AICPA CPA-Auditing Exam Actual Questions
CPA Auditing and Attestation (AUD) (Page 13 )

• Context: You’re configuring a Windows Autopilot deployment profile (Profile1) for Windows 11 devices. The hotspot asks you to pick the correct behavior for two statements based on the profile’s settings.

• Box 1: “can modify the desktop settings only for themselves”

• Box 2: “Cortana settings” with options like computer name, keyboard layout, etc.

• SageMaker endpoint: Not required because the model is being used through Amazon Bedrock.
• SageMaker Model Registry: Used for managing SageMaker models, not for making a Bedrock custom model available.
• Grant access in Amazon Bedrock: IAM permissions may still be needed, but granting access alone does not provide the required inference capacity.

• The 99.99% availability SLA for VMs is achieved when you run VMs across two or more Availability Zones.
• Two VMs in a single Availability Zone do not meet the 99.99% target (their SLA is lower, e.g., around 99.95% or less depending on configuration).

• Deploy at least two VMs across two different Availability Zones (one VM in each zone, or both in two zones with a load balancer).
• This provides the required zone redundancy and the 99.99% SLA.

• Storage accounts: storage1, storage2, and storage3
• Log Analytics workspace: Analytics3

• Azure Backup reports can send the AzureBackupReports diagnostic log to eligible storage accounts. The storage account’s subscription and region do not have to match the Recovery Services vault, so all three listed storage accounts are valid.
• The Log Analytics workspace must be in the same region as the Recovery Services vault for this configuration. Vault1 and Analytics3 are both in West Europe, making Analytics3 the valid workspace.

• On-prem you generalize and capture the VM as a VHD.
• Upload the VHD to Azure with Add-AzVhd.
• Register the VHD as an image in Azure with Add-AzImage (or New-AzImage) so it appears as a selectable image.
• Create new VMs from that image (e.g., with New-AzVM -Image ...).

Why B works

• AWS KMS keys are Regional resources. A normal customer managed key in Region A cannot be used directly in Region B.
• A customer managed multi-Region KMS key (MRK) has related key replicas in both Regions. The replicas share key material and key ID, although each has a Regional ARN.
• With client-side encryption, the application encrypts the data before storing it in S3. Cross-Region replication then copies already-encrypted objects, so S3 does not need to decrypt and re-encrypt them with a different Regional key.

Why the other choices are weaker

• A and C: SSE-S3 uses Amazon-managed S3 keys, not the required customer managed KMS key.
• D: SSE-KMS can work only if the solution creates and configures the appropriate KMS key or multi-Region key replica in each Region. As written, it says to create a customer managed KMS key in each Region, which implies separate keys—not the same KMS key. Replication also requires additional KMS permissions and destination encryption configuration.

• Why: ADS is designed to collect information about on-premises environments to plan migrations. It inventories details like hostname, IP address, MAC address, OS, hardware, and installed software, plus dependency mappings. This data helps you understand your current environment before moving to AWS.

• How it differs from the other options:

• Practical use: Install the ADS agent on on-prem hosts to collect data, then view the inventory in Migration Hub to inform migration planning and sequencing.

• A — conformant: Incorrect because one explicit requirement is violated.
• B — consistent: “Consistent” is not sufficient where the implementation contradicts a mandatory specification. The RPC mechanism is covered by the architecture, and the implementation differs from it.
• C — consistent: Incorrect reasoning: the RPC mechanism does have a defined architectural requirement, so conformance must be assessed.
• D — non-conformant: Correct because the implementation fails to follow the specified RPC/threading requirement.

• Risk tolerance describes the organization’s overall risk appetite, not the risks themselves.
• Risk transfer is a treatment option (e.g., insurance), not a documentation artifact.
• Risk analysis assesses likelihood and impact but doesn’t establish ownership or thresholds in a formal register.

• Import mode loads the data into the Power BI model. Visuals query the in-memory model, which generally provides faster calculation and rendering than DirectQuery.
• Import mode also minimizes online processing because report interactions do not send queries back to the dataflow or SQL Server.
• A daily refresh can load data through the previous day, satisfying the freshness requirement without unnecessary hourly processing.

• DirectQuery keeps querying the data source or dataflow during report use, increasing online processing and potentially slowing visuals.
• Adding a gateway enables connectivity for on-premises sources, but it does not remove the performance disadvantages of DirectQuery.
• An hourly Power Automate refresh is unnecessary when the requirement is only data through the previous day and creates additional processing overhead.

