ASIS ASIS-CPP Exam Actual Questions
ASIS Certified Protection Professional (Page 73 )

• Short answer: The correct term is Anti-forensics (option D), not “Felony.”

• Why: The actions described—hiding files in slack space, changing file headers, placing suspicious files in executables, and altering metadata—are classic anti-forensics techniques. They’re used to hinder or obscure forensic analysis, not to label the act as a legal category.

• About the options:

• Note: The provided answer key lists B (Felony), which is misleading for this exam objective. The exam typically tests knowledge of forensics concepts, where anti-forensics is the correct category.

• Developed and maintained independently
• Deployed without changing the entire application
• Scaled separately based on demand
• More resilient when another service has problems

• A: Functional testing is useful, but it is not the main practice described.
• B: Automation helps deployment, but the scenario focuses on architectural decomposition.
• C: Multiple locations improve availability, not application modularity.

• A. IDS attack signatures: An IDS primarily detects suspicious network activity and usually alerts rather than directly scanning and blocking uploaded files.
• C. Load balancer: Distributes traffic among servers but does not inspect files for malware.
• D. WAF: Protects web applications from attacks such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and some malicious requests. It is not primarily a PDF-malware scanning solution.

• Answer: D. Select an IdP

• Why: To reduce the number of credentials across multiple SaaS apps, implement a single sign-on approach via an Identity Provider. The first step is choosing the IdP; once selected, you can enable SAML (A) or OAuth as supported by apps. Password vaulting (C) is not a true SSO solution, and B is not the foundational step.

• Port 515: LPD/LPR line-printer service
• Port 631: IPP — Internet Printing Protocol
• Port 9100: JetDirect/RAW printing, commonly used by network printers

• Linux machine: Linux could run these services, but the three printer-specific ports strongly indicate a printer.
• Router: Routers may use Telnet and HTTP, but normally would not expose ports 515, 631, and 9100 together.
• Windows machine: Windows can share printers, but this particular service combination is more characteristic of a network printer’s embedded operating system.

• Who performed the action
• What action occurred
• When it occurred
• Where it originated
• Whether it succeeded or failed

• Investigating suspicious activity: Important, but investigation depends on having adequate audit data first.
• Storage allocation: Necessary for retention, but storage does not help if the records lack meaningful details.
• Actions after audit failure: Part of operational planning, not the primary assessment of the application’s audit capability.

• Correct answer: B — A reservation for the server based on the MAC address.

• Why this is the best choice:

• Why the other options are less suitable:

• Quick takeaway: Use a DHCP reservation to give the file server a fixed IP while still benefiting from centralized DHCP management.

• What it’s asking: In an ARM template, for an Availability Set, what value should you set for the property platformFaultDomainCount to maximize availability during fabric failures or maintenance?

• Key concept: Fault domains are groups of hardware that can fail independently. By spreading VMs across more fault domains, you reduce the risk that a single hardware fault takes out many VMs.

• Important detail: For managed Availability Sets, the number of fault domains you can use varies by region — typically 2 or 3.

• What to choose: Set platformFaultDomainCount to the maximum supported in your region. In most regions this is 3, which gives you the best resilience. If your region only supports 2, you’d use 2.

• Answer: 3 (Max Value). In ARM template syntax, this would appear as "platformFaultDomainCount": 3 (within the Availability Set resource).

• Side loading means installing software from sources outside official or trusted repositories.
• This process can bring in malicious payloads because the installed software hasn’t been vetted. A rootkit is a type of malware that hides its presence and maintains privileged access, making it a prime risk when using untrusted sources.
• Why not the other options:

• Only install apps from trusted sources; verify signatures.
• Use application whitelisting and security controls to block sideloading.
• Keep systems updated and use anti-malware tools capable of detecting rootkits.

• Answer: B — Improve employee training and awareness

• Why this is correct:

• Why the other options are less effective here:

• Quick practical note:

• The Accrue liability on product receipt flag controls whether a liability is accrued and posted at the time of receiving the item.
• If this checkbox is unchecked, receipts won’t create postings to the Product receipt journal. Enabling it ensures the system posts inventory value and the vendor liability when the item is received.

• Go to the Item model group setup form.
• Enable (check) Accrue liability on product receipt.
• Save.

• The other option, Include physical value, affects how physical value is handled but is not the direct cause of postings to the product receipt journal. If issues persist after enabling accrual, you may need to verify related posting definitions or journal setup.

