CompTIA
Checkpoint
ISC
HP
Dell
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
ITIL®
Juniper
PMI
Microsoft
VMware
Avaya
Google
Salesforce
Amazon
Palo Alto Networks
Certiport
ISC2
All Vendors
  2. Home
  3. Exams
  4. VMware
  5. 2V0-13.24

Free 2V0-13.24 Exam Braindumps (page: 5)

Page 4 of 24
PDF with 90 Questions

A customer is deploying VCF at a new datacenter location. They will migrate their workloads from the existing datacenter to the new VCF platform over six months. Both datacenters will run simultaneously for six months during the migration.
Which of the following should be a documented risk?

  1. Six months may not be enough time to complete the migration.
  2. There will be connectivity between the two locations.
  3. Bandwidth between the two locations is sufficient to accommodate the workload migration.
  4. Workloads will be powered off during migration.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

In VCF design, risks are potential issues that could jeopardize project success, documented to prompt mitigation planning. Option A, "Six months may not be enough time to complete the migration," is a valid risk because workload migration complexity (e.g., application dependencies, data volume, testing) could exceed the timeline, a common challenge in VCF deployments. Option B (connectivity) is a fact, not a risk, unless qualified as unreliable. Option C (sufficient bandwidth) is an assumption or requirement, not a risk unless proven inadequate. Option D (powering off workloads) is a design choice, not an inherent risk without evidence. VCF migration planning emphasizes timeline risks, making A the best choice.


Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide, Chapter 5: Risk Assessment; VMware Migration Best Practices for VCF.



An architect had gathered the following requirements and constraints for a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) deployment.

Requirements:

* User interface (UI) SSL certificates must have a maximum validity of 6 months.

* Have the least possible administrative time to install and renew certificates.

* Each certificate must be created on a per VCF component basis.

Constraints:

* Limited administrative skillsets on SSL certificate administration

* Limited operational expenditure budget for SSL certificates

Which design decision should be made to satisfy the stated requirement(s) and constraint(s)?

  1. Use wildcard certificates
  2. Use and configure integration with a certificate vendor such as DigiCert
  3. Disable the use of SSL certificates for user interfaces
  4. Use and configure integration with Microsoft Certificate Authority (CA)

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

The requirements demand per-component certificates with 6-month validity and minimal admin effort, while constraints limit skills and budget. Option D, "Use and configure integration with Microsoft Certificate Authority (CA)," meets all criteria: Microsoft CA (integrated via SDDC Manager in VCF 5.2) supports individual certificates per component (e.g., vCenter, NSX), allows short validity periods, automates renewal (reducing effort), and leverages existing infrastructure (low cost, skill- friendly). Option A (wildcard certificates) violates per-component needs. Option B (DigiCert) incurs higher costs and requires more skill. Option C (disabling SSL) compromises security, failing compliance. Microsoft CA aligns with VCF's certificate management capabilities.


Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide, Section on Certificate Management with Microsoft CA; VMware Validated Design 6.2, Certificate Authority Integration.



A design requirement has been specified for a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) instance. All managed workload resources must be lifecycle managed with the following criteria:

* Development resources must be automatically reclaimed after two weeks

* Production resources will be reviewed yearly for reclamation

* Resources identified for reclamation must allow time for review and possible extension

What capability will satisfy the requirements?

  1. Aria Suite Lifecycle Content Management
  2. Aria Operations Rightsizing Recommendations
  3. Aria Automation Lease Policy
  4. Aria Automation Project Membership

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Lifecycle management of resources in VCF 5.2 involves automation tools like Aria Automation. Option C, "Aria Automation Lease Policy," allows setting expiration dates for resources (e.g., 2 weeks for dev, 1 year for prod), automatically reclaiming them unless extended during a review period, directly meeting all criteria. Option A (Aria Suite Lifecycle) manages software deployment, not resource lifecycles. Option B (Aria Operations Rightsizing) provides sizing insights, not reclamation automation. Option D (Project Membership) controls access, not lifecycles. Aria Automation's lease policies are designed for this exact purpose in VCF, integrating with cloud zones and projects.


Reference:

VMware Aria Automation 8.10 Administration Guide, Section on Lease Policies; VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Study Guide, Automation Features.



A VMware Cloud Foundation design incorporates the following technical requirements:

All management components must have their login sessions timeout after 2 minutes of inactivity.

Communication between management components should be limited to required ports only.

Modifications required by compliancy should not impact the management components' functionality.

What would be the recommendation from a design perspective that would aid in achieving the above requirements?

  1. Consult the vSphere Security Configuration kit
  2. Leverage the results of a vulnerability assessment and apply the recommendations
  3. Consult the Compliance Kit for VMware Cloud Foundation
  4. Apply NSX DFW (Distributed Firewall) to achieve zero-trust

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

These requirements focus on security and compliance for VCF management components (e.g., vCenter, NSX Manager). Option C, "Consult the Compliance Kit for VMware Cloud Foundation,"

provides specific guidance on configuring session timeouts (via SSO settings), restricting ports (via firewall rules), and ensuring compliance changes maintain functionality, tailored to VCF 5.2. Option A (vSphere Security kit) is vSphere-specific, less comprehensive for VCF's multi-component environment. Option B (vulnerability assessment) is reactive, not prescriptive. Option D (NSX DFW) addresses networking but not session timeouts or compliance holistically. The VCF Compliance Kit is purpose-built for such requirements.


Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Compliance Kit Documentation, Security Configuration Section; VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Security Guide.






Post your Comments and Discuss VMware 2V0-13.24 exam with other Community members:

2V0-13.24 Exam Discussions & Posts