings only for themselves”

• Box 2: “Cortana settings” with options like computer name, keyboard layout, etc.

• Pull: Downloads changes from the central repository and updates the local repository.
• Push: Sends local commits to the central repository.
• Commit: Records local changes in the repository’s history.
• Merge: Combines changes from different branches.
• Clone: Creates a new local copy of a repository.

• Alice is co-resident on the same physical host and exploits shared hardware (the processor cache) to infer secrets. This is the classic definition of a side-channel attack—information leakage through implementation details (like timing or cache behavior) rather than by breaking a protocol or injecting code.

• Observing cache timing or access patterns to deduce cryptographic keys or plaintext data from the victim VM.

• Man-in-the-cloud attack: targets cloud trust/auth, not local hardware sharing.
• SQL injection: exploits input to run SQL commands, not a VM/caching vector.
• Service hijacking: takes control of a service, not about covert data leakage via shared hardware.

• Notice phrases like “shared hardware resources,” “co-resident,” or “cache”—these indicate a side-channel vector.

• According to the provided answer key, the four options are: Upload File, User Criteria, HR Profiles, HR Criteria (options B, D, F, G).

• Upload File: Filter by a file you upload (e.g., CSV) that provides data for bulk case creation.
• User Criteria: Filter by criteria related to users (e.g., role, department) to select target users.
• HR Profiles: Filter by HR profile data associated with users.
• HR Criteria: Filter by HR-related criteria or attributes.

• cloud applications only
• all Web traffic including cloud applications

• Cloud applications only: Only traffic to cloud apps is steered to Netskope for inspection/enforcement; other traffic bypasses.
• All Web traffic including cloud applications: All web-bound traffic, including cloud app traffic, is steered to Netskope.

• Browser isolation, Web traffic only, or a vague “traffic only” option are not the standard two steering modes.
• These two configurations let you decide what traffic Netskope analyzes in real time and what is bypassed.

• The “Answer(s)” field lists B and C (likely incorrect). The explanatory text correctly describes cloud applications only and all Web traffic including cloud applications as the two configurations.

• What the scenario tests: How monitoring paths on a Universal Forwarder (UF) behave when you deploy an app via the Deployment Server.
• How monitoring is configured: Log paths to monitor are defined in inputs.conf (within apps/local on the UF). Splunk on the UF merges inputs from all apps and local config.
• Key point: Deploying a new app that adds a monitor for a log file does not typically remove existing monitors. The UF will continue monitoring any previously configured paths and will add the new ones from the deployed app.

• Correct answer: C) /var/log/maillog and /var/log/messages.

• Used for communication on the local link or LAN segment
• Automatically generated on IPv6-enabled interfaces
• Not routed by routers to other networks
• Commonly used by devices to communicate with their local IPv6 router
• Begins with FE80 through FEBF

• FC00::/7 — unique local unicast
• FE80::/10 — link-local unicast
• FF00::/8 — multicast
• 2000::/3 — global unicast

• The problem describes the class updating field-level security on some profiles. To prevent updating fields that are not updateable for the current user, you should check each field’s updateability before making changes. Use DescribeFieldResult.isUpdateable() (e.g., via Field.describe() on each field) to guard updates.

• A and D (With Sharing): Running a class with Sharing affects record visibility, not whether a field can be updated by a user. It doesn’t prevent updates to fields the user shouldn’t modify.
• C (WITH SECURITY_ENFORCED in SOQL): This enforces FLS/FRC during queries, but it doesn’t control whether the Apex code updates fields or modifies permissions. It’s not addressing the update behavior directly.

• Context: You’ve enabled auditing in Dataverse and need to trim audit data to free storage. The question asks which deletion options you can use.

• What the options typically mean:

• About the provided answer (A, C, D): The list includes “by column,” which isn’t a typical or supported way to purge audit data. The more plausible trio is A (by record), B (date range), and C (by table older than date). If the exam expects A, C, D, that seems incorrect or mis-stated in the source.

• Practical takeaway: To reduce audit storage, use per-record deletions, per-table purge by date, and/or date-range deletions as supported by the environment’s audit management UI or admin docs.

• Correct answer: D.

• Why: In a service offering, a service action is the activity performed by the service provider to deliver or support the service. A service desk agent provides support to a user is the actual action.

• Why the others aren’t service actions:

• The answer: Question 51: C — Request trigger.

