Free CFA-Level-III Exam Braindumps (page: 21)

Page 21 of 91

Mark Stober, William Robertson, and James McGuire are consultants for a regional pension consultancy. One of their clients, Richard Smitherspoon, chief investment officer of Quality Car Part Manufacturing, recently attended a conference on risk management topics for pension plans. Smitherspoon is a conservative manager who prefers to follow a long-term investment strategy with little portfolio turnover. Smitherspoon has substantial experience in managing a defined benefit plan but has little experience with risk management issues.
Smitherspoon decides to discuss how Quality can begin implementing risk management techniques with Stober, Robertson, and McGuire. Quality's risk exposure is evaluated on a quarterly basis.
Before implementing risk management techniques, Smitherspoon expresses confusion regarding some measures of risk management. "I know beta and standard deviation, but what is all this stuff about convexity, delta, gamma, and vega?" Stober informs Smitherspoon that delta is the first derivative of the call-stock price curve, and Robertson adds that gamma is the relationship between how bond prices change with changing time to maturity.
Smitherspoon is still curious about risk management techniques, and in particular the concept of VAR. He asks, "What does a daily 5% VAR of $5 million mean? I just get so confused with whether VAR is a measure of maximum or minimum loss. Just last month, the consultant from MinRisk, a competing consulting firm, told me it was ‘a measure of maximum loss, which in your case means we are 95% confident that the maximum 1-day loss is $5.0 million." McGuire states that his definition of VAR is that "VAR is a measure that combines probabilities over a certain time horizon with dollar amounts, which in your case means that one expects to lose a minimum $5 million five trading days out of every 100."
Smitherspoon expresses bewilderment at the different methods for determining VAR. "Can't you risk management types formulate a method that works like calculating a beta? It would be so easy if there were a method that allowed one to just use mean and standard deviation. I need a VAR that I can get my arms around."
The next week, Stober visits the headquarters of TopTech, a communications firm. Their CFO is Ralph Long, who prefers to manage the firm's pension himself because he believes he can time the market and spot upcoming trends before analysts can. Long also believes that risk measurement for TopTech can be evaluated annually because of his close attention to the portfolio. Stober calculates TopTech's 95% surplus at risk to be S500 million for an annual horizon. The expected return on TopTech's asset base (currently at S2 billion) is 5%. The plan has a surplus of $100 million. Stober uses a 5% probability level to calculate the minimum amount by which the plan will be underfunded next year.
Of the following VAR calculation methods, the measure that would most likely suit Smitherspoon is the:

  1. variance-covariance method.
  2. historical simulation method.
  3. Monte Carlo simulation method.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Variance-covariance method
The variancc-covariance method, also known as the delta-normal method, only requires estimates of mean and standard deviation of returns to estimate VAR. This is the closest method to which Smicherspoon refers. (Study

Session 14, LOS 40.f)



Mark Stober, William Robertson, and James McGuire are consultants for a regional pension consultancy. One of their clients, Richard Smitherspoon, chief investment officer of Quality Car Part Manufacturing, recently attended a conference on risk management topics for pension plans. Smitherspoon is a conservative manager who prefers to follow a long-term investment strategy with little portfolio turnover. Smitherspoon has substantial experience in managing a defined benefit plan but has little experience with risk management issues.
Smitherspoon decides to discuss how Quality can begin implementing risk management techniques with Stober, Robertson, and McGuire. Quality's risk exposure is evaluated on a quarterly basis.
Before implementing risk management techniques, Smitherspoon expresses confusion regarding some measures of risk management. "I know beta and standard deviation, but what is all this stuff about convexity, delta, gamma, and vega?" Stober informs Smitherspoon that delta is the first derivative of the call-stock price curve, and Robertson adds that gamma is the relationship between how bond prices change with changing time to maturity.
Smitherspoon is still curious about risk management techniques, and in particular the concept of VAR. He asks, "What does a daily 5% VAR of $5 million mean? I just get so confused with whether VAR is a measure of maximum or minimum loss. Just last month, the consultant from MinRisk, a competing consulting firm, told me it was ‘a measure of maximum loss, which in your case means we are 95% confident that the maximum 1-day loss is $5.0 million." McGuire states that his definition of VAR is that "VAR is a measure that combines probabilities over a certain time horizon with dollar amounts, which in your case means that one expects to lose a minimum $5 million five trading days out of every 100."
Smitherspoon expresses bewilderment at the different methods for determining VAR. "Can't you risk management types formulate a method that works like calculating a beta? It would be so easy if there were a method that allowed one to just use mean and standard deviation. I need a VAR that I can get my arms around."
The next week, Stober visits the headquarters of TopTech, a communications firm. Their CFO is Ralph Long, who prefers to manage the firm's pension himself because he believes he can time the market and spot upcoming trends before analysts can. Long also believes that risk measurement for TopTech can be evaluated annually because of his close attention to the portfolio. Stober calculates TopTech's 95% surplus at risk to be S500 million for an annual horizon. The expected return on TopTech's asset base (currently at S2 billion) is 5%. The plan has a surplus of $100 million. Stober uses a 5% probability level to calculate the minimum amount by which the plan will be underfunded next year.
Smitherspoon asks Stober if it would be possible to calculate the VAR for each individual portfolio manager as well as the overall Quality fund. Determine which of Stober's three responses is most incorrect.

