Free C_ABAPD_2507 Exam Braindumps
SAP Certified Associate - Back-End Developer - ABAP Cloud Questions 21–25 (page: 6)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

Which of the following results in faster access to internal tables? (Select 3 correct answers)

  1. In a sorted internal table, specifying the primary key completely.
  2. In a standard internal table, specifying the primary key partially from the left without gaps.
  3. In a sorted internal table, specifying the primary key partially from the left without gaps.
  4. In a hashed internal table, specifying the primary key partially from the left without gaps.
  5. In a hashed internal table, specifying the primary key completely.

Answer(s): A,C,E

Explanation:

Sorted tables:

Full key lookup uses a binary search efficient (A).

Left-aligned partial key lookup also benefits from sort order to find ranges efficiently (C).

Hashed tables:

Require the complete key for O(1) access; partial key is not supported. Hence (E) is correct and (D) is not.

Standard tables:

Have no inherent ordering/index for key-based access; specifying a key (even partially) results in linear search unless you maintain sort and specify BINARY SEARCH explicitly, which still doesn't change the fundamental case in this question; thus (B) is not considered a faster pattern here.

Study Guide


Reference:

ABAP Cloud Programming--Internal Tables (standard/sorted/hashed) performance characteristics.



You have the following CDS definition (aliases shown):

define view entity Z_ENTITY

as select from Z_SOURCE1 as _Source1

association to Z_SOURCE2 as Source2 on ???

{

key carrier_id as Carrier,

key connection_id as Connection,

cityfrom as DepartureCity,

cityto as ArrivalCity,

Source2

}

(The data sources are joined by the field carrier_id. The corresponding field in Z_SOURCE2 is also carrier_id.)

Which ON condition must you insert?

  1. ON Z_SOURCE1.carrier_id = Z_SOURCE2.carrier_id
  2. ON $projection.carrier_id = Z_SOURCE2.carrier_id
  3. ON $projection.Carrier = _Source2.carrier_id
  4. ON _Source1.carrier_id = Source2.carrier_id

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

In a CDS view entity defined AS SELECT FROM, the association ON condition must use the source aliases defined in the FROM clause.

$projection is used in projection views (AS PROJECTION ON ...), not in a basic select view entity. Therefore, options using $projection (B, C) are invalid here.

Using global names (Z_SOURCE1, Z_SOURCE2) in the ON (A) ignores the declared aliases and is not the recommended/valid form within the view definition.

The correct ON clause uses the aliases _Source1 and Source2 with the matching key fields:

ON _Source1.carrier_id = Source2.carrier_id (D).

This aligns with CDS modeling rules in RAP: use aliases consistently and model associations with precise ON conditions based on keys.

Study Guide


Reference:

ABAP CDS Development--Associations & ON conditions; RAP Data Modeling.



Given the following Core Data Service View Entity Data Definition:

@AccessControl.authorizationCheck: #NOT_REQUIRED

DEFINE VIEW ENTITY demo_flight_info_union AS

SELECT FROM scustom {

KEY id,

KEY 'Customer' AS partner,

name,

city,

country

}

UNION

SELECT FROM stravelag {

KEY agencynum AS id,

'Agency' AS partner,

name,

city,

country

}

When you attempt to activate the definition, what will be the response?

  1. Activation error because the field types of the union do not match
  2. Activation error because the key fields of the union do not match
  3. Activation successful
  4. Activation error because the field names of the union do not match

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

In CDS UNION, field names and positions must match exactly across all SELECT statements.

In this case, the first SELECT uses id, while the second uses agencynum AS id, which is fine. However, the literal 'Customer' AS partner and 'Agency' AS partner create inconsistencies.

SAP CDS guidelines specify that for a UNION, field names must be identical and aligned in order; mismatches cause an activation error.

Study Guide


Reference:

ABAP CDS Development User Guide ­ Union Compatibility Rules.



Which statements apply to the TRY-ENDTRY construct? (Select 3 correct answers)

  1. A CATCH clause can be used as a handler for several exception classes.
  2. A CLEANUP clause catches remaining exceptions.
  3. All matching CATCH clauses are always executed.
  4. A superclass in a CATCH clause catches exceptions of itself and of its subclasses.
  5. CATCH clauses should be organized ascending from most specific to most general.

Answer(s): A,D,E

Explanation:

A . Valid: A CATCH block can list multiple exception classes separated by |.

B . Wrong: CLEANUP is not a catch mechanism; it executes after try/catch, regardless of exception, but does not handle exceptions.

C . Wrong: Only the first matching CATCH executes, not all.

D . Valid: A superclass exception handler can catch its subclasses.

E . Valid: Best practice is to order CATCH blocks from most specific most general.

Study Guide


Reference:

ABAP Keyword Documentation ­ TRY ... CATCH ... CLEANUP.



What RAP object contains only the fields required for a particular app?

  1. Projection view
  2. Metadata extension
  3. Database view
  4. Data model view

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

In RAP, the Projection View is designed to expose only the fields relevant for a specific app, keeping the UI lean and controlled.

Metadata extension adds UI-related metadata, not fields.

Database view technical representation, not app-specific.

Data model view defines the data structure, not app-specific projection.

Verified by RAP documentation: Projection views are application-specific representations of the underlying data model.

Study Guide


Reference:

SAP RAP Help ­ Business Object Projection Layer.



Viewing page 6 of 17
Viewing questions 26 - 30 out of 85 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss SAP C_ABAPD_2507 exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!