Free AWS Certified Security - Specialty Exam Braindumps
AWS Certified Security - Specialty SCS-C03 Questions 46–50 (page: 11)

Updated On: 6-Feb-2026

A company runs a web application on a fleet of Amazon EC2 instances in an Auto Scaling group. Amazon GuardDuty and AWS Security Hub are enabled. The security engineer needs an automated response to anomalous traffic that follows AWS best practices and minimizes application disruption.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

  1. Use EventBridge to disable the instance profile access keys.
  2. Use EventBridge to invoke a Lambda function that removes the affected instance from the Auto Scaling group and isolates it with a restricted security group.
  3. Use Security Hub to update the subnet network ACL to block traffic.
  4. Send GuardDuty findings to Amazon SNS for email notification.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

AWS incident response best practices emphasize isolating compromised resources rather than immediately terminating them. According to AWS Certified Security ­ Specialty documentation, removing an instance from an Auto Scaling group prevents replacement loops, while applying a restrictive security group isolates the instance for forensic analysis.

Using Amazon EventBridge to trigger an AWS Lambda function enables automated, consistent responses to GuardDuty findings. This approach minimizes disruption to the application because healthy instances continue serving traffic while the affected instance is isolated.

Disabling credentials or modifying network ACLs can have broader impact on unrelated workloads. SNS notifications alone do not provide response automation.

AWS recommends isolate-and-investigate patterns for EC2 incident response.

Referenced AWS Specialty Documents:

AWS Certified Security ­ Specialty Official Study Guide

Amazon GuardDuty Automated Responses

AWS Incident Response Playbooks



A company's security engineer receives an alert that indicates that an unexpected principal is accessing a company-owned Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue. All the company's accounts are within an organization in AWS Organizations. The security engineer must implement a mitigation solution that minimizes compliance violations and investment in tools outside of AWS.

What should the security engineer do to meet these requirements?

  1. Create security groups and attach them to all SQS queues.
  2. Modify network ACLs in all VPCs to restrict inbound traffic.
  3. Create interface VPC endpoints for Amazon SQS. Restrict access using aws:SourceVpce and aws:PrincipalOrgId conditions.
  4. Use a third-party cloud access security broker (CASB).

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Amazon SQS is a regional service that supports AWS PrivateLink through interface VPC endpoints. According to AWS Certified Security ­ Specialty documentation, the most secure and compliant way to restrict access to AWS services is by using VPC endpoints combined with resource-based policies.

By creating interface VPC endpoints for Amazon SQS in all VPCs, traffic to SQS remains on the AWS network and does not traverse the public internet. Using the aws:SourceVpce condition in the SQS queue policy ensures that only requests originating from approved VPC endpoints can access the queue. Adding the aws:PrincipalOrgId condition further restricts access to principals that belong to the same AWS Organization.

Security groups and network ACLs do not apply to SQS because SQS is not deployed inside a VPC. Third-party CASB tools add cost and operational overhead.

Referenced AWS Specialty Documents:

AWS Certified Security ­ Specialty Official Study Guide

Amazon SQS Security and VPC Endpoints

AWS Organizations Condition Keys



A company needs to deploy AWS CloudFormation templates that configure sensitive database credentials. The company already uses AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) and AWS Secrets Manager.

Which solution will meet the requirements?

  1. Use a dynamic reference in the CloudFormation template to reference the database credentials in Secrets Manager.
  2. Use encrypted parameters in the CloudFormation template.
  3. Use SecureString parameters to reference Secrets Manager.
  4. Use SecureString parameters encrypted by AWS KMS.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

AWS CloudFormation supports dynamic references to AWS Secrets Manager, which allow sensitive values to be retrieved securely at stack runtime. According to AWS Certified Security ­ Specialty guidance, dynamic references prevent secrets from being stored in plaintext in templates, stack metadata, or logs.

Using dynamic references ensures that secrets remain encrypted at rest and are accessed only when required. CloudFormation does not support SecureString parameters for Secrets Manager references, and encrypting templates does not prevent exposure during execution.

Referenced AWS Specialty Documents:

AWS Certified Security ­ Specialty Official Study Guide

AWS CloudFormation Dynamic References

AWS Secrets Manager Best Practices



A company must immediately disable compromised IAM users across all AWS accounts and collect all actions performed by the user in the last 7 days.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

  1. Disable the IAM user and query CloudTrail logs in Amazon S3 using Athena.
  2. Remove IAM policies and query logs in Security Hub.
  3. Remove permission sets and query logs using CloudWatch Logs Insights.
  4. Disable the user in IAM Identity Center and query the organizational event data store.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

AWS IAM Identity Center centrally manages user access across an AWS Organization. Disabling the user in Identity Center immediately revokes access to all AWS accounts. According to AWS Certified Security ­ Specialty documentation, organizational CloudTrail event data stores provide centralized, queryable access to all events across accounts.

Using CloudTrail Lake enables direct querying of activity without exporting logs. Disabling the user at the Identity Center level ensures full containment.

Referenced AWS Specialty Documents:

AWS Certified Security ­ Specialty Official Study Guide

AWS IAM Identity Center Incident Response

AWS CloudTrail Lake



A company detects bot activity targeting Amazon Cognito user pool endpoints. The solution must block malicious requests while maintaining access for legitimate users.

Which solution meets these requirements?

  1. Enable Amazon Cognito threat protection.
  2. Restrict access to authenticated users only.
  3. Associate AWS WAF with the Cognito user pool.
  4. Monitor requests with CloudWatch.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Amazon Cognito threat protection is purpose-built to detect and mitigate malicious authentication activity such as credential stuffing and bot traffic. It uses adaptive risk-based analysis without disrupting legitimate users.

AWS WAF cannot be directly associated with Cognito user pools.

Referenced AWS Specialty Documents:

AWS Certified Security ­ Specialty Official Study Guide

Amazon Cognito Threat Protection



Viewing page 11 of 26
Viewing questions 51 - 55 out of 77 questions


Post your Comments and Discuss Amazon AWS Certified Security - Specialty exam prep with other Community members:

AI Tutor AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!