• Pay-as-you-go in Azure is an operating expense (OPEX) model, not an “elastic” expenditure model.
• Elastic or scalable terms describe capacity planning, not the cost category. The cost should be treated as OPEX since you pay for usage each month.
• The parallel question (Question 12) shows the correct approach is using an operational expenditure model.

• Quick context: In a three-tier network (Access, Distribution, Core), roles are:

• Why A is correct: The Distribution layer runs Layer 2 and Layer 3 technologies. It often handles VLAN access (L2) and can perform inter-VLAN routing or connect to the core (L3). So it makes sense for the distribution layer to support both L2 and L3.

• Why B is correct: The Core layer is designed to maintain continuous connectivity when devices fail. It is built for high availability and redundancy, providing multiple paths so the network remains reachable even if some components fail.

• Why the others are not correct:

• Answer: A. Use Amazon SageMaker Serverless Inference to deploy the model.

• Why: SageMaker Serverless Inference hosts the model and serves real-time predictions without you provisioning or managing servers. It scales automatically and handles deployment details.

• Why the others aren’t suitable:

• Quick example flow: web app ? SageMaker Serverless Inference endpoint ? model ? response.

• User1 can sign in because the account is cloud-only. It does not depend on the on-premises domain.
• User3 can sign in because the account uses Password Hash Synchronization (PHS). Azure AD has a synchronized password hash and can validate the sign-in even when connectivity to on-premises Active Directory is unavailable.
• User2 cannot sign in because the account relies on Pass-through Authentication (PTA). PTA sends the authentication request to an on-premises PTA agent, which must contact a domain controller. With the internet connection from on-premises lost, that validation cannot occur.

• D. Provide public endpoints to store and retrieve data

• E. Manage the infrastructure layer and the operating system

• Classifying data
• Configuring access permissions, such as IAM policies
• Selecting or configuring available encryption options, depending on the requirement

• What the goal is: You want to add guest (external) users to your Azure AD tenant contoso.com, one entry per external user in a CSV.

• The proposed solution uses New-AzureADUser for each external user. Why this isn’t correct: New-AzureADUser creates a regular (internal) user in your directory. It does not create a guest/B2B user invite. So you’d end up with 500 ordinary accounts, not guest accounts with external access.

• The correct approach: Use New-AzureADMSInvitation for each external user. This invites the external user to your directory and creates a guest user (a B2B collaboration user) in your tenant. The invited user then accepts the invitation and gains access as a guest.

• Azure AD vs directory/tenant: Azure AD is the cloud identity service. A directory (also called a tenant) is your specific instance of that service (contoso.com in your scenario). The terms are often used interchangeably in exams.
• Guest user vs internal user: A guest user is external to your organization; an internal user is created directly in your directory as a normal employee/user account.
• B2B invitation: The process of inviting external users so they can collaborate in your resources; New-AzureADMSInvitation is designed for this.

• Correct answer: S3 Versioning

• Why the other options aren’t suitable for this protection:

• Quick tip: For enhanced protection, enable Versioning (and consider related features like Object Lock for write-once scenarios in specific compliance cases).

• Review the risk register.
• Use the previously defined risk response plan, such as assigning a backup resource, reprioritizing work, or using another qualified engineer.
• Implement the response promptly because the task is on the critical path.

• B: Revising the schedule without first applying the planned response may be premature.
• C: Excluding a required task could compromise the project’s objectives and requirements.
• D: Updating the risk and lessons learned records is appropriate, but it should happen after managing the immediate issue, not as the next primary action.

• What each role allows at the storage account scope:

• Why someone might say it’s not correct in this question:

• Practical takeaway:

• Answer: No

• Why: Using several Azure AD directories (tenants) would create separate identity stores for each division, which significantly increases administrative overhead. You’d need cross-tenant access management, separate governance, and duplicated admin efforts, which goes against the goal of minimizing administrative work.

• How to meet the goal instead:

• Developed and maintained independently
• Deployed without changing the entire application
• Scaled separately based on demand
• More resilient when another service has problems

• A: Functional testing is useful, but it is not the main practice described.
• B: Automation helps deployment, but the scenario focuses on architectural decomposition.
• C: Multiple locations improve availability, not application modularity.

• The problem: Guest users can’t create posts in the Monthly Reports channel.
• The recommended fix (answer B): Modify the Guest access settings in the Teams admin center.

