During onboarding al Private Bank A, client C indicated that the account would be initially funded with a transfer from Bank B totaling 50 million USD. On which source of funds should Bank A conduct additional scrutiny? (Select Two.)
Answer(s): B,D
The sources of funds that Bank A should conduct additional scrutiny on are the third-party transfer and the transfer from Bank B. This is because these sources may pose higher risks of money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud, or other illicit activities. Some of the reasons why these sources require more scrutiny are23:Third-party transfers may involve unknown or unrelated parties that may have ulterior motives or hidden agendas. They may also be used to obscure the origin or destination of funds, or to circumvent sanctions or other regulatory restrictions. Transfers from Bank B may involve jurisdictions that have weak anti-money laundering and counter- terrorist financing (AML/CFT) regimes, high levels of corruption, or significant criminal activity. They may also involve banks that have poor reputation, compliance, or transparency standards.
Third Party Payments - Wolfsberg GroupGuidance on Correspondent Banking Services - FATF
The compliance learn is reviewing multiple data points to include in its data analytics program to detect shell or front company red flags. Which data points should the compliance team include? (Select Two.)
Answer(s): B,E
The data points that the compliance team should include in its data analytics program to detect shell or front company red flags are entities whose principal place of business is a non-residential address and entities transacting with or having relation to tax haven or high-risk countries. These data points may indicate that the entities are not conducting legitimate business activities, but rather are used to conceal the identity or location of the true beneficiaries or owners, or to facilitate money laundering, tax evasion, or other illicit activities. Some of the sources that support these data points as red flags are4567:Entities whose principal place of business is a non-residential address may indicate that they have no physical presence, operations, assets, or employees. They may use addresses such as post office boxes, mail forwarding services, registered agents, or virtual offices to avoid detection or scrutiny. Entities transacting with or having relation to tax haven or high-risk countries may indicate that they are involved in offshore financial activities that are designed to evade taxes, regulations, or sanctions. They may also be exposed to higher risks of money laundering, terrorist financing, corruption, or fraud.
How to Identify a Shell Company and the Associated Red Flags Difference between Shell, Shelf & Front Company | Sigma Ratings Shell Companies and Money Laundering | ComplyAdvantage General Comments Incorporation of shell companies - Singapore Police Force
Which most likely indicates that a business email compromise attack has occurred?
Answer(s): A
When writing or reviewing a SAR/STR, it is important to ensure that the narrative is kept to the point; easy to read; and addresses the who, what, when, where, why, and how. This is because the narrative is the most crucial part of the SAR/STR, as it provides a clear and concise summary of the suspicious activity or transaction that triggered the report. The narrative should include all the relevant information that would help law enforcement or regulators to understand the nature and context of the activity or transaction, such as123:The who: The names, addresses, account numbers, and other identifying information of the parties involved in the activity or transaction, such as customers, beneficiaries, intermediaries, or third parties.The what: The type, amount, frequency, and purpose of the activity or transaction, such as cash deposits, wire transfers, check payments, or purchases of goods or services. The when: The date, time, and duration of the activity or transaction, and whether it was a one-time occurrence or part of a pattern or trend.The where: The location or channel of the activity or transaction, such as branches, ATMs, online platforms, or mobile applications.The why: The reason or rationale for the activity or transaction, and why it was considered suspicious or unusual based on the customer's profile, behavior, or expected activity. The how: The method or mechanism of the activity or transaction, such as cash, check, debit card, credit card, cryptocurrency, or prepaid card.
How to write the perfect "Suspicious Activity Reports" (SAR)? | i-AML Writing for Prosecution: Best Practices For Composing SAR Narratives That Assist Prosecutors | ACAMSSAR Writing Examples and Proper Formatting: Write for Your Reader - Alessa
In the past 6 months, a small financial institution (Fl) has received regular remittances that are increasing in value from a country with high piracy activity. The Fl's AML officer (AMLO) has also noted that piracy in this country has increased in the same time frame. Which recommendation should the AMLO make?
Answer(s): D
VerifiedAnswer; D, The recommendation that the AMLO should make is to conduct an in-depth Explanation; investigation into accumulated remittance information in the past year to find the trend of such transactions. This is because the regular and increasing remittances from a country with high piracy activity may indicate a possible link to illicit funds derived from piracy or other criminal activities. According to the World Bank, remittances are often used as a channel for money laundering and terrorist financing, especially when they originate from or are destined to high-risk jurisdictions1. Therefore, the AMLO should analyze the remittance data to identify the sources, destinations, amounts, frequencies, and purposes of the transactions, and compare them with the customer profiles, expected activities, and risk ratings. The AMLO should also review any relevant information from external sources, such as media reports, sanctions lists, or law enforcement alerts, to determine if there are any red flags or indicators of suspicious activity. If the investigation reveals any evidence or suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing, the AMLO should file a SAR/STR to the appropriate AML authority.
Remittances data - Migration data portal
When writing or reviewing a SAR/STR, it is important to:
The correct answer is A because a SAR/STR narrative should be concise, clear, and complete, addressing the who, what, when, where, why, and how of the suspicious activity. Option B is incorrect because providing too much information can make the narrative confusing and irrelevant. Option C is incorrect because the introduction should provide a summary of the suspicious activity, not the conclusion. Option D is incorrect because suspect names should be mentioned in the narrative to identify the parties involved in the suspicious activity.
Advanced CAMS-FCI Certification Handbook, page 17; Leading Complex Investigations Certificate, Module 3.
Post your Comments and Discuss ACAMS CAMS-FCI exam prep with other Community members:
Our website is free, but we have to fight against AI bots and content theft. We're sorry for the inconvenience caused by these security measures. You can access the rest of the CAMS-FCI content, but please register or login to continue.