Free AWS-SOLUTIONS-ARCHITECT-PROFESSIONAL Exam Braindumps (page: 13)

Page 13 of 134

A company wants to migrate its data analytics environment from on premises to AWS. The environment consists of two simple Node.js applications. One of the applications collects sensor data and loads it into a MySQL database. The other application aggregates the data into reports. When the aggregation jobs run, some of the load jobs fail to run correctly.

The company must resolve the data loading issue. The company also needs the migration to occur without interruptions or changes for the company’s customers.

What should a solutions architect do to meet these requirements?

  1. Set up an Amazon Aurora MySQL database as a replication target for the on-premises database. Create an Aurora Replica for the Aurora MySQL database, and move the aggregation jobs to run against the Aurora Replica. Set up collection endpoints as AWS Lambda functions behind a Network Load Balancer (NLB), and use Amazon RDS Proxy to write to the Aurora MySQL database. When the databases are synced, disable the replication job and restart the Aurora Replica as the primary instance. Point the collector DNS record to the NLB.
  2. Set up an Amazon Aurora MySQL database. Use AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) to perform continuous data replication from the on-premises database to Aurora. Move the aggregation jobs to run against the Aurora MySQL database. Set up collection endpoints behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB) as Amazon EC2 instances in an Auto Scaling group. When the databases are synced, point the collector DNS record to the AL Disable the AWS DMS sync task after the cutover from on premises to AWS.
  3. Set up an Amazon Aurora MySQL database. Use AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) to perform continuous data replication from the on-premises database to Aurora. Create an Aurora Replica for the Aurora MySQL database, and move the aggregation jobs to run against the Aurora Replica. Set up collection endpoints as AWS Lambda functions behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB), and use Amazon RDS Proxy to write to the Aurora MySQL database. When the databases are synced, point the collector DNS record to the ALB. Disable the AWS DMS sync task after the cutover from on premises to AWS.
  4. Set up an Amazon Aurora MySQL database. Create an Aurora Replica for the Aurora MySQL database, and move the aggregation jobs to run against the Aurora Replica. Set up collection endpoints as an Amazon Kinesis data stream. Use Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to replicate the data to the Aurora MySQL database. When the databases are synced, disable the replication job and restart the Aurora Replica as the primary instance. Point the collector DNS record to the Kinesis data stream.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

C) Set up an Amazon Aurora MySQL database. Use AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) to perform continuous data replication from the on-premises database to Aurora. Create an Aurora Replica for the Aurora MySQL database, and move the aggregation jobs to run against the Aurora Replica. Set up collection endpoints as AWS Lambda functions behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB), and use Amazon RDS Proxy to write to the Aurora MySQL database. When the databases are synced, point the collector DNS record to the ALB. Disable the AWS DMS sync task after the cutover from on premises to AWS is the correct answer.

This solution leverages AWS DMS for seamless, continuous replication from the on-premises MySQL database to Amazon Aurora, ensuring minimal downtime during the migration. Using Aurora Replica for the aggregation jobs offloads the read traffic, improving performance and reducing load on the primary database. By setting up AWS Lambda functions for data collection and Amazon RDS Proxy for connection management, the solution provides scalability and handles the load jobs efficiently. The use of ALB for the Lambda endpoints allows smooth handling of traffic, ensuring no interruptions for customers during the migration.



