QUESTION: 21

A customer defined a requirement for the newly deployed SDDC infrastructure which will host one of the applications responsible for video streaming. Application will run as part of a VI Workload Domain with dedicated NSX instance and virtual machines. Required network throughput was defined as 250 Gb/s. Additionally, the application should provide the lowest possible latency.
Which design decision should be recommended by an architect for the NSX Edge deployment?

Deploy 2 NSX Edges using NSX console and add to Edge cluster created in SDDC Manager.
Deploy 4 extra large edges using vCenter Server console.
Deploy NSX bare-metal Edges and create Edge Cluster using NSX console.
Deploy 2 large NSX Edges using SDDC Manager.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

For 250 Gb/s throughput and low latency in a VI Workload Domain, NSX Edges must handle high- performance traffic. Option C, "Deploy NSX bare-metal Edges and create Edge Cluster using NSX console," is optimal: bare-metal Edges in NSX-T 3.2 (VCF 5.2) support up to 100 Gb/s per node, and clustering multiple nodes achieves 250 Gb/s with minimal latency due to direct hardware access, ideal for video streaming. Option A (2 VM Edges) and D (2 large VM Edges) cap at ~20 Gb/s per node, insufficient for 250 Gb/s. Option B (4 extra-large VM Edges) improves throughput but increases latency via virtualization overhead. Bare-metal is the verified high-performance choice.

Reference:

NSX-T 3.2 Reference Design Guide, Edge Node Performance; VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Networking Guide, NSX Edge Deployment Options.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 22

A company will be expanding their existing VCF environment for a new application. The existing VCF environment currently has a management domain and two separate VI workload domains with different hardware profiles. The new application has the following requirements:

* The application will use significantly more memory than current workloads today.

* The application will have a limited number of licenses to run on hosts.

* Additional VCF and hardware costs have been approved for the application.

* The application will contain confidential customer information that requires isolation from other workloads.

What design recommendation should the administrator document?

Deploy a new consolidated VCF instance and deploy the new application into it.
A new Workload domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements of the new application should be implemented.
Enough identical hardware for the management domain should be ordered to accommodate the new application requirements and a new workload domain should be designed for the application.
Purchase enough matching hardware to accommodate the new application's memory requirements and expand an existing cluster to accommodate the new application. Use host affinity rules to manage the new licensing.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

The requirements demand memory capacity, licensing control, cost approval, and isolation. Option B, "A new Workload domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements," satisfies all: a new VI domain in VCF 5.2 isolates workloads (via separate NSX instance), uses approved funds for high-

memory hardware, and allows licensing via DRS affinity rules within the domain. Option A (new VCF instance) is overkill, duplicating management overhead. Option C (management domain hardware) misuses the management domain's purpose. Option D (expanding existing cluster) risks isolation breaches. B leverages VCF's workload domain architecture effectively.

Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide, Workload Domain Design; VMware vSphere 7.0 Documentation, DRS Affinity Rules.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 23

An architect is working with an organization on the creation of a new Private Cloud Platform. The organization has provided the following business objectives they wish to achieve with the new platform:

* Reduce the operating costs associated with running separate areas of hosting capacity and separate/duplicate systems.

* Reduce the risks, time, and effort associated with managing platforms that are out of vendor support.

* Reduce the operating costs associated with Public Cloud usage.

* Reduce the risks associated with having incomplete documentation for application inventory and dependency mappings.

They have grouped these business objectives into a set of use cases:

* Migration - Provide a platform that supports the migration of virtualized workloads from existing platforms.

* Containerization - Provide a platform that supports the deployment of containerized workloads.

* Centralization and Consolidation - Provide a central private cloud platform accessible to all relevant areas of the business.

When considering these objectives and use cases, what should the architect include in the design documentation as a part of the Conceptual Model?

An assumption that the new platform will co-exist with the existing platforms for a period of time to allow workloads to be migrated in a phased approach
A risk that the existing platforms are running Linux Operating Systems that are out of vendor support
An assumption that a complete mapping of application dependencies is not available
A requirement that the solution will provide the capability to migrate Kubernetes-based workloads from the Public Cloud

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The Conceptual Model in VCF outlines high-level assumptions and approaches to meet objectives. Option A, assuming "co-existence with existing platforms for phased migration," directly supports the Migration and Consolidation use cases, aligning with cost reduction and risk mitigation by enabling a controlled transition to the new VCF platform (e.g., using vMotion or HCX). Option B (Linux risk) is specific and unstated. Option C (dependency mapping) is a risk, not an assumption driving design. Option D (Kubernetes requirement) adds specificity beyond the stated objectives. A is foundational to VCF migration strategies.

Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Study Guide, Chapter 1: Conceptual Design; VMware Migration Planning Guide for VCF.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 24

A customer has stated the following requirements for Aria Automation within their VCF implementation:

* Users must have access to specific resources based on their company organization

* Developers must only be able to provision to the Development environment

* Production workloads can be placed on DMZ or Production clusters

What two design decisions must be implemented to satisfy these requirements? (Choose two.)

Separate cloud zones will be configured for Development and Production.
Users' access to resources will be controlled by project membership.
Users' access to resources will be controlled by tenant membership.
Separate tenants will be configured for Development and Production.

Answer(s): A,B

Explanation:

Aria Automation in VCF 5.2 uses cloud zones and projects for resource control. Option A, "Separate cloud zones for Development and Production," restricts provisioning to specific clusters (Development, Production/DMZ), meeting the second and third requirements. Option B, "Project membership," assigns users to projects tied to specific zones and roles, satisfying organization-based access and developer restrictions. Option C (tenant membership) is for multi-tenancy, unnecessary here within one VCF instance. Option D (separate tenants) overcomplicates isolation beyond needs. A and B leverage Aria Automation's native capabilities effectively.

Reference:

VMware Aria Automation 8.10 Configuration Guide, Cloud Zones and Projects; VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Automation Guide.

Reveal Solution Next Question

Free 2V0-13.24 Exam Braindumps (page: 7)

QUESTION: 21

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 22

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 23

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 24

Explanation:

Reference:

2V0-13.24 Exam Discussions & Posts