• Answer: A) Clear the Windows event logs

• Windows event logs (System, Security, Application) are key forensic artifacts. If an attacker clears these logs, there’s no built-in local record of actions taken, making it harder for investigators to trace what happened.

• Modify the system time: may misalign timestamps but does not erase past events and can be easily detected.
• Alter log permissions: could prevent new log entries, but it doesn’t remove existing ones and can raise alarms due to permission changes.
• Reduce log retention settings: affects only future logs; it doesn’t wipe already recorded activity.

• In real environments, defenders mitigate this risk with tamper-evident, centralized logging (remote SIEM, write-once storage, log integrity checks) to preserve evidence even if a host is compromised.

• Step 1: From Power BI Desktop, select Get Data, choose Folder, enter the folder path, and click OK, then choose Transform data to open Power Query Editor.

• Step 2: In Power Query Editor, expand the Attributes column.

• Step 3: From the Power Query Editor, select the Content column and use Home > Combine Files (aka “Combine binaries”) to consolidate the files.

• A single Construction Job can use multiple Machinery records.
• A single Machinery record may be used on multiple Construction Jobs.
• This is a many-to-many relationship, which Salesforce models using a junction object.
• The junction object can contain fields such as:

• Master-detail to Machinery
• Master-detail to Construction Job
• Date and cost fields

• Leadership and stakeholder commitment
• Business capability and skills
• Organizational culture
• Availability of resources
• Ability to manage and sustain change
• Impact of the proposed transformation

• How ready the organization is
• Which areas require urgent attention
• How difficult each issue may be to resolve
• Risks that could affect implementation

• A: Places the assessment in Phase B and refers vaguely to creating views; this is not the prescribed technique.
• B: An Implementation Factor Assessment and Deduction Matrix is not the primary TOGAF technique described for business transformation readiness.
• D: A Business Scenario helps identify requirements and stakeholder concerns, but it is not the main technique for assessing organizational readiness.

• Cross-account access is typically implemented with an IAM role. You create a role in the target account (where the resources live) and configure a trust policy that allows principals from the source account to assume that role.
• Users in the source account then assume the role (via Switch Role in the console or STS:AssumeRole) and receive temporary credentials with the role’s permissions to access the resources.

• IAM group: Groups exist inside a single account; they don’t grant cross-account access.
• IAM tag: Tags are metadata and do not grant access.
• IAM Access Analyzer: It analyzes and identifies public or cross-account access but does not grant access itself.

• The correct answer is “Think and work holistically” (Option B).

• Focus on value: ensures outcomes matter to stakeholders, but isn’t specifically about end-to-end delivery.
• Optimize and automate: about efficiency and performance, not the holistic view.
• Collaborate and promote visibility: about teamwork and sharing information, not the end-to-end scope.

• Box 1: Azure Lighthouse — ??? ??????? ? ?????????? ????????? ? ?????????? Entra tenants. ??? ??????????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ? VM ? ?????? ?????????/????????.
• Box 2: Azure Monitor Agent ? ?????????????? Data Collection Rules (DCR) — AMA ???????? ??????? Windows (????????, Security Logs) ? DCR ??????????, ????? ??????? ???????? ? ???? ?????????? (? ?????? Log Analytics workspace).

• Use a field on Account to show the aggregated yearly shipments (a Roll-Up Summary).
• A Master-Detail relationship between Shipment and Account is required for Roll-Up Summary to work (and to ensure access is governed by the parent Account).
• OWD and the relationship type determine what users can see. If you want to restrict shipment-level access while still showing a summary on Account, Private OWD on Shipment plus Master-Detail helps, because access to shipments is controlled by the Account record.

• A (Public OWD on Shipment with Process Builder and a Lookup to Account): Not ideal. Public access would expose shipments broadly, and a lookup cannot support a built-in roll-up summary.
• B (Private OWD on Shipment, Roll-Up Summary, Master-Detail to Account): Best answer. Private shipments, but because of Master-Detail, access and the roll-up are tied to the Account. The Account can show the yearly total via a Roll-Up Summary field.
• C (Controlled by Parent on Shipment, Trigger, Master-Detail): Master-Detail is correct, but using a trigger is unnecessary for a straightforward roll-up; roll-ups are the standard, maintainable solution.
• D (Private OWD on Shipment, Trigger, Lookup to Account): More complex and not as efficient; no automatic roll-up, and lookup breaks the ease of summarizing by Account.

• Answer: False. Agents and managers CAN create knowledge articles from Community questions.