• To invoke a Logic App from an external service (here, the Azure Application Insights availability test) you need a trigger that starts on an incoming HTTP request. In Logic Apps, this is the trigger that exposes an HTTP endpoint — typically shown as "When a HTTP request is received" and referred to as the Request trigger.
• The other options aren’t appropriate:

• Create a Logic App with the Request trigger to generate a URL.
• Configure Application Insights to post the degraded-availability payload to that URL.
• Add actions (e.g., send email, follow-up) in the Logic App to notify the customer services team.

• Answer: C — Spot Instances

• Why: The workload is a test environment that can be interrupted and does not need to run continuously. Spot Instances let you bid on unused EC2 capacity at a deep discount, making them the most cost-effective option for interruptible workloads.

• Why not the others:

• Quick tips:

• Answer: B — Improve employee training and awareness

• Why this is correct:

• Why the other options are less effective here:

• Quick practical note:

• Review the risk register.
• Use the previously defined risk response plan, such as assigning a backup resource, reprioritizing work, or using another qualified engineer.
• Implement the response promptly because the task is on the critical path.

• B: Revising the schedule without first applying the planned response may be premature.
• C: Excluding a required task could compromise the project’s objectives and requirements.
• D: Updating the risk and lessons learned records is appropriate, but it should happen after managing the immediate issue, not as the next primary action.

• Amazon Cognito is designed for customer-facing apps to handle user sign-up, sign-in, and access control, and it can federate identities from social providers (Facebook, Google, etc.) or enterprise IdPs via SAML/OpenID Connect.
• You can configure a Cognito User Pool and connect social identity providers, then use tokens (JWT) to authorize backend API calls.

• AWS Directory Service is for connecting your AWS apps to an existing directory (like Active Directory) for enterprise users, not social login for customer apps.
• AWS IAM is for managing access to AWS resources, not end-user authentication for your website.
• AWS IAM Identity Center (AWS SSO) provides SSO for AWS accounts and enterprise apps, not typical social logins for consumer-facing websites.

• Cutover: The old system is replaced immediately. It may be fast, but any failure can cause significant disruption.
• Phased: The system is introduced in stages, which reduces implementation risk but may prolong the transition.
• Pilot: The system is first deployed to a limited group or location. This is useful for testing but does not necessarily minimize downtime for the entire organization.

• Incidents & alerts — see how the phishing activity was detected, correlated, and investigated.
• Threat Explorer — search for the malicious messages, recipients, URLs, attachments, and campaign activity.
• Email and collaboration reports — assess how many users or messages were affected.
• Remediation details — verify whether messages were quarantined, removed, or otherwise contained.

• Microsoft 365 admin center — general tenant administration.
• Microsoft Entra admin center — identity and access management.
• Exchange admin center — mail-flow and Exchange configuration, rather than full phishing-incident investigation.

• Correct answer: C: Amazon Comprehend.

• Why: The library wants to classify books based on their text content. This is an NLP (natural language processing) task. Amazon Comprehend is AWS’s managed NLP service that can perform content classification (including creating custom classifiers) and extract meaningful information from text. The other services are not focused on text classification:

• Quick note: In practice, you’d store the books in S3, extract text if needed (e.g., from PDFs with Textract), and then use Comprehend to classify the documents into topics or genres.

• A: True. You can change the size of a Virtual Warehouse after creation (via UI or ALTER WAREHOUSE).

• B: True. A warehouse can be resized while it’s running; the resize will take effect without needing to stop queries.

• C: True. A warehouse can be configured to suspend after a period of inactivity (AUTO_SUSPEND).

• D: True. A warehouse can be configured to auto-resume when new queries are submitted (AUTO_RESUME).

• Network Security Groups (NSGs) control network traffic to and from Azure resources.
• By applying NSGs to the web tier and the database tier (subnets or NICs), you can:

• NSGs provide the necessary granularity (source/destination, port, protocol) to enforce the desired traffic patterns between tiers.
• For easier management you can use separate subnets for each tier or, optionally, use Application Security Groups to simplify rule management.

• Correct answer: B — From the code repository, modify Startup.cs (in ASP.NET Core you configure the Application Insights SDK in code, not with ApplicationInsights.config).