• Guest access settings control what guests are allowed to do across Teams (for example, posting, chat, and channel participation). If guests are restricted from posting, enabling the appropriate guest permissions will let them post in channels like Monthly Reports.
• The other options don’t directly change guest permissions in the way that affects posting:

• Co to znaczy: transakcje zachowuja sie tak, jakby byly wykonywane jeden po drugim. Dzieki temu nie ma brudnych odczytów, niepowtarzalnych odczytów ani phantom reads.

• Implementacja: PostgreSQL uzywa SSI (Serializable Snapshot Isolation). W praktyce oznacza to, ze jesli wykryje konflikt miedzy transakcjami, jedna z nich zostanie zakonczona bledem “serialization failure” i trzeba ja ponowic.

• Zalózmy tabele orders(customer_id int, amount int).

• Transakcja T1:

• Transakcja T2, równoczesnie:

• T1 ponownie wykonuje to zapytanie:

• Correct answer: Power BI dataset

• The scenario says the data model already contains several measures and you want to create a report from the existing data with minimal development. Reusing a published Power BI dataset lets you inherit the existing measures and data model, so you don’t have to recreate them.
• How to do it: In Power BI Desktop, use the connector Power BI datasets (Get Data > Power BI datasets) and connect to the existing dataset, then build visuals using the pre-defined measures.
• Why the other options are less suitable:

• Ablauf: Er wird in der gleichen Transaktion ausgeführt, bei der z. B. ein Datensatz erstellt oder aktualisiert wird. Der Benutzer wartet, bis der Workflow abgeschlossen ist.
• Stufen: Kann vor dem Vorgang (pre-operation) oder nach dem Vorgang (post-operation) laufen.
• Zweck: Sofortige Validierung oder Anpassung von Daten, ggf. auch das Verhindern eines Vorgangs, wenn Bedingungen nicht erfüllt sind.

• Automatisierte Flows (Power Automate, automatisierte/ Background Flows) laufen asynchron im Hintergrund, nachdem der Trigger erkannt wurde, und blockieren den Benutzer nicht.

• Authenticating websites with TLS/HTTPS
• Enabling certificate-based VPN authentication
• Signing or encrypting email
• Supporting device or user authentication

• VLAN tagging: Uses network-frame tags, such as 802.1Q; it does not rely on X.509 certificates.
• LDAP: May integrate with PKI in some environments, but X.509 certificates are not most commonly associated with LDAP itself.
• MFA: Certificates can be one authentication factor, but X.509 is fundamentally a PKI technology.

• Why Ishikawa:

• Why not the others:

• Storage requirement: 10 apps × 10 GB each = 100 GB total. Basic’s storage quota is insufficient to host 100 GB in one plan, whereas Standard provides enough storage capacity for multiple apps.

• Dedicated compute: The plan must use dedicated compute instances; Free/Shared do not meet this, while Basic, Standard, and higher do.

• Load balancing: The plan must include load balancing between instances. Standard includes built-in load balancing across app instances; Basic may not meet this requirement.

• Costs: Among the plans that satisfy storage, dedicated compute, and load balancing, Standard is the lowest-cost option.

1. Ingestion Lambda receives requests from API Gateway and places messages in an SQS queue.
2. Processing Lambda is triggered by the queue and loads records into Aurora PostgreSQL.

• Decoupling: API request handling is separated from database loading.
• Buffering: SQS absorbs bursts when incoming traffic exceeds the database’s processing capacity.
• Controlled concurrency: Configure the SQS-triggered Lambda’s concurrency and batch size to avoid overwhelming Aurora or exhausting database connections.
• Automatic retries: Messages that fail processing can return to the queue and be retried. A dead-letter queue can capture persistent failures.
• Lower operational effort: The solution remains serverless and avoids managing EC2 servers or Kubernetes clusters.

• A: EC2 and Tomcat add server-management overhead.
• B: DynamoDB/DAX would require changing the database model and does not solve the Aurora ingestion design.
• C: SNS is useful for notifications and fanout, but SQS is better for durable buffering and backpressure in this producer-consumer workflow.

• The correct answer: B) Synthetic identity theft.

• Synthetic identity theft involves creating a new, forged identity by combining information from multiple real people (e.g., names, dates of birth, SSNs) to commit fraud.
• In the scenario, Adam “created a new identity by obtaining information from different victims,” which matches the idea of synthesizing data to form a fake person.

• Medical identity theft: using someone’s medical information to obtain care or services.
• Tax identity theft: using someone’s personal info to file fraudulent tax returns.
• Social identity theft: impersonating someone to deceive others socially or publicly.

• Look for phrases like “create a new identity” or “combine information from multiple people” to identify synthetic identity theft.