• Why: In ServiceNow, a Community question can be converted into a Knowledge article using the Create Knowledge (or Convert to Knowledge) action. This allows what customers asked to become a reusable article for others.

• How it works (high level):

• Permissions: This ability depends on having the right roles/permissions (e.g., agents or knowledge managers). If you don’t see the option, check your role assignments or the knowledge-management configuration.

• Quick take: If a question in Community is valuable for others, a trained agent can turn it into a Knowledge article, making it available for self-service.

• Context: You’ve enabled auditing in Dataverse and need to trim audit data to free storage. The question asks which deletion options you can use.

• What the options typically mean:

• About the provided answer (A, C, D): The list includes “by column,” which isn’t a typical or supported way to purge audit data. The more plausible trio is A (by record), B (date range), and C (by table older than date). If the exam expects A, C, D, that seems incorrect or mis-stated in the source.

• Practical takeaway: To reduce audit storage, use per-record deletions, per-table purge by date, and/or date-range deletions as supported by the environment’s audit management UI or admin docs.

• In Microsoft Entra (Azure AD), admin roles can be scoped to either the entire directory (tenant) or to an Administrative Unit (AU). To assign a role at an AU scope, the user must be a member of that AU.

• Roles in question: Security Administrator and User Administrator can be scoped either to the Directory or to a specific AU.

• User1 is a member of AU1. Therefore, User1 can be assigned either at the AU scope (AU1) or at the Directory scope (global).

• User2 is not a member of AU1. Therefore, User2 cannot be assigned at the AU scope; the valid scope for User2 is only the Directory scope.

• User1: can be assigned at AU1 and at Directory scopes.
• User2: can be assigned only at the Directory scope.

• Answer: No (B)

• SaaS (Software as a Service) delivers applications over the internet; you don’t manage the underlying infrastructure or OS.
• Deploying Azure virtual machines requires provisioning and managing virtual machines, OS, updates, and networking—this is classic IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service).
• PaaS is for managed runtime environments (apps hosted on a platform), not for VM deployment.

• The first step in risk management is to understand objectives, constraints, and drivers from those who care about the project. This stakeholder engagement helps identify what could go wrong and what risks are most critical.
• Only after you’ve gathered input from stakeholders should you identify risks and document them in the risk register. Updating the risk register (option C) is important, but it comes after identifying and analyzing risks.
• Options B (ensure resources) and D (revise the risk management plan) are actions that may follow once risks are identified and understood; they’re not the initial step.

• B: Intégrez des résultats de due diligence tels que les évaluations de risque client.

• C: Utilisez des correspondants en aval pour enquêter et signaler les activités suspectes.

• Storage accounts: storage1, storage2, and storage3
• Log Analytics workspace: Analytics3

• Azure Backup reports can send the AzureBackupReports diagnostic log to eligible storage accounts. The storage account’s subscription and region do not have to match the Recovery Services vault, so all three listed storage accounts are valid.
• The Log Analytics workspace must be in the same region as the Recovery Services vault for this configuration. Vault1 and Analytics3 are both in West Europe, making Analytics3 the valid workspace.

• Ablauf: Er wird in der gleichen Transaktion ausgeführt, bei der z. B. ein Datensatz erstellt oder aktualisiert wird. Der Benutzer wartet, bis der Workflow abgeschlossen ist.
• Stufen: Kann vor dem Vorgang (pre-operation) oder nach dem Vorgang (post-operation) laufen.
• Zweck: Sofortige Validierung oder Anpassung von Daten, ggf. auch das Verhindern eines Vorgangs, wenn Bedingungen nicht erfüllt sind.

• Automatisierte Flows (Power Automate, automatisierte/ Background Flows) laufen asynchron im Hintergrund, nachdem der Trigger erkannt wurde, und blockieren den Benutzer nicht.

• Elicited and documented customer requirements
• Converted them into clear, measurable specifications
• Validated the requirements with the customer
• Used them as the basis for design, quality checks, and acceptance

• A: Requirements should reflect the customer’s needs—not the supplier’s standards.
• B: Iteration review planning does not replace proper requirements collection.
• D: A retrospective occurs after work is completed and is mainly for process improvement, not initial requirements definition.

• A. Configure prompt modifications to enforce tone, disclaimers, and refusal behavior at the system level.

• D. Configure Power Platform DLP policies to restrict unauthorized data connectors.