  1. "VAR is a universally accepted risk measure because it can be applied to practically any investment and is interpreted effectively the same way in each case; it is either the minimum or maximum loss at a given level of significance or confidence. For me to calculate the delta-normal VAR, you will need to provide me with each manager's historical returns distribution and expected return, the time frame you wish to use, and the desired level of significance. I can then calculate VAR for each manager using historical standard deviations and expected returns."
  2. "We can calculate VAR using the delta-normal method, which is also known as the mean variance approach, the historical method, or the Monte Carlo method. To calculate each manager's 95% VAR, all we would have to do is use standard deviations and expected returns to calculate 90% confidence intervals."
  3. "Because of the way it is calculated, individual mean-variance VARs can probably be calculated for each of our portfolio managers, regardless of their style or assets under management. The overall fund VAR is then the sum of the individual VARs. To calculate the fund VAR directly, we would have to measure the fund's overall expected return and standard deviation. The problem with calculating it directly like this, however, is that to calculate the fund standard deviation we must consider the correlations of the managers' returns."

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Response 1 is almost a definition of VAR. Response 2 might appear incorrect at first, because of the reference to the 90% confidence interval. Remember, however, that VAR considers only the lower tail of the distribution. To calculate the 95% VAR we use the Z-value corresponding to a 90% confidence interval (1.65), because that isolates the lower 5% of the distribution. Response 3 has an incorrect component. The last statement about calculating the overall VAR directly is correct; you must incorporate the correlations of the managers' returns to calculate the overall fund standard deviation. That is the problem with using individual VARs to calculate a fund VAR; VAR is not additive. Adding individual VARs overstates the fund VAR, because adding them ignores the correlations of individual manager's returns. (Study Session 14, LOS 40.d)



Mark Stober, William Robertson, and James McGuire are consultants for a regional pension consultancy. One of their clients, Richard Smitherspoon, chief investment officer of Quality Car Part Manufacturing, recently attended a conference on risk management topics for pension plans. Smitherspoon is a conservative manager who prefers to follow a long-term investment strategy with little portfolio turnover. Smitherspoon has substantial experience in managing a defined benefit plan but has little experience with risk management issues.
Smitherspoon decides to discuss how Quality can begin implementing risk management techniques with Stober, Robertson, and McGuire. Quality's risk exposure is evaluated on a quarterly basis.
Before implementing risk management techniques, Smitherspoon expresses confusion regarding some measures of risk management. "I know beta and standard deviation, but what is all this stuff about convexity, delta, gamma, and vega?" Stober informs Smitherspoon that delta is the first derivative of the call-stock price curve, and Robertson adds that gamma is the relationship between how bond prices change with changing time to maturity.
Smitherspoon is still curious about risk management techniques, and in particular the concept of VAR. He asks, "What does a daily 5% VAR of $5 million mean? I just get so confused with whether VAR is a measure of maximum or minimum loss. Just last month, the consultant from MinRisk, a competing consulting firm, told me it was ‘a measure of maximum loss, which in your case means we are 95% confident that the maximum 1-day loss is $5.0 million." McGuire states that his definition of VAR is that "VAR is a measure that combines probabilities over a certain time horizon with dollar amounts, which in your case means that one expects to lose a minimum $5 million five trading days out of every 100."
Smitherspoon expresses bewilderment at the different methods for determining VAR. "Can't you risk management types formulate a method that works like calculating a beta? It would be so easy if there were a method that allowed one to just use mean and standard deviation. I need a VAR that I can get my arms around."
The next week, Stober visits the headquarters of TopTech, a communications firm. Their CFO is Ralph Long, who prefers to manage the firm's pension himself because he believes he can time the market and spot upcoming trends before analysts can. Long also believes that risk measurement for TopTech can be evaluated annually because of his close attention to the portfolio. Stober calculates TopTech's 95% surplus at risk to be S500 million for an annual horizon. The expected return on TopTech's asset base (currently at S2 billion) is 5%. The plan has a surplus of $100 million. Stober uses a 5% probability level to calculate the minimum amount by which the plan will be underfunded next year.
Using Stober's 5% probability level, the minimum amount by which TopTech's plan will be underfunded next year is closest to:

  1. $5 million.
  2. $25 million.
  3. $300 million.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

$300 million.
The current surplus is $100 million, and the asset base is also expected to generate $100 million ($2,000 million x 0.05). The 5% SAR of $500 million indicates that the underfunding of the plan at year end will be $300 (= 200 - 500) or more, 5% of the time. (Study Session 14, LOS 40.f)



Mark Stober, William Robertson, and James McGuire are consultants for a regional pension consultancy. One of their clients, Richard Smitherspoon, chief investment officer of Quality Car Part Manufacturing, recently attended a conference on risk management topics for pension plans. Smitherspoon is a conservative manager who prefers to follow a long-term investment strategy with little portfolio turnover. Smitherspoon has substantial experience in managing a defined benefit plan but has little experience with risk management issues.
Smitherspoon decides to discuss how Quality can begin implementing risk management techniques with Stober, Robertson, and McGuire. Quality's risk exposure is evaluated on a quarterly basis.
Before implementing risk management techniques, Smitherspoon expresses confusion regarding some measures of risk management. "I know beta and standard deviation, but what is all this stuff about convexity, delta, gamma, and vega?" Stober informs Smitherspoon that delta is the first derivative of the call-stock price curve, and Robertson adds that gamma is the relationship between how bond prices change with changing time to maturity.
Smitherspoon is still curious about risk management techniques, and in particular the concept of VAR. He asks, "What does a daily 5% VAR of $5 million mean? I just get so confused with whether VAR is a measure of maximum or minimum loss. Just last month, the consultant from MinRisk, a competing consulting firm, told me it was ‘a measure of maximum loss, which in your case means we are 95% confident that the maximum 1-day loss is $5.0 million." McGuire states that his definition of VAR is that "VAR is a measure that combines probabilities over a certain time horizon with dollar amounts, which in your case means that one expects to lose a minimum $5 million five trading days out of every 100."
Smitherspoon expresses bewilderment at the different methods for determining VAR. "Can't you risk management types formulate a method that works like calculating a beta? It would be so easy if there were a method that allowed one to just use mean and standard deviation. I need a VAR that I can get my arms around."
The next week, Stober visits the headquarters of TopTech, a communications firm. Their CFO is Ralph Long, who prefers to manage the firm's pension himself because he believes he can time the market and spot upcoming trends before analysts can. Long also believes that risk measurement for TopTech can be evaluated annually because of his close attention to the portfolio. Stober calculates TopTech's 95% surplus at risk to be S500 million for an annual horizon. The expected return on TopTech's asset base (currently at S2 billion) is 5%. The plan has a surplus of $100 million. Stober uses a 5% probability level to calculate the minimum amount by which the plan will be underfunded next year.
VAR is a more relevant measure of firm risk for:

  1. Quality, because of its industry type.
  2. TopTech, because of its industry type.
  3. Quality, because of its measurement process.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

VAR will be a more relevant risk measure for Quality because its portfolio experiences less turnover and because VAR is evaluated more frequently.
Coupling a high turnover with a long time horizon decreases VARs usefulness. VAR is calculated for a specific portfolio at a point in time. High turnover will change a portfolios composition, which will also change the underlying statistical characteristics of the portfolio. These changes in statistical characteristics then decrease the usefulness of VAR calculations, especially in situations with long time horizons. (Study Session 14, LOS 40.e)



Page 21 of 91



Post your Comments and Discuss CFA® CFA-Level-III exam with other Community members:

MANISH DURAISWAMY commented on November 07, 2024
Good Practices sessions
Anonymous
upvote

Jonhsh commented on November 07, 2024
It's ok to do this quizz
Anonymous
upvote

Joan commented on November 07, 2024
Keep Trying
Anonymous
upvote

ProDumpper commented on November 07, 2024
The questions looks promising and well formatted. But has anyone passed this exam recently? I have heard the exam is very very hard.
Anonymous
upvote

Vin commented on November 07, 2024
Good content
Anonymous
upvote

Mii commented on November 07, 2024
great resource, for the exams Ireland
Anonymous
upvote

Jay Gomes commented on November 07, 2024
Very nice and very good questions
Anonymous
upvote

Jay Gomes commented on November 07, 2024
Nice v nice questions
Anonymous
upvote

Aswin commented on November 07, 2024
Good practice test
INDIA
upvote

Elias commented on November 07, 2024
Really this material supports alot
Anonymous
upvote

DN commented on November 06, 2024
Very helpful
UNITED STATES
upvote

Christine commented on November 06, 2024
Good for practice
Anonymous
upvote

Mike commented on November 06, 2024
Very good website
Anonymous
upvote

Elias commented on November 06, 2024
The revision materials are 100% helpfull.
Anonymous
upvote

Lula commented on November 06, 2024
One of the top exam dumps sites I have ever used. Very clean and decent pricing for the full version.
Singapore
upvote

Paula commented on November 06, 2024
Useful question dumps. I will leave it to that.
Anonymous
upvote

Prabhat Kumar commented on November 06, 2024
Google Google Associate Cloud Engineer
EUROPEAN UNION
upvote

Connor commented on November 06, 2024
This is wild. I did not know these study guides were available online.
UNITED KINGDOM
upvote

Mike commented on November 05, 2024
can anyone explain to me for question 77?
MALAYSIA
upvote

Non-sus user commented on November 05, 2024
good luck y'all
MALAYSIA
upvote

Jondré commented on November 05, 2024
I am writing soon hope this will help me pass first time.
Anonymous
upvote

Farid commented on November 05, 2024
This exam is hard but not as bad as others have stated here. With these question you can pass on first try.
Canada
upvote

Mohammed commented on November 05, 2024
I got a 87.4% in my exam with these questions. Just keep in mind that the full version they sell in PDF format has way way more questions that covers most of the topics in this exam.
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
upvote

Giordano commented on November 05, 2024
Sono uguali all'esame?
Anonymous
upvote

Luntz commented on November 05, 2024
If you want to just prepare for your exam and then clear it then this is a good source. But not for deep learning.
GERMANY
upvote

Gutsy commented on November 05, 2024
Pretty clear and close to content of real exam.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Nansi commented on November 05, 2024
hope for the best
Anonymous
upvote

Amelio commented on November 04, 2024
Big win for me this week. I passed my exam and now getting ready for my second exam.
UNITED STATES
upvote

Jeeva commented on November 04, 2024
Still preparing to attend
Anonymous
upvote

Nikki Cruz commented on November 04, 2024
This was a life saver for me. I knew the material but these questions really helped me . Passed on my first attempt !
Anonymous
upvote

Emmanuel commented on November 04, 2024
Can a person pass AZ900 just by using this site only ?
SOUTH AFRICA
upvote

Tech Savvy commented on November 04, 2024
Great work team!, would be good if you list 10 questions at each page,
Anonymous
upvote

Jay commented on November 04, 2024
I tried to clear this exam for 3 times but failed. So I finally resorted to using these exam dumps which I really did not want to. But I was left with no choice.
New Zealand
upvote

Fernando commented on November 04, 2024
Very cool and very helpful. Bought 2 exams with 50% discount.
Brazil
upvote