• You want: a row for each year and each product (year+product), plus a summary row for each year that totals all products (year only).
• GROUP BY ROLLUP(YEAR(SO.ModifiedDate), P.Name) yields:

• GROUP BY CUBE(YEAR(SO.ModifiedDate), P.Name) produces all combinations of the grouping columns, including:

• This adds extra rows (per-year totals by product across all years and a grand total) that aren’t needed for your stated goal.

• If you want exactly the (Year, Product) and (Year) rows, you can use GROUPING SETS ((Year, Product), (Year)) which is equivalent to Rollup in this two-column case but makes intent explicit.

• SELECT YEAR(SO.ModifiedDate) AS OrderYear, P.Name AS ProductName, SUM(SO.OrderQty) AS TotalQty

• Why: Crisis management relies on established, repeatable procedures for responding to an incident (activation of the crisis team, escalation paths, communications, containment actions). This ensures a coordinated, timely, and auditable response.

• Why not the others:

• What it says: you can add a cost when you adjust inventory, and that cost is posted automatically to a specific GL account.
• Reality: yes, you can adjust both quantity and value via an inventory adjustment journal. The cost on the journal line affects the inventory value.

• The general ledger postings are not arbitrary. the actual accounts used are determined by your item posting group and the system’s posting definitions. In practice, the adjustment debits/credits the appropriate inventory-related accounts (e.g., Inventory asset and a related offset such as an adjustment or COGS account) based on configuration.
• So, the cost change does not go to a single “manual” GL account you pick per line unless your posting setup maps to that account.

• The concept is true (you can adjust cost and have GL impact), but the claim that it posts to a single, specific GL account is oversimplified—the accounts come from your posting configuration.

• The correct option is B: AWS Storage Gateway.

• Why: The scenario requires backing up on-prem data to AWS without changing existing backup workflows. AWS Storage Gateway provides a hybrid storage solution; specifically, the Tape Gateway emulates a physical tape library, allowing your existing backup software to write to virtual tapes that are stored in AWS (in S3 or S3 Glacier). This lets you back up 10 TB to the cloud while preserving current backup workflows and on-prem infrastructure.

• How it would work: Deploy a gateway appliance or VM on-site, connect your tape-based backup software to the virtual tape library, and start writing to virtual tapes. The data is then archived in AWS, freeing up local storage.

• Why the others aren’t suitable:

• Quick tip: If you weren’t using tape, File Gateway could be another option for file-based backups; Tape Gateway is the right pick for tape-based workflows.

• A? ??? Aurora Replicas? ?? ??? ???? ?? ???, ?? ???? Network Load Balancer(NLB)? ??????. NLB? ?? 4 ?? ???? HTTP ??? ?? ???(Sticky sessions)? ????? ???? ????.
• ??? ?? ??????? ?? ?? ???? ??? ???? ?? ????? ????? ?? ?? ???(?? ?/??? ??)? ?????. ? ??? ALB?? ?? ????, NLB?? ???? ?????.
• ??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? HTTP ???? ??? ALB? ???? ???. A? ? ??? ??????.

• The standard Enterprise Architecture domains are: Business, Data, Application, Technology (BDAT).

• A: Business, strategy, application and technology — includes business and application/tech but uses “strategy” instead of data.
• B: Zachman, TOGAF, Cobit, and Heath architectures — names frameworks, not domains.
• C: Business, data, infrastructure and technology — has business, data, and technology; lacks a distinct application domain (uses “infrastructure” instead).
• D: Process, database, software and technology — covers data (database), application (software), and technology, but omits business.

• The four BDAT domains (business, data, application, technology) is the conventional model you should study.
• None of the options perfectly lists all four BDAT domains. The closest are C (if you map infrastructure to technology) and D (data/application/technology but no business).

• The correct setting to configure is the Enrollment Status Page (ESP) profile.
• Why: ESP tracks the enrollment progress and logs during Autopilot provisioning. You can enable log collection within the ESP policy so that, if ESP times out, the user can collect and share the logs with support.
• Optional enhancement: In the ESP policy (or the Autopilot diagnostics settings), you can enable:

• Automatic enrollment settings: control how devices auto-enroll, not log collection.
• Windows Autopilot deployment profile: controls deployment steps but not ESP log collection.
• Device configuration profile: applies settings but doesn’t provide ESP log collection mechanics.

• Correct answer: A) Hashing

• Why: Hashing produces a fixed-size digest of the software. If the final build is altered in any way, the hash will change, enabling you to detect tampering by comparing the stored digest with a freshly computed one.