A health insurance company stores personally identifiable information (PII) in an Amazon S3 bucket. The company uses server-side encryption with S3 managed encryption keys (SSE-S3) to encrypt the objects. According to a new requirement, all current and future objects in the S3 bucket must be encrypted by keys that the company’s security team manages. The S3 bucket does not have versioning enabled.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

  1. In the S3 bucket properties, change the default encryption to SSE-S3 with a customer managed key. Use the AWS CLI to re-upload all objects in the S3 bucket. Set an S3 bucket policy to deny unencrypted PutObject requests.
  2. In the S3 bucket properties, change the default encryption to server-side encryption with AWS KMS managed encryption keys (SSE-KMS). Set an S3 bucket policy to deny unencrypted PutObject requests. Use the AWS CLI to re-upload all objects in the S3 bucket.
  3. In the S3 bucket properties, change the default encryption to server-side encryption with AWS KMS managed encryption keys (SSE-KMS). Set an S3 bucket policy to automatically encrypt objects on GetObject and PutObject requests.
  4. In the S3 bucket properties, change the default encryption to AES-256 with a customer managed key. Attach a policy to deny unencrypted PutObject requests to any entities that access the S3 bucket. Use the AWS CLI to re-upload all objects in the S3 bucket.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

B) In the S3 bucket properties, change the default encryption to server-side encryption with AWS KMS managed encryption keys (SSE-KMS). Set an S3 bucket policy to deny unencrypted PutObject requests. Use the AWS CLI to re-upload all objects in the S3 bucket is the correct answer.

The requirement is to ensure that all current and future objects in the S3 bucket are encrypted with customer-managed keys, which means using AWS KMS managed encryption keys (SSE-KMS) instead of the default SSE-S3 encryption.

To meet this requirement:

You need to change the default encryption setting to SSE-KMS.
You must deny any unencrypted PutObject requests to ensure compliance for future uploads.
Because the bucket does not have versioning enabled, you need to re-upload the existing objects to apply the new encryption (SSE-KMS).
This solution ensures compliance with the new encryption requirements while properly encrypting both existing and future objects with KMS-managed keys.



A company is running a web application in the AWS Cloud. The application consists of dynamic content that is created on a set of Amazon EC2 instances. The EC2 instances run in an Auto Scaling group that is configured as a target group for an Application Load Balancer (ALB).

The company is using an Amazon CloudFront distribution to distribute the application globally. The CloudFront distribution uses the ALB as an origin. The company uses Amazon Route 53 for DNS and has created an A record of www.example.com for the CloudFront distribution.

A solutions architect must configure the application so that itis highly available and fault tolerant.
Which solution meets these requirements?

  1. Provision a full, secondary application deployment in a different AWS Region. Update the Route 53 A record to be a failover record. Add both of the CloudFront distributions as values. Create Route 53 health checks.
  2. Provision an ALB, an Auto Scaling group, and EC2 instances in a different AWS Region. Update the CloudFront distribution, and create a second origin for the new AL Create an origin group for the two origins. Configure one origin as primary and one origin as secondary.
  3. Provision an Auto Scaling group and EC2 instances in a different AWS Region. Create a second target for the new Auto Scaling group in the ALB. Set up the failover routing algorithm on the ALB.
  4. Provision a full, secondary application deployment in a different AWS Region. Create a second CloudFront distribution, and add the new application setup as an origin. Create an AWS Global Accelerator accelerator. Add both of the CloudFront distributions as endpoints.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

B) Provision an ALB, an Auto Scaling group, and EC2 instances in a different AWS Region. Update the CloudFront distribution, and create a second origin for the new ALB. Create an origin group for the two origins. Configure one origin as primary and one origin as secondary is the correct solution.

This setup ensures high availability and fault tolerance by creating a secondary application deployment in a different AWS Region. By adding a second ALB and Auto Scaling group in the new Region and configuring the CloudFront distribution with an origin group, you can set up failover between the two origins. This way, if the primary origin fails, CloudFront automatically switches to the secondary origin, providing seamless failover and reducing downtime.

This approach leverages CloudFront's built-in support for origin failover and ensures the application remains globally available with minimal latency and high fault tolerance.



A company has an organization in AWS Organizations that has a large number of AWS accounts. One of the AWS accounts is designated as a transit account and has a transit gateway that is shared with all of the other AWS accounts. AWS Site-to-Site VPN connections are configured between all of the company’s global offices and the transit account. The company has AWS Config enabled on all of its accounts.