• B: Manual topic-by-topic disclaimer edits are specifically discouraged.
• C: Channel settings do not replace agent-level Responsible AI controls.
• E: Publishing before enabling safety filters violates the stated deployment sequence. Responsible AI filters should be enabled before publication, not afterward.

• Voice devices ? VLAN 10
• Data devices ? VLAN 20
• SVI for VLAN 10 ? 192.168.10.1
• SVI for VLAN 20 ? 192.168.20.1

• A: Describes a physical trunk interface, not an SVI.
• B: An SVI can provide management access, but that is not its primary definition here.
• D: SVI does not compensate for insufficient physical ports; it is a logical interface.

• Reusing features across different models and teams
• Consistent feature definitions
• Managing feature versions and metadata
• Using features for both training and inference

• SageMaker Data Wrangler: Prepares and transforms data; it is not primarily a shared feature repository.
• SageMaker Clarify: Helps detect bias and explain model predictions.
• SageMaker Model Cards: Documents models, including intended use, risks, and evaluation results.

• Goal: Guests should not use cameras, but company users can.
• Correct configuration: Guest access settings in the Org-wide settings.

• External access: Controls external-domain communication, not guest capabilities inside Teams.
• Teams settings in Org-wide settings: Too generic; doesn’t specifically target guest capabilities.
• Audio & Video in the default Meeting Policy: Would affect everyone assigned to that policy. To meet the requirement without impacting internal users, you’d need separate policies or guest-specific settings; the exam focuses on the guest-access policy.

• Correct answer: D) Microservices using API

• Why:

• Why this is correct: In Azure Virtual Desktop, user access to a host pool is controlled through App Groups. The default app group for a host pool publishes the full desktop, so adding members to that app group grants them sign-in and access to the desktop (and any RemoteApps in that group). This is the standard way to give users access to AVD resources.

• Why the other options are not correct:

• Practical steps (high level):

• Phishing can map to two MITRE ATT&CK tactics depending on the attacker’s objective.

• Therefore, phishing isn’t confined to a single tactic; it can serve both Reconnaissance and Initial Access, which is why option D (Reconnaissance, Initial Access) is correct.

• Review the risk register.
• Use the previously defined risk response plan, such as assigning a backup resource, reprioritizing work, or using another qualified engineer.
• Implement the response promptly because the task is on the critical path.

• B: Revising the schedule without first applying the planned response may be premature.
• C: Excluding a required task could compromise the project’s objectives and requirements.
• D: Updating the risk and lessons learned records is appropriate, but it should happen after managing the immediate issue, not as the next primary action.

• The correct option is A: Data architecture.

• Why: In the AWS CAF, the Platform perspective covers the technical foundation and architecture that enable cloud workloads to run reliably and efficiently. This includes how data is modeled, stored, and accessed across the enterprise—the core of data architecture.

• Quick mapping for the other options:

• Context: You’re configuring a Windows Autopilot deployment profile (Profile1) for Windows 11 devices. The hotspot asks you to pick the correct behavior for two statements based on the profile’s settings.

• Box 1: “can modify the desktop settings only for themselves”

• Box 2: “Cortana settings” with options like computer name, keyboard layout, etc.

• B — Prompts and suggestions retained for 28 days
• C — User engagement data kept for two years

• The key distinction is between content data—your prompts, code context, and generated suggestions—and engagement data, such as usage activity.
• Do not confuse retention with training: enterprise Copilot data is generally not used to train GitHub’s models without appropriate authorization.
• For a current exam, verify the policy version cited by the exam provider. The key’s C is likely correct, but B should be treated cautiously and may no longer reflect the current policy.

Simple explanation

• The Azure VPN gateway to connect to
• Authentication settings
• Routes for networks that the client can access

• The app on EC2 connects to Aurora using DB credentials stored on the instance. Secrets Manager centralizes these credentials and can rotate them automatically, eliminating manual updates on each EC2 host.
• Automatic rotation reduces operational overhead and enhances security because credentials are rotated on a schedule without code changes.
• The app can retrieve the current secret at runtime (e.g., via the AWS SDK) and use it to authenticate to Aurora, avoiding reliance on locally stored files.

• B (Parameter Store) can store secrets but lacks seamless built-in rotation for database credentials like Secrets Manager; rotation often requires more custom work.
• C (S3) would require complex tooling to rotate and securely fetch credentials and still risks exposure if access policies aren’t perfect.
• D (Encrypted EBS volumes) would store credentials locally on each instance and does not automate rotation or centralized management.

• Assign a Teams license to a user — Licenses are assigned through the Microsoft 365 admin center, Microsoft Entra ID, or PowerShell.
• Deploy the Teams client — The Teams admin center manages Teams policies and apps, but it is not the primary tool for deploying the desktop client.
• Prevent users from creating teams — Team creation depends on controlling the creation of Microsoft 365 groups, generally configured through Microsoft Entra ID and PowerShell rather than directly in the Teams admin center.

1. Remote access to a Windows PC
2. Full chat and optional game-console functions

• Windows Remote Desktop (RDP) uses TCP 3389. The router needs a port-forwarding rule that sends incoming traffic on that port to the Windows PC’s internal IP address.
• The game console should connect through the wireless AP. Using WPA2-PSK provides the required wireless security while allowing normal online, chat, and optional services.
• The firewall should separate the internal network from the screened subnet. Its screened-subnet-side address is shown as 10.100.0.1.
• Devices must be placed in the correct network locations: the PC behind the router, the console on the wireless AP, and the firewall between the appropriate network segments.

• Correct answer: A — a clear business case has been established.

• The audit focus for IT procurement is ensuring there is a solid economic justification for the investment. A clear business case documents the expected benefits, costs, risks, and alignment with strategic objectives, which governs whether the investment is worth pursuing.
• The other options are important controls or project aspects, but they are secondary to ensuring the investment is justified financially and strategically:

• AWS IoT Greengrass supports local ML inference using models trained in Amazon SageMaker.
• The model and inference code run on the factory’s local server, so processing continues even when internet connectivity is unavailable.
• A Greengrass component can:

• This provides low latency and avoids sending images to AWS for every inference.

• A: Uses AWS-hosted services and therefore depends on internet connectivity. It would fail during an outage.
• C: Snowball Edge is unnecessary for this use case and adds deployment complexity. A local Greengrass server is the intended edge-inference solution.
• D: Amazon Monitron is designed for monitoring industrial equipment health, not analyzing camera images with a custom SageMaker model.

• Startup scripts run at computer startup, before any user logs on, making them ideal for machine-wide configuration on each new VM.
• They execute under the Local System account, which is appropriate for initial setup tasks.
• Linking a GPO to the OU ensures every new VM in that domain automatically receives the configuration—great for scalability.

• A) SetupComplete.cmd runs only once, right after Windows Setup, not on every boot, so it isn’t ideal for provisioning multiple VMs consistently.
• B) Logon scripts run per user, not per machine, so they aren’t reliable for initial VM configuration before a user signs in.
• D) Placing scripts in a VHD doesn’t automatically execute them.

• Why: If an application on EC2 needs to call other AWS services, using an IAM role (attached to the EC2 instance as an instance profile) provides temporary, automatically rotated credentials. This avoids embedding access keys in the application.
• How it works: Create a role with the minimum required permissions, attach it to the EC2 instance, and let the AWS SDK used by the application retrieve credentials from the instance metadata service. The credentials rotate automatically and are scoped to the policy you define.
• Why not other options:

• Quick context: In a three-tier network (Access, Distribution, Core), roles are:

• Why A is correct: The Distribution layer runs Layer 2 and Layer 3 technologies. It often handles VLAN access (L2) and can perform inter-VLAN routing or connect to the core (L3). So it makes sense for the distribution layer to support both L2 and L3.

• Why B is correct: The Core layer is designed to maintain continuous connectivity when devices fail. It is built for high availability and redundancy, providing multiple paths so the network remains reachable even if some components fail.

• Why the others are not correct:

• Cutover: The old system is replaced immediately. It may be fast, but any failure can cause significant disruption.
• Phased: The system is introduced in stages, which reduces implementation risk but may prolong the transition.
• Pilot: The system is first deployed to a limited group or location. This is useful for testing but does not necessarily minimize downtime for the entire organization.

• The correct setting to configure is the Enrollment Status Page (ESP) profile.
• Why: ESP tracks the enrollment progress and logs during Autopilot provisioning. You can enable log collection within the ESP policy so that, if ESP times out, the user can collect and share the logs with support.
• Optional enhancement: In the ESP policy (or the Autopilot diagnostics settings), you can enable:

• Automatic enrollment settings: control how devices auto-enroll, not log collection.
• Windows Autopilot deployment profile: controls deployment steps but not ESP log collection.
• Device configuration profile: applies settings but doesn’t provide ESP log collection mechanics.