• Why the other options aren’t correct:

• How to implement fixed-rate sampling (ASP.NET Core):

var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args); 


    builder.Services.Configure<TelemetryConfiguration>(telemetryConfiguration => 
    { 
        var builder = telemetryConfiguration.DefaultTelemetrySink.TelemetryProcessorChainBuilder; 
        double fixedSamplingPercentage = 10; // 10% sampling 
        builder.UseSampling(fixedSamplingPercentage); 
    }); 


    builder.Services.AddApplicationInsightsTelemetry(new ApplicationInsightsServiceOptions 
    { 
        EnableAdaptiveSampling = false 
    }); 


    var app = builder.Build();

• Why: Crisis management relies on established, repeatable procedures for responding to an incident (activation of the crisis team, escalation paths, communications, containment actions). This ensures a coordinated, timely, and auditable response.

• Why not the others:

• Correct answer: A

• Why:

• Takeaway: For data exfiltration detection with ETD, opt for targeted data read audit logs on the designated resources to balance visibility and cost.

Why B works

• AWS KMS keys are Regional resources. A normal customer managed key in Region A cannot be used directly in Region B.
• A customer managed multi-Region KMS key (MRK) has related key replicas in both Regions. The replicas share key material and key ID, although each has a Regional ARN.
• With client-side encryption, the application encrypts the data before storing it in S3. Cross-Region replication then copies already-encrypted objects, so S3 does not need to decrypt and re-encrypt them with a different Regional key.

Why the other choices are weaker

• A and C: SSE-S3 uses Amazon-managed S3 keys, not the required customer managed KMS key.
• D: SSE-KMS can work only if the solution creates and configures the appropriate KMS key or multi-Region key replica in each Region. As written, it says to create a customer managed KMS key in each Region, which implies separate keys—not the same KMS key. Replication also requires additional KMS permissions and destination encryption configuration.

• Answer: A — EC2 Image Builder

• Why: EC2 Image Builder is AWS’s fully managed service designed to automate the creation, testing, and ongoing management of custom EC2 AMIs. It lets you build image pipelines that start from a base image, apply software/components, run tests, and publish/distribute the resulting AMIs across regions or accounts.

• How it works (high level):

• Why not the other options:

• Quick tip: Use EC2 Image Builder to reduce manual image maintenance and drift, and to enforce consistent, tested base images across environments.

• Enable the owner dimension
• Allocate a standard costing inventory model

• Owner dimension (B): This dimension Lets you track who owns the stock. By enabling the owner dimension, items can be configured as either company owned or consignment (vendor-owned) when you create or edit items. Without enabling this dimension, you can’t designate ownership per item.
• Standard costing inventory model (D): Selecting a costing model determines how item costs are calculated and posted. Standard costing provides a fixed cost per unit, which is commonly used for agreed pricing scenarios like consignment arrangements for easier accounting and valuation. It helps ensure consistent cost treatment across transactions for items that can be owned by the company or on consignment.

• Batch dimension (A): Batch tracking is unrelated to ownership and isn’t required to support company-owned vs. consignment configurations.
• Moving average costing (C): This is an alternative costing method. It’s not required to enable ownership config, and the exam’s expected choice focuses on standard costing for this scenario.

• Multiple AWS accounts: Create a separate account for each department or workload. This provides clear isolation and makes it easier to track each department’s usage and costs for chargeback.
• Consolidated billing: AWS Organizations can combine billing for multiple accounts into one central payer account. The company can still view costs by account while managing payment centrally.

• Placement groups: Control how EC2 instances are physically placed for networking or performance; they do not provide departmental billing separation.
• Edge locations: Infrastructure used by services such as Amazon CloudFront; unrelated to chargeback.
• AWS Config: Records and evaluates resource configurations and compliance; it is not a billing-separation mechanism.

• Answer: A. Use Amazon SageMaker Serverless Inference to deploy the model.

• Why: SageMaker Serverless Inference hosts the model and serves real-time predictions without you provisioning or managing servers. It scales automatically and handles deployment details.

• Why the others aren’t suitable:

• Quick example flow: web app ? SageMaker Serverless Inference endpoint ? model ? response.

• Correct answer: D – Do not enable default administrative accounts to ensure accountability.

• A – Do not use encryption methods … backups and sensitive information: Encryption helps protect data; not using it increases risk, not reduces insider threats.
• B – Do not allow administrators to use unique accounts during installation: We actually want unique admin accounts, not the opposite.
• C – Do not control the access to administrators and privileged users: Failing to control access directly enables misuse.