• Why not the others:

• CAPWAP (Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points) creates a tunnel between the AP and the Wireless LAN Controller over the IP network. The AP and WLC communicate via this CAPWAP tunnel, which can traverse Layer 2 or Layer 3 networks.
• The AP does not have to be on the same switch as the WLC. It can connect to any switch in the network, as long as there is IP reachability between the AP and the WLC. This is why option D is correct.
• The other options are incorrect:

• Answer: D) Shadow IT

• Why: Shadow IT is when employees use unsanctioned tools or bypass IT controls (like the VPN) to access services, often without IT oversight. It’s an internal behavior, not an external attacker’s activity.

• Not these:

• Quick note: This creates risk due to lack of visibility and control. Mitigations include a defined approved-tools list, enforcing VPN usage, device management, and continuous monitoring.

• Answer:

• Why:

• Why the other centers aren’t the right fit here:

• As the project progresses, you gain information, refine requirements, and lock down baselines (scope, schedule, cost). This reduces overall risk and uncertainty because more is known and addressed.
• At the same time, changes become more costly over time. Later changes can affect already approved baselines, cause rework, impact the critical path, require more coordination, and incur penalties or delays, all of which raise the cost of making changes.

• Answer: D

• The strongest security comes from enforcing access at the storage layer. An IAM policy scoped to the Cognito identity prefix restricts each user to their own S3 prefix (folder), so users can only access their own files regardless of client or server code.
• This per-user isolation reduces risk of cross-user data access and is more robust than UI validation or Lambda/API validation alone.
• Implementation note: attach a policy to the Cognito identity role that allows actions on arn:aws:s3:::your-bucket/${cognito-identity.amazonaws.com:sub}/* (per-user prefix). Ensure TLS in transit and enable at-rest encryption (SSE-S3 or SSE-KMS). Use multipart upload for large files up to 300 MB.

• In the AWS shared responsibility model, AWS manages the security of the “infrastructure,” including the physical hardware and underlying virtualization.
• The customer is responsible for everything else in the cloud stack: the guest OS on EC2, the NoSQL database software running on it, data, patching the OS, and configuring access controls like security groups.
• So, for a self-managed NoSQL database on EC2, AWS would handle the physical hardware, while you would patch the guest OS and manage DB availability, backups, and security.

• Correct answer: A. Inbound data transfer from the internet

• Why: AWS does not charge for data transferred into AWS from the internet. Inbound data transfer is free, regardless of the amount (in this case, 2 TB). The other options involve data leaving AWS or moving between AWS regions/AZs, which incur costs:

• A. Custom and standard objects have standard fields. True. Both object types include standard fields (for example, CreatedDate, LastModifiedDate, Owner). Custom objects also have the Name field, which is a standard field on all objects.
• B. Standard objects are included with Salesforce. True. Standard objects (like Account, Contact, etc.) come with Salesforce out of the box.
• C. A new standard object can be created. False. You can create custom objects, but you cannot create new standard objects.
• D. Only standard objects support master-detail relationships. False. Master-detail relationships can be used with both standard and custom objects.

• B. Enable column profile — This turns on column profiling, which computes statistics like min and max for each column.
• C. Show column profile in details pane — This ensures the per-column profile is visible in the details pane.
• E. Enable details pane — This makes the details pane available so you can view the column profile there.

• A. Show column value distribution may help with distribution but isn’t specifically about min/max.
• D. Show column quality details shows data quality (valid/null counts), not min/max.

• Basic: billing/subscription support only; no technical support requests can be opened.
• Developer, Standard, Professional Direct, and Premier: include technical support and allow opening new support requests.

• If option A corresponds to “Developer, Standard, Professional Direct, Premier,” that is the correct choice.
• If the option text is really “Premier only,” that would be incorrect per current Azure docs.

• MFA verifies a user’s identity using additional authentication factors, such as a phone prompt or security token.
• It helps prevent unauthorized access even if a password is compromised.
• It does not provide secure storage or encryption of credentials used during automated deployment.

• To get min/max per column, you need column profiling. That’s provided by enabling the column profile.
• To actually see those min/max values, you should show the column profile in the details pane, and you also need the details pane itself enabled so you can view it.

• Enable column profile (B)
• Show column profile in details pane (C)
• Enable details pane (E)

• Show column value distribution (D) shows distribution shape but isn’t required to get min/max.
• Show column quality details (D) deals with data quality metrics, not min/max.