Free CAMS-FCI Exam Braindumps
Advanced CAMS-Financial Crimes Investigations Questions 31–35 (page: 8)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

An investigator is reviewing a case generated from the transaction monitoring system, with two large amounts of incoming remittance (IR) to an individual customer. Based on the KYC profile, the customer is a plant manager of a famous multi-national electronics manufacturing firm. As the customer has no similarly large transaction patterns for the past 2 years, the investigator sends an inquiry to the relationship manager (RM) about the nature of the transaction. The RM replies that the transaction is a consultancy fee provided from two different electronics companies with a debit note provided However, there is no detail of service provided on the debit note, and the remitters are two individuals.
Which actions should the investigator recommend to mitigate risk? (Select Two.)

  1. Exit the relationship with the customer.
  2. Document and maintain a file with the investigative findings.
  3. Discuss the investigation findings with the customer.
  4. Conduct enhanced due diligence.
  5. Re-evaluate the customer risk profile.

Answer(s): D,E

Explanation:

The actions that the investigator should recommend to mitigate risk are conducting enhanced due diligence (D) and re-evaluating the customer risk profile (E). These actions are appropriate and prudent, as they allow the investigator to obtain more information and evidence about the nature and purpose of the transactions, the source and destination of the funds, and the identity and legitimacy of the parties involved. According to the ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide1, "the FI should conduct enhanced due diligence on all parties involved in the investigation, including checking various sources of information, such as watch lists, sanctions lists, negative news, and official registries" (p. 24). The FI should also "re-assess the customer risk profile based on any new information obtained during the investigation, and adjust the customer due diligence and monitoring requirements accordingly" (p. 25).

The other options are not as appropriate or effective as options D and E. The investigator should not recommend exiting the relationship with the customer (A), as this could be premature or disproportionate, as well as potentially discriminatory or illegal. The investigator should not recommend documenting and maintaining a file with the investigative findings (B), as this is not an action to mitigate risk, but rather a standard procedure for any investigation. The investigator should not recommend discussing the investigation findings with the customer ©, as this could compromise the integrity and objectivity of the investigation, as well as expose the FI to legal or regulatory risks.


Reference:

1: ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide



Which statement most accurately characterizes the methods used by transnational criminal organizations?

  1. They are unlikely to associate with known terrorist organizations due to the reputational risks.
  2. They are likely to specialize in one particular method and continue to refine that method to escape detection.
  3. They routinely engage in many different types of criminal activities as long as they think it will benefit them.
  4. They see each other as competitors and rarely cooperate.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The statement that most accurately characterizes the methods used by transnational criminal organizations is that they routinely engage in many different types of criminal activities as long as they think it will benefit them ©. This is because transnational criminal organizations are flexible and adaptable, and they exploit opportunities and vulnerabilities in different markets and jurisdictions. According to ACAMS2, "Transnational criminal organizations are involved in a wide range of illicit activities, such as drug trafficking, human trafficking, arms trafficking, money laundering, cybercrime, environmental crime, fraud, corruption, and terrorism" (p. 3). They also "operate across borders and regions, using complex networks and structures to evade detection and prosecution" (p.3).

The other statements are not as accurate or comprehensive as option C. Transnational criminal organizations are unlikely to associate with known terrorist organizations due to the reputational risks (A) is false, as transnational criminal organizations may collaborate or cooperate with terrorist organizations for mutual benefit or convenience, such as sharing resources, routes, or contacts. Transnational criminal organizations are likely to specialize in one particular method and continue to refine that method to escape detection (B) is false, as transnational criminal organizations may diversify or change their methods depending on the circumstances or opportunities, such as shifting products, markets, or modus operandi. Transnational criminal organizations see each other as competitors and rarely cooperate (D) is false, as transnational criminal organizations may form alliances or partnerships with other criminal groups for strategic or tactical reasons, such as sharing information, expertise, or influence.


Reference:

ACAMS Transnational Organized Crime eLearning Course Module 1: Introduction to Transnational Organized Crime



Law enforcement agents arrive at a broker-dealer's premises with a search warrant. In addition to cooperation with the warrant, which instructions should the person in charge of the broker-dealer provide to their employees?

  1. Take notes on the questions and comments made by the agents.
  2. Sign consent forms permitting the agents to search employees' offices.
  3. Provide agents with unlimited access to customers' personal data.
  4. Volunteer information not requested by the agents that the employees think may be useful.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The instruction that the person in charge of the broker-dealer should provide to their employees is to take notes on the questions and comments made by the agents (A). This is because taking notes can help the employees to recall and document what happened during the search warrant execution, which can be useful for legal or regulatory purposes. According to ACAMS3, "the FI should instruct its staff to cooperate with LE agents during a search warrant execution, but also to take notes of what is being searched, seized, or asked by the agents" (p. 35). The FI should also "keep copies of any documents or records that are taken by LE agents" (p. 35).