The company’s networking team needs to centrally manage a list of internal IP address ranges that belong to the global offices. Developers will reference this list to gain access to their applications securely.

Which solution meets these requirements with the LEAST amount of operational overhead?

  1. Create a JSON file that is hosted in Amazon S3 and that lists all of the internal IP address ranges. Configure an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic in each of the accounts that can be invoked when the JSON file is updated. Subscribe an AWS Lambda function to the SNS topic to update all relevant security group rules with the updated IP address ranges.
  2. Create a new AWS Config managed rule that contains all of the internal IP address ranges. Use the rule to check the security groups in each of the accounts to ensure compliance with the list of IP address ranges. Configure the rule to automatically remediate any noncompliant security group that is detected.
  3. In the transit account, create a VPC prefix list with all of the internal IP address ranges. Use AWS Resource Access Manager to share the prefix list with all of the other accounts. Use the shared prefix list to configure security group rules in the other accounts.
  4. In the transit account, create a security group with all of the internal IP address ranges. Configure the security groups in the other accounts to reference the transit account’s security group by using a nested security group reference of “<transit-account-id>/sg-1a2b3c4d”.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

C) In the transit account, create a VPC prefix list with all of the internal IP address ranges. Use AWS Resource Access Manager to share the prefix list with all of the other accounts. Use the shared prefix list to configure security group rules in the other accounts is the correct answer.

This solution leverages VPC prefix lists, which provide an efficient way to centrally manage and reference a list of internal IP address ranges. By using AWS Resource Access Manager (RAM) to share the prefix list with all accounts in the organization, this method minimizes operational overhead while ensuring that all accounts have consistent access to the updated list of internal IP addresses. This solution is highly scalable and avoids the complexity of maintaining individual IP ranges in each account’s security groups.

This approach ensures that developers can securely access their applications by referencing the shared prefix list in their security group rules across multiple AWS accounts, streamlining management and reducing the chance of misconfigurations.



Page 13 of 134



Post your Comments and Discuss Amazon AWS-SOLUTIONS-ARCHITECT-PROFESSIONAL exam with other Community members:

Zak commented on June 28, 2024
@AppleKid, I manged to pass this exam after failing once. Do not set for your exam without memorizing these questions. These are what you will see in the real exam.
Anonymous
upvote

Apple Kid commented on June 26, 2024
Did anyone gave exam recently and tell if these are good?
Anonymous
upvote

Captain commented on June 26, 2024
This is so helpful
Anonymous
upvote

udaya commented on April 25, 2024
stulll learning and seem to be questions are helpful
Anonymous
upvote

Jerry commented on February 18, 2024
very good for exam !!!!
HONG KONG
upvote

AWS-Guy commented on February 16, 2024
Precise and to the point. I aced this exam and now going for the next exam. Very great full to this site and it's wonderful content.
CANADA
upvote

Jerry commented on February 12, 2024
very good exam stuff
HONG KONG
upvote

travis head commented on November 16, 2023
I gave the Amazon SAP-C02 tests and prepared from this site as it has latest mock tests available which helped me evaluate my performance and score 919/1000
Anonymous
upvote

Weed Flipper commented on October 07, 2020
This is good stuff man.
CANADA
upvote

IT-Guy commented on September 29, 2020
Xengine software is good and free. Too bad it is only in English and no support for French.
FRANCE
upvote

pema commented on August 30, 2019
Can I have the latest version of this exam?
GERMANY
upvote

MrSimha commented on February 23, 2019
Thank you
Anonymous
upvote

Phil C. commented on November 12, 2018
To soon to tell, but I will be back to post a review after my exam.
Anonymous
upvote

MD EJAZ ALI TANWIR commented on August 20, 2017
This is valid dump in US. Thank you guys for providing this.
UNITED STATES
upvote

flypig commented on June 02, 2017
The Braindumps will short my ready time for this exam!
CHINA
upvote