Free CGSS Exam Braindumps
Certified Global Sanctions Specialist Questions 46–50 (page: 11)

Updated On: 10-Feb-2026

Which action should an institution take after freezing funds for a customer who became an EU- sanctioned subject?

  1. Notify the customer about the freezing.
  2. Freeze accounts of the customer's family members that have accounts within the same financial institution.
  3. Inform the applicable authorities about the freezing.
  4. Transfer the funds to another financial institution where the customer has another account.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

EU sanctions require financial institutions to immediately freeze the funds or economic resources of designated persons and promptly report the freeze to the competent national authority. Reporting is mandatory to ensure oversight and enforcement.

Banks must not transfer frozen funds, and they must not freeze accounts of family members unless those individuals are also designated or otherwise meet ownership/control criteria. Institutions also do not notify the customer directly, as doing so may undermine regulatory requirements.


Reference:

EU asset-freeze reporting obligations to competent authorities.

Prohibitions on transferring frozen assets or applying freezes to non-designated persons.



Independent testing related to sanctions screening should be conducted by which group with adequate technology expertise?

  1. A team that is from internal audit
  2. A team that conducts investigations
  3. A team that manages risk assessments
  4. A team that manages the institution's screening lists

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Sanctions and Compliance Domains state that independent testing and auditing must be conducted by a group separate from the sanctions operations and screening management teams. Internal audit is typically the independent function with sufficient technology and control expertise to assess system performance, threshold calibration, governance, and rule sets.

Teams involved in day-to-day operations (investigations, list management, risk assessment) cannot test their own work due to conflicts of interest.


Reference:

OFAC and industry expectations for independent testing.

Internal audit as the designated independent review function.



Which would constitute a deceptive shipping practice for the purpose of sanctions evasion?

  1. Transshipments
  2. Refueling at a port in a prohibited country
  3. Disabling the Automatic Identification System on vessels
  4. Chartering the entire vessel to a single client

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Sanctions and Compliance Domains describe disabling or manipulating the Automatic Identification System (AIS) as a primary deceptive shipping practice used to obscure vessel movements, hide calls at sanctioned ports, and evade detection.

Transshipment may create risk but is not inherently deceptive. Refueling at a prohibited port may violate sanctions but is not a deceptive practice by itself. Chartering a vessel to a single client is a normal commercial arrangement. AIS disabling is a recognized evasion tactic highlighted in global maritime advisories.


Reference:

Deceptive shipping practices: AIS disabling, falsified documentation, and vessel masking.

Maritime sanctions evasion indicators.



Which are key components of a sanctions compliance system model validation? (Select Three.)

  1. Governance and management oversight
  2. Identification of all data sources that require relevant data
  3. Excess data storage capacity
  4. Matching algorithms and thresholds
  5. Automation of repetitive tasks

  6. Multiple system administrators

Answer(s): A,B,D

Explanation:

Sanctions and Compliance Domains explain that model validation for sanctions screening systems must include:

· Governance and management oversight, ensuring independent review, escalation paths, and proper control structures.

· Identification and verification of all data sources, ensuring that all required and relevant reference data feeds are included in screening.

· Matching algorithms and thresholds, which require testing, calibration, and validation to ensure accurate detection of potential sanctions matches.

Storage capacity, automation, or multiple administrators are operational considerations but not core components of model validation.


Reference:

Requirements for model governance and oversight.

Validation of data sources and matching logic.

Threshold testing and system calibration expectations.



A data quality review will often attempt to identify which issues? (Select Three.)

  1. Data placed in incorrect fields, such as names placed in address fields
  2. Use of separate first and last name fields
  3. Default values for date fields
  4. Data using all upper case letters instead of mixed case
  5. Hispanic names with both paternal and maternal last names
  6. Duplicate records

Answer(s): A,C,F

Explanation:

Data quality reviews focus on errors that negatively impact sanctions screening accuracy, such as:

· Incorrect field placement (e.g., names in address fields), which causes screening failures.

· Default or missing date values, which undermine proper identity matching.

· Duplicate records, which complicate alert resolution and distort screening results.

Use of separate name fields, uppercase text, or cultural naming conventions are not data errors but normal formatting variations.


Reference:

Data field integrity requirements.

Importance of accurate dates and non-duplicated entries.

Data quality controls supporting sanctions screening systems.



Viewing page 11 of 22
Viewing questions 51 - 55 out of 194 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss ACAMS CGSS exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!