• Correct answer: C) After installing ES on the search head(s) and running the distributed configuration management tool.

• ES requires the Splunk_TA_ForIndexes.spl add-on on indexers to apply index-time configurations. It should be deployed via the distributed configuration management (DCM) flow after ES is installed on the search heads, so the indexers receive the proper configuration in a controlled, versioned bundle.

• A) Deploying when adding apps to the deployment server isn’t the ES-specific order; it bypasses the ES-instantiated workflow.
• B) Installing Splunk_TA_ForIndexes.spl first isn’t the recommended order; ES needs to be installed on the search heads first.
• D) It isn’t limited to indexer cluster sites or cluster master commands; the standard flow uses DCM to push the TA to indexers in general.

• Two VMs
• Distributed across two separate availability zones

• You want: a row for each year and each product (year+product), plus a summary row for each year that totals all products (year only).
• GROUP BY ROLLUP(YEAR(SO.ModifiedDate), P.Name) yields:

• GROUP BY CUBE(YEAR(SO.ModifiedDate), P.Name) produces all combinations of the grouping columns, including:

• This adds extra rows (per-year totals by product across all years and a grand total) that aren’t needed for your stated goal.

• If you want exactly the (Year, Product) and (Year) rows, you can use GROUPING SETS ((Year, Product), (Year)) which is equivalent to Rollup in this two-column case but makes intent explicit.

• SELECT YEAR(SO.ModifiedDate) AS OrderYear, P.Name AS ProductName, SUM(SO.OrderQty) AS TotalQty

• Short answer: The correct term is Anti-forensics (option D), not “Felony.”

• Why: The actions described—hiding files in slack space, changing file headers, placing suspicious files in executables, and altering metadata—are classic anti-forensics techniques. They’re used to hinder or obscure forensic analysis, not to label the act as a legal category.

• About the options:

• Note: The provided answer key lists B (Felony), which is misleading for this exam objective. The exam typically tests knowledge of forensics concepts, where anti-forensics is the correct category.

• The correct answer: C. Tokenization

• Why:

• Why the others are weaker:

• Answer: D) Out-of-band management

• Why this is correct:

• Why the other options aren’t suitable here:

• The correct option is A: Data architecture.

• Why: In the AWS CAF, the Platform perspective covers the technical foundation and architecture that enable cloud workloads to run reliably and efficiently. This includes how data is modeled, stored, and accessed across the enterprise—the core of data architecture.

• Quick mapping for the other options:

• VMs without NGT: Not clearly a migration blocker on its own; NGT (Nutanix Guest Tools) status isn’t the typical gating factor for live migration during maintenance.
• VMs marked as an Agent: Not a standard, widely-known migration blocker; agents aren’t the typical reason a VM can’t be migrated.
• Memory Overcommitted VMs: While memory pressure can affect placement, memory overcommitment isn’t a fundamental reason a VM would be labeled non-migratable during maintenance.
• VMs with attached Volume Groups: This is the strongest candidate. A Volume Group is a set of volumes bound to a VM; moving the VM would entail relocating and reattaching those volumes, which can complicate or block live migration during maintenance.

• Correct answer: B) “16 MB document and 100 MB RAM”
• Why:

• They propose a 2 MB document limit, which is not the current document size limit.
• Some options ignore the 16 MB document limit or the RAM limit.

• The problem: Guest users can’t create posts in the Monthly Reports channel.
• The recommended fix (answer B): Modify the Guest access settings in the Teams admin center.

• Guest access settings control what guests are allowed to do across Teams (for example, posting, chat, and channel participation). If guests are restricted from posting, enabling the appropriate guest permissions will let them post in channels like Monthly Reports.
• The other options don’t directly change guest permissions in the way that affects posting:

• Core idea: Diffie-Hellman (DH) by itself only establishes a shared secret; it does not authenticate who you’re talking to. If the exchange is unauthenticated, it’s vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.
• How MITM works in this context: An attacker intercepts the DH public values exchanged by the two legitimate parties and substitutes their own values. Each party then ends up with a shared secret with the attacker, not with the intended peer.
• Consequences: The attacker can decrypt, read, and possibly modify messages between the two parties, all without either party realizing.
• Why the other options are not correct: