QUESTION: 5

A customer has a requirement to improve bandwidth and reliability for traffic that is routed through the NSX Edges in VMware Cloud Foundation.
What should the architect recommend satisfying this requirement?

Configure a Load balanced Group for NSX Edges
Configure a TEP Group for NSX Edges
Configure a TEP Independent Group for NSX Edges
Configure a LAG Group for NSX Edges

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

In VCF, NSX Edges handle north-south traffic, and improving bandwidth and reliability involves optimizing their network connectivity. Option D, "Configure a LAG Group for NSX Edges," uses Link Aggregation Groups (LAG) to bundle multiple physical links, increasing bandwidth and providing redundancy via failover if a link fails. This aligns with NSX-T 3.2 capabilities in VCF 5.2 for edge nodes, directly addressing the requirement. Option A (load balancing) could distribute traffic but doesn't inherently improve physical link reliability, while B and C (TEP groups) relate to host-level Tunnel

Endpoints, not edge traffic. LAG is a standard NSX recommendation for such scenarios.

Reference:

NSX-T 3.2 Administration Guide (included in VCF 5.2), Section on Edge Networking and Link Aggregation; VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Networking Guide.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 6

A VMware Cloud Foundation multi-AZ (Availability Zone) design mandates that:

* All management components are centralized.

* The availability SLA must adhere to no less than 99.99%.

What would be the two design decisions that would help satisfy those requirements? (Choose two.)

Choose two distant AZs and configure distinct management workload domains.
Configure a stretched L2 VLAN for the infrastructure management components between the AZs.
Configure a separate VLAN for the infrastructure management components within each AZ.
Configure VMware Live Recovery between the selected AZs.
Choose two close proximity AZs and configure a stretched management workload domain.

Answer(s): B,E

Explanation:

A 99.99% SLA requires HA across AZs, and centralized management in VCF implies a single management domain. Option B, "Configure a stretched L2 VLAN," ensures management components (e.g., vCenter, NSX Manager) communicate seamlessly across AZs, supporting centralization and redundancy. Option E, "Choose two close proximity AZs and configure a stretched management workload domain," extends the management domain across AZs with low latency (<5ms RTT recommended), achieving HA and meeting the SLA via synchronous replication and failover. Option A contradicts centralization with distinct domains, C isolates components (reducing HA), and D (Live Recovery) is for DR, not primary HA. VCF 5.2 supports stretched clusters for this purpose.

Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Multi-AZ Deployment Guide, Section on Stretched Management Domains; VMware Validated Design for VCF 5.2, Availability Zone Configurations.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 7

A customer has a requirement to use isolated domains in VMware Cloud Foundation but is constrained to a single NSX management pane.
What should the architect recommend satisfying this requirement?

An NSX VPC
A Shared NSX Instance
NSX Federation
A 1:1 NSX Instance

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, isolated domains within a single NSX management pane (i.e., a single NSX Manager cluster) require a solution that provides logical isolation without additional management overhead. Option A, "An NSX VPC" (Virtual Private Cloud), is the correct choice as it enables tenant-specific isolated networking environments within a single NSX instance, managed via the same NSX Manager. Introduced in NSX-T 3.2 (supported in VCF 5.2), NSX VPCs allow segmentation with dedicated routing, security policies, and resource allocation, meeting the isolation requirement efficiently. Option B, "A Shared NSX Instance," implies no isolation, contradicting the requirement. Option C, "NSX Federation," supports multi-site management with multiple NSX Managers, exceeding the single-pane constraint. Option D, "A 1:1 NSX Instance," suggests a dedicated NSX Manager per domain, also violating the constraint. NSX VPC is explicitly designed for this use case in VCF.

Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Networking Guide, Section on NSX-T VPCs; NSX-T 3.2 Administration Guide, Chapter on Virtual Private Clouds.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 8

An Architect is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based private cloud solution for a customer. During the requirements gathering workshop, the customer stated the following:

* All users must only have access to the solution components to fulfill their defined role.

* All administrative users must be authenticated to a separate approved identity source for administrator accounts only.

* All service users must be authenticated to the central approved identity source.

* All service account passwords must be stored centrally in an approved secrets management platform.

When creating the design, how should the Architect classify all the stated requirements?

Security
Manageability
Recoverability
Availability

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

VCF design classifies requirements into qualities like Security, Manageability, Availability, and Recoverability based on their focus. The listed requirements all pertain to access control, authentication, and data protection: role-based access limits user privileges, separate identity sources for admins enhance security, centralized authentication for service users ensures consistency, and a secrets management platform protects credentials. These align with the Security design quality in VCF, which encompasses identity and access management (IAM), encryption, and compliance--key aspects of VCF's integration with tools like vSphere's SSO and third-party identity providers. Manageability (B) focuses on operational ease, Recoverability (C) on data restoration, and Availability (D) on uptime--none of which directly match these requirements. Security is the encompassing classification per VCF's methodology.

Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Study Guide, Chapter 3: Design Qualities, Section on Security Requirements; VMware Validated Design 6.2 (applicable to 5.2), Security Architecture.

Reveal Solution Next Question

Free 2V0-13.24 Exam Braindumps (page: 3)

QUESTION: 5

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 6

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 7

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 8

Explanation:

Reference:

2V0-13.24 Exam Discussions & Posts