The other instructions are not correct. The person in charge of the broker-dealer should not instruct their employees to sign consent forms permitting the agents to search employees' offices (B), as this is unnecessary and potentially risky, as the agents already have a valid search warrant that authorizes them to search the premises. The person in charge of the broker-dealer should not instruct their employees to provide agents with unlimited access to customers' personal data ©, as this could violate privacy or data protection laws, as well as compromise customer trust and confidentiality. The person in charge of the broker-dealer should not instruct their employees to volunteer information not requested by the agents that they think may be useful (D), as this could interfere with the LE investigation or expose them to legal or regulatory risks.


Reference:

Introduction to Transnational Organized Crime
ACAMS Law Enforcement and Financial Crimes Investigations eLearning Course Module Law Enforcement Requests and Actions



Due to an ever-diversifying business model and multi-jurisdictional footprint, a casino has decided to outsource the source of funds and wealth checks to a third-party provider.
Why is it important for the casino to maintain control of the output from the provider?

  1. Clients of the casino prefer to know that the casino is keeping their information secure when being held by a third-party.
  2. As with all third-party relationships, proper control must be maintained to ensure profitability.
  3. The casino maintains ultimate responsibility for this activity and should maintain control to avoid non-compliance.
  4. Other casinos are frequently looking to reduce costs and share ideas, so if this relationship is successful, the model can be used by other businesses.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The reason why it is important for the casino to maintain control of the output from the provider is that the casino maintains ultimate responsibility for this activity and should maintain control to avoid non-compliance ©. This is because the casino is accountable for its own AML/CFT obligations and cannot delegate or outsource them to a third-party provider. According to the ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide1, "the FI should ensure that it has adequate oversight and control over any third-party providers that it engages for AML/CFT purposes, such as conducting due diligence, verifying information, or monitoring transactions" (p. 25). The FI should also "review and evaluate the performance and quality of the third-party providers on a regular basis, and address any issues or gaps that may arise" (p. 25).

The other options are not as relevant or accurate as option C. The clients of the casino prefer to know that the casino is keeping their information secure when being held by a third-party (A) is not a reason why the casino should maintain control of the output from the provider, but rather a customer expectation or preference. As with all third-party relationships, proper control must be maintained to ensure profitability (B) is not a reason why the casino should maintain control of the output from the provider, but rather a general business principle or objective. Other casinos are frequently looking to reduce costs and share ideas, so if this relationship is successful, the model can be used by other businesses (D) is not a reason why the casino should maintain control of the output from the provider, but rather a potential benefit or outcome.



The intended benefits of section 314(b) of the USA PATRIOT Act include: (Select Three.)

  1. sharing the existence and content of SARs/STRs with other participating FIs.
  2. participating FIs sharing information about suspicious activity by customers that may have otherwise gone unnoticed.
  3. providing mandatory results to law enforcement agencies so that they can more easily obtain useful information.
  4. expediting the filing of SARs/STRs due to the information sharing facilitated by 314(b).
  5. detecting money laundering and TF approaches and schemes across multiple financial institutions (FIs).
  6. obtaining additional information on customers or transactions regarding potential money laundering or terrorist financing (TF).

Answer(s): B,E,F

Explanation:

Section 314(b) of the USA PATRIOT Act allows financial institutions to share information with each other, under a safe harbor that offers protection from liability, in order to better identify and report potential money laundering or terrorist financing activities. The intended benefits of this information sharing include:

Participating financial institutions sharing information about suspicious activity by customers that may have otherwise gone unnoticed. For example, if a customer is conducting transactions with multiple financial institutions that individually do not appear suspicious, but collectively indicate a pattern of money laundering or terrorist financing, the financial institutions can share this information and report it to the authorities.
Detecting money laundering and terrorist financing approaches and schemes across multiple financial institutions. For example, if a financial institution identifies a new typology or modus operandi of money laundering or terrorist financing, it can share this information with other financial institutions to help them prevent or detect similar activities by their customers. Obtaining additional information on customers or transactions regarding potential money laundering or terrorist financing. For example, if a financial institution has incomplete or insufficient information on a customer or a transaction that raises suspicion, it can request more information from another financial institution that may have dealt with the same customer or transaction.


Reference:

Section 314(b) | FinCEN.gov
Section 314(b) Fact Sheet - FinCEN.gov



Viewing page 8 of 22
Viewing questions 36 - 40 out of 101 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss ACAMS CAMS-FCI exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!